Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

To President Castro - Warm Congratulations

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
V-for-Vendicar - 19 Feb 2008 16:56 GMT
With Fidel Castro's letter of resignation as Cuba's President, the time
seems appropriate for
all honest, and moral people to applaud him in reconstituting CUBA from a
Puppet state for the AmeriKKKan
elite to a outstanding independent nation that has done much to raise the
quality of life for the Cuban
people and the people of South America in general dispite the continual war
against Cuba perpetrated by
the USA.

We wish Cuba continued good health and note that it's political - and not so
political - war with the
dying AmeriKKKan state will soon be over with the comming collapse of the
U.S.A.

Only a little more patients in this area is required before complete victory
over the AmeriKKKan state
will be achieved.

Congratulations and best Wishes from Vendicar Decarian and company.
Matthew T. Russotto - 19 Feb 2008 18:18 GMT
>With Fidel Castro's letter of resignation as Cuba's President, the time
>seems appropriate for
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>against Cuba perpetrated by
>the USA.

You do realize that many of the cars in Cuba are 1950s American
models, yes?  That should be enough for you to hate them.

(and, of course, the US has not been engaged in any sort of war
against Cuba since the Cuban Missile Crisis, but that's part for the
course for Village Idiot)
Signature

 There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
 result in a fully-depreciated one.

V-for-Vendicar - 19 Feb 2008 18:26 GMT
> You do realize that many of the cars in Cuba are 1950s American
> models, yes?  That should be enough for you to hate them.

 Did you know that a Canadian who sold automotive parts to Cuba was
kidnapped by AmeriKKKan Bounty hunters and whisked away to AmeriKKKa where
he stood trial for breaking AmeriKKKan law for trading with the AmeriKKKan
enemy - CUBA.
Tom Gardner - 19 Feb 2008 19:29 GMT
>> You do realize that many of the cars in Cuba are 1950s American
>> models, yes?  That should be enough for you to hate them.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> he stood trial for breaking AmeriKKKan law for trading with the AmeriKKKan
> enemy - CUBA.

People should only obey laws that they agree with!
V-for-Vendicar - 19 Feb 2008 20:21 GMT
> People should only obey laws that they agree with!

 LIBERTARIAN
 MMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOONNNNNNN
DanKMTB@gmail.com - 19 Feb 2008 21:38 GMT
On Feb 19, 7:21 pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:

> > People should only obey laws that they agree with!
>
>   LIBERTARIAN
>   MMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOONNNNNNN

I'd rather be a Libertarian nutjob than a liberal nut kook with no
nuts and no job.
V-for-Vendicar - 19 Feb 2008 22:04 GMT
> I'd rather be a Libertarian nutjob than a liberal nut kook with no
> nuts and no job.

 That's odd. because I though you would rather be a woman.

 The only good Libertarian is a dead Libertarian.
MasterChief - 20 Feb 2008 02:12 GMT
The only one dead, is some brainwashed f.ck who mess with a armed
libertarian.

>> I'd rather be a Libertarian nutjob than a liberal nut kook with no
>> nuts and no job.
>
>  That's odd. because I though you would rather be a woman.
>
>  The only good Libertarian is a dead Libertarian.
V-for-Vendicar - 20 Feb 2008 03:41 GMT
> The only one dead, is some brainwashed f.ck who mess with a armed
> libertarian.

 Tell that to Ken McVeigh your Libertarian Hero.
David Poole - 20 Feb 2008 03:51 GMT
>> I'd rather be a Libertarian nutjob than a liberal nut kook with no
>> nuts and no job.
>
>  That's odd. because I though you would rather be a woman.

Projecting again, I see.

--

People don't confuse me with someone who cares.
V-for-Vendicar - 20 Feb 2008 03:58 GMT
>>  That's odd. because I though you would rather be a woman.

> Projecting again, I see.

 Ya, I think you should be a woman as well.
David Poole - 22 Feb 2008 02:57 GMT
>>>  That's odd. because I though you would rather be a woman.
>
>> Projecting again, I see.
>
>  Ya, I think you should be a woman as well.

You seem to have a bizarre fixation with this. What does your analyst
think about that?

