Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / July 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

observations on left-lane rolling

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
not much of anyone - 19 Jul 2008 21:59 GMT
(heh - rolling - no, I don't mean rolling joints - I do that before I
leave home).

But seriously folks, I often find myself driving down I-25 which is 2
lanes (each way) where I usually drive and I often see "opportunities"
to enter the right lane.  Often I take those opportunities since I can
pass on the right and then again merge left.

But a lot of times, there really isn't room to merge without performing
crazy maneuvers to jump in front of someone else and I prefer not to do
that so I remain in line in the left lane.

Lots of folks do this and so you often have situations where you could
accelerate up to a half-mile in the right-hand lane, but then be stuck
waiting for a gap to pass.

In fact I did just that yesterday.

I was cruising in the left-hand lane a reasonable distance from the car
in front of me and saw space in the right-hand lane and tried to take
it.  I merged right and the cars in the left-hand lane accelerate enough
to make the gaps too narrow for me to risk - I could have taken the gaps
- I've seen others do so, but I don't treat interstate as racetracks and
my car is not equipped with all the safety devices that are required by
NASCAR.

So I give up and put on my signal to merge back left as I slow down to
let traffic speed up enough for me to safely merge back into the
left-hand lane.

The guy who used to be behind me (still in the left hand-lane) starts
speeding up.   In fact even after my signal is on and I've already
re-merged into the left lane, he continues to speed up until he is
within about 2 feet of my rear bumper.

After a couple of minutes, I guess he shot his wad and went back to
following at a reasonable distance.

So the subject says this is just an observation and the above is just an
observation, but WTF is up with you drivers who speed up just to try to
cut someone off?  And what the f.ck are you thinking when you're way
behind them and have no hope of cutting them off and even after they are
in your lane you continue to speed up and tailgate them?

You should lose our license - such behavior should be expected if we
allowed 5-year olds to drive.  Perhaps a maturity test to get a driver's
license should be in order.
Nate Nagel - 19 Jul 2008 22:59 GMT
> (heh - rolling - no, I don't mean rolling joints - I do that before I
> leave home).
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> allowed 5-year olds to drive.  Perhaps a maturity test to get a driver's
> license should be in order.

Please tell me that you're in a "drive left, pass right" country and not
in the US...

nate

Signature

replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

Alexander Rogge - 20 Jul 2008 00:22 GMT
> I was cruising in the left-hand lane a reasonable distance from the car
> in front of me and saw space in the right-hand lane and tried to take
> it.  I merged right and the cars in the left-hand lane accelerate enough
> to make the gaps too narrow for me to risk

Why weren't you passing the car that was in front of you, instead of
worrying about the drivers who were behind you?  The only gap that you
should have been merging into was in front of the car that was in front
of you.  If you were attempting to pass several cars and the traffic in
the passing lane was going faster than you wanted to drive, you should
not have entered the passing lane.

> So I give up and put on my signal to merge back left as I slow down to
> let traffic speed up enough for me to safely merge back into the
> left-hand lane.

You should have continued passing.  Maybe the other drivers behind you
were also trying to pass.

> The guy who used to be behind me (still in the left hand-lane) starts
> speeding up.   In fact even after my signal is on and I've already
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> observation, but WTF is up with you drivers who speed up just to try to
> cut someone off?

Tailgating instead of passing is not cutting someone off.  It indicates
that the driver is incompetent and needs to play Duckling.

What you were doing was improper passing, which caused confusion with
the drivers behind you.  I will sometimes follow the car in front of me
to pass, because I'm entering the same gap in the passing lane.  If you
try to cancel your pass after I've started accelerating, I will also be
forced to brake to avoid hitting you as you return to the outermost
lane.  Then I can't use the gap anymore because I've stopped
accelerating, and I need to wait for another gap in the traffic.  The
drivers in the passing lane have right-of-way.  You must continue
accelerating once you have started passing, and you must yield to faster
traffic in the passing lane.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS - 20 Jul 2008 04:42 GMT
As long as you're doing the speed limit you have a right and a moral
obligation to stay in the left lane. It forces the deadly and psychopathic
speeders to slow down and thereby saves lives.
necromancer - 21 Jul 2008 00:28 GMT
SFB spewed:

> As long

<< snip crap >>

> saves lives.

