Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / October 2006
GM Headache
|
|
Thread rating:  |
theroadisalover - 20 Sep 2006 11:08 GMT Get a Load O' This!
An aquaintance of mine has a 2000 Grand Am. 2.4L 4 Banger. Tells me car wont start, some kind of electrical problem, or? F*#@, they dont know. He's replaced a lot of parts...still nothin. Then he says it will start while using starter fluid. I say, well...sounds like fuel pump/relay...filter etc. Oh no, Ive already changed all that. Hmmm....Intermittant electrical problem...bad ground...OBDII not sending injector signal....no spark situation ala crank sensor.. cam sensor?? So, I get over there to look at the car. He says sometimes the key wont turn. Sure enough.... key wont budge from off position! I tried everything short of tearing the dash off this f.cker. On this car, if you cant turn the key, you cant remove lock cylinder, You cant take the thing out of park ( at least to move shifter lever so one can gain access to remove center console bezel) which is in the way of accessing lock assem. to remove and inspect. The long and short of it...I managed to get the ignition and lock assembly out in my lap. At this point, my question is, what is the cable attached to the lock housing? Does it release something mechanically, or just serve as a tether for the lock? Also, the three wire terminal that seems impossible to remove without destroying. "Its neatly tucked into the lock housing". The key cylinder appears to be worn to the point of not funtioning any longer. Im thinking locksmith to free it up so pin may be depressed and cylinder removed. Then, wrecking yard, to chase down additional parts. I cant troubleshoot the electrical problems until I can turn it on and see whats up?
Any suggestions regarding above problem "Greatly appreciated"
The road....
 Signature theroadisalover
http://www.automotiveforums.com
* - 20 Sep 2006 12:56 GMT theroadisalover <theroadisalover.2efhrf@no-mx.nodomain.com> wrote in
> Get a Load O' This! > [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Any suggestions regarding above problem "Greatly appreciated" I think this is a classic situation where your "friend" certainly doesn't need any enemies........
Change a few more parts....
You MAY get lucky......
KjunRaven - 20 Sep 2006 13:03 GMT > Get a Load O' This! > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > The road.... cable goes to shifter. it has 2 jobs. 1)wont allow key to turn to off unless in park..2)wont allow shifter out of park until key turned from off position...........3 wire 'tucked' terminal is theft lock wiring. you must remove cyl. assy. from lock housing b4 being able to remove this connection. first you must be able to turn ign from lock position to push release pin and release lock cyl......turn ign. = key or drill......sir, your officially in 'a can of worms'........this reply is from exp. on W patforms, your descriprion sounds identical.
jeffcoslacker - 20 Sep 2006 14:02 GMT Warn him about the VATS system...is that what you were saying about theft lock? Might have been the problem from the beginning, unless I missed something...
 Signature jeffcoslacker
http://www.automotiveforums.com
KjunRaven - 21 Sep 2006 00:21 GMT > Warn him about the VATS system...is that what you were saying about > theft lock? Might have been the problem from the beginning, unless I > missed something... first sentence, 2nd paragraph of OP.....key wont turn
jeffcoslacker - 21 Sep 2006 01:34 GMT KjunRaven Wrote:
> > Warn him about the VATS system...is that what you were saying about > > theft lock? Might have been the problem from the beginning, unless I > > missed something... > > first sentence, 2nd paragraph of OP.....key wont turn Funny, I read key won't turn SOMETIMES, but when it does, car will start on starting fluid...sounds like two different problems (key won't turn) (key turns, but no fuel delivery)...so when he fixes the key problem, he may well still have another problem to deal with (VATS?).
You have to read more than the first few words and assume you know what was said...
 Signature jeffcoslacker
http://www.automotiveforums.com
KjunRaven - 22 Sep 2006 00:38 GMT > KjunRaven Wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > You have to read more than the first few words and assume you know what > was said... oh , i read the entire post. the wall he was up against at the time was just getting the key to turn to be able to find any other probs.
you have to understand the order in which he is approaching problems before you lead the poster off track.
