 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / April 2008Cops Refuse to Pay Speeding Fines
I say cops should be held to a higher standard than the general public. Not only should they be penalized for breaking the speed laws but their penalty should be say 5 times that of joe lunchbox. http://www.nbc4.com/news/15545755/detail.html Union: Officers Won't Pay Speed Camera Fines POSTED: 9:37 am EDT March 9, 2008 ROCKVILLE, Md. -- A certain group of drivers is refusing to pay dozens of $40 fines issued by Montgomery County's new speed cameras -- the county's police officers. The police union said officers shouldn't pay because the citations are issued to the owner of a vehicle, in this case the county, and not to the driver. But that advice is causing a clash with the police chief. Chief Thomas Manger said officers are not above the law and should hold themselves to the same standards they hold the public to. In the last eight months of 2007, the department's cameras recorded 224 cases in which police vehicles were recorded traveling more than 10 miles per hour over the speed limit. Supervisors dismissed 76 of those citations after they determined the officers were responding to calls or had valid reasons to break the speed limit. On Mar 10, 10:27 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I say cops should be held to a higher standard than the general public. Not > only should they be penalized for breaking the speed laws but their penalty > should be say 5 times that of joe lunchbox. Lady: You are full of sh.t as usual > http://www.nbc4.com/news/15545755/detail.html > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > after they determined the officers were responding to calls or had valid > reasons to break the speed limit. > I say cops should be held to a higher standard than the general public. Not > only should they be penalized for breaking the speed laws but their penalty [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > after they determined the officers were responding to calls or had valid > reasons to break the speed limit. Cops are far better drivers than 90% of the population. To single them out is tosingle out our best drivers. Are YOU a good and competent driver? >Cops are far better drivers than 90% of the population. >To single them out is tosingle out our best drivers. >Are YOU a good and competent driver? Does this quote answer your question? Speeders & Drunk Drivers Are MURDERERS advocates unsafe driving: "Yes - the stupid media BLAMED it on the fog. If the SL is 60 then, by god, you have a right to drive 60 no matter what the conditions." --Speeders & Drunk Drivers Are MURDERERS, 1/9/08 Ref: http://tinyurl.com/2fnkof Msg ID: 706d1599-c987-40a9-8899-bae460b3e291@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com > Cops are far better drivers than 90% of the population. ROFLMAO!!! Where'd you come up with that turd? >Cops are far better drivers than 90% of the population. >To single them out is tosingle out our best drivers. >Are YOU a good and competent driver? You should consider a career in comedy. -- People don't confuse me with someone who cares. > > I say cops should be held to a higher standard than the general public. Not > > only should they be penalized for breaking the speed laws but their penalty [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > To single them out is tosingle out our best drivers. > Are YOU a good and competent driver? Please don't do that when I'm drinking coffee, it burns. nate On Mar 11, 2:17 am, jerry warner <ware...@mchsi.com> wrote: > Cops are far better drivers than 90% of the population. > To single them out is tosingle out our best drivers. > Are YOU a good and competent driver? Please don't do that when I'm drinking coffee, it burns. - - - - Try penicillin. Bo > Cops are far better drivers than 90% of the population. > To single them out is tosingle out our best drivers. > Are YOU a good and competent driver? HAHAHA. Talk about changing the subject!!!!!!!!!!! SFB spewed: >> Cops are far better drivers than 90% of the population. >> To single them out is tosingle out our best drivers. >> Are YOU a good and competent driver? > >HAHAHA. Talk about changing the subject!!!!!!!!!!! Look who is talking. The village idiot who keeps evading the issue that the Blessed Imam has raised. -- Speeders & Drunk Drivers Are MURDERERS (a.k.a. SFB) admits to being a deadly speeder, psychopath and criminal coddler: "> Have you ever driven a car faster than the legal speed limit? Yes, but never deliberately. In fact i got a speeding ticket about 5 years ago for doing 41 in a 25. I just about kicked the cops teeth in cause i was sure he was lying. No way the SL on this wide open stretch could be 25, i thought." Pride of America (c.k.a. Laura Bush murdered her boyfriend/ laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE/Speeders And Drunk Drivers Are Murderers (SADDAM)), 10/3/2002 Message-ID: <3c1753f7.0210030916.7b6f5dff@posting.google.com> http://tinyurl.com/5u4wg Proof that POA is LBMHB/lbVH/SADDAM: See the following: http://tinyurl.com/ahphj > Cops are far better drivers than 90% of the population. > To single them out is tosingle out our best drivers. > Are YOU a good and competent driver? Well, except for Santa Clara County (CA) Sheriff's Deputies. Did you see that one fell asleep at the wheel the other day, and plowed in to four bicyclists, killing two? Yikes. > > Cops are far better drivers than 90% of the population. > > To single them out is tosingle out our best drivers. