Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

GM Headache

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
theroadisalover - 20 Sep 2006 11:08 GMT
Get a Load O' This!

An aquaintance of mine has a 2000 Grand Am. 2.4L 4 Banger. Tells me car
wont start, some kind of electrical problem, or? F*#@, they dont know.
He's replaced a lot of parts...still nothin. Then he says it will start
while using starter fluid. I say, well...sounds like fuel
pump/relay...filter etc. Oh no, Ive already changed all that.
Hmmm....Intermittant electrical problem...bad ground...OBDII not
sending injector signal....no spark situation ala crank sensor.. cam
sensor??
So, I get over there to look at the car. He says sometimes the key wont
turn. Sure enough.... key wont budge from off position! I tried
everything short of tearing the dash off this f.cker. On this car, if
you cant turn the key, you cant remove lock cylinder, You cant take the
thing out of park ( at least to move shifter lever so one can gain
access to remove center console bezel) which is in the way of accessing
lock assem. to remove and inspect.
The long and short of it...I managed to get the ignition and lock
assembly out in my lap. At this point, my question is, what is the
cable attached to the lock housing? Does it release something
mechanically, or just serve as a tether for the lock? Also, the three
wire terminal that seems impossible to remove without destroying. "Its
neatly tucked into the lock housing". The key cylinder appears to be
worn to the point of not funtioning any longer. Im thinking locksmith
to free it up so pin may be depressed and cylinder removed. Then,
wrecking yard, to chase down additional parts.
I cant troubleshoot the electrical problems until I can turn it on and
see whats up?

Any suggestions regarding above problem "Greatly appreciated"

The road....

Signature

theroadisalover

http://www.automotiveforums.com

* - 20 Sep 2006 12:56 GMT
theroadisalover <theroadisalover.2efhrf@no-mx.nodomain.com> wrote in

> Get a Load O' This!
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Any suggestions regarding above problem "Greatly appreciated"

I think this is a classic situation where your "friend" certainly doesn't
need any enemies........

Change a few more parts....

You MAY get lucky......
KjunRaven - 20 Sep 2006 13:03 GMT
> Get a Load O' This!
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> The road....

cable goes to shifter. it has 2 jobs. 1)wont allow key to turn to off
unless in park..2)wont allow shifter out of park until key turned from
off position...........3 wire 'tucked' terminal is theft lock wiring. you
must remove cyl. assy. from lock housing b4 being able to remove this
connection. first you must be able to turn ign from lock position to push
release pin and release lock cyl......turn ign. = key or drill......sir,
your officially in 'a can of worms'........this reply is from exp. on W
patforms, your descriprion sounds identical.
jeffcoslacker - 20 Sep 2006 14:02 GMT
Warn him about the VATS system...is that what you were saying about
theft lock? Might have been the problem from the beginning, unless I
missed something...

Signature

jeffcoslacker

http://www.automotiveforums.com

KjunRaven - 21 Sep 2006 00:21 GMT
> Warn him about the VATS system...is that what you were saying about
> theft lock? Might have been the problem from the beginning, unless I
> missed something...

first sentence, 2nd paragraph of OP.....key wont turn
jeffcoslacker - 21 Sep 2006 01:34 GMT
KjunRaven Wrote:

> > Warn him about the VATS system...is that what you were saying about
> > theft lock? Might have been the problem from the beginning, unless I
> > missed something...
>
> first sentence, 2nd paragraph of OP.....key wont turn

Funny, I read key won't turn SOMETIMES, but when it does, car will
start on starting fluid...sounds like two different problems (key won't
turn) (key turns, but no fuel delivery)...so when he fixes the key
problem, he may well still have another problem to deal with (VATS?).

You have to read more than the first few words and assume you know what
was said...

