Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

avoiding cold starts

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mac - 14 Nov 2006 03:42 GMT
First, are these assumptions correct?
(1) Starting a car when the engine is cold puts alot more stress on it
than when it's already warm.
(2) And the colder it is, the more stress.

Because i've always assumed the above, I do the following, but I want
to verify whether it's really worth it and doing any good...noone else
that I  know does this.

If I know I"m going to cold-start and then drive to  a destination that
is only a short distance (less than 5 miles) and then a second
destination a short time later,  rather than go to the first
destination and turn off the engine off right away (before it's reached
full operating temps, at least based on the "thermometer" on the dash),
I'll usually drive around a little bit more, or let the engine run for
about more minutes, before turning it off........since I know i have to
re-start it in less than an hour to go to my second destination....so
tha when i re-start it the engine should still be warm.

Also, in other cases, if after reaching the first destination with the
engine not fully hot...., rather than turn it off, i'll just leave the
car and let the engine run (if it's just a short stop over, like 5
minutes) and then go on to my 2nd destination.

I'm wondering whether i'm doing any good by this.
MishaA - 14 Nov 2006 04:33 GMT
Modern engines with modern oils are way less sensible to cold starts.
What you are doing does not do any noticeable good for your engine, and
technically does not hurt either. It hurts your wallet and our ecology,
though.

Signature

MishaA

http://www.automotiveforums.com

=?x-user-defined?Q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?Q?=BB?= - 14 Nov 2006 06:25 GMT
> First, are these assumptions correct?
> (1) Starting a car when the engine is cold puts alot more stress on it
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> I'm wondering whether i'm doing any good by this.

Define cold.
Cold to me is anything below 85F.  Below 50F and I don't go outside.
Dan_Thomas_nospam@yahoo.com - 16 Nov 2006 16:14 GMT
> Define cold.
> Cold to me is anything below 85F.  Below 50F and I don't go outside.

        On the Canadian Prairies:
85F = Hot day. Stay in the shade.
50F = Might want a sweater on.
40F = Time for the jacket.
20F = Time to change the oil. Max 5W30, maybe 0W30.
0F = Getting a little chilly. Might want to warm the engine for two or
three minutes before driving or it might cough and die.
-20F = Plug in the block heater. Put on long underwear. Wear a hat.
-40F = Some parents keep kids at home from school. The rest of us go to
work.
-50F = Can't talk outside. Your words freeze and fall to the ground,
and in the spring everyone can hear what you said about them when those
words melt.
-60F = Smoke freezes in the chimney and the furnace fumes back up into
the house. Got to climb up on the roof and poke a long stick down
through the frozen smoke, turn the heat way up and burn the rest of it
out.
-70F = Can't drive at night. The headlight beams freeze to anything
they hit and immobilize the vehicle. Have to turn off the lights to get
moving again.

         Dan
ROY BRAGG - 14 Nov 2006 07:55 GMT
It's better to let any engine warm up as much as possible, but leaving the
car running (unless it is occupied) is a great invitation for car thieves.
Many people have gone to 7-11 to get coffee on the way to work and left
their cars running while in the store only to have it disappear while
getting their coffee.
Roy
> First, are these assumptions correct?
> (1) Starting a car when the engine is cold puts alot more stress on it
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> I'm wondering whether i'm doing any good by this.
Steve - 14 Nov 2006 14:59 GMT
> First, are these assumptions correct?
> (1) Starting a car when the engine is cold puts alot more stress on it
> than when it's already warm.
> (2) And the colder it is, the more stress.

I would dispute that it puts "a lot" more stress on it. Cold starts with
modern oils of the correct grade for the climate you're in are really a
non-issue. Yeah, a modern engine may piston-slap like a diesel when its
cold and sound very different than when its hot (unlike older engines
with different piston alloys and designs that traded efficiency for
quiet when cold,) but that's a completely harmless sound. It would be
far more harmful if the pistons bound in the bore when the engine was
fully heated up.

> Also, in other cases, if after reaching the first destination with the
> engine not fully hot...., rather than turn it off, i'll just leave the
> car and let the engine run (if it's just a short stop over, like 5
> minutes) and then go on to my 2nd destination.
>
> I'm wondering whether i'm doing any good by this.

You're probably doing HARM through excessive fuel dilution into the
lubricating oil.
mac - 14 Nov 2006 15:49 GMT
> You're probably doing HARM through excessive fuel dilution into the
> lubricating oil.

Interesting....I was reading in the past few years that idling doesn't
hurt the engine any more than driving does....but i think a LONG time
ago I used to hear that it's not good to idle too "long" (an hour?).