AAAAAAAAAAAA... Shaddap! You suck, luzer!

--
S tupid
A ssed
D ipshit
D oesn't
A mount to
M uch
gpsman - 20 Jul 2008 05:06 GMT
> I often find myself driving down I-25 which is 2
> lanes (each way) where I usually drive and I often see "opportunities"
> to enter the right lane.  Often I take those opportunities since I can
> pass on the right and then again merge left.

Why?

> But a lot of times, there really isn't room to merge without performing
> crazy maneuvers to jump in front of someone else and I prefer not to do
> that so I remain in line in the left lane.

That sounds like a good idea.

> Lots of folks do this and so you often have situations where you could
> accelerate up to a half-mile in the right-hand lane, but then be stuck
> waiting for a gap to pass.
>
> In fact I did just that yesterday.

Why?  50mph faster for a whole mile = a few seconds (24 using 65 and
115mph), all of which you begin to lose if you have to stop at the end
of the exit.

> I was cruising in the left-hand lane a reasonable distance from the car
> in front of me and saw space in the right-hand lane and tried to take
> it.

Yer from California, aren't you?

You "saw a space"... so you took it...?

Why do I have the feeling this is going to lead to a "problem"?

> I merged right and the cars in the left-hand lane accelerate enough
> to make the gaps too narrow for me to risk - I could have taken the gaps
> - I've seen others do so, but I don't treat interstate as racetracks

Aren't you trying to pass... on the R... for no other reason than to
"get ahead"?

> So I give up and put on my signal to merge back left as I slow down to
> let traffic speed up enough for me to safely merge back into the
> left-hand lane.

Good luck with that.

> The guy who used to be behind me (still in the left hand-lane) starts
> speeding up.   In fact even after my signal is on and I've already
> re-merged into the left lane, he continues to speed up until he is
> within about 2 feet of my rear bumper.

He's like you, measures his trips in car-lengths.

> After a couple of minutes, I guess he shot his wad and went back to
> following at a reasonable distance.

They usually do.

> So the subject says this is just an observation and the above is just an
> observation, but WTF is up with you drivers who speed up just to try to
> cut someone off?

To be fair, you don't know why he increased velocity.  Most likely, he
measures his trips in car-lengths.

You, got out of line, obviously mistakenly, because you didn't look
far enough ahead to insure the maneuver was of benefit.  Your former
space now belongs to the driver to your rear.

He's possibly thinking, as I so often do, "Where in the f.ck do you
think you're going", can you not see it's NOWHERE"?!

But, if I had been behind you, I wouldn't have closed the gap, because
I don't measure my trips in car-lengths.

> And what the f.ck are you thinking when you're way
> behind them and have no hope of cutting them off and even after they are
> in your lane you continue to speed up and tailgate them?

Obviously, that's just stupid.

> You should lose our license - such behavior should be expected if we
> allowed 5-year olds to drive.  Perhaps a maturity test to get a driver's
> license should be in order.

Perhaps.  But you are not as good a driver as you think you are.  You
do not look far enough ahead, by a long shot.

It's easy and tempting to point out the driving errors of others, a
little tougher to concentrate on your own.
-----

- gpsman
not much of anyone - 20 Jul 2008 23:20 GMT
> You, got out of line, obviously mistakenly, because you didn't look
> far enough ahead to insure the maneuver was of benefit.  Your former
> space now belongs to the driver to your rear.

What a f.cking moron you are.

Sorry but I don't drive an SUV so it's hard to see too far ahead.

I move right - I could pass and dangerously swerve in front of the car
ahead of me, but I don't because I'm not that stupid.

So I move back to the left lane.  Meanwhile - the idiot (just like you)
who was a quarter mile behind me starts to speed up until he's riding my
a.s.