--

People don't confuse me with someone who cares.
V-for-Vendicar - 23 Feb 2008 04:36 GMT
>>  Ya, I think you should be a woman as well.

> You seem to have a bizarre fixation with this. What does your analyst
> think about that?

 He thinks that you should be a woman too.
Matthew T. Russotto - 19 Feb 2008 21:53 GMT
>> You do realize that many of the cars in Cuba are 1950s American
>> models, yes?  That should be enough for you to hate them.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>he stood trial for breaking AmeriKKKan law for trading with the AmeriKKKan
>enemy - CUBA.

Ordinary I'd believe such a story.  Your high negative credibility
leads me to believe it's false in at least one critical detail.
Signature

 There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
 result in a fully-depreciated one.

Brent P - 19 Feb 2008 22:14 GMT
>>> You do realize that many of the cars in Cuba are 1950s American
>>> models, yes?  That should be enough for you to hate them.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Ordinary I'd believe such a story.  Your high negative credibility
> leads me to believe it's false in at least one critical detail.

Sounds like a myth based on that pot seed guy in canada the DEA so much
wants to get their grubby paws on. If they were going to bounty hunt
anyone the pot seed guy would come WAYYYY before some dufus selling auto
parts to cuba.
V-for-Vendicar - 19 Feb 2008 23:06 GMT
"Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com> wrote
U.S. court convicts Canadian

for trade with Cuba

By Gloria La Riva

James Sablazi, a Canadian, faces years in

U.S. prison for selling water purification

supplies to Cuba. Anywhere else in the

world, such an act would be routine. But in

the U.S. it is a crime.

While U.S. officials hypocritically trumpet

the virtues of "free trade," they have devoted

the last forty years to choking the

commerce of one of the U.S.'s closest

neighbors. The United States is the only

country in the world that has an economic

blockade against Cuba.

What is so unusual about the Sablazi case

is that his conviction is the first time in U.S.

history that someone from another country

has been charged with violating the U.S.

"Trading with the Enemy" law for trading

with Cuba from his own country. Another

Canadian associate of Sabzali's, Claude

Gauthier, was also charged for business

transactions with Cuba carried out entirely

within Canada.
Matthew T. Russotto - 20 Feb 2008 03:38 GMT
>"Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com> wrote
>U.S. court convicts Canadian
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>the U.S. it is a crime.

Ah, yes, it appears here is the critical detail you missed:

"Sabzali was acquitted of the charges that dealt with his business done
 entirely from Canada, but he was convicted on 21 other counts for his
 actions in the United States. Those actions were carried out after he
 accepted a full-time job with Purolite in 1996 in Philadelphia."

He traded with Cuba _while in the US_.  There's also no evidence in the
article that he was kidnapped from Canada.
Signature

 There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
 result in a fully-depreciated one.

V-for-Vendicar - 19 Feb 2008 22:53 GMT
"Matthew T. Russotto" <russotto@grace.speakeasy.net> wrote in
> Ordinary I'd believe such a story.  Your high negative credibility
> leads me to believe it's false in at least one critical detail.

From The Sunday Times
December 2, 2007

US says it has right to kidnap British citizens
David Leppard
AMERICA has told Britain that it can "kidnap" British citizens if they are
wanted for crimes in the United States.

A senior lawyer for the American government has told the Court of Appeal in
London that kidnapping foreign citizens is permissible under American law
because the US Supreme Court has sanctioned it.

The admission will alarm the British business community after the case of
the so-called NatWest Three, bankers who were extradited to America on fraud
charges. More than a dozen other British executives, including senior
managers at British Airways and BAE Systems, are under investigation by the
US authorities and could face criminal charges in America.

Until now it was commonly assumed that US law permitted kidnapping only in
the "extraordinary rendition" of terrorist suspects.

Related Links
 a.. NatWest trio allowed time to pay off debts
The American government has for the first time made it clear in a British
court that the law applies to anyone, British or otherwise, suspected of a
crime by Washington.

Legal experts confirmed this weekend that America viewed extradition as just
one way of getting foreign suspects back to face trial. Rendition, or
kidnapping, dates back to 19th-century bounty hunting and Washington
believes it is still legitimate.

