Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / September 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

REAR wheel alignment??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
me@privacy.net - 11 Sep 2007 17:12 GMT
Took my 2000 Mazda Protege ES to local brake shop for
brake job.  Told them to rotate tires front to back as
well.

Turns out brakes were OK... but they called me and said
they would not rotate my tires as the rear tires were
badly cupped on inside of tread.

The technician claims my rear wheels are out of
alignment!   I've never heard of a rear wheel
alignment. Anything to this?
Mike Romain - 11 Sep 2007 18:10 GMT
> Took my 2000 Mazda Protege ES to local brake shop for
> brake job.  Told them to rotate tires front to back as
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> alignment!   I've never heard of a rear wheel
> alignment. Anything to this?

Yup, the rear wheels are on bushings at their suspension pivots.  These
wear and can need replacing or adjusting.

I don't know how 'much' they can be adjusted before you need new parts.

Cupping means a balance or dead shock issue usually to me though,
peeling off an inside or outside edge suggests alignment....  Could be
wrong.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
me@privacy.net - 11 Sep 2007 18:19 GMT
>Yup, the rear wheels are on bushings at their suspension pivots.  These
>wear and can need replacing or adjusting.

wow

ok

how much do you think it would cost to have this
problem fixed properly?

I'm unemployed at the moment so money is an issue.

Is it something that needs fixed NOW?   Or could it
wait a few more months?
Mike Romain - 11 Sep 2007 19:51 GMT
>> Yup, the rear wheels are on bushings at their suspension pivots.  These
>> wear and can need replacing or adjusting.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Is it something that needs fixed NOW?   Or could it
> wait a few more months?

Most places offer a 4 wheel alignment these days, you will have to phone
around for pricing.

Are the tires dead now?   If cupped or worn bad enough, they won't line
up properly so you will need a fresh set.  If they are a write off, then
holding off on the fix for a while isn't going to cost much more likely.

I would also try a different shop than gave you the bad news because I
don't agree with their diagnosis.  I think you will get the alignment
and 'then' be told 'oh, the shocks are dead too' by the way or 'the
balance is way off now' too...

I blew/wore out the rear swing arm bushings on on rally car I used to
own.  These were worn enough the whole wheel would swing in and out if
you jacked up the side and the tires did 'not' cup in any way, they
peeled the edges.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
me@privacy.net - 11 Sep 2007 20:43 GMT
>I would also try a different shop than gave you the bad news because I
>don't agree with their diagnosis.

OK

Well the tires were bought new on 7/8/2006 with car
that had 110k miles on it at the time

So its now 9/11/07 and car has 136k miles on it....so
that's 14 months and 26k miles later.

Does that info help any?
Mike Romain - 12 Sep 2007 15:10 GMT
>> I would also try a different shop than gave you the bad news because I
>> don't agree with their diagnosis.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Does that info help any?

When you say 'cupping' on tires, that means scallop shaped wear marks
are happening in a pattern around the tire.

This implies a harmonic wobble in the rubber.  This can be caused by a
tire that is out of balance or a bad shock absorber allowing a slightly
out of balance tire set up a vibration.  A poor alignment can likely
make this worse, but when I think alignment troubles, I think of the
inside or outside edge of the tire showing unusual 'even' wear.

A test for shocks you can do yourself is to bounce each corner of the
vehicle as hard as you can and let go.  You then count the bounces to
stop.  A good shock will stop bouncing at 2 bounces or less.  If it hits
three bounces after you let go, the shock is done for.

You can also jack up each side and see if the wheel physically moves in
or out.

Loose rear wheel bearings can also allow a harmonic to set up cupping
the tires.  Again if you jack it up and they are loose, the wheel will
wobble

I could be wrong here, but rear wheel alignment is the last thing that
comes to mind for cupping.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
me@privacy.net - 12 Sep 2007 22:19 GMT
>I could be wrong here, but rear wheel alignment is the last thing that
>comes to mind for cupping.

Ok

Well I need to get under there and actually SEE the
tire wear myself.... I was just told it was cupping but
it may not be.

Instead it may be even wear all along inside edge of
tire on rear.  If that's the case its probably not some
kind of harmonic thing then, huh?
golden oldie - 13 Sep 2007 00:11 GMT
On Sep 12, 3:19 pm, m...@privacy.net wrote:
> >I could be wrong here, but rear wheel alignment is the last thing that
> >comes to mind for cupping.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> tire on rear.  If that's the case its probably not some
> kind of harmonic thing then, huh?

