Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / September 2006
ethanol producers who use ethanol?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Mad Scientist Jr - 08 Sep 2006 17:44 GMT Who are some Ethanol or E85 producers (or farms / suppliers / etc along the chain) that use Ethanol instead of fossil fuels, to produce their products?
Kruse - 08 Sep 2006 18:09 GMT > Who are some Ethanol or E85 producers (or farms / suppliers / etc along > the chain) that use Ethanol instead of fossil fuels, to produce their > products? Not exactly sure of the answer that you want, but I think the day is coming (if we like it or not) where the percentage of corn and soybean products being added to our fuel is increasing. About 25 miles to the north of me the largest biodiesel plant in the U.S. is under construction and is due for completion in '07 or '08. So I guess after that, the area will have a larger percentage of biodiesel fuel use. As for if you are trying to start a pro or con argument on ethanol or biodiesel use, sorry, I'm not going to bite.
Harry - 08 Sep 2006 19:13 GMT I don't know if you travel, bur if you go to Brasil, ethanol is for sale at every gas station (as "Alcool"). About a quarter of cars I would say run on the stuff. They make it from sugar cane The engine is specially modified. No-one likes it but it's sold at a lower price than petrol (gas). You have to decoke the engine quite regularly and there's much less power. I think the compression ratio has to be considerably reduced. In Bolivia now, they sell compressed methane (at about 10 bars) at some gas stations in the cities. Now that sounds a dangerous business! Here in the UK you can buy "Autogas" at some gas stations (liquified petroleum gas/propane). Engines run very sweet on this and easier starting. The engine has to be modified but there's no power loss USA lags behind the rest of the world again.
> Who are some Ethanol or E85 producers (or farms / suppliers / etc along > the chain) that use Ethanol instead of fossil fuels, to produce their > products? HLS@nospam.nix - 08 Sep 2006 19:50 GMT > I don't know if you travel, bur if you go to Brasil, ethanol is for > sale at every gas station (as "Alcool"). About a quarter of cars I > would say run on the stuff. They make it from sugar cane > The engine is specially modified. No-one likes it but it's sold at a > lower price than petrol (gas). I was in Brasil a few weeks ago and had a long discussion with my taxi driver about the energy situation. He was quite positive on alcohol, and bought whatever was cheapest. (His Fiat could run on gasoline, alcohol, or propane.)
Apparently a lot of the new cars are flexfuel.
Joe Fischer - 08 Sep 2006 21:10 GMT >Who are some Ethanol or E85 producers (or farms / suppliers / etc along >the chain) that use Ethanol instead of fossil fuels, to produce their >products? Perhaps none use only ethanol at this time. but they may use the stalks, shucks, or other by products to supply heat to the stills.
But there is a better way, any waste heat at about 100C can be used for the heat for the still, and many Trillions of BTU of waste heat has just been wasted when it could have been use to run a still, or to distill bad water or salt water for drinking water, see the date on;
http://stinet.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=AD 0406634
I have proposed that power plant waste heat be used, but hopefully has already considered it and is using it.
Joe Fischer
Harry - 09 Sep 2006 18:44 GMT Many "Eastern block cities had district heating systems (ie for homes) run from rejected heat from the llocal power station. Very succesful. However in Summer no-one needs it, so the same means of dumping heat are needed as if the distrct heating weren't there. Grossly uneconomic and definately financially unviable. These systems now pose a massive problem as they run for miles and mile and are insulated with asbestos :-( It's going to cost a fortune to de-commission them and repairs are a nightmare and extremely hazardous for the workers
Lots of rejected and "waste" heat is low grade/temperature. Thinking of uses for it is very difficult.
> >Who are some Ethanol or E85 producers (or farms / suppliers / etc along > >the chain) that use Ethanol instead of fossil fuels, to produce their [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Joe Fischer * - 08 Sep 2006 21:44 GMT Mad Scientist Jr <usenet_daughter@yahoo.com> wrote in article <1157733848.658173.103060@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>...
> Who are some Ethanol or E85 producers (or farms / suppliers / etc along > the chain) that use Ethanol instead of fossil fuels, to produce their > products? I think the question should be about ethanol producers who use *ETHICS* to *market* their product......
