Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

bypassing rear brakes

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Big T - 16 Oct 2006 22:15 GMT
A rear brake line blew on my 91 Toyota Corolla the other day due to
corosion, and rather than replace it, which would be tricky and
expensive due to the amount of corrosion and access to parts, I was
thinking of just crimping the rear brake hoses, making the rear brakes
inoperative but stoppping the leak. I only plan on keeping this car for
a year at most, and can't justify the expense of refitting it with new
lines etc. would doing this cause any major problems with the front
brakes? would they be extremely grabby?

Thanks for any help'

Tyson
mandtprice@gmail.com - 16 Oct 2006 22:44 GMT
> would doing this cause any major problems with the front brakes?

yeah, they'll be real screwed up after you slide into the first
unexpected heavy, immobile, inelastic object.

Matthew
* - 16 Oct 2006 22:49 GMT
Big T <tysontomaszewicz@yahoo.ca> wrote in article
<1161033347.307771.242120@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>...
> A rear brake line blew on my 91 Toyota Corolla the other day due to
> corosion, and rather than replace it, which would be tricky and
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Tyson

You ARE joking.....RIGHT???

The cost of fixing the car properly pales in comparison to the potential
cost of driving a car with inadequate brakes........

Is this some sort of troll????
Shep - 16 Oct 2006 22:57 GMT
Yeah get it inspected in NYS and have it impounded!

> Big T <tysontomaszewicz@yahoo.ca> wrote in article
> <1161033347.307771.242120@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>...
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Is this some sort of troll????
AZ Nomad - 16 Oct 2006 23:02 GMT
>A rear brake line blew on my 91 Toyota Corolla the other day due to
>corosion, and rather than replace it, which would be tricky and
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>lines etc. would doing this cause any major problems with the front
>brakes? would they be extremely grabby?

>Thanks for any help'

It won't cause any problem that getting twenty years in jail and dying
there won't cure.

Don't forget to get the big sign saying  'f.ck YOU! NO BRAKES AND I DON'T CARE!"
Maybe you'll make it a few extra months before you get somebody killed.
James Drinkwater - 16 Oct 2006 23:31 GMT
I think the general consensus is, it's extremely unsafe and unadvisable. If
the lines are in that bad of shape, the systems literally falling apart. Any
professional (mechanic, cop, etc.) wouldn't allow you to drive the vehicle
with brakes being tampered/disabled and if someone else had a wreck with the
car, you'd at least have a major lawsuit if not criminal charges. I really
appreciate your desire just to "get by for a while". Believe me, I've had my
share of gasoline fires involving propane torches or Styrofoam of some
sort:) But you won't care if it goes if it stop.

 Jim

>A rear brake line blew on my 91 Toyota Corolla the other day due to
> corosion, and rather than replace it, which would be tricky and
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Tyson
TeGGeR® - 16 Oct 2006 23:42 GMT
"Big T" <tysontomaszewicz@yahoo.ca> wrote in news:1161033347.307771.242120
@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

> A rear brake line blew on my 91 Toyota Corolla the other day due to
> corosion, and rather than replace it, which would be tricky and
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> lines etc. would doing this cause any major problems with the front
> brakes? would they be extremely grabby?

Nobody's said it up to now, but there is NO NEED to replace the entire
line!

Patch-fixes are usual and commonplace for this sort of problem. You cut out
the rusted patch with a pipe cutter, make new flares and splice in a new
section of generic line, which may be easily bent up by hand to near the
original contours.

Bulk brake line is dirt cheap, so are flare nuts. A garage will probably
charge you an hour's labor to replace the rusted patch. Even though you can
rent flare tools, I'd advise not doing it yourself if you've never done it
before.

DO NOT disable the rear brakes.

Signature

TeGGeR®

Andy Dingley <dingbat@codesmiths.com> - 17 Oct 2006 00:40 GMT
> Nobody's said it up to now, but there is NO NEED to replace the entire
> line!

