
Signature
"Liberals used to be the ones who argued that sending U.S. troops abroad
was a small price to pay to stop genocide; now they argue that genocide
is a small price to pay to bring U.S. troops home."
-- Jonah Goldberg
> box...@sasktel.net wrote:
> >> box...@sasktel.net wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> is a small price to pay to bring U.S. troops home."
> -- Jonah Goldberg
the arrows are for direction of air flow. it makes no difference in my
1997 suburban with a 5.7
Paul Hovnanian P.E. - 31 Jul 2007 05:36 GMT
> > box...@sasktel.net wrote:
> > >> box...@sasktel.net wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> the arrows are for direction of air flow. it makes no difference in my
> 1997 suburban with a 5.7
It depends on exactly what kind of MAF sensor you are talking about. A
hot wire sensor won't care which way the air flows. A mechanical type
may very well block if the flow pushes the cone/diaphram or whatever
closed instead of open.

Signature
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Relax, its only ones and zeros!
Comboverfish - 31 Jul 2007 06:42 GMT
On Jul 29, 2:19 am, box...@sasktel.net wrote:
> > box...@sasktel.net wrote:
> > >> box...@sasktel.net wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> the arrows are for direction of air flow. it makes no difference in my
> 1997 suburban with a 5.7- Hide quoted text -
Now that you've mentioned a make and model we can continue. I haven't
looked at that style in quite a while, but I don't think that it has
any (significant) asymmetrical airflow paths inside. Also it is
unusual in that it *can* be turned around. I still wouldn't use it
backwards unless it was for some sort of testing. The MAFs I see on a
daily basis can't be installed backward in their air boxes.
Furthermore, there is a designed in 'windbreak' for lack of better
terminology that would surely interupt intended airflow patterns
around the two sensor elements if it were oriented wrong.
Toyota MDT in MO