Signature

jeffcoslacker

http://www.automotiveforums.com

KjunRaven - 22 Sep 2006 00:38 GMT
> KjunRaven Wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> You have to read more than the first few words and assume you know what
> was said...

oh , i read the entire post. the wall he was up against at the time was
just getting the key to turn to be able to find any other probs.

you have to understand the order in which he is approaching problems before  
you lead the poster off track.
theroadisalover - 22 Sep 2006 10:31 GMT
Say Guys,

Thanks for the response...Id be screwed without it, I assure you.
Personally, the last time I had to get into a key cylinder was a 90's
ish Buick. I went for a good 10 years without turning wrenches as I got
involved with Premise wiring for Computers/Telephone systems. As is
evident in my original post, the new type of anti-theft
hardware/software in cars has changed considerably since I have have
stumbled back into it!
To clear up a misunderstanding on the "key turning issue" Your both
sort of correct at the same time. Ok, My friend tells me "Sometimes the
key wont turn out of "Off" position. Well...sometimes my a.s...it never
even acted like it was going anywhere for me. So, while it supposedly
operated some of the time for him, no go later after I darkened the
door! Armed with some basic info and a dig multi-meter, Im approaching
it like this: We're dealing with a PCM/BCM Key cylinder with mag field,
but no sensor. So it simply sees when key is turning and grants
permission to fire up systems. However, Im still baffled about key not
turning in Ignition.. Short of key cylinder being simply worn out of
course, I was trying to make sense of the original problem in the first
place. Since some systems recognize keys as being correct for a
particular vehicle, What, in East Jehosafat, is the problem with this
piece of work? Could we be dealing with faulty electronic/software
snufu's combined with a worn out lock. I scoured the automotive forums
for answers, but didnt exactly get run over in the pontiac forum. This
forum seems to have a lot more experienced eye's on the more difficult
subjects. Thinking back on the history of my involvement on this
vehicle, Ive observed the following or been informed: 1. A 2000 GA
which had original motor burned up within a year. 2. A good used motor
put in its place consiquentially (ahem...) 3. They say the car has been
running great since then.4. My first sight of the conditions in which
the vehicle has been cared for/maintained...Under the hood....wiring
exposed in several areas for the purpose of testing ( Though... I would
not leave said wiring in this shape even for a moment while trying to do
a systematic problem solve ) 5.Overall apparent cond. haphazardly
dishelved but workable....I think. This guy needs to be kept as far
away from the interwokings of an automobile as possible.6. I band-aided
the wiring for now and propose solder and shrink wrap before I sew the
thing up. Every picture tells a story dont it, and this one is no
exception.
Ok, So where I am now, in my estimation is....When I am able to
actually turn key, check for security light on IP. If present, why.
Learn from researching prob. and talking to you guys what snafu might
be/ prove to be. And finally, since I have butchered the ignition
switch and housing trying to Exorsize it, what sort of little tidbit
parts or special tools might I want on hand to put it back together
(Namely, the cable assem. I spoke of and the three wire connector I
plucked out of the housing ( the connector is still intact)
Anything come to mind to watch out for or perhaps a sequence of problem
solving that would prove helpful.

Jokes are welcome....one would have to be a little crazy to work on
cars. Laughter helps get u through the rough spots.

This reminds me of a chart I read in the office of an Audio/Video
equipment installer.  ( A supposed substitute fuse where real fuse is
not availible.)
They started with foil, light wire, nails, and my favorite....A bolt
was shown as a high capacity fuse...referred to as a.... Slow
Burn.....

Thanks Guys for what ever you can do.....

the road

Signature

theroadisalover

http://www.automotiveforums.com

jeffcoslacker - 22 Sep 2006 13:20 GMT
theroadisalover Wrote:
> Say Guys,
>
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>
> the road

I'm still a little lost. Does it have VATS or not? If so (square chip
in key) the VATS resistor has to make contact with two contacts in the
cylinder or the car will not start. You can probe the contacts on the
VATS chip and read the resistance, and substitute a standard resistor
shunted into the wires for the VATS if doing so helps in any way (like
to verify that it is disarmed while trying to figure out why the key
won't turn) so if you remove the ignition lock and turn the switch
manually, you still have to have the correct resistance present in that
circuit...I'm no good with cylinders, my experience is mostly limited to
pulling them out with a slide hammer prior to reposessing the car;), but
that gets you nowhere with a VATS equipped system.