Just get the f.ck off the road.  You're obviously too stupid to drive.

it shouldn't be a f.cking line.  Slower traffic SHOULD keep right.  It's
the law, a.shole.
gpsman - 21 Jul 2008 07:12 GMT
> > You, got out of line, obviously mistakenly, because you didn't look
> > far enough ahead to insure the maneuver was of benefit.  Your former
> > space now belongs to the driver to your rear.
>
> What a f.cking moron you are.

Thanks for the reminder.

> Sorry but I don't drive an SUV so it's hard to see too far ahead.

Have you tried... looking...?

> I move right - I could pass and dangerously swerve in front of the car
> ahead of me, but I don't because I'm not that stupid.

Eh... I'll give you that.

You're not among the worst of drivers, just about average.

You didn't report a "move right", as if you were making way for faster
traffic to your rear.  You reported- "<I> saw space in the right-hand
lane and tried to take it."

That was preceded by- "I often see "opportunities" to enter the right
lane.  Often I take those opportunities since I can pass on the right
and then again merge left."

Let us assume you changed lanes to pass, and traffic was of a density
that rendered any advantage of passing effectively moot.

You can see that f.cking far ahead, can't you?

> So I move back to the left lane.  Meanwhile - the idiot (just like you)
> who was a quarter mile behind me starts to speed up until he's riding my
> a.s.

Yeah, I got that part.  You seem to have missed the point of my reply.

> Just get the f.ck off the road.  You're obviously too stupid to drive.

Yes, of course.

> it shouldn't be a f.cking line.

Then why were you in it?

And what does it matter what "should be" at any particular moment?
You are dealing with what "is".

> Slower traffic SHOULD keep right.  It's
> the law, a.shole.

You now imply you were intending to go slower... and, for some reason,
found the R lane unacceptable for that maneuver?!

Obviously you are injecting something other than logic into your
argument... for some reason.
-----

- gpsman
not much of anyone - 26 Jul 2008 07:26 GMT
>>>You, got out of line, obviously mistakenly, because you didn't look
>>>far enough ahead to insure the maneuver was of benefit.  Your former
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Thanks for the reminder.

If only other drivers accepted the reminder so kindly.

>>Sorry but I don't drive an SUV so it's hard to see too far ahead.
>
> Have you tried... looking...?

Well, yes - I look - I see a big-assed SUV in front of me.  I move a
little left onto the shoulder and often see a half-mile of empty road in
front of him.

Sometimes I move a little right and see that despite a half-mile of cars
in the left-hand lane, there is a mile of empty space in the right.

>>I move right - I could pass and dangerously swerve in front of the car
>>ahead of me, but I don't because I'm not that stupid.
>
> Eh... I'll give you that.

Thanks - if I took every space that I might be able to, I'd probably
succeed 98% of the time - it's that other 2% of the time that I don't
want to deal with.

> You're not among the worst of drivers, just about average.
>
> You didn't report a "move right", as if you were making way for faster
> traffic to your rear.  You reported- "<I> saw space in the right-hand
> lane and tried to take it."

Yes, that's true...I "moved right" not because someone was riding my
a.s, but because I saw a herd of sheep in the left lane and fewer in the
right.

I think more people should try it.

> That was preceded by- "I often see "opportunities" to enter the right
> lane.  Often I take those opportunities since I can pass on the right
> and then again merge left."
>
> Let us assume you changed lanes to pass, and traffic was of a density
> that rendered any advantage of passing effectively moot.

Okay - that is often the case.  Sometimes I end up at the light at my
exit in the exact same position among other cars as I was before - of
course other times I make the light and leave those people I was behind
waiting at the light, but for the sake of argument, let's assume the
advantage of passing was effectivly moot.

> You can see that f.cking far ahead, can't you?

How many miles ahead should I be able to see?  20?  That's about the
length of my daily commute.

