Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Oldsmobile Diesel

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Wonderer - 28 Apr 2007 21:39 GMT
I got this vintage oldsmobile diesel float from ebay without googling
it first.  There are a lot of heels in my area and it heats up badly
on my road home(elevation 2200ft).  I am a trucker and the diesel
trucks have high speed elctric fans for doing heavy lifting on
grades.  How can I retrofit my float to perform better in my area?  I
would imagine that the current fan which is attached to the crakshaft
would run at engine speed and not on load.
cuhulin@webtv.net - 28 Apr 2007 22:07 GMT
Is that similar to one of those parade floats? Those old Oldsmobile
diesel engines,mainly,they are beefed up gasoline engines.They are not
as tough as regular diesel engines.
cuhulin
Wonderer - 29 Apr 2007 00:48 GMT
On Apr 28, 4:07 pm, cuhu...@webtv.net wrote:
> Is that similar to one of those parade floats? Those old Oldsmobile
> diesel engines,mainly,they are beefed up gasoline engines.They are not
> as tough as regular diesel engines.
> cuhulin

It's a 82 98 regency diesel.  They are bad I know now.  I am hoping to
cook some bio diesel to run on it. The water in the radiator
mysteriously dissapear after 1/2 hour.  It could be a blown
headgasket.  It is still running and I want to take it easy with it
and use it for a while.
Hal - 29 Apr 2007 01:32 GMT
> It's a 82 98 regency diesel.  They are bad I know now.  I am hoping to
> cook some bio diesel to run on it. The water in the radiator
> mysteriously dissapear after 1/2 hour.  It could be a blown
> headgasket.  It is still running and I want to take it easy with it
> and use it for a while.

If you are losing coolant and don't see it on the ground somewhere
then yes, it could very well be a blown head gasket. Best thing to do
is to get a radiator pressure tester and pump the system up with the
engine cold and see where the leak is.

Chris
cuhulin@webtv.net - 29 Apr 2007 02:00 GMT
Maybe you can convert the engine into a steam engine by removing the
fuel injection and replace that with a steam pipe,you would need some
kind of a lubricant to mix with the water/steam.Only joking,of course.
cuhulin
Wonderer - 29 Apr 2007 13:29 GMT
On Apr 28, 9:00 pm, cuhu...@webtv.net wrote:
> Maybe you can convert the engine into a steam engine by removing the
> fuel injection and replace that with a steam pipe,you would need some
> kind of a lubricant to mix with the water/steam.Only joking,of course.
> cuhulin

If I could find some electric motors for the rear wheels would be neat
as well.  I could run the engine at a constant load.
ROY BRAGG - 30 Apr 2007 22:34 GMT
AS a former owner of a Cadillac Eldorado diesel (they used the Oldsmobile
engine) I would turn it into a boat anchor.  I had two injector pump
failures and blown main bearing seals.  Finally GM replaced the engine, and
it was a fair car for about 50000 miles.  I think at that point a head
gasket had blown, and I got rid of it.
Roy
> On Apr 28, 9:00 pm, cuhu...@webtv.net wrote:
>> Maybe you can convert the engine into a steam engine by removing the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> If I could find some electric motors for the rear wheels would be neat
> as well.  I could run the engine at a constant load.
Scott Dorsey - 01 May 2007 14:52 GMT
>AS a former owner of a Cadillac Eldorado diesel (they used the Oldsmobile
>engine) I would turn it into a boat anchor.  I had two injector pump
>failures and blown main bearing seals.  Finally GM replaced the engine, and
>it was a fair car for about 50000 miles.  I think at that point a head
>gasket had blown, and I got rid of it.