Dumb question, but the cylinder is not in a torque lock because he shut
it off with the wheels turned, is it?

Signature

jeffcoslacker

http://www.automotiveforums.com

aarcuda69062 - 22 Sep 2006 14:26 GMT
> I'm still a little lost. Does it have VATS or not? If so (square chip
> in key)

GM hasn't used VATS in about ten years.

PATS replaces VATS and works entirely different.
jeffcoslacker - 22 Sep 2006 16:31 GMT
aarcuda69062 Wrote:

> > I'm still a little lost. Does it have VATS or not? If so (square chip
> > in key)
>
> GM hasn't used VATS in about ten years.
>
> PATS replaces VATS and works entirely different.

My friend's '00 Lumina has a VATS key, so I assumed this one might be
similar. How's PATS work? I've been out of the shop for about 7 years
now, and I'm getting farther and farther detached from what cars use
anymore...and forgetting things I should really know. :banghead:

Signature

jeffcoslacker

http://www.automotiveforums.com

aarcuda69062 - 22 Sep 2006 22:33 GMT
> My friend's '00 Lumina has a VATS key, so I assumed this one might be
> similar. How's PATS work? I've been out of the shop for about 7 years
> now, and I'm getting farther and farther detached from what cars use
> anymore...and forgetting things I should really know. :banghead:

The Lumina was one of the last hold outs for VATS, even the lowly
Cadavalier had PATS in 1996.

PATS is a bit too complicated to describe here, if you google  
"GM passlock" you should find a bunch of information.

Here's an article from Motor Age to get you started;

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3102/is_6_124/ai_n14890
664
jeffcoslacker - 22 Sep 2006 22:55 GMT
aarcuda69062 Wrote:

> > My friend's '00 Lumina has a VATS key, so I assumed this one might be
> > similar. How's PATS work? I've been out of the shop for about 7 years
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3102/is_6_124/ai_n14890
> 664

the link is no good...but I found some other stuff about it but I need
to read it more carefully, because it basically sounds the same as VATS
except the resistor is in the lock rather yhan the key (for what purpose
I don't get), so that if you crack the column and try to start it with
no key to complete the circuit in the lock, injectors are disabled.

Does this mean that ANY key, whether correct one or not, would suffice
to complete the circuit as long as it fit in the cylinder, or is
contact only made when the lock is rotated from the locked position
when the correct key is used? Because otherwise any clown with a worn
down key could defeat it and start the car...

Anyway...still looks like a likely spot to cause the trouble he's
seeing...

Signature

jeffcoslacker

http://www.automotiveforums.com

aarcuda69062 - 22 Sep 2006 23:38 GMT
> aarcuda69062 Wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> I don't get), so that if you crack the column and try to start it with
> no key to complete the circuit in the lock, injectors are disabled.

(summarizing)
The resistor is replaced by a Hall Effect sensor that has to send
its signal it the correct point in the power up sequence.
if the lock cylinder is "jimmied" the sensor is destroyed and/or
it becomes very difficult to get the sensor signal timed
correctly.

> Does this mean that ANY key, whether correct one or not, would suffice
> to complete the circuit as long as it fit in the cylinder, or is
> contact only made when the lock is rotated from the locked position
> when the correct key is used? Because otherwise any clown with a worn
> down key could defeat it and start the car...

If the key fits the lock tumblers and the lock cylinder can be
rotated, the car will start.  Odds of a worn key working are slim
because they keys now have more cuts, 8 or 10 IIRC.

> Anyway...still looks like a likely spot to cause the trouble he's
> seeing...