.....discussing the *real* costs of ethanol production, and including them in the cost of ethanol......
.....discussing the Federal subsidies, and including them in the expenditures to produce ethanol.......
etc.
=?x-user-defined?Q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?Q?=BB?= - 09 Sep 2006 02:42 GMT > Who are some Ethanol or E85 producers (or farms / suppliers / etc along > the chain) that use Ethanol instead of fossil fuels, to produce their > products? None of them. Its inefficient. They don't use gasline either. They use diesel and biodiesel. Slow turning engines with a lot of torque. More btu/lb in diesel.
HLS@nospam.nix - 09 Sep 2006 23:09 GMT > Who are some Ethanol or E85 producers (or farms / suppliers / etc along > the chain) that use Ethanol instead of fossil fuels, to produce their > products? If you took the time to have a nice caipirinha out on Copacabana beach, and to enjoy the tanginhas, you would wonder why anyone would want to use alcohol for fuel, and why they would worry so much about what they were going to 'drive'.
You would understand why God did not put brains in the little head.
Harry - 10 Sep 2006 17:55 GMT If you drank that stuff you'd end up mad and/or blind in a very short time. Quite literally! :-)
> > Who are some Ethanol or E85 producers (or farms / suppliers / etc along > > the chain) that use Ethanol instead of fossil fuels, to produce their [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > You would understand why God did not put brains in the little head. * - 10 Sep 2006 22:45 GMT Harry <susan.armitage@virgin.net> wrote in article <1157907344.556792.108540@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>...
> If you drank that stuff you'd end up mad and/or blind in a very short > time. > Quite literally! :-) You are thinking of Methanol.....aka "wood alcohol."
Ethanol is grain alcohol...."Corn liquor" if you will.
Quite literally!:-)
I know some farm boys who used to tap the "squeezings" from the bottom of the silo.......
The Ghost In The Machine - 11 Sep 2006 00:00 GMT In sci.environment, * <nospam@this.addy.com> wrote on Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:45:26 -0500 <01c6d521$a2a1fd40$2390c3d8@race>:
> Harry <susan.armitage@virgin.net> wrote in article > <1157907344.556792.108540@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > I know some farm boys who used to tap the "squeezings" from the bottom of > the silo....... It might be worth noting that ethanol is also classified as a poison (AIUI). 0.5% blood level will most likely kill you. 0.05% will most likely impair you; hence the establishment of that level in various states of the Union for legal drunkenness while operating a motor vehicle. (Some use 0.05%, some 0.08% -- not sure if anyone uses 0.10% anymore. In some cases -- teens, mostly -- 0.01% is the limit.)
I don't know about the "squeezings" but suspect they were a mixture of things -- ethanol being a prime ingredient thereof. However, one cannot generate pure alcohol by distillation alone (the boiling point of the mixture is lower than water or alcohol), and in any event things like vodka and whiskey have additional ingredients, to give them flavor.
Non-drinkable ethanol is denatured with various things to give it an undesirable flavor. I don't know what they are offhand.
 Signature #191, ewill3@earthlink.net Windows Vista. Because it's time to refresh your hardware. Trust us.
HLS@nospam.nix - 11 Sep 2006 13:11 GMT "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in message news:u3fet3-
> I don't know about the "squeezings" but suspect they were > a mixture of things -- ethanol being a prime ingredient [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > give it an undesirable flavor. I don't know what they > are offhand. Too much ethanol and you will certainly feel punk. Drink enough and you can die. Water is poisonous by the same definition, when you take it to extremes.
I have been in a distillery in Bolivia, and you can take a sample right off the still and drink it - carefully. It contains no great quantities of any contaminants except about 5% water, which -as you have correctly posted - cannot be directly separated by common distillation. (But why would you want to do so?..Vodka normally contains 50-60% water.)
