Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / November 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Passport 8500 just died?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Justin - 22 Nov 2007 21:55 GMT
Hi,

Back in 2001, I bought a Passport 8500. In the years since, I have had
no runs in with the law. The detector has saved my bacon quite a few
times, and I felt, and still continue to feel that purchasing it was a
good investment. However, yesterday, I got a ticket for the first time
in a long time and the detector didn't even go off at all. I asked the
cop about it and she said she was using an old K band unit in the
"instant on" mode and perhaps that was why it didn't go off. Still, I
find this incredible because the Passport has alerted me to instant on
traps before. Also, when I was sitting there while she was writing up
the ticket the detector suddenly sounded the K band alarm ever so
briefly, but loud and clear. Was it just then registering the hit like a
minute or more after it happened? I think that the detector may be
faulty. I do get laser falsing occasionally when using the power door
locks and windows, sometimes even the power mirrors. This hasn't been a
problem before, only recently, and it comes and goes. Is it possible for
detectors to "lose" their sensitivity over time? I'm really at a loss
for an explanation here. I know there are new radars out there, and
newer radar detectors, but the fact that the thing was fooled by a K
band gun just blows my mind! Anyone had similar experiences with their
Passports losing sensitivity or having problems similar to what I have
described?

Thanks.
Arif Khokar - 22 Nov 2007 22:16 GMT
> Anyone had similar experiences with their
> Passports losing sensitivity or having problems similar to what I have
> described?

It's possible that a problem with your car's electrical system may have
damaged the detector's circuitry.  Try finding a radar trailer and see
if your detector detects it.  I had a similar problem several years ago
when my detector would not detect K band, but would detect X and Ka
band.  Sending it in for repair and an upgrade solved that problem.
Old Wolf - 23 Nov 2007 03:19 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> good investment. However, yesterday, I got a ticket for the first time
> in a long time and the detector didn't even go off at all.

I've had a weird problem with mine lately; often the LASER
warning will go off, when there was no laser (sometimes even
when the unit was sitting on the floor of my car -- and lasers
don't travel around corners).
Justin - 23 Nov 2007 14:33 GMT
In article
<87390940-d58b-4a0e-b233-412464cf7c39@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
oldwolf@inspire.net.nz says...

>I've had a weird problem with mine lately; often the LASER
>warning will go off, when there was no laser (sometimes even
>when the unit was sitting on the floor of my car -- and lasers
>don't travel around corners).

Yeah, that is the problem I started having with mine. Come to find out I
have no reliable K band protection now too and it cost me big time. I
don't know how possible this is but I wonder if Escort programmed these
things to "die" after awhile so you have to buy a new one a few years down
the road. I always thought it was shitty that they advertised the 8500 as
"re-programmble" so it may be upgraded to deal with future radar/laser
threats, and then they release the x50 leaving us 8500 owners with no
upgrade options, like POP for example, other than to buy the new model. I
am really leaning towards getting a V1 now, especially since those can
always be upgraded.
Scott in SoCal - 23 Nov 2007 17:11 GMT
>In article
><87390940-d58b-4a0e-b233-412464cf7c39@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>things to "die" after awhile so you have to buy a new one a few years down
>the road.

This is why I have never used a radar detector. You never know whether
it's protecting you until it's too late. Even when it's working as it
was designed to you can still get nailed. You're much better off
simply paying attention to your driving and remaining alert to your
surroundings. That's what I do, and I haven't had any tickets or
collisions in over 20 years.

>I am really leaning towards getting a V1 now, especially since those can
>always be upgraded.

The reason they can always be upgraded is because the basic design
hasn't changed in a decade. I gotta give Mike Valentine a lot of
credit: he has fully amortized his basic design, and long ago
recovered all of his development costs. Every single $400 radar
detector he has sold since then has been almost pure profit. He's a
marketing genius! :)
Ashton Crusher - 25 Nov 2007 08:10 GMT
>>In article
>><87390940-d58b-4a0e-b233-412464cf7c39@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>surroundings. That's what I do, and I haven't had any tickets or
>collisions in over 20 years.

Guess what, you can do both, have a detector AND pay attention.

>>I am really leaning towards getting a V1 now, especially since those can
>>always be upgraded.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>detector he has sold since then has been almost pure profit. He's a
>marketing genius! :)

So every single Chevy sold is pure profit too I suppose....
Scott in SoCal - 25 Nov 2007 18:41 GMT
>>>In article
>>><87390940-d58b-4a0e-b233-412464cf7c39@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>Guess what, you can do both, have a detector AND pay attention.

Question: Then why did the OP get nailed?