Absolutely a likely cause.  These things are getting quite
notorious for failure.
piratesofsml - 01 Oct 2006 03:48 GMT
i just went thru the same thing,i have a 2001 grand prix and it turns
out it was the pass key 3 theft deterrent system it cost about $600
to fix at a dealer,damn dealers now i cant get the key out of the
ignition!!!! they say it will cost me another $300.
theroadisalover - 02 Oct 2006 13:49 GMT
Here's the deal folks,

I did some reading to catch up on the passlock issue described below.
Its confusing, because just when you think an auto maker has something
they will stick with, they will change it. So again, here's a 1999
Grand Am (and simular makes) with a Hall effect sensor on the ignition.
This, instead of the key sensor.....Read on.....                        

Hall effect sensor on ign key GM.txt

In normal operation, the key turns the ignition lock cylinder. The
Passlock sensor monitors the position of the lock cylinder and relays
an analog Passlock signal to the body control module (BCM). The BCM
determines the validity of the Passlock signal, then sends a password
to the powertrain control module (PCM). When the PCM receives the
correct password, it allows the fuel injectors to operate and the
vehicle starts normally. Passlock communication between the PCM and BCM
takes place over the Class 2 serial data line (CKT 1807), as you
correctly surmised.
The Passlock sensor contains two Hall effect sensors. The security
sensor is mounted under the tamper sensor. This arrangement enables the
tamper sensor to engage first in the event a thief attempts to bypass
the Passlock sensor by placing a large magnet around the area of the
steering column.
A security resistor inside the Passlock sensor provides further theft
protection. Ten different security resistors are available. Each
generates a unique Passlock code that must be recognized by the BCM
during a starting attempt. If the Passlock sensor, BCM or PCM are
replaced, a releam sequence must be followed to acquaint the new parts
with each other and allow normal starting.

This sounds like an awful lot of bullshit just to start a f.cking car!

Enjoy!

Road

Signature

theroadisalover

http://www.automotiveforums.com

M.M. - 03 Oct 2006 01:18 GMT
> ...
>
> This sounds like an awful lot of bullshit just to start a f.cking car!

Ain't that the truth? I believe that's the same system my 98 Astro has.
For the past year or so it's been starting and running normally but most
(but not all) of the time the Security light comes on shortly after the
engine starts. It supposedly indicates a problem in the anti theft
system. I haven't been able to find out what causes it to come on like
that. Plenty of info about when it blinks and won't let you start the
car but nothing about when it comes on solid & doesn't seem to affect
anything. I'd take it in to the dealer but don't want to spend several
hundred bux on something that I don't really want or care about (until
it won't let me start the engine). I think the solution will be a one
inch length of black electrical tape...
VetNutJim - 21 Oct 2006 02:54 GMT
'Oh no, I've already changed all that'

Don't trust ANY work ANYBODY else has 'already' done.
Most folks create more problems than they fix when they start
'shotgunning' their vehicle.

Some of the worst 'messes' I've straightened out has been after
someone 'replaced' half the parts on the car.

These kind of jobs will sucker you in with their assurance they have
replaced 'this that or the other'.

If you want to fix it, start on it as if NOTHING has been replaced and
go from there, satisfying yourself that each part and system is
working properly before moving on the the next part/system.

If the guy that replaced the parts doesn't like that approach, the
best thing for you and him is to let him find another troubleshooter.
Jerry Foster - 21 Oct 2006 19:30 GMT
> 'Oh no, I've already changed all that'
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> If the guy that replaced the parts doesn't like that approach, the
> best thing for you and him is to let him find another troubleshooter.

Good advice for another reason.  I had a motor home quit on the road.  After
much agony, I diagnosed a bad ignition module.  I got a ride into the
nearest town, got a new one and installed it.  It still didn't run.  So, I
bit the bullet, had it towed in and waited until the mechanic could look at
it next morning.  Of course, the new ignition module was bad...  (He was
nice enough to get the auto parts store to give me a refund on the bad
one...)

Jerry
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.