The US government's view emerged during a hearing involving Stanley Tollman,
a former director of Chelsea football club and a friend of Baroness
Thatcher, and his wife Beatrice.

The Tollmans, who control the Red Carnation hotel group and are resident in
London, are wanted in America for bank fraud and tax evasion. They have been
fighting extradition through the British courts.

During a hearing last month Lord Justice Moses, one of the Court of Appeal
judges, asked Alun Jones QC, representing the US government, about its
treatment of Gavin, Tollman's nephew. Gavin Tollman was the subject of an
attempted abduction during a visit to Canada in 2005.

Jones replied that it was acceptable under American law to kidnap people if
they were wanted for offences in America. "The United States does have a
view about procuring people to its own shores which is not shared," he said.

He said that if a person was kidnapped by the US authorities in another
country and was brought back to face charges in America, no US court could
rule that the abduction was illegal and free him: "If you kidnap a person
outside the United States and you bring him there, the court has no
jurisdiction to refuse - it goes back to bounty hunting days in the 1860s."

Mr Justice Ouseley, a second judge, challenged Jones to be "honest about
[his] position".

Jones replied: "That is United States law."

He cited the case of Humberto Alvarez Machain, a suspect who was abducted by
the US government at his medical office in Guadalajara, Mexico, in 1990. He
was flown by Drug Enforcement Administration agents to Texas for criminal
prosecution.

Although there was an extradition treaty in place between America and Mexico
at the time - as there currently is between the United States and Britain -
the Supreme Court ruled in 1992 that the Mexican had no legal remedy because
of his abduction.

In 2005, Gavin Tollman, the head of Trafalgar Tours, a holiday company, had
arrived in Toronto by plane when he was arrested by Canadian immigration
authorities.

An American prosecutor, who had tried and failed to extradite him from
Britain, persuaded Canadian officials to detain him. He wanted the Canadians
to drive Tollman to the border to be handed over. Tollman was escorted in
handcuffs from the aircraft in Toronto, taken to prison and held for 10
days.

A Canadian judge ordered his release, ruling that the US Justice Department
had set a "sinister trap" and wrongly bypassed extradition rules. Tollman
returned to Britain.

Legal sources said that under traditional American justice, rendition meant
capturing wanted people abroad and bringing them to the United States. The
term "extraordinary rendition" was coined in the 1990s for the kidnapping of
terror suspects from one foreign country to another for interrogation.

There was concern this weekend from Patrick Mercer, the Tory MP, who said:
"The very idea of kidnapping is repugnant to us and we must handle these
cases with extreme caution and a thorough understanding of the implications
in American law."

Shami Chakrabarti, director of the human rights group Liberty, said: "This
law may date back to bounty hunting days, but they should sort it out if
they claim to be a civilised nation."

The US Justice Department declined to comment.
Matthew T. Russotto - 20 Feb 2008 03:33 GMT
>"Matthew T. Russotto" <russotto@grace.speakeasy.net> wrote in
>> Ordinary I'd believe such a story.  Your high negative credibility
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>US says it has right to kidnap British citizens

Which, since your story concerned a Canadian citizen, has no bearing.

Signature

 There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
 result in a fully-depreciated one.

V-for-Vendicar - 20 Feb 2008 03:52 GMT
>>US says it has right to kidnap British citizens
>
> Which, since your story concerned a Canadian citizen, has no bearing.

 Of course it does, since the issue is AmeriKKKan Corruption.
Thanatos - 20 Feb 2008 03:51 GMT
> Jones replied: "That is United States law."

> There was concern this weekend from Patrick Mercer, the Tory MP, who said:
> "The very idea of kidnapping is repugnant to us and we must handle these
> cases with extreme caution and a thorough understanding of the implications
> in American law."

> The US Justice Department declined to comment.

The solution is simple: other countries should start doing the same.
After a few well-heeled Americans get kidnapped off the streets of Los
Angeles or Miami or Houston and whisked away to stand trial elsewhere,
the U.S. attitude toward this sort of thing might change.
V-for-Vendicar - 20 Feb 2008 03:58 GMT
> The solution is simple: other countries should start doing the same.
> After a few well-heeled Americans get kidnapped off the streets of Los
> Angeles or Miami or Houston and whisked away to stand trial elsewhere,
> the U.S. attitude toward this sort of thing might change.

