> No, people that "update" Porsches are jackasses. Especially jackassish
> are those that have ruined pre-1973 911s by "updating" them with big
> ugly bumpers.
On Feb 28, 8:56 am, tetraethylleadREMOVET...@yahoo.com (Brent P)
wrote:
> In article <es3p362...@news3.newsguy.com>, Nate Nagel wrote:
> > No, people that "update" Porsches are jackasses. Especially jackassish
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> fairly common to buy pre-73 maverick bumpers and all the associated
> parts and back date the big bumpered 74-77s.
Oh heck yeah. I remember admiring what appeared to be a clean
mid-70's or 80's 911 outside a restaurant once and the owner caught me
looking. He proudly informed me that it was actually a '71 or '72 and
he'd just finished having it "updated" with the newer style bumpers
and associated body modifications. This was a decade or more ago, so
at the time it made it look like a "new" car. Fortunately, I couldn't
decide whether to cry or strangle him, so I just kind of stood there
expressionless for a second and then mumbled something like "well, it
looks good." If you look at Porsche-specific catalogs of the time
(and it may still be true today, but back then I was getting a lot of
them because I was working on a 914 and stuff was not as readily
available online as it is today) there were lots of "update kits"
available.
Personally, I don't understand the point of trying to make a car look
like something it's not, especially when the original design was so
pretty to begin with. And just before someone picks nits, I should
have said "Pre-1974" in my original post; they still used the early,
metal-bumper body style with the turn signals in the front fenders in
1973. Brain/finger interface failure.
nate
Brent P - 28 Feb 2007 16:53 GMT
> Personally, I don't understand the point of trying to make a car look
> like something it's not, especially when the original design was so
> pretty to begin with.
That was the point with backdating, to restore the orginal lines of the
design.
> And just before someone picks nits, I should
> have said "Pre-1974" in my original post; they still used the early,
> metal-bumper body style with the turn signals in the front fenders in
> 1973. Brain/finger interface failure.
Model year '73 only required a 5mph bumper in front. There are a good
deal of '73 unique bumper designs out there and for many makes and models.
Sometimes they are very well done and show little difference from a '72
of the same model. Other times they are in between what a '72 and a '74
looks like. For some reason when they went front and rear in '74 that's
when the ugly started for most models. So, what you meant was clear to me
anyway.