Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / April 2008
Why are gas caps on the driver's side of some cars but the passenger's side of others?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS - 31 Mar 2008 03:36 GMT .
Suppose fuel tanks were always on the driver's side of the car. Drivers would then have to park on the right side of an open pump in order to fill their tanks.
During busy times, all spots on the right sides of pumps would be filled even while most spots on the left sides of pumps remained empty.
Putting petrol caps on different sides of different cars means that some cars can access pumps from the left. And this makes it less likely that drivers will have to queue for fuel.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id= 548730&in_page_id=1879
Paul Hovnanian P.E. - 31 Mar 2008 04:17 GMT > . > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id= > 548730&in_page_id=1879 Gas (petrol) caps are usually located on the opposite side from the tailpipe.
I have yet to see a gas pump hose that couldn't reach across a car (trucks are a different case).
 Signature Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't upset me! I'm running out of places to hide the bodies.
Studemania - 31 Mar 2008 04:28 GMT > > . > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > - Show quoted text - I wish that the tank gauge on the instrument panel was on the same side of the filler.
necromancer - 31 Mar 2008 05:16 GMT >> . >> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >I have yet to see a gas pump hose that couldn't reach across a car >(trucks are a different case). And (atleast in the US), gas pumps have handles on both sides of the pump or atleast the pump can be accessed from both sides. I fail to see what the OP is whining about.....
-- Aunt Judy defends a known *drunk driver*:
"Almost all vehicle 'accidents' are due to driver recklessness but the Chappaquidick incident is one instance where it may really have been no ones fault except the idiot who built the bridge." --"Laura Bush murdered her boyfriend," (currently known as Speeders & Drunk Drivers Are MURDERERS) 11/10/2005 Ref: http://tinyurl.com/9jtjt Msg ID: 1131599968.267321.318380@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com
Brent P - 31 Mar 2008 05:22 GMT >And (atleast in the US), gas pumps have handles on both sides of the >pump or atleast the pump can be accessed from both sides. I fail to >see what the OP is whining about..... who knows? The troll just posts for replies. I prefer the center of the back of the car for the filling location. Pull up to any pump without concern as to which side it's on.
Probably a combination of fire protection and tanks under the rear seat is why that location isn't used any longer.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS - 31 Mar 2008 06:40 GMT On Mar 30, 10:22 pm, tetraethylleadREMOVET...@yahoo.com (Brent P)
> who knows? The troll just posts for replies. I prefer the center of the > back of the car for the filling location. Pull up to any pump without > concern as to which side it's on. > > Probably a combination of fire protection and tanks under the rear seat > is why that location isn't used any longer. Too many rear-end collisions is why, you hatefilled numbskull.
Larry Bud - 31 Mar 2008 17:24 GMT On Mar 31, 1:40 am, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <beta...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> On Mar 30, 10:22 pm, tetraethylleadREMOVET...@yahoo.com (Brent P) > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Too many rear-end collisions is why, you hatefilled numbskull. Many caused by your love affair with red light cameras.
Howard Brazee - 31 Mar 2008 21:45 GMT >Gas (petrol) caps are usually located on the opposite side from the >tailpipe. > >I have yet to see a gas pump hose that couldn't reach across a car >(trucks are a different case). In vans with one sliding door, gas caps were on the other side. I've had cars that had the cap behind the license plate.
If the free space at the gas station is on the right, and my gas cap is on the right, I come in from the other side. Doesn't everybody?
Studemania - 01 Apr 2008 01:38 GMT > If the free space at the gas station is on the right, and my gas cap > is on the right, I come in from the other side. Doesn't everybody? YOU DISCOVERED THAT? (I though that I was the only one) <g>
Dave - 01 Apr 2008 13:03 GMT > If the free space at the gas station is on the right, and my gas cap > is on the right, I come in from the other side. Doesn't everybody? YOU DISCOVERED THAT? (I though that I was the only one) <g>
In some areas that is actually OUTLAWED though, some type of bullshit fire code which IS enforced by the local fire marshalls. I guess the theory is that if you drive the wrong way through the fuel island, the whole gas station will explode into a huge fireball that might scorch the governor's mansion? :) -Dave
Matthew T. Russotto - 02 Apr 2008 02:25 GMT >I have yet to see a gas pump hose that couldn't reach across a car >(trucks are a different case). I've seen plenty that couldn't reach across my Outback, and some which can't reach across the Miata.
 Signature There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can result in a fully-depreciated one.