Except that it's _cheaper_ to do it by replacement.

Brake pipe is cheap, labour is expensive. Replace the pipe and it's one
pipe, splice it and it's one new pipe and a couple of in-situ flares to
do too. If it's rusted out then it'll be steel pipe too, not a copper
alloy, so it's a harder flare to do by hand, especially without even a
vice to hold it in.  Now personally I have better things to do than to
lie on my back, trying to screw down a couple of new nipples onto some
old junkyard dog of a beaten up Corolla.  I don't mind making up
flares, but I can do them a lot faster and better on the bench in a
vice.

I'd suggest that the OP just goes out and gets his damn fool self
killed and do us all a favour, except that he's likely to hurt
bystanders  8-(
N8N - 17 Oct 2006 14:30 GMT
> > Nobody's said it up to now, but there is NO NEED to replace the entire
> > line!
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> killed and do us all a favour, except that he's likely to hurt
> bystanders  8-(

I see you're posting from the YooKay so I understand where you're
coming from, but there *are* no "copper alloy" brake lines in the
YooEss.  I have seen them advertised in various UK Volkswagen
enthusiast rags but they are not approved for use over here.  You can
only use steel or stainless steel, and the latter is a cast-iron bitch
to cut, bend and flare properly.  So much so that I actually paid the
premium to have some pre-bent lines sent to me when I swapped rear
axles in my '55 Stude (but those stainless brake lines look sooo sexy
under there.)

nate

(been there, flared that)
aarcuda69062 - 17 Oct 2006 15:34 GMT
In article
<1161091822.050164.144990@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,

> > > Nobody's said it up to now, but there is NO NEED to replace the entire
> > > line!
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> (been there, flared that)

http://www.fedhillusa.com/index.html
Andy Dingley <dingbat@codesmiths.com> - 17 Oct 2006 20:06 GMT
> I see you're posting from the YooKay so I understand where you're
> coming from, but there *are* no "copper alloy" brake lines in the
> YooEss.

They're available in the US, although they're not common.  It's a 10%
nickel bronze, not pure copper. The US problem is with the commonly
available pure copper aircon pipe getting using as brake pipe, then
having fatigue problems owing to vibration. Here in the UK it's easy to
get the brakepipe alloy, hard to find anything for aircon.

Another UK patent "alloy" for brake pipes is KuNiFer. This is a
concentric laminate though, not an alloy.
Steve W. - 17 Oct 2006 23:01 GMT
>> I see you're posting from the YooKay so I understand where you're
>> coming from, but there *are* no "copper alloy" brake lines in the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Another UK patent "alloy" for brake pipes is KuNiFer. This is a
> concentric laminate though, not an alloy.

The catch in the US is that many types of lines are not DOT legal for
brake use. Copper is one of them. Same thing with compression fittings
on brake lines. Don't see US DOT approval on the web site either. That
makes them a lot like many aftermarket parts, designated OFF ROAD only
parts. Many braided lines fall in that area as well. Even though they
provide superior braking.

Signature

Steve W.
Near Cooperstown, New York

Nate Nagel - 18 Oct 2006 00:13 GMT
>>> I see you're posting from the YooKay so I understand where you're
>>> coming from, but there *are* no "copper alloy" brake lines in the
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> parts. Many braided lines fall in that area as well. Even though they
> provide superior braking.

I thought that one of the FMVSS' specified material for brake lines - I
would assume 105, but I no longer have access to the full text of the
FMVSSs and can't seem to find it on the web.  IF my memory is correct, I
wouldn't want to take on the liability of installing a different, albeit
equal or superior, product on a road going vehicle - it would be just
chumming for lawyers.

nate

Signature

replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

Andy Dingley <dingbat@codesmiths.com> - 18 Oct 2006 00:17 GMT
> >> I see you're posting from the YooKay so I understand where you're
> >> coming from, but there *are* no "copper alloy" brake lines in the
> >> YooEss.
> >
> > They're available in the US, although they're not common.  It's a 10%
> > nickel bronze, not pure copper.