Answer: Because people who have a RD tend to get lazy. They slack off
from their visual scanning, thinking "oh, my RD will protect me." Of
course, they ultimately find out they were wrong.

>>>I am really leaning towards getting a V1 now, especially since those can
>>>always be upgraded.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>So every single Chevy sold is pure profit too I suppose....

Show me a Chevy that can be upgraded to look and operate EXACTLY like
the 2008 model.

Also, thanks to the UAW, no Chevy will *ever* have the margins that
the V1 radar detector has. GM's ridiculous pension obligations and
"pay the workers even when they don't work" contract requirements
guarantee that can't happen.
Ashton Crusher - 26 Nov 2007 02:26 GMT
>>>>In article
>>>><87390940-d58b-4a0e-b233-412464cf7c39@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>from their visual scanning, thinking "oh, my RD will protect me." Of
>course, they ultimately find out they were wrong.

Sure that happens, But so does the flip side, the people who don't
have a radar detector slip up and don't notice the hiding spot and
slow down... guess what, if they had chosen the BOTH option, and had a
RD, they would have gotten the BUZZT and not got caught either.  It
works both ways.

>>>>I am really leaning towards getting a V1 now, especially since those can
>>>>always be upgraded.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>"pay the workers even when they don't work" contract requirements
>guarantee that can't happen.
Old Wolf - 25 Nov 2007 10:58 GMT
> This is why I have never used a radar detector. You never know whether
> it's protecting you until it's too late. Even when it's working as it
> was designed to you can still get nailed. You're much better off
> simply paying attention to your driving and remaining alert to your
> surroundings. That's what I do, and I haven't had any tickets or
> collisions in over 20 years.

I remain alert *and* use the detector. In my area there are plenty
of undercover cops; and you *can't* see a laser gun if it's
sufficiently
far enough away (they can get you from 2-3km  ; if they hide in the
bushes you can only seem when you're just about on them).
Scott in SoCal - 25 Nov 2007 18:54 GMT
>> This is why I have never used a radar detector. You never know whether
>> it's protecting you until it's too late. Even when it's working as it
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>I remain alert *and* use the detector.

Congratulations. But you are the exception, not the rule.

>In my area there are plenty
>of undercover cops; and you *can't* see a laser gun if it's
>sufficiently
>far enough away (they can get you from 2-3km  ; if they hide in the
>bushes you can only seem when you're just about on them).

Ah, but you can see the brake lights of all the cars ahead of you that
are getting hit, and you can put 2 and 2 together and slow down.

If there are no cars ahead of you getting tagged, then your radar
detector is useless. Why? Because if he keeps his instant-on radar or
laser transmitter off until he clocks YOU, then it's too late - by the
time your detector goes off, you're already nailed. Unless the cop is
using an antique "always on" radar gun, your detector only works if
there are cars ahead of you that get nailed first so that your
detector has a signal to detect.

To be perfectly honest, I wouldn't mind having a radar/lidar detector
in my car, just for the slight added protection it might give me. The
problem is that having a detector in your car labels you as a sly,
habitual offender in the cop's mind. You want him to think you are a
good little sheeple whose attention simply wandered for a few moments,
allowing his speed to accidentally creep up. Having a radar detector
(or the telltale suction cup ring marks on your windshield) destroys
the illusion you want to project, and can turn a warning into a
ticket.

If Mike Valentine would get off his lazy a.s and make a unit that can
be HIDDEN inside the vehicle, like the K-40, I might even buy one. I
think it would be a fun hacking project to interface the "Stealth V1"
to the nav system and heads-up displays in my car. I could sell the
conversion kits on the Internet and make a fortune. :)
Old Wolf - 25 Nov 2007 10:56 GMT
> >I've had a weird problem with mine lately; often the LASER
> >warning will go off, when there was no laser (sometimes even
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Yeah, that is the problem I started having with mine. Come to find out I
> have no reliable K band protection now too and it cost me big time.

In my country the police only use Ka and laser; I've had K and X
disabled for a long time because they go off all the time from
stuff like gas station security systems. So I wouldn't know if
they're still working :)
Scott in SoCal - 23 Nov 2007 17:01 GMT
>I've had a weird problem with [my placebo] lately; often the LASER
>warning will go off, when there was no laser (sometimes even
>when the unit was sitting on the floor of my car -- and lasers
>don't travel around corners).

They do if there is a mirror... :)
Paul Hovnanian P.E. - 26 Nov 2007 02:41 GMT
Keep an eye on it. Does the power light stay on?

I've had problems with loose connections when using cigarette lighter
plugs. The detector shuts off and, if I don't watch it, I've lost
protection. A hard wired feed was the solution.

Signature

Paul Hovnanian     mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten.
                               -- George Carlin

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.