Clave - 31 Mar 2008 06:46 GMT > . > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > cars can access pumps from the left. And this makes it less likely that > drivers will have to queue for fuel. Right. All gas stations have only one entrance and exit.
This is the stupidest thing you've posted in months.
Jim
Bobby Knight - 31 Mar 2008 13:36 GMT >> . >> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >Jim Yep...and that's saying something. There's nothing between those ears.
 Signature ___, \o | / \ . "Someone likes every shot"! bk
Larry Bud - 31 Mar 2008 17:27 GMT On Mar 30, 10:36 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> . > > Suppose fuel tanks were always on the driver's side of the car. Drivers > would then have to park on the right side of an open pump in order to fill > their tanks. Here's one that will scramble the two neurons left in your brain: My gas cap in the CENTER above the license plate.
> During busy times, all spots on the right sides of pumps would be filled > even while most spots on the left sides of pumps remained empty. Oh my God, I may have given you too much credit thinking you had 2 neurons left...
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS - 31 Mar 2008 17:33 GMT > Here's one that will scramble the two neurons left in your brain: My > gas cap in the CENTER above the license plate. Everyone has seen that you idiot. But it's pretty rare because of all the rear-end collisions caused by drunks like you.
MNMikew - 31 Mar 2008 17:41 GMT >> Here's one that will scramble the two neurons left in your brain: My >> gas cap in the CENTER above the license plate. > > Everyone has seen that you idiot. But it's pretty rare because of all > the rear-end collisions caused by drunks like you. You must still drive a Pinto then idiot.
Paul Hovnanian P.E. - 01 Apr 2008 01:29 GMT > >> Here's one that will scramble the two neurons left in your brain: My > >> gas cap in the CENTER above the license plate. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > > You must still drive a Pinto then idiot. Best sticker I've ever heard of on a car: Pinto hatchback with the phrase "Close cover before striking" on the back window.
 Signature Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ It's easier said than done. ... and if you don't believe it, try proving that it's easier done than said, and you'll see that it's easier said that `it's easier done than said' than it is done, which really proves that it's easier said than done.
Jeff Strickland - 31 Mar 2008 19:10 GMT Suppose all fuel fillers were on the same side of the car -- my first choice is to put it on the right side (passenger side in the USA) -- all carw would alwasy go through the station going the same way. You pull to the pump going in one direction, and if the pumps are filled on one side, then you smiply drive around to the other, but all cars would always be nose to tail as they go through the pumps. Having the filler holes all on the same side would eliminate the chaos at the gas pumps.
I suggested the filler should be on the passenger side, this would place the operator on the curb side of the car if the gas can was needed. It is silly to have a disabled car on the side of the road, and the operator standing next to the traffic lanes as he tries to pour in gas.
> . > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id= > 548730&in_page_id=1879 Dave - 31 Mar 2008 19:27 GMT > Suppose all fuel fillers were on the same side of the car -- my first > choice is to put it on the right side (passenger side in the USA) -- all [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > silly to have a disabled car on the side of the road, and the operator > standing next to the traffic lanes as he tries to pour in gas. My first two cars had the gas filler tube (exactly centered on the rear of the vehicle) behind a trap door under the trunk lid. The trap door held the rear license plate also, on one of them. First time I drove a car with a gas filler on the SIDE (don't remember which side) I thought that was a really fricking STUPID place to put it. Because of course I pulled up to the pump with the pump on the wrong side. And it shouldn't have MATTERED what side the pump was on if the filler was in the rear where it should be!!!!
f.ck gas fillers on the side, put it back on the REAR where it f.cking BELONGS!!!
But then I still am pissed that they moved the headlight dimmer switch to the turn signal stalk, instead of on the footrest where it belongs, also. Now your left foot has nothing to do usually (even if you have a manual tranny) and your hands are too busy steering to operate the dimmer switch, because the dimmer switch is in the WRONG place. -Dave
Jeff Strickland - 31 Mar 2008 19:38 GMT >> Suppose all fuel fillers were on the same side of the car -- my first >> choice is to put it on the right side (passenger side in the USA) -- all [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > tranny) and your hands are too busy steering to operate the dimmer switch, > because the dimmer switch is in the WRONG place. -Dave The filler can't be on the back because that exposes the gas tank to the impact of a rear end collision. They put the gas tank forward of the axle these days, and the filler neck on the back gets in the way of the trunk.
