Interesting. Really the "tire of the future" or a gimmick?
http://www.michelinman.com/difference/releases/pressrelease01102005a.html
Noozer - 29 May 2007 15:19 GMT
> Interesting. Really the "tire of the future" or a gimmick?
>
> http://www.michelinman.com/difference/releases/pressrelease01102005a.html
This press release is over two years old and we still aren't seeing them on
the road. What do you think?
Doc - 29 May 2007 17:59 GMT
> >http://www.michelinman.com/difference/releases/pressrelease01102005a....
>
> This press release is over two years old and we still aren't seeing them on
> the road. What do you think?
I don't know whether it's a concept with the potential to be superior
- and it may not be - but I also don't know that this time frame
necessarily leads to a conclusion that it's not viable. I imagine
there have been longer time frames than this between working prototype
and refined product.
Noozer - 29 May 2007 20:59 GMT
>> >http://www.michelinman.com/difference/releases/pressrelease01102005a....
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> there have been longer time frames than this between working prototype
> and refined product.
Buy you'd expect to see the occasional updates.
Warren Weber - 30 May 2007 03:28 GMT
> Interesting. Really the "tire of the future" or a gimmick?
>
> http://www.michelinman.com/difference/releases/pressrelease01102005a.html
I wonder how they would hold up on high horsepower drivin wheels on take off
or on hard cornering.?
disston - 31 May 2007 16:51 GMT
They were suposed to be an option on some BMW's, or so I seem to
remember from TV show. Ops...showing my education again.
disston
Broderick Crawford - 01 Jun 2007 03:55 GMT
> Interesting. Really the "tire of the future" or a gimmick?
> http://www.michelinman.com/difference/releases/pressrelease01102005a.html
Yes, there was a science show on tv about them. I'd have to test drive
them to know.
John S. - 01 Jun 2007 14:34 GMT
> Interesting. Really the "tire of the future" or a gimmick?
>
> http://www.michelinman.com/difference/releases/pressrelease01102005a....
Airless yes, it substitutes a flexible core of ribs for the baloon of
air most tires use for cushioning. But it is hardly sideless. The
press release described the automotive application of the tweel as a
"concept" which tells me it is a long way from production.
Sounds interesting, although our lingo will have to change from having
a tire that is flat to a wheel that is broken when it inevitably
becomes no longer round. Wonder if they are repairable or just
throwaway wheels?
Elko Tchernev - 01 Jun 2007 22:42 GMT
>> Interesting. Really the "tire of the future" or a gimmick?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> becomes no longer round. Wonder if they are repairable or just
> throwaway wheels?
Yeah, that's a very good point. When the threads wear out, you
again change the entire wheel?