theroadisalover - 22 Sep 2006 10:31 GMT Say Guys,
Thanks for the response...Id be screwed without it, I assure you. Personally, the last time I had to get into a key cylinder was a 90's ish Buick. I went for a good 10 years without turning wrenches as I got involved with Premise wiring for Computers/Telephone systems. As is evident in my original post, the new type of anti-theft hardware/software in cars has changed considerably since I have have stumbled back into it! To clear up a misunderstanding on the "key turning issue" Your both sort of correct at the same time. Ok, My friend tells me "Sometimes the key wont turn out of "Off" position. Well...sometimes my a.s...it never even acted like it was going anywhere for me. So, while it supposedly operated some of the time for him, no go later after I darkened the door! Armed with some basic info and a dig multi-meter, Im approaching it like this: We're dealing with a PCM/BCM Key cylinder with mag field, but no sensor. So it simply sees when key is turning and grants permission to fire up systems. However, Im still baffled about key not turning in Ignition.. Short of key cylinder being simply worn out of course, I was trying to make sense of the original problem in the first place. Since some systems recognize keys as being correct for a particular vehicle, What, in East Jehosafat, is the problem with this piece of work? Could we be dealing with faulty electronic/software snufu's combined with a worn out lock. I scoured the automotive forums for answers, but didnt exactly get run over in the pontiac forum. This forum seems to have a lot more experienced eye's on the more difficult subjects. Thinking back on the history of my involvement on this vehicle, Ive observed the following or been informed: 1. A 2000 GA which had original motor burned up within a year. 2. A good used motor put in its place consiquentially (ahem...) 3. They say the car has been running great since then.4. My first sight of the conditions in which the vehicle has been cared for/maintained...Under the hood....wiring exposed in several areas for the purpose of testing ( Though... I would not leave said wiring in this shape even for a moment while trying to do a systematic problem solve ) 5.Overall apparent cond. haphazardly dishelved but workable....I think. This guy needs to be kept as far away from the interwokings of an automobile as possible.6. I band-aided the wiring for now and propose solder and shrink wrap before I sew the thing up. Every picture tells a story dont it, and this one is no exception. Ok, So where I am now, in my estimation is....When I am able to actually turn key, check for security light on IP. If present, why. Learn from researching prob. and talking to you guys what snafu might be/ prove to be. And finally, since I have butchered the ignition switch and housing trying to Exorsize it, what sort of little tidbit parts or special tools might I want on hand to put it back together (Namely, the cable assem. I spoke of and the three wire connector I plucked out of the housing ( the connector is still intact) Anything come to mind to watch out for or perhaps a sequence of problem solving that would prove helpful.
Jokes are welcome....one would have to be a little crazy to work on cars. Laughter helps get u through the rough spots.
This reminds me of a chart I read in the office of an Audio/Video equipment installer. ( A supposed substitute fuse where real fuse is not availible.) They started with foil, light wire, nails, and my favorite....A bolt was shown as a high capacity fuse...referred to as a.... Slow Burn.....
Thanks Guys for what ever you can do.....
the road
 Signature theroadisalover
http://www.automotiveforums.com
jeffcoslacker - 22 Sep 2006 13:20 GMT theroadisalover Wrote:
> Say Guys, > [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > > the road I'm still a little lost. Does it have VATS or not? If so (square chip in key) the VATS resistor has to make contact with two contacts in the cylinder or the car will not start. You can probe the contacts on the VATS chip and read the resistance, and substitute a standard resistor shunted into the wires for the VATS if doing so helps in any way (like to verify that it is disarmed while trying to figure out why the key won't turn) so if you remove the ignition lock and turn the switch manually, you still have to have the correct resistance present in that circuit...I'm no good with cylinders, my experience is mostly limited to pulling them out with a slide hammer prior to reposessing the car;), but that gets you nowhere with a VATS equipped system.
Dumb question, but the cylinder is not in a torque lock because he shut it off with the wheels turned, is it?
 Signature jeffcoslacker
http://www.automotiveforums.com
aarcuda69062 - 22 Sep 2006 14:26 GMT > I'm still a little lost. Does it have VATS or not? If so (square chip > in key) GM hasn't used VATS in about ten years.
PATS replaces VATS and works entirely different.
jeffcoslacker - 22 Sep 2006 16:31 GMT aarcuda69062 Wrote:
> > I'm still a little lost. Does it have VATS or not? If so (square chip > > in key) > > GM hasn't used VATS in about ten years. > > PATS replaces VATS and works entirely different. My friend's '00 Lumina has a VATS key, so I assumed this one might be similar. How's PATS work? I've been out of the shop for about 7 years now, and I'm getting farther and farther detached from what cars use anymore...and forgetting things I should really know. :banghead:
 Signature jeffcoslacker
http://www.automotiveforums.com
aarcuda69062 - 22 Sep 2006 22:33 GMT > My friend's '00 Lumina has a VATS key, so I assumed this one might be > similar. How's PATS work? I've been out of the shop for about 7 years > now, and I'm getting farther and farther detached from what cars use > anymore...and forgetting things I should really know. :banghead: The Lumina was one of the last hold outs for VATS, even the lowly Cadavalier had PATS in 1996.
PATS is a bit too complicated to describe here, if you google "GM passlock" you should find a bunch of information.
Here's an article from Motor Age to get you started;
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3102/is_6_124/ai_n14890 664
jeffcoslacker - 22 Sep 2006 22:55 GMT aarcuda69062 Wrote:
> > My friend's '00 Lumina has a VATS key, so I assumed this one might be > > similar. How's PATS work? I've been out of the shop for about 7 years [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3102/is_6_124/ai_n14890 > 664 the link is no good...but I found some other stuff about it but I need to read it more carefully, because it basically sounds the same as VATS except the resistor is in the lock rather yhan the key (for what purpose I don't get), so that if you crack the column and try to start it with no key to complete the circuit in the lock, injectors are disabled.
