If you
> let the group know what your actual concern is we could address it more
> precisely. I thought you just wanted to know where the OP sender was.
Yes, I want to know where the OP sender was. To check if I found it, I
unplugged it, thinking the fuel pump would not engage. I guess that's
not the case.
I was told that the OP sender disabled the fuel pump in case of an
accident so that if you wrecked the car, the fuel pump wouldn't keep
spewing gas all over the road.
Steve - 12 Oct 2006 21:24 GMT
> If you
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> accident so that if you wrecked the car, the fuel pump wouldn't keep
> spewing gas all over the road.
I don't think carmakers have used the oil pressure switch for that
purpose for many years. Since the switch to full computer control of the
engine, its much quicker and more fool-proof to shut down the fuel pump
when the ECM stops seeing crank sensor pulses.
Comboverfish - 13 Oct 2006 13:55 GMT
> Yes, I want to know where the OP sender was. To check if I found it, I
> unplugged it, thinking the fuel pump would not engage. I guess that's
> not the case.
I see.
> I was told that the OP sender disabled the fuel pump in case of an
> accident so that if you wrecked the car, the fuel pump wouldn't keep
> spewing gas all over the road.
GM has held on to this dual purpose OP sender design for decades now.
I guess they are concerned the fuel pump relay will fail, and the cost
to incorporate the sender/switch as a failsafe is virtually nil. It is
not a safety shutoff measure, rather a FP relay failure measure.
Toyota MDT in MO