Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

When rivers make confusing boundaries

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Carl Rogers - 24 May 2008 07:52 GMT
Hi Viatologists and Geography Aficionados,

It's a natural occurrenct that land shifts and rivers divert.  When state
borders are defined on geographic points of interest, it presents a gamble
that mother nature remains complacent.  If mother nature takes it course and
"shifts" the point of interest, the two states can either:

(a)  Move their common border to meet the the point's new location.
(b)  Keep the original border intact.

If you look at the Texas-New Mexico border from a 10,000' perspective, you'd
swear the western border were the Rio Grande.  In some areas however, it's
not.

In the 19th century, Texas and the New Mexico territory defined the western
border on the aforementioned river.  Problem was, the river westerly
diverted in the 20th century.  What did NM and TX do about?  Nothing
actually.  The historic border was kept intact.  Don't be surprised if you
notice that a racetrack to the east of the Rio Grande and belonging to New
Mexico.  Also take notice that the Country Club neighbourhood of El Paso
lies west of "el rio".

So the next time you look at a political map of TX and NM, be assured that
the squiggly land border is not a product of overly serious
errymandering  -- it's essentially the preservation of a 19th century
agreement!

Cheers,

Carl Rogers
"Adding human experience to transportology"
********
Worldwide Transportation Library (WWTL):
http://wwtl.info
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Complete coverage of international roads and railways.
Since 2000, we offer several photographs, videos and
Virtual 360 demonstrations -- free of charge.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
********
John A. Weeks III - 24 May 2008 12:47 GMT
> So the next time you look at a political map of TX and NM, be assured that
> the squiggly land border is not a product of overly serious
> errymandering  -- it's essentially the preservation of a 19th century
> agreement!

The poster child for this type of thing is the lower Mississippi
River.  Pull out your trusty Rand McNally road atlas, and check
the path taken by the river compared to various state lines.  There
are sections where the river has moved and left parts of states on
the wrong side of the river.

Heading south, there is a section of Missouri on the east side of
the river by Ste Geneviere, and the old city of Kaskaskia, Illinois
on the west side of the river.  A cut off loop left a part of
Missouri on the east side of the river near Grand Tower.  This
happens twice in Kentucky, and then occurs on a regular basis
starting in Tennessee.  There is a double loop like this south
of Helena where two adjacent loops were cut off, leaving a
piece of Arkansas on the east side of the river, and a piece
of Mississippi on the west side of the river.

This geographical oddity becomes very dramatic near the city
of Greenville, Mississippi.  Greenville was once a river town,
but a change in the river path left its riverfront area miles
from the great river.  Former bast sweeping loops in the river
has left the state lines looking like a jigsaw puzzle, while
both the old and new river bridges sit entirely within the
state of Arkansas (both the west and east ends of the bridge
are in Arkansas).

Vicksburg has a similar issue where the river changed course
and left the waterfront dry.  The city solved this problem by
rerouting the Yazoo River to flow past the downtown.  Tourists
often mistake the small Yazoo River for the mighty Mississippi,
which is over a mile from the historic river landing at Vicksburg.

The river bridges at Natchez cross between Louisiana and
Mississippi, but due to a cut-off loop, US-84 ends up running
parallel to the state line for 8 miles as it heads west away
from the river and the river bridge.

The cut-off loops become a moot point once the river leaves
Mississippi, and runs fully within Louisiana.

The Missouri River also has a few such geographical oddities.
Heading north out of KC, we find that the St. Joseph airport
is on a cut-off loop, and despite being a mile west of the
river, it is fully within the state of Missouri.  In another
case, the city of Carter Lake, Iowa, is on the west side
of the Missouri River, and is located between Omaha and the
Omaha Airport, both of which are in Nebraska and on the west
side of the river.

