 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / July 2007mileage for 84-87 Honda CRX
I am trying to find out which year and exactly the gas mileage of the CRX that got the great 60? mpg mileage in the middle 80s. Also a place to get mileage info of other cars would be good too. Reply to redgreen202 at yahoo. >I am trying to find out which year and exactly the gas mileage of the CRX >that [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Reply to redgreen202 at yahoo. http://www.fueleconomy.gov/ On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:56:04 +0000, xxx wrote: > Reply to redgreen202 at yahoo. Didn't you once duct-tape two Hyundai Ponies together? On Jul 11, 9:56 pm, x...@xxx.xxx wrote: > I am trying to find out which year and exactly the gas mileage of the CRX that > got the great 60? mpg mileage in the middle 80s. Also a place to get mileage > info of other cars would be good too. That would be the HF version, which I believe was available in the 88-91 body style as well. A different charging system, final drive ratio in the transaxle, and possibly camshaft, along with EFI strategy changes were the differences between the HF and standard 1.5 liter Civics of that era. To say it was a dog is a royal understatement. It was probably more like 50 mpg, and you would have to lug around in a high gear to achieve that. 0-60 times were listed as "eventually". > Reply to redgreen202 at yahoo. Actually, I'll reply to the group. This isn't your personal one stop info source. Toyota MDT in MO >On Jul 11, 9:56 pm, x...@xxx.xxx wrote: >> I am trying to find out which year and exactly the gas mileage of the CRX that [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >It was probably more like 50 mpg, and you would have to lug around in >a high gear to achieve that. 0-60 times were listed as "eventually". I remember the prevalent comment of the time was that "HF" stood for "horsepower-free." Good mileage but I would say 50 mpg would be a stretch. Don www.donsautomotive.com >> Reply to redgreen202 at yahoo. > >Actually, I'll reply to the group. This isn't your personal one stop >info source. > >Toyota MDT in MO > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:35:25 -0700, Comboverfish > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > "horsepower-free." Good mileage but I would say 50 mpg would be a > stretch. Ha! That sounds about right RE: 'HF'. I worked at a Honda dealer during the HF era (a prouder time there likely will never be) and must say that they were good for 50 mpg. Some of the older techs reported getting that kind of mpg also during their mandated trips for new model training. That was before my time. New model training became a room of guys and a VCR by the time I signed on. Toyota MDT in MO > I am trying to find out which year and exactly the gas mileage of the CRX that > got the great 60? mpg mileage in the middle 80s. Also a place to get mileage > info of other cars would be good too. > > Reply to redgreen202 at yahoo. I had a 1987 HF with carb that got 52 mpg on a trip to Detroit from Muskegon.  SignatureSteve Walker Fusion640@verizonwallet.net (remove wallet to reply) > I am trying to find out which year and exactly the gas mileage of the CRX that > got the great 60? mpg mileage in the middle 80s. Also a place to get mileage > info of other cars would be good too. > > Reply to redgreen202 at yahoo. My son had an HF that he clocked 50 Mpg with.. > My son had an HF that he clocked 50 Mpg with.. How big a sail did he use? SignaturePostulate a group whose intent is to destroy the United States from within via anarchy and bankruptcy. The actions of the United States Congress are completely consistent with the actions one would predict from such a group. >> My son had an HF that he clocked 50 Mpg with.. > > How big a sail did he use? Stick shift and 55 mph |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.