As I recall, there was a standard retrofit to turn these back into gasoline
engines, and when this was done they actually ran well and were pretty
reliable.
--scott

Signature

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

cuhulin@webtv.net - 01 May 2007 18:14 GMT
Back in the 1970's,I bought a Mercedes Benz four cylinder diesel engine
from J.C.Whitney Company,I think I paid about $350.00 for my diesel
engine,I know where my papers are on the engine are,it wouldn't take me
more than a few minutes to find them.At the time,I owned a small 1967
International Step Van.I had the idea I would replace the worn out
International slant four cylender engine in the van with the diesel
engine,but I never did get around to doing it.(that old song,I Am
Forever Blowing Bubbles,they must have named that song after me)

I bought a new starter motor and bell houshing and clutch disk and
pressure plate and throw out fork and some other new thingys for my
diesel engine.The old International van got to rusting out so bad,I got
rid of it.I still have the diesel engine here.

There is no serial number (serious number) on my diesel engine,so I
guess it is a replacement engine with no serial number.As soon as my
diesel engine showed up here,I used an old Chevrolet radiator and a one
or two gallon fuel tank I rigged up so I could get the engine running to
see if it runs ok.I haven't cranked my diesel engine up since after
that.

It would need a new fuel filter and new oil filter and fresh oil and
fresh diesel fuel just to be on the safe side to get it running again.I
guess to really be on the safe side, (since it's been sitting up since
the 1970's) my diesel engine would need somebody who knows how to work
on those engines,to really check the engine out.  
cuhulin
shiden_kai - 01 May 2007 22:54 GMT
> As I recall, there was a standard retrofit to turn these back into
> gasoline engines, and when this was done they actually ran well and
> were pretty reliable.

I've never heard of a "retrofit" to "turn these back into gasoline"
engines! That would be quite the retrofit...lowering compression
ratio, figuring out where to put the spark plugs.....etc,etc.

The retrofit was to yank out the diesel and install a gas Olds engine
in it's place.  Other then a few minor inconveniences....everything from
the diesel engine fits on the gas engine.

Ian
ROY BRAGG - 02 May 2007 07:37 GMT
That was the fix, the Oldsmobile 350 gas engine was well proven to be
reliable since it had been around since 1968.
Roy

>> As I recall, there was a standard retrofit to turn these back into
>> gasoline engines, and when this was done they actually ran well and
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Ian
Scott Dorsey - 02 May 2007 18:37 GMT
>> As I recall, there was a standard retrofit to turn these back into
>> gasoline engines, and when this was done they actually ran well and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>engines! That would be quite the retrofit...lowering compression
>ratio, figuring out where to put the spark plugs.....etc,etc.

What Olds did was to take an existing gasoline engine block, put on a
slightly different head, and different pistons and rods.  But an awful
lot of the diesel engine parts were shared with the original gasoline
design that they adapted.

This, incidentally, is why the engine didn't work worth a damn.

>The retrofit was to yank out the diesel and install a gas Olds engine
>in it's place.  Other then a few minor inconveniences....everything from
>the diesel engine fits on the gas engine.

Right, because it's the same engine.  As I recall, to convert back to
a gas engine you changed the head and the rods and kept the rest of
the engine.  Oh, and of course you put the carb back on....
--scott
Signature

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

shiden_kai - 03 May 2007 00:23 GMT
> What Olds did was to take an existing gasoline engine block, put on a
> slightly different head, and different pistons and rods.  But an awful
> lot of the diesel engine parts were shared with the original gasoline
> design that they adapted.

You are unbelievably full of sh.t when it comes to this engine!
Better go do some reading.

> Right, because it's the same engine.  As I recall, to convert back to
> a gas engine you changed the head and the rods and kept the rest of
> the engine.  Oh, and of course you put the carb back on....

See above!  It's not even close to the same engine, unless you mean,
"I stand back about 5 feet, and gosh it looks like an Olds engine"!

I worked on these engines day in, day out for five years when they
came out.  The fix for these engines was to stick in the gasoline version
of the Olds 350.

Ian
Scott Dorsey - 03 May 2007 01:27 GMT
>> What Olds did was to take an existing gasoline engine block, put on a
>> slightly different head, and different pistons and rods.  But an awful
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>You are unbelievably full of sh.t when it comes to this engine!
>Better go do some reading.