-john-

Signature

======================================================================
John A. Weeks III           612-720-2854            john@johnweeks.com
Newave Communications                         http://www.johnweeks.com 
======================================================================

KML0224@gmail.com - 24 May 2008 13:19 GMT
Does anything like this happen in the northeast? The longest river or
water state line I know of is the Connecticut River forming most of
the border between Vermont and New Hampshire. I often head north to
Brattleboro, VT and take Exit 3 from I-91 for US Route 5/VT Route 9
East. When walking over into Chesterfield, NH (the state line is only
1/3 mile east from the rotary on US Route 5), the state line sign is
clearly on the west side of the bridge. That's because NH claims much
of the Connecticut River as their territory. It's also why 90% of the
bridge carrying Route 9 over the river was paid for by them, with
Vermont paying for the west landing and the road reshaping on their
side (VT Route 9 passes under a railroad bridge between the rotary and
the bridge).

If it works, this picture was taken from the center of the Connecticut
River bridge. I'm looking south with NH on the left and VT on the
right: http://s2.photobucket.com/albums/y32/KML0224/?action=view&current=KML-PICS068.jpg
Oscar Voss - 24 May 2008 13:31 GMT
> Does anything like this happen in the northeast? The longest river or
> water state line I know of is the Connecticut River forming most of
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> side (VT Route 9 passes under a railroad bridge between the rotary and
> the bridge).

In the East, boundaries running on one side or the other of a river rather
than right down the middle are sometimes the result of colonial land grants.
For example, the Potomac River boundary between Maryland and DC on the one
hand, and Virginia and West Virginia on the other, runs along the west bank
of the Potomac.  Indeed, D.C. includes some land on the Virginia side of the
main Potomac channel, so the George Washington Parkway passes briefly from
Virginia to DC before returning to Virginia.  All because the colonial land
grant establishing Maryland gave the river to Maryland.

--
Oscar Voss - oscar.voss@comcast.net - Arlington VA

my Hot Springs and Highways pages:  http://home.comcast.net/~oscar.voss/
Hawaii Highways:  http://www.hawaiihighways.com/
Steve A. - 24 May 2008 14:26 GMT
On May 24, 8:19 am, KML0...@gmail.com wrote:
> Does anything like this happen in the northeast?

Two examples, actually.  I thought I had a third one, maybe it will
come back to me.

#1: Harlem River, north side of Manhattan: A former bend in the
"river" is now straight, leaving a neighborhood of Manhattan north of
the river, surrounded by the Bronx, just off of US 9/Broadway.
#2: Delaware River, southern New Jersey: Two pieces of land, one much
bigger than the other, belong to Delaware but can only be walked to
from NJ.  This is made possible because Delaware owns the entire river
up to the historic shore of NJ.
Oscar Voss - 24 May 2008 15:07 GMT
> On May 24, 8:19 am, KML0...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Does anything like this happen in the northeast?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> "river" is now straight, leaving a neighborhood of Manhattan north of
> the river, surrounded by the Bronx, just off of US 9/Broadway.

That sounds like an example of the general default rule in these matters,
that a sudden "avulsive" change of a river's course doesn't change the
boundary, while gradual changes by "accretion" (such as a river eroding one
bank and building up the other) do move the boundary to follow the river's
new course.

Of course, this general rule can be overridden in specific instances.

--
Oscar Voss - oscar.voss@comcast.net - Arlington VA

my Hot Springs and Highways pages:  http://home.comcast.net/~oscar.voss/
Hawaii Highways:  http://www.hawaiihighways.com/
PatOConnell - 24 May 2008 16:34 GMT
>> On May 24, 8:19 am, KML0...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Does anything like this happen in the northeast?
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Of course, this general rule can be overridden in specific instances.