> The catch in the US is that many types of lines are not DOT legal for
> brake use. Copper is one of them.

What part of "alloy" are you having the problem in understanding?

> Same thing with compression fittings on brake lines.

What do you think we use?  Just because it's an axial compression
fitting with an integral flare rather than the radial wedge-ring type
we use on water plumbing doesn't mean that it isn't a metal-to-metal
compression fitting.

Besides which, the SAE design of flare is crap and barely tolerated in
Europe. DIN flares are much better, especially if there's any end
tension on the pipe.
Steve W. - 18 Oct 2006 01:17 GMT
>>>> I see you're posting from the YooKay so I understand where you're
>>>> coming from, but there *are* no "copper alloy" brake lines in the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> What part of "alloy" are you having the problem in understanding?

Doesn't matter. It is a COPPER ALLOY. DOT says NO. Install it on a
vehicle and wait for the lawyers to come calling if anything EVER
happens. Just the way it is.

>> Same thing with compression fittings on brake lines.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Europe. DIN flares are much better, especially if there's any end
> tension on the pipe.

SAE flares and bubble flares are LEGAL. Compression ring style fittings
are not.

Signature

Steve W.

Nate Nagel - 18 Oct 2006 01:54 GMT
>>>>I see you're posting from the YooKay so I understand where you're
>>>>coming from, but there *are* no "copper alloy" brake lines in the
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Europe. DIN flares are much better, especially if there's any end
> tension on the pipe.

What's a "DIN" flare?  Is that what I'd know as an ISO or "bubble"
flare?  If so I disagree; a bubble flare can only be disassembled once
or twice before it needs replacement.

Best of all would be AN type flares/fittings, but they've never caught
on for automotive use for some reason.

nate

Signature

replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

Steve W. - 18 Oct 2006 03:16 GMT
> What's a "DIN" flare?  Is that what I'd know as an ISO or "bubble"
> flare?  If so I disagree; a bubble flare can only be disassembled once
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> nate

DIN are sort of a half ISO bubble. The face looks like a bubble flare
but the back has a flat surface. If you start forming a standard double
flare and stop after the first step on a manual tool you get the DIN
style flare.

You are VERY correct. They are at most a two time use flare. Even then
they are a pain to seal the second time. Plus the stress riser at that
flat area at the base of the flare makes it easy for vibration to break
them.

Looking online I found a few references to the "Kunifer" or "90-10
Copper-Nickel" being marginal for vehicle use due to work hardening from
vibration.
The only thing I see on the web sites about it are that it doesn't
corrode like steel. That is it's claim to fame.

http://www.copper.org/applications/automotive/hydraulic_brake_tube.html
http://www.copper.org/applications/automotive/brake.html
http://www.dimebank.com/BrakePlumbing.html

Signature

Steve W.

John S. - 16 Oct 2006 23:49 GMT
> A rear brake line blew on my 91 Toyota Corolla the other day due to
> corosion, and rather than replace it, which would be tricky and
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Tyson

Can this not be a troll?
Don - 17 Oct 2006 03:07 GMT
>> A rear brake line blew on my 91 Toyota Corolla the other day due to
>> corosion, and rather than replace it, which would be tricky and
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Can this not be a troll?

There really ARE people that stupid and irresponsible out there.
After all, 2-wheel brakes met all current standards in the year 1920!

Don
www.donsautomotive.com
John S. - 17 Oct 2006 12:51 GMT
> >> A rear brake line blew on my 91 Toyota Corolla the other day due to
> >> corosion, and rather than replace it, which would be tricky and
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> There really ARE people that stupid and irresponsible out there.
> After all, 2-wheel brakes met all current standards in the year 1920!

