>>CarclubsUSA.com <chilldeals@yahoo.com> wrote in article
>><1165980461.081060.37000@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>...
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> Don
> www.donsautomotive.com
If you're selling parts a "free" diagnostic is great investment. It's
amazing the amount of money some people will spend to avoid having to pay
for a real diagnosis.
At least the "diagnostic" is free --
> worth every penny it costs!
>
> Don
Ive used them twice, since I have not invested in a code scanner yet. The
first time it gave me a multiple misfire diagnosis,
which confirmed my fears...that the Buick plenum had decomposed and was
irrigating my cylinders. The second time it
was quickly recognized to be due to a gas cap improperly seated (which the
Autozone counterman recognized), and we just
reseated it.
So for me, it has been helpful...
Even if a person has his own scanner, it will only point to the codes, it
wont diagnose the problem. Throwing parts at cars
is a very unreliable way to fix them.
Don - 16 Dec 2006 15:26 GMT
> At least the "diagnostic" is free --
>> worth every penny it costs!
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>Even if a person has his own scanner, it will only point to the codes,
Not true at all! The scanners at my shop have freeze-frame ability,
data stream readout, KAM reset, factory tests, ability to write to
the PCM. There is a HUGE difference between the code reader at
AutoZone and a real scanner.
>it wont diagnose the problem.
A scanner that is more than a code reader is frequently essential for
diagnosis.
Don
www.donsautomotive.com
> Throwing parts at cars
>is a very unreliable way to fix them.
Correct.
hls - 16 Dec 2006 15:32 GMT
>>Even if a person has his own scanner, it will only point to the codes,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> A scanner that is more than a code reader is frequently essential for
> diagnosis.
Again, I think we disagree more in semantics than philosophy. You have
commercial quality diagnosis equipment.
There is a great difference between this, and what some people buy as code
readers or 'scanners'. The AutoZone
unit is okay for its type, but does not do the diagnostic work for you.
aarcuda69062 - 16 Dec 2006 20:35 GMT
> > A scanner that is more than a code reader is frequently essential for
> > diagnosis.
>
> Again, I think we disagree more in semantics than philosophy. You have
> commercial quality diagnosis equipment.
The confusion occurs because many do not know the difference
between a code reader and a real scan tool.
> There is a great difference between this, and what some people buy as code
> readers or 'scanners'.
A code "reader" is not a "scanner."
> The AutoZone
> unit is okay for its type, but does not do the diagnostic work for you.
Neither tool does the diagnostic work.
A trained brain is still a very essential part of that step.
aarcuda69062 - 16 Dec 2006 15:44 GMT
> The second time it
> was quickly recognized to be due to a gas cap improperly seated (which the
> Autozone counterman recognized), and we just
> reseated it.
That's one hell of a counterman. ;-)
I wonder how he knew it was the gas cap and not a leaking vent
solenoid?
hls - 16 Dec 2006 15:54 GMT
>> The second time it
>> was quickly recognized to be due to a gas cap improperly seated (which
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I wonder how he knew it was the gas cap and not a leaking vent
> solenoid?
He had seen it enough times that he 'suspected' it was the gas cap, but said
it might be further in the system.
We reseated and reset, and it turned out to be the answer.
Was a service to me because I had no code reader at all. And it worked..
I dont mind taking the car to a competent dealership or independent mechanic
if needed, but would prefer
to sidestep simple issues like the abovementioned.
aarcuda69062 - 16 Dec 2006 20:30 GMT
> > I wonder how he knew it was the gas cap and not a leaking vent
> > solenoid?
>
> He had seen it enough times that he 'suspected' it was the gas cap, but said
> it might be further in the system.
IOWs, he was guessing.
> We reseated and reset, and it turned out to be the answer.
AKA a lucky guess.
> Was a service to me because I had no code reader at all. And it worked..
> I dont mind taking the car to a competent dealership or independent mechanic
> if needed, but would prefer
> to sidestep simple issues like the abovementioned.
And had he guessed wrong, he'd already erased important freeze
frame information making subsequent diagnosis that much more
difficult.
anumber1 - 19 Dec 2006 05:52 GMT
>>>I wonder how he knew it was the gas cap and not a leaking vent
>>>solenoid?
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> frame information making subsequent diagnosis that much more
> difficult.
Although if he was wrong and the purge valve or another leak is causing
the problem, the light will come back on once the car goes through the
evap system pressure check again.
No real harm done IMO.