I was just rear-ended in my 2006 model - near new Civic. The impact was
hard enough
to slightly warp the trunk, but the most notably the driver was a 90
year old man who
stepped on the gas instead of the break after hitting my car and
further sandwitched
my car between his and three other stopped cars infront for a good 5 to
10 yards.
The repair shop is suggesting a bumper reconditioning instead of
replacing the bumper.
Can a reconditioned bumper be as good as the brand new bumper? Or can
the bumper
loose effectiveness, as small as it may be - given it has been thru an
10-20 mph to 0
impact?
Thanks,
Ben
Brent P - 16 Jan 2007 06:42 GMT
> The repair shop is suggesting a bumper reconditioning instead of
> replacing the bumper.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 10-20 mph to 0
> impact?
Bumper cover? The bumper cover is just cosmetic. If it isn't torn or
otherwise messed up it will be fine if hasn't been repainted before. Last
time my rear bumper was hit, the paint was cracked badly because it had
been repainted before. The body shop decided to replace it because it
would take as much in labor costs to strip it down and get it right as it
would to just start from a new part.
The actual bumper is under the cover, it's a hunk of steel. If they are
getting a used part, it will be fine. It's just a piece of formed steel.