As for your foot getting bored and your hands overworked from the dimmer switch, get over it. Nearly everyone prefers the dimmer switch to be on the steering column. Think about it, as a practical matter how often are you turning and having to hit the dimmer at the same time? My hands have never ever been too busy to work the dimmer and the steering wheel at the same time. I can even hit the dimmer and the wipers (on different stalks on opposite sides of the wheel) and the steering wheel all at once. There is not a big demand for this ability because if the wipers are needed, odds are strong that high beams are a poor choice anyway.
Dave - 01 Apr 2008 00:30 GMT > As for your foot getting bored and your hands overworked from the dimmer > switch, get over it. Nearly everyone prefers the dimmer switch to be on the > steering column. That's because other than old geezers like me, almost nobody ever drove a car with a dimmer switch on the floor. If they tried it, most people would agree that it's a better system. But moving the switch to the steering column was one of many cost-cutting measures auto manufacturers have adopted. Newer isn't always better, but usually more profitable.
>Think about it, as a practical matter how often are you >turning and having to hit the dimmer at the same time? About every other time I round a curve at night to find traffic approaching from the opposite direction. But then I learned to drive when it was still emphasized that LOW beams should only be used when absolutely necessary to avoid blinding other drivers. These days most drivers NEVER use the high beams, being content to see most hazards about 10 seconds after they run over them at night. :) -Dave
Nate Nagel - 01 Apr 2008 00:01 GMT >>As for your foot getting bored and your hands overworked from the dimmer >>switch, get over it. Nearly everyone prefers the dimmer switch to be on [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > beams, being content to see most hazards about 10 seconds after they run > over them at night. :) -Dave I'm indifferent on the high beam issue - both methods are good when well implemented. What I hate is when you have both the dimmer switch and the little squeezy bulb for the windshield washers on the floor (remember those?) and your shuffling around trying to find the right thing to step on...
I *HATE* those "multifunction stalks." Turn signals on a stalk = good. High beams = acceptable. But when you cram cruise control, wiper controls, and sometimes even headlight controls onto the same stalk with the two aforementioned functions, you end up with a flaming bag of crap. My mom had a Renault once where you honked the horn by pressing the end of the turn signal stalk. Three guesses what I thought of that ergonomic abortion, first two don't count.
I do like the seperate stalk on the passenger side of the column for the windshield wipers. There's something to be said about putting them in a standard location, which hadn't been previously done since the days when you had a rotary knob in the exact center of the dash to control the vacuum motor.
I think the most ergonomically wonderful car I've ever had was a Porsche 914. The turn signal lever was METAL and it was a joy to signal lane changes, it felt so nice and precise. One could almost imagine Porsche buying the switches from Swiss watchmakers who were hand crafting them in their spare time. Compare and contrast with the stalk on my Ford pickup which feels like you could break it off with any r Unfortunately my 914 was built a year or two before the introduced the column mounted wiper switch, but at least Porsche bothered to use little colored knob inserts for all the switches which lit up with the marker lights.
nate
 Signature replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel
Dave - 01 Apr 2008 12:56 GMT > I *HATE* those "multifunction stalks." Turn signals on a stalk = good. > High beams = acceptable. But when you cram cruise control, wiper > controls, and sometimes even headlight controls onto the same stalk with > the two aforementioned functions, you end up with a flaming bag of crap. gotta agree with you there
Scott in SoCal - 01 Apr 2008 14:25 GMT >I *HATE* those "multifunction stalks." Turn signals on a stalk = good. > High beams = acceptable. But when you cram cruise control, wiper >controls, and sometimes even headlight controls onto the same stalk with >the two aforementioned functions, you end up with a flaming bag of crap. LOL!! You'd hate mine. Cruise control, main lighting, and auxiliary lighting all on one stalk. I've had this car for three years and I still haven't figured it all out! :)
 Signature "Dave's not here, man!" - Tommy Chong
Harry K - 01 Apr 2008 16:30 GMT > >I *HATE* those "multifunction stalks." Turn signals on a stalk = good. > > High beams = acceptable. But when you cram cruise control, wiper [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > "Dave's not here, man!" > - Tommy Chong I don't have the 'multi stalk' as the cc is on the steerig wheel. But the Ford 500 took a big leap backwards on their headlight dimmer switch on the wiper stalk. Used to be to dim you just flicked your finger at the stalk. On this one you have pull 'up' on the stalk and then hold it for a short bit.
Harry K
Jeff Strickland - 01 Apr 2008 00:20 GMT >> As for your foot getting bored and your hands overworked from the dimmer >> switch, get over it. Nearly everyone prefers the dimmer switch to be on [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > column was one of many cost-cutting measures auto manufacturers have > adopted. Newer isn't always better, but usually more profitable. I'm an old geezer like you, and taking the dimmer switch off of the floor is one of the better improvements to the automobile.