Rear wheel alingment is as important as front. The cupping that the
shop reffered to could be the diagional ear marks in the tread face
caused by the toe being out of spec. The Ford Escort and Tempo often
exhibited the diagional wear and if the toe was out enough would rear
end steer causing problems on slippery roads
me@privacy.net - 13 Sep 2007 16:01 GMT
>Rear wheel alingment is as important as front.

Ok will remember that in future

Question for the group tho.....should I go ahead and
rotate those tires and put backs one on the front since
they now have that wear?

The shop tech was hesitant to rotate them due to wear
on back tires...saying that it will be VERY noisy if
put on front wheels

What should I do?  leave em alone or rotate them?
golden oldie - 13 Sep 2007 16:13 GMT
On Sep 13, 9:01 am, m...@privacy.net wrote:
> >Rear wheel alingment is as important as front.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> What should I do?  leave em alone or rotate them?

Leave them where they are. Putting the front ones on the back will
cause the same wear on them and you will have to buy 4 new ones.
hls - 14 Sep 2007 02:05 GMT
>>Rear wheel alingment is as important as front.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> What should I do?  leave em alone or rotate them?

I echo what everybody has said about the rear alignment.. It can
be very important.  Stepdaughter had two tires worn to the steel belts
and it occurred quickly after she rotated tires, so she bought two new
and had the front end aligned.  This didnt make sense with the rotation
she had done so I asked her to go back and have them check the rear
alignment (Buick Regal).. It had a bent suspension member and the
alignment was dangerously off.

On my van, I had cupping on the front tires (high buck Michelins), so
went back to the tire supplier.  I had no suspension problems, nor out
of alignment conditions.   They (Discount Tire) told me I had not rotated
quickly enough and this sort of cupping was not unusual.  They rotated
the cupped ones to the back, and the noise and wear problem was brought
into reasonable limits.  Unfortunately, they used torque stix on their
impact
wrenches, and warped a set of rotors for me.

That was a couple of years ago, and I now have some 62,000 miles on those
Michelins.  I rotated them myself the last time, since the local tire
merchant
(NOT Discount Tire) never heard of a torque wrench.
me@privacy.net - 14 Sep 2007 16:36 GMT
>I echo what everybody has said about the rear alignment.. It can
>be very important.

OK point taken

Well I've REALLY learned something here. Thanks so much
guys!!

Just had no idea that rear wheel could get out of
alignment.  But its also my fault that when getting new
tires, I haven't been getting ANY kind of alignment
done.

I bought these tires at Costco where they have lifetime
rotation as well.
Scott Dorsey - 11 Sep 2007 19:53 GMT
>Took my 2000 Mazda Protege ES to local brake shop for
>brake job.  Told them to rotate tires front to back as
>well.

Why?  What made you think you needed a brake job?
And when did you last rotate your tires?

>Turns out brakes were OK... but they called me and said
>they would not rotate my tires as the rear tires were
>badly cupped on inside of tread.

Could be an alignment issue.  Could be an inflation issue too.

>The technician claims my rear wheels are out of
>alignment!   I've never heard of a rear wheel
>alignment. Anything to this?

Maybe, although I am not sure I'd want the local brake shop doing my
alignment for me.
--scott
Signature

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

me@privacy.net - 11 Sep 2007 20:45 GMT
>Why?  What made you think you needed a brake job?
>And when did you last rotate your tires?

I was hearing what I thought was noise when braking.  I
guess the brake man found lots of duct and dirt in rear
drums and cleaned them out

I usually rotate tires every 10k or so.
Comboverfish - 12 Sep 2007 04:22 GMT
On Sep 11, 2:45 pm, m...@privacy.net wrote:
> >Why?  What made you think you needed a brake job?
> >And when did you last rotate your tires?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I usually rotate tires every 10k or so.

Do it every 5k miles (or at every oil change).  Independent rear
suspensions on light FWD cars will often cause diagonal wear on tires,
which will spiral out of control if they are left in the same
positions for too long.  Just the uneven wear of front to rear tires
is reason enough to rotate regularly.  Add both reasons and you are
throwing tire $$$ away by not rotating properly.

Toe is adjustable in the rear of your car, so do consider doing the 4
wheel alignment after you get new tires.  Rear toe out of spec just
compounds the wear phenomenon mentioned above.

Toyota MDT in MO
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.