 Why not just have some religious leader issue a fatwah and then just blow
up some U.S. government buildings for the crimes they have committed?

 I don't know about you, but I'm all in favour if kidnappin imprisoning and
torturing the AmeriKKKan president, before he is convicted and put to death.
N8N - 19 Feb 2008 23:23 GMT
On Feb 19, 4:53 pm, russo...@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew T. Russotto)
wrote:
> In article <vbFuj.21566$612.2...@read1.cgocable.net>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Ordinary I'd believe such a story.  Your high negative credibility
> leads me to believe it's false in at least one critical detail.

And you'd be right.

nate
Matthew T. Russotto - 20 Feb 2008 03:40 GMT
>On Feb 19, 4:53=A0pm, russo...@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew T. Russotto)
>wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>And you'd be right.

Yup, at least two critical details -- he wasn't kidnapped, he sold the
items while he was in the in the US.  And the less than critical detail is
that it wasn't auto parts, it was water purification supplies.

The law against trading with Cuba is ridiculous, but making it out
like the US applied it to a Canadian citizen trading with Cuba from
Canada is nonsense.
Signature

 There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
 result in a fully-depreciated one.

V-for-Vendicar - 20 Feb 2008 03:52 GMT
> Yup, at least two critical details -- he wasn't kidnapped, he sold the
> items while he was in the in the US.  And the less than critical detail is
> that it wasn't auto parts, it was water purification supplies.

 I didn't claim it was the same story.

 Duh.

> The law against trading with Cuba is ridiculous, but making it out
> like the US applied it to a Canadian citizen trading with Cuba from
> Canada is nonsense.

 Yet that is exactly what happened in this instance.
N8N - 19 Feb 2008 20:23 GMT
On Feb 19, 1:18 pm, russo...@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew T. Russotto)
wrote:
> In article <RODuj.21546$612.10...@read1.cgocable.net>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> You do realize that many of the cars in Cuba are 1950s American
> models, yes?  That should be enough for you to hate them.

Unpossible.  no car lasts that long.  Just ask Vendickarse.

nate
V-for-Vendicar - 19 Feb 2008 21:12 GMT
> You do realize that many of the cars in Cuba are 1950s American
> models, yes? That should be enough for you to hate them.

> Unpossible.  no car lasts that long.  Just ask Vendickarse.

 At this point they are more recycled bean cans than cars.  But that was
the old Cuba.  Now that the world has told AmeriKKKa that it can go f.ck 
ITSELF when it comes to the Cuban Embargo, Cuba has a reasonably modern
fleet of automobiles.

 I encourage everyone I know is going to Cuba for a visit, just to take a
car part with them and plunk it down at the nearest Cuban auto shop with
thanx for a job well done.
MasterChief - 20 Feb 2008 02:12 GMT
Only American made, like they use to
On Feb 19, 1:18 pm, russo...@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew T. Russotto)
wrote:
> In article <RODuj.21546$612.10...@read1.cgocable.net>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> You do realize that many of the cars in Cuba are 1950s American
> models, yes? That should be enough for you to hate them.

Unpossible.  no car lasts that long.  Just ask Vendickarse.

nate
V-for-Vendicar - 20 Feb 2008 12:21 GMT
> Unpossible.  no car lasts that long.  Just ask Vendickarse.

 Your words, not mine.  John Boy.

 Many social degenerates feel that their lives are best spent giving more
time and care to their cars, and spending more money on their cars, than
they do with their children.

 It's a form of child neglect and results in the creation of a
devolutionary degenerate society that has no future.
N8N - 20 Feb 2008 13:17 GMT
> > Unpossible.  no car lasts that long.  Just ask Vendickarse.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>   It's a form of child neglect and results in the creation of a
> devolutionary degenerate society that has no future.

I get it now.  You didn't get enough love and attention as a small
troll so now you're the unpleasant, antisocial creature that we have
grown to know and be annoyed by.

If I find someone willing to give you a hug, will you STFU, or at
least make an attempt to be rational?

nate
V-for-Vendicar - 20 Feb 2008 13:31 GMT
> I get it now.  You didn't get enough love and attention as a small
> troll so now you're the unpleasant, antisocial creature that we have
> grown to know and be annoyed by.

