Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

PLAGIARIST LIST

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
* - 21 Jun 2006 23:05 GMT
Regardless of where you are reading this, I post my comments on the
rec.autos.tech newsgroup....ONLY.

I have discovered that autoforums.com and talkaboutautos.com are two of
what I suspect is many forums that are plagiarizing material from this
newsgroup.

I am curious if anybody else knows other forums that are doing the same.

I discovered the talkaboutautos connection in a poster's header.

These forums are selling advertising based on clicks, and they are using
newsgroup material to generate these clicks.

Perhaps, when we discover another plaigiarist, we could click onto their
advertisers and let them know where the content of the forum actually comes
from. The forum doesn't really have the support/traffic it appears to have.

I've never been into talkaboutautos.com before today, but I have been
posted there all along.

Let's build a list of plagiarists, and let their advertisers know what we
know.....

If we build the list here at rec.autos.tech, it will automatically play on
the plagiarist sites, so list them - and perhaps some of their key
advertisers - right here. They'll handle our distribution for us.

---------------------------------------------
PLAGIARIST LIST

• autoforums.com

• talkaboutautos.com - www.trussvillemazda.com/partsstore;
http://www.alldatadiy.com/;
http://www.allautoequip.com/Mazda.htmlhttp://norasite.com/c/Mazda_MX-6_.php
Kevin - 21 Jun 2006 23:18 GMT
> Regardless of where you are reading this, I post my comments on the
> rec.autos.tech newsgroup....ONLY.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> • talkaboutautos.com - www.trussvillemazda.com/partsstore;
> http://www.alldatadiy.com/;

http://www.allautoequip.com/Mazda.htmlhttp://norasite.com/c/Mazda_MX-6_.php

Google Groups is another, but plagiarism is not exactly what happens. You
see, the Usenet is a PUBLIC use service and the posts to any news group can
be carried by any number of news servers (even AOL). These new Web Based
GUIs are just another way of offering the news groups to the public. No
rights have been violated. I do agree that their use is a poor way to read
and post to UseNet, and  they are often used by clueless web surfers who
have no Idea of what a Use Net is or what it is for, and some of the web
based interfaces do a piss poor job of collecting and distributing the news
groups. This is just another case of the internet being used for financial
gain and in my mind goes in the same box as spamming and phishing.
Signature

Kevin Mouton
Automotive Technology Instructor
"If women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy"
Red Green

TeGGeR® - 21 Jun 2006 23:40 GMT
> These
> new Web Based GUIs are just another way of offering the news groups to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> is for, and some of the web based interfaces do a piss poor job of
> collecting and distributing the news groups.

Not only that, they lard up their own pages with (along with ads) HTML,
smilies, photos, and other detritus. We don't see it here, but they sure do
on their Web interface. It's inefficient and very hard to read, especially
when quoting is turned on.

The way Web interfaces display Usenet content has a tendency to make
posters omit quoting, which can make threads extremely difficult to follow
if a post goes missing, or your server's retention time is short.

Signature

TeGGeR®

Raymond J. Henry - 22 Jun 2006 06:14 GMT
>Not only that, they lard up their own pages with (along with ads) HTML,
>smilies, photos, and other detritus. We don't see it here, but they sure do
>on their Web interface. It's inefficient and very hard to read, especially
>when quoting is turned on.

Sounds kinda like Windows, huh? :P
* - 22 Jun 2006 14:44 GMT
Kevin <kmouton6@cox.net> wrote in article
<7Bjmg.57914$9c6.46535@dukeread11>...

> > Regardless of where you are reading this, I post my comments on the
> > rec.autos.tech newsgroup....ONLY.
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> > • talkaboutautos.com - www.trussvillemazda.com/partsstore;
> > http://www.alldatadiy.com/;

http://www.allautoequip.com/Mazda.htmlhttp://norasite.com/c/Mazda_MX-6_.php

> Google Groups is another, but plagiarism is not exactly what happens. You
> see, the Usenet is a PUBLIC use service and the posts to any news group can
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> groups. This is just another case of the internet being used for financial
> gain and in my mind goes in the same box as spamming and phishing.

What I find so onerous is the fact that any perceived attempt at
advertising here on rec.autos.tech is jumped upon by the self-appointed
'net cops, yet our thoughts, comments, ideas, suggestions, etc. are the
base for someone else making a profit from advertising.

I've got to believe that slipping a little ad into one's sig has much more
value than the exposure on the usenet.

Due to publishing contracts, I am not allowed to offer ANY automotive
advice under my own name. Others own my name in that context.

Were it not for that, I might consider developing a sig with a tag-line
message to take advantage of the many places my stuff seems to be
published.

"Call on us for all your "*****" needs in the Northeast...."
Pop - 23 Jun 2006 23:25 GMT
> Kevin <kmouton6@cox.net> wrote in article
> <7Bjmg.57914$9c6.46535@dukeread11>...
[quoted text clipped - 81 lines]
>
> "Call on us for all your "*****" needs in the Northeast...."

The ONLY way to keep your INFO from being used by ANYONE for ANY
purpose, is to NOT POST IT.  It's elementary, rudimentary, and
not illegal to use any publicly available information in any way
one wishes to, the same as it's no indication that what YOU post
is actually YOURS and not gleaned from any other person's
education, experience, or properties, intellectual or otherwise,
regardless of your claims.  You cannot even copyright or
trademark anything publicly and in a venue such as this and make
it stick that this was the source it was stolen from.  It's just
like most spam:  It's not illegal either.
  What you want is a moderated, controlled, private forum to
post in.  There are such things but they're not nearly as useful
as a group like this is.

Personally, any advice I give is actually meant to be (assuming
I'm accurate, and if I'm not, it's usually pointed out) dispersed
as widely as possible to the largest audience possible.  I don't
post about my perpetual motion machine successes here because I
obviously don't want the world to know about them yet.  But, I'll
post about the neat way I found to put my little finger over the
gizmo to make the whatsit do the other noisy thingies; that I
want the world to enjoy.

It's perception vs reality.  Perception is often wrong, but
perception IS reality to the perceiver.

Pop

Pop
Knifeblade_03 - 24 Jun 2006 16:47 GMT
Well said, Pop.

Signature

Knifeblade_03

http://www.automotiveforums.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.