<<snip>>
> I would be very wary of a so-called mechanic who tells me that 'all the
> sensors and the computer' are bad. This person is quite obviously not
> troubleshooting anything at all and just plans on throwing parts at your
> car with no knowledge of how these parts even work.
>
> Can he explain what *exactly* is wrong with 'every sensor and the computer'?
He just said it was probably because it was jumped. I found it very hard
to believe but he was recommended by a shop I trusted.
> Some of the scanners will show the the 'snapshot' data captured at the
> time the MIL was lit. But I don't think that your '89 will have the
> OBD-II controller. You may need to work through the codes that you have
> and check each part of the system to figure out what went wrong.
I am under the impression that I need an OBD I reader although the manual
says DRB II.
> You mentioned a loss of fuel efficiency coupled with a smell of gas. The
> first thing I would check for is a leak. Bend/pull/push on all fuel
> lines to be sure that it is not a simple cracked fuel line causing your
> problem.
The fuel would drip from the injector manifold. Like the old cars when
they flooded. I went to another shop and they tightened all the hoses.
The first shop told me the compression was good. I checked the compression
and it read 100, 110, 55, 110. Even I know that's NOT good. I'd sure like
to make it run for a while longer though. Years ago at Precision Tune
we had an old Chrysler come in with a dead hole. 0 compression. That car
would squeal the tires no problem, with 7 cylinders.
I called the shop that recommended them and let them know what I have
found out. They were not too pleased about that shop. I hope they don't
send too many more that direction.
Thanks,
Steve
Ron - 21 Oct 2006 02:30 GMT
> <<snip>>
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> Thanks,
> Steve
Ron - 21 Oct 2006 02:45 GMT
> > <<snip>>
> >
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> > Thanks,
> > Steve
TomO - 23 Oct 2006 17:09 GMT
> <<snip>>
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> to believe but he was recommended by a shop I trusted.
>
I've jumped and jumped from plenty of cars without destroying all the
sensors: or even a single one as that goes. Sure, it's possible to do
damage, but to just say that jump starting a car will destroy all the
electronics just goes to prove how little your mechanic knows about
vehicle electronic systems.
>>Some of the scanners will show the the 'snapshot' data captured at the
>>time the MIL was lit. But I don't think that your '89 will have the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> says DRB II.
>
Go with what the manual says. I don't know what a DRB II is, but I am
severly limited to experience of only the vehicles I have owned.
>>You mentioned a loss of fuel efficiency coupled with a smell of gas. The
>>first thing I would check for is a leak. Bend/pull/push on all fuel
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Thanks,
> Steve
Good Luck! Perhaps it's time for some valve work or a complete software
change?
mandtprice@gmail.com - 23 Oct 2006 17:44 GMT
> >>Some of the scanners will show the the 'snapshot' data captured at the
> >>time the MIL was lit. But I don't think that your '89 will have the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Go with what the manual says. I don't know what a DRB II is, but I am
> severly limited to experience of only the vehicles I have owned.
ODB-II wasn't available until the late 90's - 1996 I think. Most cars
of this vintage will have some way of communicating trouble codes out
by blinking the MIL light. A shop manual for this car would certainly
be able to walk you through this procedure. Also, most cars from of
this age weren't very verbose, so don't worry about getting a bunch of
different codes.
Most parts stores - AutoZone for sure, others maybe - will do an ODB-II
scan for you for free. You might try calling around to see if anyone
can handle an older car like the one you are working on. ODB-II is
nice because it is mostly standardized whereas what came before was a
crapshot of connectors and languages.
Best of luck
Matthew