Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Test for unknown current draw on battery?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Steve - 09 Feb 2007 16:23 GMT
Help please!  I either have a marginally bad battery or I have an
unknown current draw to cause a dead battery?  I put a test meter on
ohm setting at X10 between the pos and neg cables (battery removed)
and I get a slight movement of the meter needle - I don't recall the
actual reading.  So I opened the side door to simulate for the dome
light to go on and got a major jump of the meter needle.  Is this a
valid test to verify a current draw on a vehicles battery?  Should
there be any movement at all of the meter needle if there is zero
draw?  Or am I totally out of bounds on this?
Thanks,
Steve

This is on a 1990 Ford F-150 with about a 5 or six year old battery -
only the 2nd battery that's ever been in the truck since new - @130K
miles.
Mark Olson - 09 Feb 2007 16:55 GMT
> Help please!  I either have a marginally bad battery or I have an
> unknown current draw to cause a dead battery?  I put a test meter on
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> light to go on and got a major jump of the meter needle.  Is this a
> valid test to verify a current draw on a vehicles battery?

No.

> Should there be any movement at all of the meter needle if there is zero
> draw?  Or am I totally out of bounds on this?

It's really beyond the scope of a newsgroup to teach basic electricity...
but with that said:

You're using the wrong function of your multimeter.  Measure the current
drawn from the battery starting with the highest DC Amps range your meter
has, and working your way down in ranges until you get a measurable reading
in milli- or micro-amps with all electrical loads off, including the dome
light, and report the reading back here.
AZ Nomad - 09 Feb 2007 18:03 GMT
>You're using the wrong function of your multimeter.  Measure the current
>drawn from the battery starting with the highest DC Amps range your meter
>has, and working your way down in ranges until you get a measurable reading
>in milli- or micro-amps with all electrical loads off, including the dome
>light, and report the reading back here.

Keep in mind that most meters will go up in smoke if you don't have a high
enough range.
Don't try it if you don't have a 10A range.  Don't do anything stupid like
turn on the headlights or step on the brakes while the meter is in series.
Chris - 09 Feb 2007 18:15 GMT
I can't imagine anything constructive happening when connecting an ohm
meter across a batteries terminals, or even between 1 and ground.
You'll probably damage the meter. To check how much current you have
flowing while the engine is off, disconnect one of the terminals, then
connect your meter between the disconnected terminal and the
disconnected cable. The meter has to be set to read amperage, and this
sometimes entails unplugging one of the test leads and plugging it
into a different hole. Depends on the meter I guess.
Not at all an unusual question for a newsgroup. Heck people learn a
lot more complicated topics then that! If you still need help, e-mail
me off list.
HLS@nospam.nix - 09 Feb 2007 18:20 GMT
> I can't imagine anything constructive happening when connecting an ohm
> meter across a batteries terminals, or even between 1 and ground.
> You'll probably damage the meter.

Read the original post more carefully.  He said the battery had been
removed.
He was essentially testing the resistance from the positive battery terminal
to chassis ground with no battery in place.

That wont damage any meter.
AZ Nomad - 09 Feb 2007 19:19 GMT
>> I can't imagine anything constructive happening when connecting an ohm
>> meter across a batteries terminals, or even between 1 and ground.
>> You'll probably damage the meter.

>Read the original post more carefully.  He said the battery had been
>removed.
>He was essentially testing the resistance from the positive battery terminal
>to chassis ground with no battery in place.

>That wont damage any meter.

I was replying to a post about using a current range.  You must put the
meter in series with the battery to use a current range and most cheap
meters only have 0.5-1 watt shunt resistor.  It doesn't take much to smoke it.
HLS@nospam.nix - 09 Feb 2007 21:05 GMT
"AZ Nomad" <aznomad.2@PremoveOBthisOX.COM> wrote in message
news:slrnespia7.o72.aznomad.2@ip70-
> >That wont damage any meter.
>
> I was replying to a post about using a current range.  You must put the
> meter in series with the battery to use a current range and most cheap
> meters only have 0.5-1 watt shunt resistor.  It doesn't take much to smoke it.

Absolutely correct.  His original test was okay as far as it went.  It just
didnt
go far enough.  If he found a  low resistance, it would be indicative, but
not
diagnostic.

Don mentioned the action of semiconductors, such as diodes, and he is
correct
about that too.  While an ohmmeter might indicate, for example, a lamp
active
in a circuit, you would need to reverse the ohmmeter connections to be sure
that
it was a linear resistance and not a semiconductor, perhaps like the diodes
in the
alternator.