Yes, and Ford  used a driveshaft brake but cars were much slower.  If
the rear brake lines burst because they were corroded, the fix isn't to
crimp off the rear lines and hope they don't leak.  The fix is to
replace all lines because the fronts are probably in bad shape too.
That's a guy who doesn't give a darn about his safety, other passehers
and family and other drivers.
TeGGeR® - 17 Oct 2006 18:54 GMT
> If
> the rear brake lines burst because they were corroded, the fix isn't
> to crimp off the rear lines and hope they don't leak.  The fix is to
> replace all lines because the fronts are probably in bad shape too.
> That's a guy who doesn't give a darn about his safety, other passehers
> and family and other drivers.

The Toyota brake lines I've seen are covered in black rubber sheathing.
The sheathing is interrupted where the mount brackets are, and that's where
they rust.

Signature

TeGGeR®

ray - 20 Oct 2006 15:16 GMT
>>> A rear brake line blew on my 91 Toyota Corolla the other day due to
>>> corosion, and rather than replace it, which would be tricky and
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Don
> www.donsautomotive.com

I know a guy who used compression fittings from Home Depot to fix a
broken brake line.  Stupid, but better than this.
Nate Nagel - 17 Oct 2006 03:13 GMT
> A rear brake line blew on my 91 Toyota Corolla the other day due to
> corosion, and rather than replace it, which would be tricky and
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Tyson

expense?  new lines are cheap at your FLAPS.  just remove the old one,
take it in for a pattern, and they will give you one for a couple bucks
that's within a few inches in length.  Or if it's a hose that blew...
well those are cheap too.  Basically even if you pay someone to do this
repair unless there's other issues, it should still be under $100.
Crimping a blown line is a "get you home" fix, not a "drive for a year" fix.

nate

Signature

replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

Knifeblade_03 - 17 Oct 2006 12:25 GMT
:eek:  Disable rear brakes for a year?????????:banghead: :nono: :uhoh:

Like Nate and Tegger state, it's not too hard to replace a line or pay
someone to do it.  Even if you just "patch" the bad area, better to
have rear brakes than to just say no big deal if they don't work.

In any case, if you decide to really disable the rear brakes, please
stay away from driving around my area.:shakehead

Signature

Knifeblade_03

http://www.automotiveforums.com

Steve - 17 Oct 2006 14:12 GMT
> A rear brake line blew on my 91 Toyota Corolla the other day due to
> corosion, and rather than replace it, which would be tricky and
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Tyson

I don't care if you're keeping the car for 1 hour or 10 more years...
for the sake of the rest of us on the road, FIX the brakes or get it the
piece of junk the hell off our roads.
Ralf Ballis - 18 Oct 2006 00:47 GMT
> would they be extremely grabby?

Would say it would be very stupid to do this!
By the way, manipulations like this has in consequence to lose all
pretension of insurance in case of an accident even in case you aren't the
causer.

Regards,

Ralf
Signature

www.omnibusclub.de
Erfinder des Abgasturboladers Dr. Alfred J. Büchi: "Die Abgase,
deren noch inne-wohnende Energie bis dahin vergeudet wurde ..."

Harry Face - 20 Oct 2006 15:48 GMT
If the rear brake line corroded  to the point of being useless, the
front line & hoses are probably just as bad.

The rubber brake hoses breakdown internally and can collapse when you
depress the brake pedal causing the brake to drag and or not release
fully.

If you do disable the rear brakes, it will probably put undo stress on
the fronts brakes causing them to work harder to stop the vehicle. When
the fronts fail and your on the interstate doing 80 mph try to run into
one of the " low boy " semi trailer's, that's the trailer that goes goes
almost down to the ground, that way if you hit it you don't go under it.

Fix the brake lines or junk the vehicle and get another car.

Christ, even I replaced my brake hoses on my car with over 300,000 mile,
and my vehicle certainly isn't worth fixing any more, but I keep it
anyway.

Good Luck,

harryface
05 Park Avenue 51,908
91 Bonneville 307,579
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.