The Ghost In The Machine - 11 Sep 2006 16:00 GMT In sci.environment, <HLS@nospam.nix> <HLS@nospam.nix> wrote on Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:11:48 GMT <8ocNg.170$7I1.9@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>:
> "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in message > news:u3fet3- [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > why would you want to do so?..Vodka normally contains 50-60% > water.) The only reason I'd want to do so is for fuel value. Water doesn't burn. :-)
As for the 100-120 proof, I'm looking. I was under the impression they could go up to 180 (I could be wrong; I don't drink the stuff anyway :-)), but it appears that the most common variety is 100 proof. To be sure, Stoli brews it for flavor. :-)
 Signature #191, ewill3@earthlink.net Windows Vista. Because it's time to refresh your hardware. Trust us.
Steve W. - 11 Sep 2006 19:32 GMT > In sci.environment, <HLS@nospam.nix> > <HLS@nospam.nix> [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > the most common variety is 100 proof. To be sure, Stoli > brews it for flavor. :-) Go and find a store that still carries EverClear. It is 190 proof. NASTY unless mixed with something else. Just a sip will make your mouth feel like your sucking on a ball of cotton over an air nozzle..
Makes moonshine look like water. http://www.drinksmixer.com/desc494.html for some "interesting " drinks made with it.
 Signature Steve W. Near Cooperstown, New York
HLS@nospam.nix - 11 Sep 2006 19:45 GMT "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in message news:km9gt3-
> The only reason I'd want to do so is for fuel value. > Water doesn't burn. :-) [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > the most common variety is 100 proof. To be sure, Stoli > brews it for flavor. :-) Absolutely, you can go to 190 proof (about 95% ethanol). That is good for making liquer, essences, etc. Not too good to drink, as it will take your stomach lining apart.
Harry - 11 Sep 2006 18:53 GMT Bolivia.....Ha! In Bolivia they sell plastic jerry cans of 95% alcohol (intended for drinking). I seem to remeber it was about $2/litre. They're big on partying in Bolivia! Sensible people mix it with fruit juice. Some gringos try to drink it neat. It has a very bad effect! :-) *************************************
> "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in message > news:u3fet3- [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > why would you want to do so?..Vodka normally contains 50-60% > water.) ghostwriter - 11 Sep 2006 21:14 GMT > Who are some Ethanol or E85 producers (or farms / suppliers / etc along > the chain) that use Ethanol instead of fossil fuels, to produce their > products? I cant imagine that any ethanol producer doesnt use exclusivly ethanol in any and all trucks etc. they own. The choice would be convert the engine or pay for diesel at retail so that you sell the ethanol at wholesale. That might not apply to semi-trucks etc given the cost of converting a engine that size, I dont know.
The problem is that the industry is not intergrated at all and so the producer buys grain without any relationship to the farmer etc. It might be interesting to arrange a barter of X gallons of ethanol in exchange for X bushel of corn rather than have 6 people take a cut prior to the ethanol plant.
Actually what got me started in chemistry and ethanol was a local farm in my home town that built a distillery just large enough to supply his tractors and trucks. I was close friends with his nephew and so did a interview with him about the process when I was in high school.
The problem was that it was a family farm owned by his father (the nephew's grandfather) and when a offer of $100K (this was the 80's) came in for the farm, the grandfather sold it out from under his son. The system was dismantled soon after that point.
Ghostwriter
* - 12 Sep 2006 14:41 GMT ghostwriter <ghostwriter25@postmaster.co.uk> wrote in article <1158005653.053714.170020@q16g2000cwq.googlegroups.com>...
> > Who are some Ethanol or E85 producers (or farms / suppliers / etc along > > the chain) that use Ethanol instead of fossil fuels, to produce their [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > Ghostwriter If I owned a farm, and all I had to look forward to in the future is growing grain to produce ethanol, I believe I, too, would sell out in a heartbeat.
Scott Dorsey - 12 Sep 2006 15:57 GMT >If I owned a farm, and all I had to look forward to in the future is >growing grain to produce ethanol, I believe I, too, would sell out in a >heartbeat. Jack Daniels doesn't seem to be hurting any. --scott
 Signature "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Joe Fischer - 12 Sep 2006 17:27 GMT >If I owned a farm, and all I had to look forward to in the future is >growing grain to produce ethanol, I believe I, too, would sell out in a >heartbeat. Chances are ethanol will be made from sugar cane and beets and sorghum more than from grain.