Does this mean that ANY key, whether correct one or not, would suffice to complete the circuit as long as it fit in the cylinder, or is contact only made when the lock is rotated from the locked position when the correct key is used? Because otherwise any clown with a worn down key could defeat it and start the car...
Anyway...still looks like a likely spot to cause the trouble he's seeing...
 Signature jeffcoslacker
http://www.automotiveforums.com
aarcuda69062 - 22 Sep 2006 23:38 GMT > aarcuda69062 Wrote: > > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > I don't get), so that if you crack the column and try to start it with > no key to complete the circuit in the lock, injectors are disabled. (summarizing) The resistor is replaced by a Hall Effect sensor that has to send its signal it the correct point in the power up sequence. if the lock cylinder is "jimmied" the sensor is destroyed and/or it becomes very difficult to get the sensor signal timed correctly.
> Does this mean that ANY key, whether correct one or not, would suffice > to complete the circuit as long as it fit in the cylinder, or is > contact only made when the lock is rotated from the locked position > when the correct key is used? Because otherwise any clown with a worn > down key could defeat it and start the car... If the key fits the lock tumblers and the lock cylinder can be rotated, the car will start. Odds of a worn key working are slim because they keys now have more cuts, 8 or 10 IIRC.
> Anyway...still looks like a likely spot to cause the trouble he's > seeing... Absolutely a likely cause. These things are getting quite notorious for failure.
piratesofsml - 01 Oct 2006 03:48 GMT i just went thru the same thing,i have a 2001 grand prix and it turns out it was the pass key 3 theft deterrent system it cost about $600 to fix at a dealer,damn dealers now i cant get the key out of the ignition!!!! they say it will cost me another $300.
theroadisalover - 02 Oct 2006 13:49 GMT Here's the deal folks,
I did some reading to catch up on the passlock issue described below. Its confusing, because just when you think an auto maker has something they will stick with, they will change it. So again, here's a 1999 Grand Am (and simular makes) with a Hall effect sensor on the ignition. This, instead of the key sensor.....Read on.....
Hall effect sensor on ign key GM.txt
In normal operation, the key turns the ignition lock cylinder. The Passlock sensor monitors the position of the lock cylinder and relays an analog Passlock signal to the body control module (BCM). The BCM determines the validity of the Passlock signal, then sends a password to the powertrain control module (PCM). When the PCM receives the correct password, it allows the fuel injectors to operate and the vehicle starts normally. Passlock communication between the PCM and BCM takes place over the Class 2 serial data line (CKT 1807), as you correctly surmised. The Passlock sensor contains two Hall effect sensors. The security sensor is mounted under the tamper sensor. This arrangement enables the tamper sensor to engage first in the event a thief attempts to bypass the Passlock sensor by placing a large magnet around the area of the steering column. A security resistor inside the Passlock sensor provides further theft protection. Ten different security resistors are available. Each generates a unique Passlock code that must be recognized by the BCM during a starting attempt. If the Passlock sensor, BCM or PCM are replaced, a releam sequence must be followed to acquaint the new parts with each other and allow normal starting.
This sounds like an awful lot of bullshit just to start a f.cking car!
Enjoy!
Road
 Signature theroadisalover
http://www.automotiveforums.com
M.M. - 03 Oct 2006 01:18 GMT > ... > > This sounds like an awful lot of bullshit just to start a f.cking car! Ain't that the truth? I believe that's the same system my 98 Astro has. For the past year or so it's been starting and running normally but most (but not all) of the time the Security light comes on shortly after the engine starts. It supposedly indicates a problem in the anti theft system. I haven't been able to find out what causes it to come on like that. Plenty of info about when it blinks and won't let you start the car but nothing about when it comes on solid & doesn't seem to affect anything. I'd take it in to the dealer but don't want to spend several hundred bux on something that I don't really want or care about (until it won't let me start the engine). I think the solution will be a one inch length of black electrical tape...
VetNutJim - 21 Oct 2006 02:54 GMT 'Oh no, I've already changed all that'
Don't trust ANY work ANYBODY else has 'already' done. Most folks create more problems than they fix when they start 'shotgunning' their vehicle.
Some of the worst 'messes' I've straightened out has been after someone 'replaced' half the parts on the car.
These kind of jobs will sucker you in with their assurance they have replaced 'this that or the other'.
If you want to fix it, start on it as if NOTHING has been replaced and go from there, satisfying yourself that each part and system is working properly before moving on the the next part/system.
If the guy that replaced the parts doesn't like that approach, the best thing for you and him is to let him find another troubleshooter.
Jerry Foster - 21 Oct 2006 19:30 GMT > 'Oh no, I've already changed all that' > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > If the guy that replaced the parts doesn't like that approach, the > best thing for you and him is to let him find another troubleshooter. Good advice for another reason. I had a motor home quit on the road. After much agony, I diagnosed a bad ignition module. I got a ride into the nearest town, got a new one and installed it. It still didn't run. So, I bit the bullet, had it towed in and waited until the mechanic could look at it next morning. Of course, the new ignition module was bad... (He was nice enough to get the auto parts store to give me a refund on the bad one...)
Jerry
|
|
|