>>Think about it, as a practical matter how often are you >>turning and having to hit the dimmer at the same time? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > beams, being content to see most hazards about 10 seconds after they run > over them at night. :) -Dave Technically, Low Beams should be used always, unless Hig Beams are actually necessary. Low Beams are preferred, and the emphasis is that High Beams should only be used when there is no oncoming traffic. You have the usage patterns reversed.
Scott in SoCal - 01 Apr 2008 14:28 GMT >> As for your foot getting bored and your hands overworked from the dimmer >> switch, get over it. Nearly everyone prefers the dimmer switch to be on [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >car with a dimmer switch on the floor. If they tried it, most people would >agree that it's a better system. I've owned plenty of cars with foot dimmer switches. I've even owned a car with a windshield wiper switch on the floor. The big problem with putting a switch down there is that they RUST and eventually fail.
 Signature "Dave's not here, man!" - Tommy Chong
Harry K - 01 Apr 2008 16:33 GMT > >> As for your foot getting bored and your hands overworked from the dimmer > >> switch, get over it. Nearly everyone prefers the dimmer switch to be on [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > "Dave's not here, man!" > - Tommy Chong Never had that problem. Drove several very old cars in HS. 1937 chev in 1953. 1938 chev in 1954, etc. These were cars that were salvaged just before the tow truck was due to take em to the dump.
Harry K
Bobby Knight - 31 Mar 2008 20:30 GMT >But then I still am pissed that they moved the headlight dimmer switch to >the turn signal stalk, instead of on the footrest where it belongs, also. >Now your left foot has nothing to do usually (even if you have a manual >tranny) and your hands are too busy steering to operate the dimmer switch, >because the dimmer switch is in the WRONG place. -Dave You probably miss the crank starter too. :-)
DanKMTB@gmail.com - 31 Mar 2008 23:44 GMT > >But then I still am pissed that they moved the headlight dimmer switch to > >the turn signal stalk, instead of on the footrest where it belongs, also. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > You probably miss the crank starter too. :-) I've only driven one vehicle with the floor mounted dimmer switch, but I liked it. I don't expect it to come back though. As far as the hand crank goes, I am currently reading a book that takes place in the hand crank era. The first time they mentioned the guy putting the lady in the drivers seat I'm thinking: "Let her drive? His car! On the first date?!" Then they got to the part about him going to the front to crank it and I got to thinking... that's pretty cool. I wouldn't mind a car with a hand crank. It'd be cool as heck. On sunny Sundays. As long as I had something more modern for when it was lousy out.
Studemania - 01 Apr 2008 01:45 GMT On Mar 31, 2:44 pm, "DanK...@gmail.com" <DanK...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >But then I still am pissed that they moved the headlight dimmer switch to > > >the turn signal stalk, instead of on the footrest where it belongs, also. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > sunny Sundays. As long as I had something more modern for when it was > lousy out. Set the hand throttle, the spark advance, the choke, the parking brake, prime the carb (maybe). Grab the crank and pull, then continue to run around resetting until it's idleing properly. (add a key for some of the newer old-ones.)
Harry K - 01 Apr 2008 16:37 GMT On Mar 31, 3:44 pm, "DanK...@gmail.com" <DanK...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >But then I still am pissed that they moved the headlight dimmer switch to > > >the turn signal stalk, instead of on the footrest where it belongs, also. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > sunny Sundays. As long as I had something more modern for when it was > lousy out. Don't forget the partr about fiddling with the 'tickler' to get a good spark.
Harry K
E. Barry Bruyea - 01 Apr 2008 23:14 GMT >> >But then I still am pissed that they moved the headlight dimmer switch to >> >the turn signal stalk, instead of on the footrest where it belongs, also. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >sunny Sundays. As long as I had something more modern for when it was >lousy out. I remember a couple of cars I had that had another button on the floor that allowed you to change stations on the radio with your foot. Avoided the need to either glance over at the radio or, in the case of some cars now, look down at the steering wheel to press that button. Everything new is not necessarily better.
Studemania - 06 Apr 2008 02:11 GMT > On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:44:52 -0700 (PDT), "DanK...@gmail.com" > [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > - Show quoted text - My '57 Lincoln radio: 1) Knob, 2) Push buttons, 3) Signal Seeker - City 4) Signal Seeker - country, 5) floor button connected to whichever of the Signan Seeekrs was last used.