The most experience most places making ethanol before was for beverages, and I was under the impression that even bootleggers use lots of sugar.
Joe Fischer
HLS@nospam.nix - 12 Sep 2006 17:41 GMT > The most experience most places making ethanol > before was for beverages, and I was under the impression > that even bootleggers use lots of sugar. > > Joe Fischer They used to say in Norway (where alcohol is expensive and sales are strictly controlled by the government) that, statistically, every Norwegian eats seven loaves of bread per day.
You can make alcohol from simple sugar, and from polymeric sugars like starch. The starch doesnt have to come from corn. And, since the average stalk of corn only produces two ears, you are correct that there are probably better sources of raw materials.
SJC - 13 Sep 2006 01:02 GMT >> The most experience most places making ethanol >> before was for beverages, and I was under the impression [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > average stalk of corn only produces two ears, you are correct that there > are probably better sources of raw materials. If the average stalk only produces two ears of corn and we produce a lot of corn, then that is a heck of a lot of corn stalks for cellulosic ethanol.
Drunk Cheney Shot His Dick! - 13 Sep 2006 01:22 GMT >>> The most experience most places making ethanol >>> before was for beverages, and I was under the impression [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > corn, then that is a heck of a lot of corn stalks for cellulosic > ethanol. You are talking 300 gallons of freaking ethanol per acre per year.
Solar Energy electrolyzed water makes 26,282 kilograms of hydrogen, equivilent to about 26000 gallons of gasonine per acre per year. You are not ver smart, are you? Or are you an intern at Cato Institute sponsored by Koch Industries Fertilizers and Feeds? Are you a shill for Cargill, Archer-Daniels-Midland?
SJC - 13 Sep 2006 04:09 GMT >>>> The most experience most places making ethanol >>>> before was for beverages, and I was under the impression [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > by Koch Industries Fertilizers and Feeds? Are you a shill for Cargill, > Archer-Daniels-Midland? One thing I am NOT is a jackass like you, that goes around shooting his f**king mouth off.
Joe Fischer - 13 Sep 2006 01:48 GMT >> You can make alcohol from simple sugar, and from polymeric sugars >> like starch. The starch doesnt have to come from corn. And, since the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > If the average stalk only produces two ears of corn and we produce a lot of >corn, then that is a heck of a lot of corn stalks for cellulosic ethanol. I was going to question the "two ears", it has been 65 years since I was in a real corn field, and I seem to remember 5 or 6 ears per stalk. Do the modern strains have less production?
And even if they still get 5 or 6 ears per stalk, what in the world does a big farm do with all the stalks, leaves, shucks and cobs, the small farmer had a silo that would hold most of them, the rest may have been plowed under for the benefit of the soil.
I haven't seen any pictures of thousands of silos.
Joe Fischer
Eeyore - 13 Sep 2006 03:40 GMT > >> You can make alcohol from simple sugar, and from polymeric sugars > >> like starch. The starch doesnt have to come from corn. And, since the [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > 5 or 6 ears per stalk. > Do the modern strains have less production? I suspect it's just another made up lie.
Lies is all that the USA is about these days.
Graham
ghostwriter - 12 Sep 2006 17:53 GMT > ghostwriter <ghostwriter25@postmaster.co.uk> wrote in article > <1158005653.053714.170020@q16g2000cwq.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > growing grain to produce ethanol, I believe I, too, would sell out in a > heartbeat. Actually he raised soybeans and cows mostly, he just planted enough corn every year to ferment into fuel and thus reduced his cost by more then he reduced his profits. He also used the CO2 leftover from the fermentation to preserve the corn stover so that it could be used as fodder without needing to be dryed.
He had been in the Air Force working as a radar consultant when the Iranian Revolution happened, and he got out just as things were getting hot. He was just a little paranoid about buying imported oil. Had a beautiful Korean style house, it was completely circular and heated by an central underfloor charcoal burner (he ran communication systems in Korean after the war). And man could his wife cook, she abandoned most true Korean dishes (he hated the spices) and cooked mostly Chinese food since it was something they both loved, and as a result I love Chinese food, but only the good stuff.
I will have to call his nephew and see if he is still around.
Ghostwriter
|
|
|