Many social degenerates feel that their lives are best spent giving more
time and care to their cars, and spending more money on their cars, than
they do with their children.

It's a form of child neglect and results in the creation of a
devolutionary degenerate society that has no future.
N8N - 20 Feb 2008 14:04 GMT
> > I get it now.  You didn't get enough love and attention as a small
> > troll so now you're the unpleasant, antisocial creature that we have
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> It's a form of child neglect and results in the creation of a
> devolutionary degenerate society that has no future.

Well, bitch about it to your parents, not to us.  We aren't the ones
responsible for your shortcomings.

nate
V-for-Vendicar - 20 Feb 2008 14:19 GMT
> Well, bitch about it to your parents, not to us.  We aren't the ones
> responsible for your shortcomings.

Many social degenerates feel that their lives are best spent giving more
time and care to their cars, and spending more money on their cars, than
they do with their children.

It's a form of child neglect and results in the creation of a
devolutionary degenerate society that has no future.
N8N - 20 Feb 2008 14:27 GMT
> > Well, bitch about it to your parents, not to us.  We aren't the ones
> > responsible for your shortcomings.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> It's a form of child neglect and results in the creation of a
> devolutionary degenerate society that has no future.

It's stuck in a loop!  Someone hit it!

nate
V-for-Vendicar - 20 Feb 2008 14:37 GMT
> It's stuck in a loop!  Someone hit it!

           Degenerate American

             Sitting there,
           watching the telly,
           with junk food and alcohol,
           loaded in your belly...

           Get up,
           and off your a.s;
           there's more to life,
           than watching it pass...

           Ignorant...
           You'll believe anything,
           every word and image,
           that they bring...

           Every weekend,
           you binge and drink,
           too simple-minded and stupid,
           too even think...

           When will you,
           start acting alive,
           get off of those drugs,
           by which you thrive...

           Eat and drink everyday,
           you piss your worthless life away;
           party all that you crave,
           sending your wretched life to an early grave...

           I'll stand by and I'll watch...
           and think and rave;
           enjoying my thoughts,
           of pissing on your grave...

           Your life is so pathetic,
           you fight for nothing and you suck,
           Wake up and take back your land,
           you degenerate F***! ! !

           Joshua Fegley
N8N - 20 Feb 2008 15:07 GMT
> > It's stuck in a loop!  Someone hit it!
>
>             Degenerate American

<snip>

If that's what you really think of Americans, I guess I can rest
assured that you will not be visiting our fair country.  I'm 100% OK
with that.

nate
V-for-Vendicar - 20 Feb 2008 15:21 GMT
> Degenerate American

> If that's what you really think of Americans, I guess I can rest
> assured that you will not be visiting our fair country.  I'm 100% OK
> with that.

 Was it really bad?  I didn't read it.

 Title says it all.
Matthew T. Russotto - 20 Feb 2008 17:26 GMT
>If that's what you really think of Americans, I guess I can rest
>assured that you will not be visiting our fair country.  I'm 100% OK
>with that.

Do you think he's actually foreign?
Signature

 There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
 result in a fully-depreciated one.

Larry Bud - 22 Feb 2008 23:17 GMT
> On Feb 20, 1:36 pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> assured that you will not be visiting our fair country.  I'm 100% OK
> with that.

The f.cker probably lives in the US!  Just another socialist
hypocrite.
V-for-Vendicar - 23 Feb 2008 04:37 GMT
> The f.cker probably lives in the US!  Just another socialist
> hypocrite.

 The Degenerate AmeriKKKan first assumes that I live in AmeriKKKa and then
based upon that assumption concludes that I am a hypocrite for crticizing
the country that I live in.

 Ahahahahahahahaahahah............

 MMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
Motorhead Lawyer - 20 Feb 2008 22:59 GMT
> > Well, bitch about it to your parents, not to us.  We aren't the ones
> > responsible for your shortcomings.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> It's a form of child neglect and results in the creation of a
> devolutionary degenerate society that has no future.

