
Signature
Kevin Mouton
Automotive Technology Instructor
"If women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy"
Red Green
> These
> new Web Based GUIs are just another way of offering the news groups to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> is for, and some of the web based interfaces do a piss poor job of
> collecting and distributing the news groups.
Not only that, they lard up their own pages with (along with ads) HTML,
smilies, photos, and other detritus. We don't see it here, but they sure do
on their Web interface. It's inefficient and very hard to read, especially
when quoting is turned on.
The way Web interfaces display Usenet content has a tendency to make
posters omit quoting, which can make threads extremely difficult to follow
if a post goes missing, or your server's retention time is short.

Signature
TeGGeR®
Raymond J. Henry - 22 Jun 2006 06:14 GMT
>Not only that, they lard up their own pages with (along with ads) HTML,
>smilies, photos, and other detritus. We don't see it here, but they sure do
>on their Web interface. It's inefficient and very hard to read, especially
>when quoting is turned on.
Sounds kinda like Windows, huh? :P
Kevin <kmouton6@cox.net> wrote in article
<7Bjmg.57914$9c6.46535@dukeread11>...
> > Regardless of where you are reading this, I post my comments on the
> > rec.autos.tech newsgroup....ONLY.
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> > • talkaboutautos.com - www.trussvillemazda.com/partsstore;
> > http://www.alldatadiy.com/;
http://www.allautoequip.com/Mazda.htmlhttp://norasite.com/c/Mazda_MX-6_.php
> Google Groups is another, but plagiarism is not exactly what happens. You
> see, the Usenet is a PUBLIC use service and the posts to any news group can
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> groups. This is just another case of the internet being used for financial
> gain and in my mind goes in the same box as spamming and phishing.
What I find so onerous is the fact that any perceived attempt at
advertising here on rec.autos.tech is jumped upon by the self-appointed
'net cops, yet our thoughts, comments, ideas, suggestions, etc. are the
base for someone else making a profit from advertising.
I've got to believe that slipping a little ad into one's sig has much more
value than the exposure on the usenet.
Due to publishing contracts, I am not allowed to offer ANY automotive
advice under my own name. Others own my name in that context.
Were it not for that, I might consider developing a sig with a tag-line
message to take advantage of the many places my stuff seems to be
published.
"Call on us for all your "*****" needs in the Northeast...."
Pop - 23 Jun 2006 23:25 GMT
> Kevin <kmouton6@cox.net> wrote in article
> <7Bjmg.57914$9c6.46535@dukeread11>...
[quoted text clipped - 81 lines]
>
> "Call on us for all your "*****" needs in the Northeast...."
The ONLY way to keep your INFO from being used by ANYONE for ANY
purpose, is to NOT POST IT. It's elementary, rudimentary, and
not illegal to use any publicly available information in any way
one wishes to, the same as it's no indication that what YOU post
is actually YOURS and not gleaned from any other person's
education, experience, or properties, intellectual or otherwise,
regardless of your claims. You cannot even copyright or
trademark anything publicly and in a venue such as this and make
it stick that this was the source it was stolen from. It's just
like most spam: It's not illegal either.
What you want is a moderated, controlled, private forum to
post in. There are such things but they're not nearly as useful
as a group like this is.
Personally, any advice I give is actually meant to be (assuming
I'm accurate, and if I'm not, it's usually pointed out) dispersed
as widely as possible to the largest audience possible. I don't
post about my perpetual motion machine successes here because I
obviously don't want the world to know about them yet. But, I'll
post about the neat way I found to put my little finger over the
gizmo to make the whatsit do the other noisy thingies; that I
want the world to enjoy.
It's perception vs reality. Perception is often wrong, but
perception IS reality to the perceiver.
Pop
Pop