Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

off-brand "K&N" reusuable filters

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Masospaghetti - 08 Sep 2006 15:54 GMT
Hey all--

Is there any appreciable difference in airflow or, more importantly,
filtering quality from actual K&N filters or the generic eBay cone filter?

Thanks
Pete C. - 08 Sep 2006 19:04 GMT
> Hey all--
>
> Is there any appreciable difference in airflow or, more importantly,
> filtering quality from actual K&N filters or the generic eBay cone filter?
>
> Thanks

Considering the risk of engine damage I certainly wouldn't risk using a
no-name filter to try to save what amounts to a piddly amount of money
vs. the cost of the car. Some folks say the K&N filters already
represent too much risk due to their lower filtration. Remember, if it
flows higher CFM / lower restriction and isn't physically larger then
it's most likely filtering a lot less.

Pete C.
John S. - 08 Sep 2006 19:09 GMT
> Hey all--
>
> Is there any appreciable difference in airflow or, more importantly,
> filtering quality from actual K&N filters or the generic eBay cone filter?
>
> Thanks

I would be a lot more concerned about filtration than airflow.
* - 08 Sep 2006 21:47 GMT
Masospaghetti <no@mail.gatech.edu> wrote in article
<eds06f$c27$1@news-int2.gatech.edu>...
> Hey all--
>
> Is there any appreciable difference in airflow or, more importantly,
> filtering quality from actual K&N filters or the generic eBay cone filter?
>
> Thanks

There isn't ANYTHING in this world that cannot be cheapened up a bit, made
a bit more shoddy, and sold at a lower price for a greater profit......

People who buy on price alone - expecting the products to be identical -
become the victims of this practice.
AZ Nomad - 08 Sep 2006 23:00 GMT
>Masospaghetti <no@mail.gatech.edu> wrote in article
><eds06f$c27$1@news-int2.gatech.edu>...
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
>> Thanks

>There isn't ANYTHING in this world that cannot be cheapened up a bit, made
>a bit more shoddy, and sold at a lower price for a greater profit......

>People who buy on price alone - expecting the products to be identical -
>become the victims of this practice.

Who buys on price alone except the govt.?

I can see somebody buying on price alone maybe twice in a row while they're
young and stupid, but who keeps that practice?  Somebody who thinks 25 cent
spark plugs are so wonderfull that it's reasonable to replace them weekly
and that getting stranded isn't any bother at all?  Somebody who is 40
years old and doing their first oil change?
HLS@nospam.nix - 08 Sep 2006 23:20 GMT
I wouldnt even fiddlefart around with K&N, much less buy some knockoff
crappo filter.
a9x5l - 14 Sep 2006 11:28 GMT
> Hey all--
>
> Is there any appreciable difference in airflow or, more importantly,
> filtering quality from actual K&N filters or the generic eBay cone filter?

I used generic brand filters a couple of years ago and after about a month
the filter media had started to fall apart, there were some rather large
holes in both of them. In this case it seems, you really do get what you
pay for.

Signature

a9x5l

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.