http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0110084dui1.html
Drunkest Driver Ever?
Oregon woman nine times over state blood alcohol content limit
JANUARY 10--In what may be the most extreme drunk driving case ever, an
Oregon woman was arrested last month with a .72 blood alcohol level--nine
times the state's legal limit.
Terri Comer, 42, was arrested after she was discovered unconscious in her
car, which sheriff's deputies found running and in a snow bank on a highway
in Klamath County at 11:30 AM on December 28. After breaking a car window,
rescuers removed the comatose Comer from her Toyota and transported her to
a local hospital, where a blood draw revealed the .72 BAC. She was
reportedly hospitalized for a day before being released.
Comer is pictured below in a 2006 mug shot snapped after a prior drunk
driving arrest. In that case, her BAC was recorded in the relatively minor
.3 range. In November, another Oregon woman, Meagan Harper, was nabbed for
drunk driving with an extreme BAC. In her case, Harper's BAC was measured
at .55. Comer's .72 edges out what TSG has previously identified as the
highest BAC we've ever seen. That fallen record (.69) was held by Willard
Ashley III, an Indiana man who was busted in October 2003.
Scott in SoCal - 12 Jan 2008 18:50 GMT
>http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0110084dui1.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Oregon woman was arrested last month with a .72 blood alcohol level--nine
>times the state's legal limit.
A .37 BAC is enough to cause death - HTF did this woman survive with
twice that amount flowing through her veins?

Signature
"You can all kiss my @ss!"
- Carl Rogers, Message-ID: <IE1ej.2353$se5.298@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>
Murderous Speeding Drunken Distracted Driver (Hector Goldstein) - 12 Jan 2008 19:07 GMT
>>http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0110084dui1.html
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>A .37 BAC is enough to cause death - HTF did this woman survive with
>twice that amount flowing through her veins?
I dunno, but I suspect she was driving a beater.

Signature
Sarcasm is my sword
Apathy is my shield
Matthew T. Russotto - 12 Jan 2008 22:29 GMT
>>http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0110084dui1.html
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>A .37 BAC is enough to cause death - HTF did this woman survive with
>twice that amount flowing through her veins?
Tolerance. If your newspaper prints DUI arrests, you'll note that
over .40 isn't that uncommon; alcoholics can get to that level without
much problem. Though if .72 that wasn't a blood test you should
probably take it was a pillar of salt.

Signature
There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
result in a fully-depreciated one.
Scott in SoCal - 13 Jan 2008 04:12 GMT
>>>http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0110084dui1.html
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Tolerance. If your newspaper prints DUI arrests, you'll note that
>over .40 isn't that uncommon
They do, but they don't usually mention the BAC. They just say DUI and
give the location of the arrest.

Signature
"You can all kiss my @ss!"
- Carl Rogers, Message-ID: <IE1ej.2353$se5.298@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>
MLOM - 13 Jan 2008 04:21 GMT
> On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:29:00 -0600, russo...@grace.speakeasy.net
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
The BAC would have to be significantly high to be worthy of
print...think around .20 IIRC, and that if a repeat offender or if an
*accident* occurs. Most DUI arrests of problem drivers are well above
the old limit of .10, making the reduction to .08 of little effect
except at checkpoints.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS - 14 Jan 2008 01:09 GMT
> The BAC would have to be significantly high to be worthy of
> print...think around .20 IIRC, and that if a repeat offender or if an
> *accident* occurs. Most DUI arrests of problem drivers are well above
> the old limit of .10, making the reduction to .08 of little effect
> except at checkpoints.
HAHAHA. Spoken like a serial drunk driver. So .08 is "good" drunk
driving, huh?? I'm for zero tolerance with drunk drivers. They are
kid-killers and only a nut like you wants them coddled.
necromancer - 14 Jan 2008 18:56 GMT
SFB spewed:
> > The BAC would have to be significantly high to be worthy of
> > print...think around .20 IIRC, and that if a repeat offender or if an
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> driving, huh?? I'm for zero tolerance with drunk drivers. They are
> kid-killers and only a nut like you wants them coddled.
I'm for zero tolerance with road way killers who seem to kill someone
every couple of years or so. Just to be generous, I'll let you pick your
method of execution:
1) Electric Chair
2) Firing Squad
3) Hanging
4) Run over by Hummer repeatedly.
No, wait, Let's just tie you up and make you look at pictures in WHL-360
for a few years. That would be worse than death.

Signature
"Oh yeah. Well i've gone 3 1/2 years without a fatal crash
so i must be doing something right."
--Laura Bush murdered her boyfriend/laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE/
Speeders And Drunk Drivers Are Murderers (SADDAM), 9/24/2006
Ref: http://tinyurl.com/qdotr
Msg ID: ivadh2t9kd05ilrgdercft8iuvcls6r5op@4ax.com
Ad absurdum per aspera - 15 Jan 2008 22:23 GMT
> discovered unconscious in her
> car, which sheriff's deputies found running and in a snow bank on a highway {...}
> a blood draw revealed the .72 BAC
Talk about running a gauntlet... somehow she spun the wheel right
past "head-on collision," "hypothermia," "carbon monoxide," and
"passing out and strangling on your own vomit" and landed right on
"survive."
If the blood-test reading was valid (an important point, as others
have mentioned in this thread), the accused may be an experienced
drunk who has built up a lot of physiological tolerance,. Or far
right-hand tail on the distribution of natural ability to cope with
the stuff. Or flabbergastingly lucky (even if she doesn't think so
when sitting in jail) to have hit something forgiving -- a snowbank,
say, rather than a tree or a truck -- and then been rescued promptly.
Pick one or more.
Conventional wisdom is that somewhere in the .30 milligrams/deciliter
BAC range, a hypothetical typical nonhabituated adult would go beyond
All Jacked Up and gett into the realm of potential life threatening
effects just from acute alcohol toxicity per se, never mind once-
removed ways to kill oneself or others, such as getting behind the
wheel.
--Joe