> In article <C2F073E1.2517%anix...@REMOVETHEcogecoDOT.ca>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Your 28 in.hg. evacuation comes out to be 48768 microns.
> Not even close, by a bunch.
Last I heard, 28in Hg = 710mm Hg = 94% of atmospheric pressure. Which
is pretty impressive for just a tube with a hole in it! Must be madly
innefficient though.
Steve - 22 Aug 2007 18:46 GMT
> Last I heard, 28in Hg = 710mm Hg = 94% of atmospheric pressure. Which
> is pretty impressive for just a tube with a hole in it! Must be madly
> innefficient though.
ANYTHING powered by compressed air is madly inefficient. For starters,
as soon as you compress the air, approximately 1/2 of the energy that
went into the compressor gets converted into heating the air. Before you
use the air it usually cools off again so all that heat energy is lost.
50% efficiency right off the top. THEN you get to start factoring in the
losses in the air hoses, the tool iteslf, the compressor belts, motor,
etc. All in all, if you get 10% of the energy out of the tool that you
put into the compressor, its doing pretty damn good!
But people don't use air power because its efficient- air power is good
because its rugged. No cooling of the tools is needed, no electrical
hazards, dirt and filth tolerant, etc. etc. Venturi vacuum pumps can
pull vacuum on very wet or dirty loads that would contaminate the oil
and corrode conventional vacuum pumps, so they do have a place in the world.
aarcuda69062 - 23 Aug 2007 01:33 GMT
In article
<1187797858.234184.241910@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
> > Your 28 in.hg. evacuation comes out to be 48768 microns.
> > Not even close, by a bunch.
>
> Last I heard, 28in Hg = 710mm Hg = 94% of atmospheric pressure. Which
> is pretty impressive for just a tube with a hole in it! Must be madly
> innefficient though.
Impressive is an Inficon Shark vacuum pump that will pull a
system down to 25 microns.
I wouldn't dream of shipping a car that could only be pulled down
to 28 in.hg.