"Ashton Crusher" <demi@moore.net> wrote in message
> IT's really not a problem. If people read their owners manual it
> explains how to get around the interlock if it's not working.
Good point. I suspect few actually read those manuals until
some problem occurs...possibly laziness, but also an indication of
how poorly some of the manuals are conceived and organized.
Sis brought over the owner's manual yesterday. At least it had the
fuse location chart in it, but didnt say exactly which type of fuse it uses.
(I find there are two types of blade fuses on the shelves, so I bought
both).
The trailer wiring is suspect, as I am told that horses or other animals
on the farm may have been nibbling at the external wiring runs.
The "failsafe" operation on this Ford is apparently not shared by all
new vehicles. I haven't owned a Ford in years, and expect that trend
to continue.
Pete C. - 15 Sep 2007 01:51 GMT
> "Ashton Crusher" <demi@moore.net> wrote in message
> > IT's really not a problem. If people read their owners manual it
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> some problem occurs...possibly laziness, but also an indication of
> how poorly some of the manuals are conceived and organized.
I read the manual cover to cover. I also order the factory service
manual and read it cover to cover more than once. Of course I'm probably
in a single digit group of people in the who do that.
> Sis brought over the owner's manual yesterday. At least it had the
> fuse location chart in it, but didnt say exactly which type of fuse it uses.
> (I find there are two types of blade fuses on the shelves, so I bought
> both).
It's worse, there are at least three of the blade type fuses, the
original ATC type they most people are now familiar with, a mini version
and a maxi version. All the same basic design, just three physical
sizes. At least some overlap in ratings too.
> The trailer wiring is suspect, as I am told that horses or other animals
> on the farm may have been nibbling at the external wiring runs.
External wiring runs??? What kind of POS is it? Run the wiring up inside
the trailer frame or enclose it in a suitable conduit.
> The "failsafe" operation on this Ford is apparently not shared by all
> new vehicles. I haven't owned a Ford in years, and expect that trend
> to continue.
I doubt it's an actual intentional fail-safe design, probably just a
poor design that happens to have that side effect when confronted with
the specific issue from the trailer. A different issue would probably
release magic smoke from under the dash.
Ashton Crusher - 15 Sep 2007 21:29 GMT
>"Ashton Crusher" <demi@moore.net> wrote in message
>> IT's really not a problem. If people read their owners manual it
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>new vehicles. I haven't owned a Ford in years, and expect that trend
>to continue.
Unfortunately, the lights now days are often controlled by the
computer. It used to be a simple matter to wire in extra lights, or
for cop cars to hook up flashers to the factory lights, etc. For some
of the new cars they specifically warn that you cannot do that stuff
because it will mess up the whole computer controlled light system.
The newer Chevy impala's have a warning about tapping into the lights
to make them flash on police vehicles - it's a no no.
hls - 16 Sep 2007 02:48 GMT
"Ashton Crusher" <demi@moore.net> wrote in message
> The newer Chevy impala's have a warning about tapping into the lights
> to make them flash on police vehicles - it's a no no.
In this case the Furd has a factory setup for towing. The lighting is
apparently not the problem
"Ashton Crusher" <demi@moore.net> wrote in message
> IT's really not a problem. If people read their owners manual it
> explains how to get around the interlock if it's not working.
> In this case, it really IS a problem. I went through the owners manual..
> Not a damned word about how to get around the problem.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> I will, later, try to post what the shop reports.
Pete C. - 15 Sep 2007 01:52 GMT
> "Ashton Crusher" <demi@moore.net> wrote in message
> > IT's really not a problem. If people read their owners manual it
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> >
> > I will, later, try to post what the shop reports.
So it did release the magic smoke from under the dash...
hls - 15 Sep 2007 12:04 GMT
"Pete C." <aux3.DOH.4@snet.net> wrote in message
> So it did release the magic smoke from under the dash...
No, apparently it didnt.....at least, not from the trailer connection.
The wiring was okay. Animals, particular some cattle, often will
gnaw on exposed wiring, such as the trailer connector plug. But,
it turned out that this was not at all the case.
There were no fuses blown, and I looked at every one of them.
The ones associated with the interlock were also checked with
a VOM, just to be sure there were no hairline failures.
I asked if anyone had tried to "strongarm" the shifter, which can
damage it and prevent shifting, but the answer was no.
At this point, the cause is unresolved.
Ashton Crusher - 15 Sep 2007 21:33 GMT
>"Pete C." <aux3.DOH.4@snet.net> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>At this point, the cause is unresolved.
Not sure about that particular vehicle but from my memory I think the
general solution to interlock problems is to turn the key to the
UNlock position, that's the first click. This is not the ON position,
it merely unlocks the steering wheel and does not turn on anything
electrical. When its unlocked you should be able to move the shifter
out of Park without interference from the interlock mechanism. Then
you put it in Neutral and start the car (you should have your foot on
the brake for safety). That is typically how you get around a messed
up interlock. May not be how your truck is set up however. It surely
should be in the owners manual somewhere but might be hard to find
among all the safety warnings.