The Indiana-Kentucky border on the Ohio River is fixed at the north
shore of the river as surveyed many years ago, and the river has moved
in several places since the boundary was set. The biggest piece of KY
that's north of the river is just south of Evansville IN. It's big
enough that a good sized horse racing track (with betting) is on that
land. Indiana doesn't allow betting on the horses, so that track gets a
lot of traffic from the southwestern Indiana. See:

http://bbs.keyhole.com/ubb/download.php?Number=675547

Pat
Master_Shake - 25 May 2008 15:15 GMT
> The Indiana-Kentucky border on the Ohio River is fixed at the north
> shore of the river as surveyed many years ago,

As is the Kentucky / Illinois border

There are many stories of Illinoisans fishing from the Illinois banks
of the Ohio river, only to have Kentucky Conservation police come up
on a boat and give them tickets for not having a Kentucky fishing
license.
PatOConnell - 25 May 2008 17:05 GMT
>> The Indiana-Kentucky border on the Ohio River is fixed at the north
>> shore of the river as surveyed many years ago,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> on a boat and give them tickets for not having a Kentucky fishing
> license.

IIRC you have to have a Kentucky fishing license if you fish in the
Ohio, even if you're sitting on the Illinois or Indiana (and maybe Ohio)
shore, simply because the water is all in Kentucky. However, It's been a
long time (23 years) since I've been an Indiana resident, and the rules
may have changed.
Michael Moroney - 24 May 2008 14:30 GMT
>Does anything like this happen in the northeast? The longest river or
>water state line I know of is the Connecticut River forming most of
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>side (VT Route 9 passes under a railroad bridge between the rotary and
>the bridge).

When the NH/VT state line was defined, it was defined as the west shore of
the river (along the low water mark, I believe), not the center of the
river like most river boundaries.  There have been some small shifts since
then, leaving a few small pieces of NH on the west shore, and the border
in the middle of the river, but nothing like what the Mississippi River
does south of Tennessee.

One of the sillier river boundary definitions happened in the 1930s when
they created the Quabbin Reservoir in western Mass.  4 towns being flooded
were eliminated, with their land area tacked onto adjacent towns.  They
redefined the town boundaries along the rivers being flooded, faithfully
following all the squiggles.  Then they completed the dams, flooding the
rivers, so they and all their squiggles are long gone, except as town
boundaries in the middle of the reservoir and on maps.  (They also shifted
county lines to follow the new town lines)
Michael G. Koerner - 24 May 2008 17:19 GMT
> Does anything like this happen in the northeast? The longest river or
> water state line I know of is the Connecticut River forming most of
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> River bridge. I'm looking south with NH on the left and VT on the
> right: http://s2.photobucket.com/albums/y32/KML0224/?action=view&current=KML-PICS068.jpg

IIRC, that chemical plant on the east side of the Delaware River at I-295
(Delaware Memorial Bridge) is in Delaware.

Signature

___________________________________________  ____              _______________
Regards,                                    |    |\    ____
                                            |    | |  |    |\
Michael G. Koerner               May they   |    | |  |    | |   rise again!
Appleton, Wisconsin USA                     |    | |  |    | |
___________________________________________ |    | |  |    | | _______________

Steve A. - 24 May 2008 19:40 GMT
> KML0...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Does anything like this happen in the northeast? The longest river or
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> IIRC, that chemical plant on the east side of the Delaware River at I-295
> (Delaware Memorial Bridge) is in Delaware.

I don't recall there being any actual Delaware development in those
landlocked regions.  The larger one is off Fort Mott, which is either
a NJ or national park, and there is no access to it (by road,
anyway).  The smaller one is definitely too small and isolated to have
anything on it.
Yakra - 25 May 2008 19:36 GMT
On May 24, 8:19 am, KML0...@gmail.com wrote:
> Does anything like this happen in the northeast? The longest river or
> water state line I know of is the Connecticut River forming most of
> the border between Vermont and New Hampshire.