I have a large diameter wire shunt (with clamps on each end)  I put in
series with
the battery and cable . That way, I can hook it up and let everything
stabilize
with full battery voltage at whatever resting current develops.  I can then
use the
voltmeter function to determine the current through the shunt.

Keeps me from burning up meters.  The voltmeter function (which has a high
impedance)
is practically immune to burnout when used in this way and does not
significantly
change the current draw.
Chris - 09 Feb 2007 21:13 GMT
"You want the meter set to measure milliamps of current, not
resistance."

Rather start out at the largest ampere setting. In the event of leaky
diodes in the alternator, a parasitic draw of close to 4 amps is
possible. 4 amps = 4,000 milliamps

"He was essentially testing the resistance from the positive battery
terminal
to chassis ground with no battery in place.

That wont damage any meter."

No, it won't. And unless I'm reading it wrong, it won't register
anything at all, regardless of any situation. Maybe you meant between
the disconnected negative battery cable and ground. You should get 0
ohms, unless there's corrosion. They're supposed to be 2 common
points.

But no I didn't read the original post very carefully. But
regardless,  resistance measurements aren't what's needed here.
Steve - 09 Feb 2007 22:29 GMT
>  No, it won't. And unless I'm reading it wrong, it won't register
> anything at all, regardless of any situation. Maybe you meant between
> the disconnected negative battery cable and ground. You should get 0
> ohms, unless there's corrosion. They're supposed to be 2 common
> points.

Thanks for all the help!

I definitely did get a meter reading on ohms with the battery removed
and taken between the pos and neg cables.

I didn't say I knew what I was doing.......  ;-}

My multitester only has DCmA up to 250.  I didn't use the meter
anymore for fear of wrecking it.

I put in a good, charged, spare battery that I had from another
vehicle and when I connected the terminals I immediately heard
something like the EFI cycle on and off??  I don't remember that
happening before when disconnecting and reconnecting the battery??

The engine started and ran fine.  The guage in the dash looked normal
- needle about center - not discharging at all

When I shut the engine off I just disconnected the neg cable until I
can figure it out better.

Any ideas on the EFI cycling on and off when reconnecting the battery
would surely help??

I have the dead battery charging now and have to wait to see if it
takes a good charge.

Thanks again!
Steve
Steve B. - 09 Feb 2007 23:16 GMT
>Any ideas on the EFI cycling on and off when reconnecting the battery
>would surely help??

It is normal for it to make some noise when connecting a battery back
up.

>I have the dead battery charging now and have to wait to see if it
>takes a good charge.

.

Earlier you stated the battery was five or six years old correct?  If
it is then you have most likely found the culprit.  I would just hook
up the new battery and see what happens...  chances are way in your
favor that it will be fine.  If that battery goes dead too then go get
a good dvm that has a 10amp setting on it so you can see what is going
on.

                Steve B.
HLS@nospam.nix - 09 Feb 2007 23:41 GMT
"Chris" <chrism3667@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> That wont damage any meter."
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> ohms, unless there's corrosion. They're supposed to be 2 common
> points.

Nope, bubba.  You should get infinitely high ohms, not zero.  If it is zero,
then you will get an infinitely high current flow.

And if you read what he said, he was measuring between the positive cable
and ground (with the battery removed), which might indicate a short circuit,
a lamp active, etc.
Don - 10 Feb 2007 02:16 GMT
>"Chris" <chrism3667@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> That wont damage any meter."
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>and ground (with the battery removed), which might indicate a short circuit,
>a lamp active, etc.

IT INDICATES NO USEFUL INFORMATION WHATSOEVER!  He is measuring the
resistance of all sorts of solid state electronic devices.  The
reading could be quite low depending on the ohmeter's polarity.
Impose a backwards voltage on an alternator and it is essentially a
short circuit to anything above the voltage required to make the
diodes conduct.  Even if the polarity of the ohmmeter  correctly
imposes + voltage on the + battery cable, the resistance reading is
still totally meaningless and unpredictable because none of the
circuits -- such as courtesy light timer to mention just one -- can
reach a normal condition unless provided 12 volts and allowed to time
out.  NO conventional ohmeter imposes anywhere close to 12 v on the
circuit it is measuring.

Don
www.donsautomotive.com
HLS@nospam.nix - 10 Feb 2007 14:27 GMT
"Don" <don@NO-SPAMdonsautomotive.com> wrote in message
> IT INDICATES NO USEFUL INFORMATION WHATSOEVER!  He is measuring the
> resistance of all sorts of solid state electronic devices.  The
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Don
> www.donsautomotive.com

Have it your way, Don.
HLS@nospam.nix - 09 Feb 2007 17:05 GMT
"Steve" <kskenter@2z.net> wrote in message   Should
> there be any movement at all of the meter needle if there is zero
> draw?  Or am I totally out of bounds on this?
> Thanks,
> Steve

You are not totally out of bounds.  If you can get a valid resistance
reading, you can
estimate*  the current draw using Ohms law.

