I went to a Bentley, Rolls-Royce dealer, on a Sunday just to look. It
appears the two cars are almost identical. Is there any significant
difference between the two?
Anyone here ever own or work on these cars?
Also, how much better quality are they than Lincoln, Cadillac, Accura
etc?
Do you think a Rolls or Bentley would last for 500,000 miles with
original engine and transmission etc? Better paint? Wont rust? Just
what are you getting besides a prestige name?
Scott Dorsey - 12 Mar 2007 14:38 GMT
>I went to a Bentley, Rolls-Royce dealer, on a Sunday just to look. It
>appears the two cars are almost identical. Is there any significant
>difference between the two?
They share a lot of parts. But remember, the big deal about these vehicles
has to do with the body and layout, not the drive train.
>Anyone here ever own or work on these cars?
I have worked on older RR cars, though not any of the newer ones.
>Also, how much better quality are they than Lincoln, Cadillac, Accura
>etc?
They are different vehicles for different applications. They are not
designed to make the driver happy, they are designed to make the passenger
happy.
>Do you think a Rolls or Bentley would last for 500,000 miles with
>original engine and transmission etc? Better paint? Wont rust? Just
>what are you getting besides a prestige name?
Yes, they'll last for 500,000 miles with original engine and transmission,
BECAUSE the maintenance schedule on them is so extended. Hell, some of the
older RR vehicles specify chassis lube every 500 miles. If you put that
kind of PM and attention into a Toyota it would last for 500,000 miles too.
It's expected that if you have one of these vehicles that you have a driver
and mechanic to take care of them, so they are designed to actually be
maintained, unlike most cars today.
But what you REALLY get is a driver/passenger configuration that is intended
to make the passenger in the back seat comfortable while his driver does all
the work. This is something that isn't very common, and any time you want
something that not everyone else wants, you pay more money because you don't
get the benefits of mass-production.
--scott

Signature
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
John S. - 12 Mar 2007 18:45 GMT
> I went to a Bentley, Rolls-Royce dealer, on a Sunday just to look. It
> appears the two cars are almost identical. Is there any significant
> difference between the two?
The image of the Bentley is somewhat sportier than the Rolls.
Volkswagen actually bought both names from their prior owner, although
BMW now has the right to produce Rolls Royce cars. Are they BMW Royce
and Volksentley cars now?
> Anyone here ever own or work on these cars?
Not me.
> Also, how much better quality are they than Lincoln, Cadillac, Accura
> etc?
Are they half a million bucks better quality than say a Lexus or a
Toyota? Probably not. But they do have really nice looking
interiors.
> Do you think a Rolls or Bentley would last for 500,000 miles with
> original engine and transmission etc? Better paint? Wont rust? Just
> what are you getting besides a prestige name?
Beyond a prestige name you get a lot of bragging rights and the right
to enjoy the heads that will inevitably turn as you silently and
quickly motor past. And you will take pleasure in knowing you will
be immediately identified as either having the balance sheet and
income statement to support such an Automotive Investment or an
American Express Card that will support a short term luxury car rental.
Rodan - 12 Mar 2007 20:25 GMT
I went to a Bentley, Rolls-Royce dealer, on a Sunday just to
look. It appears the two cars are almost identical. Is there
any significant difference between the two?
______________________________________________________
Many years ago they were identical except for the Grille and
the nameplate. The Bentley cost slightly less. People who
wanted Rolls quality bought the Bentley because they felt
the Rolls was too pretentious. This was a situation where
you could be one-up by buying a cheaper car.
Rodan.
cuhulin@webtv.net - 13 Mar 2007 00:10 GMT
Back in the 1930's or 1940's,Rolls Royce had a factory in
Springfield,Massachusetts.One of my books I have here about antique cars
says the American built Rolls Royce cars were of better quality than the
cars built in England and some parts of the drive train and the wiring
and some other parts were manufactured in America.The article in my book
says Rolls Royce pulled out of making Rolls Royce because America was
building them better than they were built in England.A few years ago,I
read on the internet Rolls Royce pulled out because they weren't selling
as many Rolls Royce cars in America as they had expected to sell.I have
a lady friend who lives near the Rolls Royce factory at Goodwood.
cuhulin
Hachiroku ハチロク - 16 Mar 2007 21:22 GMT
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:10:35 -0500, cuhulin wrote:
> Back in the 1930's or 1940's,Rolls Royce had a factory in
> Springfield,Massachusetts.One of my books I have here about antique cars
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Royce cars in America as they had expected to sell.I have a lady friend
> who lives near the Rolls Royce factory at Goodwood. cuhulin
It was in the 20's. One of the last cars produced there was the Silver
Shadow. They didn't stick around in Mass too long after the depression,
since the market for Roll's (and cars in general) fell right out.
IIRC, the last year of production was '32, but it may have been '34.
Too bad...I could just see myself working for Rolls-Royce!
J J - 13 Mar 2007 12:54 GMT
A friend let me drive her fathers Rolls once. Its the only car i was
nervous to drive. I noticed when I closed the door it seems to have
some sort of vacuum that helped close the door very easily and silently.
(Possibly the passenger compartment received a slight vacuum to pull the
door closed.) No slamming of door needed.
When I started it, motor was so quiet with no vibration, i couldn't tell
if it was running.
When I put it in drive there was no lurch or creeping forward like on
other automatic cars. It just stayed in place until I pushed the gas
pedal.
I felt like the seat was mounted high like i was sitting high up and
kind of looking down. I was so nervous that I might damage or wreck
the car my foot was shaking. But it was a once in a lifetime
opportunity for me.
I think the Rolls uses 7 quarts of oil and comes with Michelin tires.
Since they spare no expense its a feather in their cap to be the tire of
choice.
cuhulin@webtv.net - 13 Mar 2007 19:15 GMT
In 1927 or 1928,BMW was buildiing Austin cars under license from British
car maker Austin.If you want to google it and check out something about
that, History of BMW
When I was in the Army,I spent ten months at Scott Air Force
Base,Illinois in 1963.I bought a 1958 BMW Isetta car from an Air Force
Officer at Scott.That little car was dangerous to drive,especially
driving across the old Eads Bridge between East Saint Louis to Saint
Louis in wet weather.I sold the car to an Army Officer.
I still have the owners manual of that car.The car was originally
purchased by a woman in Germany.At Scott,sometimes some guys would pick
my little car up and hide it behind one of those evergreen bushes.I
would step outside and have to look around for my little car.
cuhulin