>> Golly, I hadn't heard until reading this post just now that the war was
>> over. Well praise be!
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> mideast wars on the price of oil:
> http://www.wtrg.com/oil_graphs/oilprice1947.gif
Of course oil will go up any time supply is threatened. So you honestly
think that threats of war has more to do with running up oil prices? Or
do you think that just maybe it has something to do with world's attempt
to keep the pressure up against a radical?
Curious, how would you handle Iran? Or would you be afraid to sacrifice
some oil prices for doing nothing to stop these people from getting nukes?
> That's nothing compared with what will happen if Bush starts a war with
> Iran. That will affect the flow of oil from every country on the
> Persian Gulf- Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, etc.
If that is what it takes to keep nukes out of those radical hands, I'll
gladly pay $10 a gallon, even if it means temporary economic hardship,
layoffs, etc.! Do you have another idea? What ever happened to good
old fashioned American willingness to sacrifice for the common long term
good? I guess it died with our grandparents who had to deal with gas
rationing stamps and had to eat potato soup every night). We are so
damn into ourselves looking out for number one it's scary!
Ashton Crusher - 29 Sep 2006 09:21 GMT
>>> Golly, I hadn't heard until reading this post just now that the war was
>>> over. Well praise be!
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Curious, how would you handle Iran? Or would you be afraid to sacrifice
>some oil prices for doing nothing to stop these people from getting nukes?
Who cares if they get nukes. Lots of countries have nukes but only
one country has ever used them and only one country has recently made
noises about possibly using them AGAIN. If Iran used nukes it would
be on Israel and I have no more use for Israel then I have for Iran so
who the hell cares who blows who up over there. They are all nuts.
>> That's nothing compared with what will happen if Bush starts a war with
>> Iran. That will affect the flow of oil from every country on the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>rationing stamps and had to eat potato soup every night). We are so
>damn into ourselves looking out for number one it's scary!
carbide@egine.com - 29 Sep 2006 16:53 GMT
> Curious, how would you handle Iran? Or would you be afraid to sacrifice
> some oil prices for doing nothing to stop these people from getting nukes?
First off, I've done my sacrificing. I'm a USAF veteran. I'm proud to
say I was doing my duty during the Vietnam War while George Bush was
AWOL.
Oh, and I'm on record on on Iran. Before these idiots invaded *IRAQ* I
was screaming that the real threat was *IRAN*. Here's something I
posted elsewhere way back in July of 2004.
"Heh heh... in fact, the people who formed al Qaeda had a lot more
active contacts with Bush's father than with Saddam. He used them as a
kind of bio-weapon against the Soviets, and now they've gone after us-
bio-weapons are a two-edged sword that cuts both ways.
You're just like the Bushbrain- ignore the real threat, go for the
trivial. Iran is harboring al Qaeda members, and will soon have the
bomb. Pakistan DOES have the bomb, and the govt could be overthrown by
Islamic militants. In fact, Bush's bungling has made that MORE LIKELY.
Those are the big threats in the middle east, not bombed-out Iraq.
But you dumb a.ses think Iraq is the top priority. The US is suffering
a lot of unnecessary death and destruction because of you morons, and I
fear Bush's bungling is going to cost us far, far more. The sh.t is
really going to hit the fan when Iran gets the bomb. Ol' Bush will get
another opportunity to sit on his a.s while the nation is under
attack... "
-Paul