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > that one fell asleep at the wheel the other day, and plowed in to four > bicyclists, killing two? Yikes. I dunno, I've driven in Montgomery County and have not been overly impressed by the driving skill of the cops. At least I haven't been run off the road by any like I was just outside of Baltimore. nate > Cops are far better drivers than 90% of the population. > To single them out is tosingle out our best drivers. > Are YOU a good and competent driver? are you deaf, dumb and stupid? or just a dumbass pig ? > I say cops should be held to a higher standard than the general public. Not > only should they be penalized for breaking the speed laws but their penalty > should be say 5 times that of joe lunchbox. I think cops should be held to higher standards not necessarily higher penalties. There was this cop who nearly slammed into us, mutiple times, he killed a man walking while driving recklessly, speeding, without lights. Didn't get sh.t. You make a complaint then it's a toss up on whether they start stalking your friends and family, they get somebody killed, nothing on them, it's somebody elses fault. The lawyers the aclu tree huggers. > I say cops should be held to a higher standard than the general public. > Not > only should they be penalized for breaking the speed laws but their > penalty > should be say 5 times that of joe lunchbox. agreed, actually cops should be shot and killed for breaking the law On Mar 10, 10:27 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I say cops should be held to a higher standard than the general public. These "cops" you speak of, are they the same cops whose teeth you wanted to kick in? Supervisors dismissed 76 of those citations after they determined the officers were responding to calls or had valid reasons to break the speed limit. > I say cops should be held to a higher standard than the general public. > Not [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > after they determined the officers were responding to calls or had valid > reasons to break the speed limit. what about the other 148? nate > Supervisors dismissed 76 of those citations > after they determined the officers were responding to calls or had valid [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >>after they determined the officers were responding to calls or had valid >>reasons to break the speed limit.  Signaturereplace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel They never happened... tin-foil-hat nonsense ;) >what about the other 148? > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] >>>after they determined the officers were responding to calls or had valid >>>reasons to break the speed limit. That's sort of my point. Never mind that the review process for civilians would be something like "did you get the ticket? Then you're guilty." Never mind that there was an ambulance behind you, you were making a legal RTOR, the yellow interval was 2 seconds on a 45 MPH street, etc... nate > They never happened... tin-foil-hat nonsense ;) > [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > > - Show quoted text - f.cking pigs. The other day I was driving at night and some stupid pig flew by me at at least 100 mph with no emergency lights, sirens, anything. Scared the sh.t out of me. f.cking pigs... H. That's sort of my point. Never mind that the review process for civilians would be something like "did you get the ticket? Then you're guilty." Never mind that there was an ambulance behind you, you were making a legal RTOR, the yellow interval was 2 seconds on a 45 MPH street, etc... nate On Mar 20, 8:37 am, tetraethylleadREMOVET...@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote: > They never happened... tin-foil-hat nonsense ;) > [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > > - Show quoted text - > f.cking pigs. > The other day I was driving at night and some stupid pig flew by me at at > least 100 mph with no emergency lights, sirens, anything. > Scared the sh.t out of me. > f.cking pigs... Were you in Texas? It was probably me... j. >> f.cking pigs. >> The other day I was driving at night and some stupid pig flew by me at at [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Were you in Texas? It was probably me... another pig admits he breaks the law, shock and surprise save america, kill a cop today, death to cops >>> f.cking pigs. >>> The other day I was driving at night and some stupid pig flew by me at [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > another pig admits he breaks the law, shock and surprise That is not breaking the law. Do some research. >>>>f.cking pigs. >>>>The other day I was driving at night and some stupid pig flew by me at [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > That is not breaking the law. Do some research. It is morally. nate Signaturereplace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel >Supervisors dismissed 76 of those citations >after they determined the officers were responding to calls or had valid >reasons to break the speed limit. Welcome back, Jaybird. Signature"Dave's not here, man!" - Tommy Chong > >Supervisors dismissed 76 of those citations > >after they determined the officers were responding to calls or had valid [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > "Dave's not here, man!" > - Tommy Chong Motion seconded. :) > >Supervisors dismissed 76 of those citations > >after they determined the officers were responding to calls or had valid [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > "Dave's not here, man!" > - Tommy Chong >Motion seconded. :) Well thank you. It's been a while, but I'm back on nights now so I have nothing else to do when I'm off... j. >> >Supervisors dismissed 76 of those citations >> >after they determined the officers were responding to calls or had valid [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Well thank you. It's been a while, but I'm back on nights now so I have > nothing else to do when I'm off... nothing else do to except harass people huh jaybird? the only good pig is a dead pig >>> >Supervisors dismissed 76 of those citations >>> >after they determined the officers were responding to calls or had [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > nothing else do to except harass people huh jaybird? I only harass people when they ask to be harassed.... come on now... > Supervisors dismissed 76 of those citations > after they determined the officers were responding to calls or had valid > reasons to break the speed limit. and the reason the other pigs havent paid their ticket yet is what exactly death to pigs, kill them all > I say cops should be held to a higher standard than the general public. > Not > only should they be penalized for breaking the speed laws but their > penalty > should be say 5 times that of joe lunchbox. the penalty for a pig that breaks the law should be 100 times that of joe lunchbox pigs know (or are supposed to now) the law, if they break it, then they should be severely punished (or shot and killed, either one works, personally I prefer the second alternative for them) save america, kill a USELESS PILE OF sh.t PIG today DEATH TO PIGS, KILL THEM ALL TIME TO BOMB PIG STATIONS |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.