For example, if you found the resistance to be 990 ohms to ground, and E=
I*R or (13.5=I*990)
you can assume the resting current might be near 14 milliamperes.
As another posted mentioned, it is often better to use the ammeter function
in series
with one of the battery leads.  In this way you can read the current draw
directly.  Be careful,
or you can ruin a meter this way.

Not all systems shut down immediately when you turn the key off.  Sometimes
you
have to wait a few minutes before they hibernate.  Remember this when you
put the
ammeter in series with the battery cable.

Now, what is normal? Varies.   10-50 milliamperes is not abnormally.  As you
approach 100 ma or
more, you are getting into the realm where resting current becomes more of a
concern.
Don - 09 Feb 2007 18:41 GMT
>"Steve" <kskenter@2z.net> wrote in message   Should
>> there be any movement at all of the meter needle if there is zero
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>You are not totally out of bounds.  If you can get a valid resistance
>reading,

That's a big "if."  Any modern car has solid state electronic devices
that remain connected with the key off.  Some can take up to 1/2 hour
to time out to a reduced draw.  If they don't have 12v supplied they
may never time out.  Also the resistance of semiconductors is varies
enormously depending on voltage supplied and polarity.  For any
vehicle with modern electronics an ohmmeter test is totally useless to
calculate parasitic draw.  I am not aware of any normal ohmeter that
supplies a constant  12v to the resistance it is measuring.    

Don
www.donsautomotive.com      

> you can
>estimate*  the current draw using Ohms law.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>more, you are getting into the realm where resting current becomes more of a
>concern.
Steve - 09 Feb 2007 17:07 GMT
> Help please!  I either have a marginally bad battery or I have an
> unknown current draw to cause a dead battery?  I put a test meter on
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> only the 2nd battery that's ever been in the truck since new - @130K
> miles.

Its a valid test, and it sounds pretty normal. With a battery that old,
I'd expect it to be the battery and not an excessive current draw.
Steve - 09 Feb 2007 18:27 GMT
>> Help please!  I either have a marginally bad battery or I have an
>> unknown current draw to cause a dead battery?  I put a test meter on
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Its a valid test, and it sounds pretty normal. With a battery that old,
> I'd expect it to be the battery and not an excessive current draw.

Whoops, read to quickly. I thought you were in the AMMETER mode. You
want the meter set to measure milliamps of current, not resistance.
Leave the positive battery cable in place, remove the negative. Then put
the ammeter between the negative battery post and the neg. battery cable
(put the meter's positive lead on the cable). Then you will be directly
measuring the current draw. Don't turn on any big loads (not bigger than
a dome light, anyway) or you'll blow your meter's internal fuse.
Don - 09 Feb 2007 18:50 GMT
>> Help please!  I either have a marginally bad battery or I have an
>> unknown current draw to cause a dead battery?  I put a test meter on
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Its a valid test,

Its 100% meaningless.  See my post above.   The OP didn't even
consider the polarity of the ohmeter leads which will have a huge
effect on draw from any solid state device.  But, in any case, the
test is 100% meaningless because the resistance of solid state
circuits varies enormously according to voltage applied, time out
functions etc.  Absolutely all he did was confirm that the door switch
works.

Don
www.donsautomotive.com

> and it sounds pretty normal. With a battery that old,
>I'd expect it to be the battery and not an excessive current draw.
Mike Romain - 09 Feb 2007 17:38 GMT
> Help please!  I either have a marginally bad battery or I have an
> unknown current draw to cause a dead battery?  I put a test meter on
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> only the 2nd battery that's ever been in the truck since new - @130K
> miles.

That just means the light bulb and door switch is working in the dome
light, nothing else.

You need the battery in place with everything off and the negative
battery cable only removed.  You then put the meter between the negative
cable clamp and the negative post to see what the draw is.

As someone else mentioned, less than 100 ma is best, but the draw
depends on how many things have a memory, like a clock or radio station
memory set on a stereo.

Just having the connections on the battery get normally dirty after all
these years can cause it to not get charged up fully so a good clean of
the connections is always a good start.

If you can open the caps on the battery, do so to check the fluid level.
 As they get  old the fluid evaporates which causes low battery charge.
 It can be topped up with distilled water if low.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.