A few examples I found from NH/VT @ the CT River:
http://maps.google.com/?ll=44.686123,-71.597364&spn=0.009901,0.020084
http://maps.google.com/?ll=44.626626,-71.551638&spn=0.009911,0.020084
http://maps.google.com/?ll=44.594516,-71.550264&spn=0.009917,0.020084
http://maps.google.com/?ll=44.580075,-71.547647&spn=0.009919,0.020084
http://maps.google.com/?ll=44.502122,-71.585562&spn=0.009932,0.020084
http://maps.google.com/?ll=44.48031,-71.634464&spn=0.009936,0.020084
http://maps.google.com/?ll=44.320194,-72.03053&spn=0.019927,0.040169
http://maps.google.com/?ll=44.012077,-72.096748&spn=0.020031,0.040169
http://maps.google.com/?ll=43.524157,-72.396684&spn=0.010098,0.020084

...and a couple more to the north that are less obvious, before I
started taking down the URLs.
While there are a few examples, there don't seem to be as many and as
dramatic examples as to be found in the more southern & western areas
of the US.
Rich Piehl - 24 May 2008 14:38 GMT
>> So the next time you look at a political map of TX and NM, be assured that
>> the squiggly land border is not a product of overly serious
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>
> -john-

During the Flood of 93 there was much concern about this type of thing,
both for state lines and for county lines.  North of St. Louis there was
a concern that the Missouri River would carve a new path through St.
Charles County and connect to the Mississippi 20 miles upstream, cutting
off the eastern 1/3 of St. Charles County.  There was also a possibility
that the southern 1/2 of Calhoun County, IL would get cut off, or end up
connected to Missouri much like Kaskaskia is.  Or, worse, just become
part of the river bed.

Take care,
Rich

God bless the USA

Signature

Pat Paulsen (1927-1997) for President - 2008

Even though he's dead it makes about much sense
to vote for him as it does for the choices
that we have who are living.  At least he's not
going change his position on anything.

DandyDan - 25 May 2008 12:02 GMT
> In article <9XOZj.286$89...@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
> Newave Communications � � � � � � � � � � � �http://www.johnweeks.com
> ======================================================================

There are a couple other places in the Missouri River where Nebraska
is on the wrong side of the river.  There is the DeSoto Wildlife
Refuge between Blair, NE and Missouri Valley, IA and there is
McKissick Island (which isn't currently an island), near the NE/IA/MO
intersection just south of Hamburg, Iowa.  I believe there has been
more than one lawsuit that ended up in the Supreme Court over that
piece of land.  McKissick Island is always shown as Nebraska's on
Nebraska maps and Missouri's on Missouri maps.

Then there is the story of the construction of the Iowa 175/Nebraska
51 toll bridge near Decatur, NE, in which the river changed course
while it was being built.  Jeff Morrison's highway ends website has
the story about that.
KML0224@gmail.com - 25 May 2008 13:07 GMT
It turns out that there's a tiny triangle of land on the east side of
the Connecticut River which belongs to Wethersfield, bounded by East
Hartford on the north and Glastonbury on the south. There are no roads
shown on the map in this "triangle". CT 3 (Putnam Bridge) is
immediately south of it, while I-91 and Wethersfield Cove are
immediately west of it.
richard - 24 May 2008 14:33 GMT
>Hi Viatologists and Geography Aficionados,
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>Cheers,

One of the big concerns in this are has been the Ohio River.
The state of {commonwealth actually) has always claimed the Ohio River
as belonging to them. To within 10 feet of the high water mark on the
opposite shore. That was fine until dams were installed and the high
water mark rose along with it. Causing the other states to lose real
estate.

So in the cases of flooding, and say the water protrudes 200 feet into
Ohio, does mean then that the state of Kentucky is responsible for
cleanup?

Then recently, the state of Georgia is trying to claim that the
original surveyors got the line wrong for dividing Tennessee.
Georgia claiming the line to be a mile north of where it actually is
so that Georgia can tap the resources of the Tennessee River.
Yakra - 25 May 2008 20:00 GMT
On May 24, 9:30 am, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
wrote:
> KML0...@gmail.com writes:
> >Does anything like this happen in the northeast? The longest river or
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> boundaries in the middle of the reservoir and on maps.  (They also shifted
> county lines to follow the new town lines)

A similar things although I don't believe any town lines were
*changed* in the process -- the Remnants of the Flagstaff town line
can be seen winding their way thru Flagstaff Lake:
http://mapper.acme.com/?ll=45.21010,-70.36880&z=14&t=T
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.