>>So I move back to the left lane.  Meanwhile - the idiot (just like you)
>>who was a quarter mile behind me starts to speed up until he's riding my
>>a.s.
>
> Yeah, I got that part.  You seem to have missed the point of my reply.

And you seem to have missed the point of my post

>>Just get the f.ck off the road.  You're obviously too stupid to drive.
>
> Yes, of course.

Wow - a reasonable response - somehow I don't think you're serious.

>>it shouldn't be a f.cking line.
>
> Then why were you in it?

Perhaps that's why I got out of it?

There are only 2 lanes to play with - did I misunderstand your earlier
post?  I thought you were saying I should stay in line.

> And what does it matter what "should be" at any particular moment?
> You are dealing with what "is".

Ah - now here's something very interesting.   Am I mixing up posts or
didn't you say I should "plan" ahead better?

Planning is an interesting thing in traffic especially when you are
dealing with constantly changing conditions.  Some folks signal an exit,
but never do.  Other's never signal an exit but then they do.

So does clairvoyance factor into your planning ahead?

Planning ahead is always a part of the plan for me.  Approaching a
traffic light, do I get behind the 18-wheeler, the Corvette or the econobox?

Rarely is it that cut and dry, but don't count on the 'vette to be the
right choice, but you can count on the 18-wheeler being the wrong one.

>>Slower traffic SHOULD keep right.  It's
>>the law, a.shole.
>
> You now imply you were intending to go slower...

No, you inferred that.  I was actually intending on going faster - at
least the speed limit (probably a little over).  You obviously don't
have much experience on freeways or interstates.

> and, for some reason,
> found the R lane unacceptable for that maneuver?!

As is often the case (if you had any experience driving), you can often
go faster in the right lane because idiots like you are clogging the
passing lane.

> Obviously you are injecting something other than logic into your
> argument... for some reason.

Unfortunately, traffic does not always follow logic.  How long have you
been driving?

Where have you been driving?

>  -----
>
> - gpsman
Alexander Rogge - 27 Jul 2008 01:40 GMT
> Approaching a traffic light, do I get behind the 18-wheeler, the
> Corvette or the econobox?

Sometimes the other drivers waiting in line are so Slothly that the
truck driver accelerates faster.  The trailer moves at the same time,
while five cars are parked next to it, and you can cut in front of the
Sloths as the tractor leaves the intersection.
Harry K - 21 Jul 2008 19:25 GMT
> > You, got out of line, obviously mistakenly, because you didn't look
> > far enough ahead to insure the maneuver was of benefit.  Your former
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> it shouldn't be a f.cking line.  Slower traffic SHOULD keep right.  It's
> the law, a.shole.

So just why are you 'rolling' (cruising) in the left lane?  Your whole
series of posts sounds like you make a habit of parking out there in
the passing lane whenever possible.

Harry K
websurf1@cox.net - 28 Jul 2008 03:55 GMT
> (heh - rolling - no, I don't mean rolling joints - I do that before I
> leave home).
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> allowed 5-year olds to drive.  Perhaps a maturity test to get a driver's
> license should be in order.

If I understand your description accurately...
You were in a line of cars in the left lane that were lined up, in the
process of passing one or more cars in the right lane.
You decided to pass on the right to get ahead of some of the cars in
front of you, rather than taking your turn in getting past the slower
vehicle, which was, after all, in the right lane.
The folks in the left lane didn't like your taking cuts in line, so
they didn't want to let you in.

And you're surprised???

I see similar crap all the time.  People squeeze in front of me, for
example to get an exit, when there is a huge area behind me.  They
just have to pass one car, dammit.  Or when a street temporarily goes
to two lanes and then back to one lane, they'll goose it to get ahead
of traffic going the speed limit, thereby forcing everyone else to
slow down.  Just plain rude.

Tailgating that close was inexcusable, though.  It's a common way of
trying to aggravate a driver who ticked you off for some reason.
Drivers of expensive cars usually don't do it to drivers of old
beaters. It'd be a great time to have a releasable rear bumper....
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.