Swear to God, heard this on the radio just a minute ago from the
Federal Highway Administration:
"When the car in front of you stops, slow down, and prepare to stop."
Yeah, THANKS!!! And here I was, about to ram up their a.s.... Glad
to know my tax dollars are hard at work!
Daniel W. Rouse Jr. - 03 Dec 2007 21:45 GMT
> Swear to God, heard this on the radio just a minute ago from the
> Federal Highway Administration:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Yeah, THANKS!!! And here I was, about to ram up their a.s.... Glad
> to know my tax dollars are hard at work!
The reminder exists because many don't slow down and prepare to stop.
Instead, it usually works like this: The vehicle in front of them slows
down, they keep speed as their following distance gets closer. The vehicle
in front of them stops, then they brake very hard and the front of their car
noticeably dips due to the sudden braking. If they stopped too late...
collision.
That is why it is always a good idea to begin braking as soon as the brake
lights of the vehicle in front light to.
Brent P - 03 Dec 2007 22:25 GMT
> Instead, it usually works like this: The vehicle in front of them slows
> down, they keep speed as their following distance gets closer. The vehicle
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> That is why it is always a good idea to begin braking as soon as the brake
> lights of the vehicle in front light to.
Some people actually take in more information than the tail-lamps of the
vehicle directly in front of them. That recommendation is nothing more
than one which causes congestion through braking waves.
Scott in SoCal - 04 Dec 2007 03:30 GMT
>> Swear to God, heard this on the radio just a minute ago from the
>> Federal Highway Administration:
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>That is why it is always a good idea to begin braking as soon as the brake
>lights of the vehicle in front light to.
What often happens is the vehicle in front of you is braking for
absolutely no reason. That's why so many drivers will NOT do what you
suggest; they have been trained to ignore brake lights and only pay
attention to an obvious closing of the gap between their vehicle and
the vehicle in front.
Pithy, sanctimonious "reminders" such as the above are also going to
be ignored.
Murderous Speeding Drunken Distracted Driver (Hector Goldstein) - 06 Dec 2007 04:53 GMT
>>> Swear to God, heard this on the radio just a minute ago from the
>>> Federal Highway Administration:
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>Pithy, sanctimonious "reminders" such as the above are also going to
>be ignored.
Why is that a bad thing? I love reading about Darwin's prizes.
--
Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.
- Admiral Hyman Rickover, U.S. Navy
John David Galt - 06 Dec 2007 19:17 GMT
>> That is why it is always a good idea to begin braking as soon as the brake
>> lights of the vehicle in front light to.
In commute traffic, watching several vehicles ahead is better, because
it allows you to follow closely (to keep out the line-cutters who cause
slowdowns) and still be perfectly safe provided the guy in front of you
only stops when *necessary*. (Your looking-ahead means you will see the
fact that makes a stop necessary _before_ the guy in front of you even
touches his brakes.) Of course, if he brakes maliciously, you're screwed.
> Pithy, sanctimonious "reminders" such as the above are also going to
> be ignored.
And will lead drivers to ignore ALL messages on VMSes, including the
important ones (construction advisories, "chains required ahead", etc)
that the signs are FOR. This is why highway authorities need to resist
all calls to display anything on a VMS except those and Amber Alerts.
Scott in SoCal - 04 Dec 2007 03:26 GMT
>Swear to God, heard this on the radio just a minute ago from the
>Federal Highway Administration:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Yeah, THANKS!!! And here I was, about to ram up their a.s.... Glad
>to know my tax dollars are hard at work!
Hmm... Looks like Robert Sumwalt, Vice Chairman of the NTSB, has some
competition for this year's Captain Obvious Award...
Sumwalt is quoted as saying "the problem here apparently was that two
trains were on the same track at the same time at the same location"
regarding the recent Amtrak crash in Chicago.
Murderous Speeding Drunken Distracted Driver (Hector Goldstein) - 06 Dec 2007 04:54 GMT
>>Swear to God, heard this on the radio just a minute ago from the
>>Federal Highway Administration:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>trains were on the same track at the same time at the same location"
>regarding the recent Amtrak crash in Chicago.
He's been reading some of Yogi's work.
--
Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.
- Admiral Hyman Rickover, U.S. Navy
Murderous Speeding Drunken Distracted Driver (Hector Goldstein) - 06 Dec 2007 04:52 GMT
>Swear to God, heard this on the radio just a minute ago from the
>Federal Highway Administration:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Yeah, THANKS!!! And here I was, about to ram up their a.s.... Glad
>to know my tax dollars are hard at work!
The feds are trying to reduce the daily road kill count to 109.
As usual, they'll fail.
--
Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.
- Admiral Hyman Rickover, U.S. Navy
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS - 06 Dec 2007 07:27 GMT
> Swear to God, heard this on the radio just a minute ago from the
> Federal Highway Administration:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Yeah, THANKS!!! And here I was, about to ram up their a.s.... Glad
> to know my tax dollars are hard at work!
Good advice. Most geezers and drunks have never heard of it.
Scott in SoCal - 06 Dec 2007 14:41 GMT
>> Swear to God, heard this on the radio just a minute ago from the
>> Federal Highway Administration:
>>
>> "When the car in front of you stops, slow down, and prepare to stop."
>
>Good advice. Most geezers and drunks have never heard of it.
They have heard of it, they just can't implement it.