Entirely possible.  I'm only passing on what the dealer explained to me
many, many years ago.  It wouldn't be the first piece of sh.t I have passed
on from Oldsmobile.
--scott

Signature

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Nate Nagel - 03 May 2007 01:42 GMT
>>>What Olds did was to take an existing gasoline engine block, put on a
>>>slightly different head, and different pistons and rods.  But an awful
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> on from Oldsmobile.
> --scott

But you're more or less right.  There were a lot of differences, but the
basic architecture is that of a gasoline Olds 350.

nate

Signature

replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

Steve - 03 May 2007 23:30 GMT
> What Olds did was to take an existing gasoline engine block, put on a
> slightly different head, and different pistons and rods.  But an awful
> lot of the diesel engine parts were shared with the original gasoline
> design that they adapted.
>
> This, incidentally, is why the engine didn't work worth a damn.

Navistar (International) did pretty much the same thing to come up with
what later became the Ford Powerstroke and Navistar T444E, and no one
says those "aren't worth a damn" (except Cummins Dodge Ram drivers
maybe) ;-)  GM just did a typical late-70s GM half-a.s job instead of
doing it right, and (as I said in another post) probably the biggest
screw up was not completely revising the fuel system in the vehicles
that got the 350 diesel to incorporate enough filtration and water
separation.
cuhulin@webtv.net - 04 May 2007 00:19 GMT
I don't remember which year it was,but at one time Oldsmobile was
installing some Chevrolet gasoline engines in some models of Odsmobile
cars.Some of the customers complained about that too.
cuhulin
Nate Nagel - 04 May 2007 00:58 GMT
> I don't remember which year it was,but at one time Oldsmobile was
> installing some Chevrolet gasoline engines in some models of Odsmobile
> cars.Some of the customers complained about that too.
> cuhulin

Wasn't just Oldsmobile, eventually they started using the 350 Chevy
across the board.  I've even seen a few Cadillacs with 350s in them.

nate

Signature

replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

Tegger - 04 May 2007 01:21 GMT
Nate Nagel <njnagel@roosters.net> wrote in news:f1dsvg11449
@news3.newsguy.com:

>> I don't remember which year it was,but at one time Oldsmobile was
>> installing some Chevrolet gasoline engines in some models of Odsmobile
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Wasn't just Oldsmobile, eventually they started using the 350 Chevy
> across the board.  I've even seen a few Cadillacs with 350s in them.

My understanding is that it had to do with '70s emissions regs. It got way
too expensive for each division to certify its own engines, so the
automakers began shrinking their engine lineups, and commonizing where they
could, so there would be only one cost for any given engine class.

Signature

Tegger

Brent P - 04 May 2007 03:02 GMT
>> Wasn't just Oldsmobile, eventually they started using the 350 Chevy
>> across the board.  I've even seen a few Cadillacs with 350s in them.

> My understanding is that it had to do with '70s emissions regs. It got way
> too expensive for each division to certify its own engines, so the
> automakers began shrinking their engine lineups, and commonizing where they
> could, so there would be only one cost for any given engine class.

And GM picked the worst V8 engine they had at the time, at least
according to every olds/buick/caddy/pontiac person I've ever come across
in any medium voicing an opinion on the subject ;)
Steve - 03 May 2007 23:26 GMT
> As I recall, there was a standard retrofit to turn these back into gasoline
> engines, and when this was done they actually ran well and were pretty
> reliable.
> --scott

There were LOTS of retrofit possibilities. Pretty much any GM gasoline
engine with a B-O-P bolt pattern (translation: anything but a Chivvy)
would bolt up to the trans. Things were generally easier with an Olds
gasoline engine, and the 350 and 403 were both common swaps.

As for the engine itself, the later versions really didn't suck quite as
badly as you might be led to believe. After they strengthened the head
clamping, the major problems came from the fact that they tried to stick
with basically a gas engine fuel delivery system, not the added filters
and water separators that diesels really needed. Combine that with a
fairly low-end Roosa injection pump that didn't tolerate abuse from
dirty fuel and you got lots of uneven fuelling that blew up the one
cylinder that was trying to haul the load at full throttle while the
other 7 were idling :-p  But if you kept the fuel filters changed
obsessively and didn't just flog the engine, the later models held up
pretty well.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.