But good parents like me help their daughters earn the Girl Scouts'
merit badge for *Car Care* and have a wonderful bonding and learning
experience while getting the snow tires mounted.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
--
C.R. Krieger
(Proud dad)
Matthew T. Russotto - 21 Feb 2008 02:58 GMT
>But good parents like me help their daughters earn the Girl Scouts'
>merit badge for *Car Care* and have a wonderful bonding and learning
>experience while getting the snow tires mounted.
>
>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Dammit Krieger, I had to look that up... you're serious, there really
is such a badge.

Signature

 There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
 result in a fully-depreciated one.

Motorhead Lawyer - 22 Feb 2008 23:52 GMT
> In article <ba5e16fd-d46d-482b-aace-093aaba58...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Dammit Krieger, I had to look that up... you're serious, there really
> is such a badge.

ROTFL!  Yep!  And guess whose daughter qualifies for one?
--
C.R.
V-for-Vendicar - 21 Feb 2008 05:22 GMT
> But good parents like me help their daughters earn the Girl Scouts'
> merit badge for *Car Care* and have a wonderful bonding and learning
> experience while getting the snow tires mounted.

 What were you mounting again?
Motorhead Lawyer - 22 Feb 2008 23:54 GMT
On Feb 21, 3:19 am, "V-for-Vendicar"
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:

> > But good parents like me help their daughters earn the Girl Scouts'
> > merit badge for *Car Care* and have a wonderful bonding and learning
> > experience while getting the snow tires mounted.
>
>   What were you mounting again?

Izzat the best you've got?  I mean, I give you a TRUE STORY about my
10-year-old daughter and you come up with this?  You're useless.  I'm
guessing as well as hoping that you have not managed to reproduce.
Please keep it that way.
--
C.R. Krieger
Nate Nagel - 23 Feb 2008 00:29 GMT
> On Feb 21, 3:19 am, "V-for-Vendicar"
> <Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> --
> C.R. Krieger

C'mon, with charm like that and obvious intelligence to boot?  He's
probably got more primo quality tail lining up outside his parents'
basement than you or I could possibly imagine.

nate

Signature

replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

V-for-Vendicar - 24 Feb 2008 03:45 GMT
> C'mon, with charm like that and obvious intelligence to boot?  He's
> probably got more primo quality tail lining up outside his parents'
> basement than you or I could possibly imagine.

 Sorry Nate, but flattery ain't gonna get you any ancillary action.
V-for-Vendicar - 24 Feb 2008 03:44 GMT
> On Feb 21, 3:19 am, "V-for-Vendicar"
>>   What were you mounting again?

> Izzat the best you've got?  I mean, I give you a TRUE STORY about my
> 10-year-old daughter and you come up with this?

  What were you mounting again?
Matthew T. Russotto - 20 Feb 2008 17:19 GMT
>On Feb 20, 11:18=A0am, "V-for-Vendicar"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>If I find someone willing to give you a hug, will you STFU, or at
>least make an attempt to be rational?

Good luck on that.  I'm certainly not volunteering.  Maybe Aunt Judy?
Signature

 There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
 result in a fully-depreciated one.

Governor Swill - 20 Feb 2008 10:56 GMT
N8N <njnagel@hotmail.com> used a stick in the sand to babble
>> You do realize that many of the cars in Cuba are 1950s American
>> models, yes?  That should be enough for you to hate them.
>
>Unpossible.  no car lasts that long.  Just ask Vendickarse.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

Swill
Signature

THIS is how we have to win the Iraq War
http://www.wheelchairsforiraqikids.com/

gpsman - 21 Feb 2008 07:24 GMT
On Feb 19, 3:52 pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> With Fidel Castro's letter of resignation as Cuba's President, the time
> seems appropriate for"....

Evaluating the relevance of the subject and content to the groups in
which it was posted...?!

Eh,... lemme guess... no such evaluation should be performed before
setting fingers to keyboard...?
-----

- gpsman
Matthew T. Russotto - 21 Feb 2008 18:40 GMT
>On Feb 19, 3:52 pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
><Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Evaluating the relevance of the subject and content to the groups in
>which it was posted...?!

You should recognize it.  That's genuine trolling from your
replacement as Village Idiot, as opposed to his usual psychotic
fantasizing.
Signature

 There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
 result in a fully-depreciated one.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.