Dave - 01 Apr 2008 00:32 GMT > You probably miss the crank starter too. :-) Nawwww... I've still got bruises from those damned things. -Dave
Studemania - 01 Apr 2008 01:41 GMT > > You probably miss the crank starter too. :-) > > Nawwww... I've still got bruises from those damned things. -Dave Don't wrap your thumb around the crank. (I gotta keep telling you damn kids.)
websurf1@cox.net - 04 Apr 2008 03:06 GMT > >But then I still am pissed that they moved the headlight dimmer switch to > >the turn signal stalk, instead of on the footrest where it belongs, also. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > You probably miss the crank starter too. :-) My folks had an Olds with an automatic radio tuner search button on the floor, near the headlight dimmer. It was no problem, except for once when Dad loaned the car to someone who couldn't figure out why the radio kept starting searches....
Floor dimmer switches are a problem if you have a clutch pedal and have to hit 2 things at the same time.
Harry K - 04 Apr 2008 03:28 GMT On Apr 3, 7:06 pm, websu...@cox.net wrote:
> > >But then I still am pissed that they moved the headlight dimmer switch to > > >the turn signal stalk, instead of on the footrest where it belongs, also. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Floor dimmer switches are a problem if you have a clutch pedal and > have to hit 2 things at the same time. Then there are the various placements of the starter. Back in the day of the floor starter switch there could be a problem if you needed to hit it and the gas pedal at teh same time.
Then Nash in ?48? put the starter switch _under_ the gas pedal. You had to floor the pedal to mash the switch.
Of cours then there was the stubborness of Ford keeping the switch on the left of steering wheel long past when everyone else had it on the right.
Harry K
Garth Almgren - 04 Apr 2008 04:06 GMT >>> But then I still am pissed that they moved the headlight dimmer switch to >>> the turn signal stalk, instead of on the footrest where it belongs, also. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Floor dimmer switches are a problem if you have a clutch pedal and > have to hit 2 things at the same time. On a related note, I noticed something interesting the last time I rode a commuter transit bus: Turn signals and hazard lights are all operated via good old fashioned heavy-duty foot switches.
The gas and brake pedals are under the right foot, and since buses are automatics the left foot is free to operate the 3 foot switches: Left, center for hazards, and right. They're arranged in a triangle shape, so the driver can rest their foot between the three, pivot on their heel slightly for left or right, or extend their ankle slightly for hazards.
It also explained how the bus drivers around here are so quick with a couple "thank you" hazard blinks when you yield to them (as required by state law).
 Signature ~/Garth |"I believe that it is better to tell the truth than a lie. Almgren | I believe it is better to be free than to be a slave. ******* | And I believe it is better to know than to be ignorant." --H.L. Mencken (1880-1956)
Paul Hovnanian P.E. - 01 Apr 2008 01:31 GMT [snip]
> But then I still am pissed that they moved the headlight dimmer switch to > the turn signal stalk, instead of on the footrest where it belongs, also. > Now your left foot has nothing to do usually (even if you have a manual > tranny) and your hands are too busy steering to operate the dimmer switch, > because the dimmer switch is in the WRONG place. -Dave Blonde drivers get their foot caught in the steering wheel trying to dim the headlights.
 Signature Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ One World, One Web, One Program - Microsoft Promotional Ad Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer - Adolf Hitler
Nate Nagel - 01 Apr 2008 02:36 GMT >> Suppose all fuel fillers were on the same side of the car -- my first >> choice is to put it on the right side (passenger side in the USA) -- [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > manual tranny) and your hands are too busy steering to operate the > dimmer switch, because the dimmer switch is in the WRONG place. -Dave Forgot to mention in my last post but there's one *good* reason to mount it on the stalk - ice. If you ever lived in an area with real winter, and wore boots a lot, if the floor of your car got real slushed up, if you parked outside in the cold you might come back to find that you needed to let the heater warm the car up a bit before you could flip over to high beams.
Surprisingly, those switches did last longer than you'd expect, given all the water and salt to which they were regularly subjected. I've had a few go bad, but all on very old cars.
nate
 Signature replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel
Paul Hovnanian P.E. - 01 Apr 2008 01:26 GMT [snip]
> During busy times, all spots on the right sides of pumps would be filled > even while most spots on the left sides of pumps remained empty. Economics would take care of that. The gas on the left side would be cheaper. ;-)
 Signature Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ Do not interfere in the affairs of dragons, For you are crunchy and tasty with barbecue sauce.