One slightly related (to my original question)  thing I heard last
year:    If your going to let you car sit parked (off) for a long time
(weeks??),  you should NOT 't drive a short distance and then turn the
engine off before the long parking duration....You should drive it
until it's fully warmed up....supposedly the condensation in the engine
would remain there and cause rust if you don't fully warm it before
turning it off and letting it sit.......true?
y_p_w - 14 Nov 2006 21:58 GMT
> > You're probably doing HARM through excessive fuel dilution into the
> > lubricating oil.
>
> Interesting....I was reading in the past few years that idling doesn't
> hurt the engine any more than driving does....but i think a LONG time
> ago I used to hear that it's not good to idle too "long" (an hour?).

Must have been when carburetors were the norm.  I can't imagine
that a modern fuel-injected and electronically controlled engine
would have problems with idling for long periods of time.

> One slightly related (to my original question)  thing I heard last
> year:    If your going to let you car sit parked (off) for a long time
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> would remain there and cause rust if you don't fully warm it before
> turning it off and letting it sit.......true?

Modern motor oil is probably better in handling all this stuff.  Many
(if not most) engines these days are aluminum.  I've never had an
oil analysis with any appreciable amount of moisture, even when
taken after a short drive.
Steve - 15 Nov 2006 15:00 GMT
>>You're probably doing HARM through excessive fuel dilution into the
>>lubricating oil.
>
> Interesting....I was reading in the past few years that idling doesn't
> hurt the engine any more than driving does....but i think a LONG time
> ago I used to hear that it's not good to idle too "long" (an hour?).

The problem isn't idling, its idling when cold. Idling will *never*
bring the oil up to full operating temp, even if the coolant gets there,
and its the oil that really needs to be heated to drive out absorbed
fuel and water vapors.

> One slightly related (to my original question)  thing I heard last
> year:    If your going to let you car sit parked (off) for a long time
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> would remain there and cause rust if you don't fully warm it before
> turning it off and letting it sit.......true?

Its not that it causes rust, its that it causes acid formation in the
oil.  But yes, its generally true. An occasional short cold trip really
isn't going to do any harm because the buffers in oils can handle the
acids just fine. But doing that sort of thing on a daily basis will
eventually overwhelm the oil and the total base number will decline,
meaning the oil is becoming acidic.
Wm Watt - 15 Nov 2006 17:43 GMT
I borrowed and electricity consumption meter from the public library
and put some of the numbers I got in a file a
www.ag384bn.bravehost.com/hydro.htp including the block heater on my
car. You can find some vauge references to fuel savings using a block
heater on the Internet but no hard data. It would be nice to have.

My impression is that an engine idling over any time without a load on
it will shake itself silly but an engine with a load on it won't shake
as much. Just an unrpoven theory of mine. My manual says not to idle
more than 30 min.

Here in Ottawa where winters get pretty cold remote starters are
popular just to warm up the car so people have a nice warm car to get
into, nothing to do with the engine, everything to do with creature
comfort.
Steve - 15 Nov 2006 20:03 GMT
> My impression is that an engine idling over any time without a load on
> it will shake itself silly but an engine with a load on it won't shake
> as much.

Uh.... no. The engine is just as balanced at idle as it is under load.
mac - 16 Nov 2006 16:19 GMT
Thanks for the replies.  I've actually never left my car running
unattended, and i never planned to  (what i meant at the end of my
original message was that i might let it run while stopping at a
destination, but not leaving it alone (like more than 10 feet away from
me).

Actually, the only time i let it run unattended was in an long-term
airport parking lot a few weeks ago, when I flew to Europe for one
week, and left the car running in the parking lot for a week, because i
heard the weather was gonna be very cold....and didn't want to start it
when i got back....didn't seem to cause any problems, though gas was
almost empty.  
(just kidding)
Steve W. - 15 Nov 2006 01:39 GMT
> First, are these assumptions correct?
> (1) Starting a car when the engine is cold puts alot more stress on it
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> I'm wondering whether i'm doing any good by this.

Depending on where you are leaving the engine idling may be illegal. It
is also a very poor idea since many of the insurance companies have it
buried in the fine print that leaving the keys in the vehicle means they
don't have to cover it in the event of loss/theft. It is also not
required with modern vehicles and oils.

Signature

Steve W.
Near Cooperstown, New York

rhiebert - 15 Nov 2006 04:00 GMT
>"... I'm wondering whether i'm doing any good by this."

Your Owner's Manual will probably say you are in the severe driving
condition catagory. As far as oil change intervals, it means follow the
RECOMMENDED o.c.i. If I were in this situation, and using my favorite
synthetic engine lubricant, I have the option and confidence to follow
what it claims on the lable.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.