DanKMTB@gmail.com - 01 Apr 2008 00:26 GMT > [snip] > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Do not interfere in the affairs of dragons, > For you are crunchy and tasty with barbecue sauce. If it split like that, the left wouldn't be able to buy any gas regardless of the price because they'd have given all their money away already.
Scott in SoCal - 01 Apr 2008 03:08 GMT >Suppose fuel tanks were always on the driver's side of the car. Drivers >would then have to park on the right side of an open pump in order to fill >their tanks. Gas caps should all be on the passenger's side.When it's on the driver's side, the gas pumps, along with little poles, big concrete planters, garbage cans, and all sorts of other sh.t, are naturally on the same side as the driver's door. This makes it tougher to park, because you now need to make sure that your door will open properly without hitting anything. If the fill pipe is on the right side of the car, you don't have to worry about it.
I remember the days when the fill pipe was behind the rear license plate. This symmetrical placement made it equally easy to fill from either side. Why don't they make cars like that anymore?
 Signature "Dave's not here, man!" - Tommy Chong
Dave - 01 Apr 2008 12:58 GMT .
> I remember the days when the fill pipe was behind the rear license > plate. This symmetrical placement made it equally easy to fill from > either side. Why don't they make cars like that anymore? > -- Exactly!!! At least someone agrees. :) -Dave
Harry K - 01 Apr 2008 16:41 GMT > On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:36:05 -0000, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > "Dave's not here, man!" > - Tommy Chong Don't forget about the ones hidden behind the tail light. Chrysler corp in the days of the big fins IIRC.
Harry K
Motorhead Lawyer - 01 Apr 2008 20:34 GMT > Don't forget about the ones hidden behind the tail light. Chrysler > corp in the days of the big fins IIRC. Actually, that was a typical GM trick. Think mid-'50s Chevys & Cadillacs. Mopars were either on the fender or dead center under the fold-down license plate. -- C.R. Krieger
Studemania - 01 Apr 2008 21:32 GMT > I remember the days when the fill pipe was behind the rear license > plate. This symmetrical placement made it equally easy to fill from > either side. Why don't they make cars like that anymore? > -- I drive one of those and it's hard to get a seal with the polution control gear the fillers of today have. I;ve poluted more from spilt fuel than wat gasses would have leaked w/o the seal.
Nate Nagel - 02 Apr 2008 03:32 GMT >>I remember the days when the fill pipe was behind the rear license >>plate. This symmetrical placement made it equally easy to fill from [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > control gear the fillers of today have. I;ve poluted more from spilt > fuel than wat gasses would have leaked w/o the seal. And if you forget to put the gas cap on, the filler is so low that it doesn't take much acceleration to slosh most of the gas out. You shoulda heard my dad trying hard not to cuss... (mid-70's, car was a '67 Cutlass)
nate
 Signature replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel
Jim Yanik - 02 Apr 2008 13:50 GMT >>>I remember the days when the fill pipe was behind the rear license >>>plate. This symmetrical placement made it equally easy to fill from >>>either side. Why don't they make cars like that anymore? Because when those cars got rear-ended,gasoline often poured out of the broken filler pipe,and fires started. also,today's cars put the gas tank AHEAD of the rear axle for better crash resistance.That would mean a longer and still vulnerable filler pipe.
 Signature Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net
>>>-- >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > nate Shawn Hirn - 02 Apr 2008 10:20 GMT > >Suppose fuel tanks were always on the driver's side of the car. Drivers > >would then have to park on the right side of an open pump in order to fill [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > without hitting anything. If the fill pipe is on the right side of the > car, you don't have to worry about it. I disagree. I have been driving for about 30 years and most of my cars have had the gas cap on the driver's side. I have never, not once, had a problem pulling up to get gas because of it. I prefer the gas filling cap on the driver's side for the simple reason that its easy for me to stick my head out the window to verify that the cap is closed. If it was on the passenger's side, I would not be able to verify it so easily.
Dave - 03 Apr 2008 09:40 GMT > I disagree. I have been driving for about 30 years and most of my cars > have had the gas cap on the driver's side. I have never, not once, had a > problem pulling up to get gas because of it. I prefer the gas filling > cap on the driver's side for the simple reason that its easy for me to > stick my head out the window to verify that the cap is closed. If it was > on the passenger's side, I would not be able to verify it so easily. Every car I've driven, if you move your head over a little, you can see the fuel door in the outside mirror. You might not be able to see it real clearly, but good enough to tell whether it's open or closed at least. :) -Dave
|
|
|