 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / September 2007www.autorepairforums.net
www.autorepairforums.net solvman@donnelly.edu wrote in article <1190602457.104920.184940@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>... > www.autorepairforums.net Last time I checked - a few days ago - there wasn't a SINGLE post on this site. I guess offering to pay 10-cents-per-post hasn't attracted people like Brock Yates, eh? > solv...@donnelly.edu wrote in article > <1190602457.104920.184...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > I guess offering to pay 10-cents-per-post hasn't attracted people like > Brock Yates, eh? How about you check right now? > > solv...@donnelly.edu wrote in article > > <1190602457.104920.184...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > How about you check right now? 3 days over 3000 visits...not that bad for a new website > > > solv...@donnelly.edu wrote in article > > > <1190602457.104920.184...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > 3 days over 3000 visits...not that bad for a new website Plus, over 200 threads/posts. ;) >> > > solv...@donnelly.edu wrote in article >> > > <1190602457.104920.184...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > ;) But you left out the most important part, none of the advice is even worth the *free* price. Come back when you have something to offer. > >> > > solv...@donnelly.edu wrote in article > >> > > <1190602457.104920.184...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > But you left out the most important part, none of the advice is even worth > the *free* price. Come back when you have something to offer. I'm not here to offer you anything... I just posted a link to my forum... whomever is interested they will sign up...if not that's fine by me. My comment is to that negative dude who said that's it's empty... I just corrected him saying that's it's not empty it has over 200 new post for last 3 days. Nobody invited you there personally either. You don't like...leave. And what do you really want for free? Maybe you should quite looking for free stuff, As you know: You get nothing for nothing, and darn little for a penny. Best regards. >> >> > > solv...@donnelly.edu wrote in article >> >> > > <1190602457.104920.184...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > whomever is interested they will sign up...if not that's fine by me. > My comment is to that negative dude who said that's it's empty... Which it was at the time of his posting. So what's your point ? > I just corrected him saying that's it's not empty it has over 200 new > post for last 3 days. OH, 3 days LATER it's no longer empty, so tell us again how you CORRECTED him. LOL > Nobody invited you there personally either. You don't like...leave. I did exactly that. I just posted hoping others wouldn't waste their time. > And what do you really want for free? Funny I didn't PAY anything to acces your site, so that would make it FREE would it not ??? But to answer your question I would like an accurate answer to my question if I was having problems with my car. Are you telling me that your site has no point in helping people with their automotive problems by giving them an accurate answer to their question???? You are really onlyinterested in the # of posts ????? Maybe you should quite looking > for free stuff, I didn't PAY anything to acces your site so it must be free right ??? I also didn't find any accurate information either. I hope you don't have this type of attitude with folks who are actually having problems with their cars. LOL I can just see it now: Website patron : "I used your website for help with my tranny problem, the only problem is the advice I recieved caused my tranny to blow up" summer1978 reply : " What do you want for free ???? I didn't personally invite you to use this site, no f.ck off" > As you know: You get nothing for nothing, and darn little for a penny. And even less from your website. LOL > Best regards. Good luck with your website, you are really going to need it. Mike <mik@localnet.com> wrote in article <uGjKi.17607$B25.9125@news01.roc.ny>... > >> >> > > solv...@donnelly.edu wrote in article > >> >> > > <1190602457.104920.184...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > >> > >> But you left out the most important part, none of the advice is even > >> worth > >> the *free* price. Come back when you have something to offer. [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > I didn't PAY anything to acces your site so it must be free right ??? I > also didn't find any accurate information either. I hope you don't have this > type of attitude with folks who are actually having problems with their [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Good luck with your website, you are really going to need it. Hey!...Hey!.......He's paying 10 cents-per-post. THAT ought to draw out the best, absolute top-notch, automotive technicians in the world, don't you think? > Hey!...Hey!.......He's paying 10 cents-per-post. How is he going to pay that ten cents, I wonder? Could the whole site be a scam for enticing people to give up their bank account info or something?  SignatureTegger > > Hey!...Hey!.......He's paying 10 cents-per-post. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > -- > Tegger I paid through pay pal...and it's not a scam...a lot of forums do it to start out...to get some quality info...that's why i advertised it. Right now on the market you could buy starting at 1000 posts for $50 that why I offered a little more. A lot of people spent time posting just out of the personal satisfaction...Wouldn't be nice to get $50 in addition to that once in a while? summer1978 <sergey@donnelly.edu> wrote in news:1190984202.817585.200710 @o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com: >> > Hey!...Hey!.......He's paying 10 cents-per-post. >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > just out of the personal satisfaction...Wouldn't be nice to get $50 in > addition to that once in a while? I think of the amount of time it would take to earn $50 with your scheme...and I decide I have better things to do with my time, thanks. Now if you offered $50 for EACH post, that would be a different story. At that point you'd have the pro's interested. And you'd get pro-quality info, which your site is sorely lacking just now. SignatureTegger > summer1978 <ser...@donnelly.edu> wrote in news:1190984202.817585.200710 > @o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com: [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > -- > Tegger You do participate in online discussions right? Like this one for instance...Do you get paid for posting here? Probably not. Wouldn't you be glad to get $10 here and there? All it takes is 100 posts. This discussion that we are making here...would already make $2... And how much time have you spent do it? Probably not too much... And I bet you anything you enjoyed it. summer1978 <sergey@donnelly.edu> wrote in article <1190989941.494212.165320@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>... > You do participate in online discussions right? > Like this one for instance...Do you get paid for posting here? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > And how much time have you spent do it? Probably not too much... > And I bet you anything you enjoyed it. Let's take a closer look at your "easy" $10. If one were able to write AND post a comment every 1.2 minutes NONSTOP, he would earn that $10 in two hours worth of work. That is $5.00 per hour - less than minimum wage, along with being more tedious and labor-intensive than flipping burgers, which would pay more. So, now you've not only violated copyright law, you are flaunting minimum wage laws. > summer1978 <ser...@donnelly.edu> wrote in news:1190984202.817585.200710 > @o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com: [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > -- > Tegger $50 for each post...hahaha that's too much. You could go and buy 600 word article specially written for you for $10 > Mike <mik@localnet.com> wrote in article > <uGjKi.17607$B25.9125@news01.roc.ny>... [quoted text clipped - 92 lines] > technicians > in the world, don't you think? If he is paying anything per post he is overpaying for the info he is getting. From a quick glance at his site it seems like only a few folks are posting answers but the info is useless. > > Mike <m...@localnet.com> wrote in article > > <uGjKi.17607$B25.9...@news01.roc.ny>... [quoted text clipped - 100 lines] > getting. From a quick glance at his site it seems like only a few folks are > posting answers but the info is useless. Listen Mike, I'll explain to you how forum works...You have to come in and ASK QUESTIONS and then you will get your answer. How do you know if my forum is not good if you have not asked anything? Just because of the threads that other people create? Well some people have very little automotive knowledge. And it is not the bad thing. We all here to learn. That's is way we have groups like this and forums like mine. And I think it is pretty lame to give out opinions without even trying it out. Did you try it? Did you ask any questions? What kind of answers did you receive? Did you like your answers? What was the general attitude? Only after answering these question you can say that "Don't waste you time that online community sucks" But you didn't do that, did you? You just went there look at other people posts and decided that you better then them. And yes we have copies of the other sources that's why on the bottom of the welding article there is a link to the site where we got it from...and it's permitted. It's easy to be a hater...it's way harder to take time and evaluate something for what it really worth...I had one guy registered from the news group...He was one of the first posts...and we did help him...and he was thankful. After all, it all about your attitude. summer1978 <sergey@donnelly.edu> wrote in article <1190983957.675600.260750@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>... > And yes we have copies of the other > sources that's why on the bottom of the welding article there is a > link to the site where we got it from...and it's permitted. Much of my work for the past three and one-half decades has been covered by copyright law. Would you care to cite the particular aspect of copyright law that allows you to plagiarize copy from other websites and printed material? > summer1978 <ser...@donnelly.edu> wrote in article > <1190983957.675600.260...@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Would you care to cite the particular aspect of copyright law that allows > you to plagiarize copy from other websites and printed material? I am not questioning you being and expert and all but I think it is called a quotation whenever you reveal the source...no? Plagiarism is when you take something and claim that it is you who came up with it. summer1978 <sergey@donnelly.edu> wrote in article <1190989591.631633.281170@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>... > > summer1978 <ser...@donnelly.edu> wrote in article > > <1190983957.675600.260...@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Plagiarism is when you take something and claim that it is you who > came up with it. There's a fine line between quoting a few paragraphs with attribution, and the outright stealing of a complete article in order to enhance your own publication/website. It is one thing to say, "According to the book, "Modern Welding Technology", a welder is one who welds." but, another thing entirely to use the entire article as though you paid the author for the rights. You have, obviously, crossed that line. You have appropriated the work of others - without compensation - to enhance your own website.....That is plagiarism!........ .....and, if that definition doesn't work for you....... ......you have stolen intellectual property - the author of which is protected from such theft by copyright law. summer1978 <sergey@donnelly.edu> wrote in article <1190983957.675600.260750@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>... > And yes we have copies of the other > sources that's why on the bottom of the welding article there is a > link to the site where we got it from...and it's permitted. The front page of Hobart's web site states specifically, "Copyright 2007 All Rights Reserved" The copyright notice in the Prentice-Hall book "Modern Welding Technology" from which Hobart quoted the welding definition states in black and white, "All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission *in writing* from the publisher." Gotta' believe Hobart has that letter on file....... Gotta' believe you don't - placing YOU in violation of copyright law..... Go find yourself a good lawyer - one who knows a little - make that a LOT - more about copyright law than you do........ Oh yeah, I've sent a note to a friend of mine who works at Prentice Hall suggesting that he log into your website....... You DO want MORE traffic, don't you? That's why you're SPAMMING newsgroups, isn't it? > summer1978 <ser...@donnelly.edu> wrote in article > <1190983957.675600.260...@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > That's why you're SPAMMING newsgroups, isn't it? You know what traffic I got from this news group 6 people in 4 days. Yeah that's huge spamming!!! I hoped I could find people interested in cars. Thanks for the note on copyright law. At least got something useful out of this discussion. summer1978 <sergey@donnelly.edu> wrote in article <1190990519.300889.87630@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>... > > You DO want MORE traffic, don't you? > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I hoped I could find people interested in cars. Are you SO f******g stupid to believe that with all the viri, spybots, and other garbage floating around these days that people are eager to click onto an anonymously-provided link in an unmoderated newsgroup? Your comment simply validates the sheer stupidity of SPAMMERS, and restores my faith - just a little bit, anyway - in the intelligence of the general public. > summer1978 <ser...@donnelly.edu> wrote in article > <1190983957.675600.260...@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > That's why you're SPAMMING newsgroups, isn't it? All I got is 6 people visit from this thread. I don't think you could call it a lot of traffic or spamming. :))) I was looking for people who would be interested in auto discussions. I well wrong place I guess. Thanks for the tips on the copyright law. Got something new out of it. >All I got is 6 people visit from this thread. >I don't think you could call it a lot of traffic or spamming. :))) Your post was spam. The fact that you only got six people just means that you aren't very good at spamming. >I was looking for people who would be interested in auto discussions. >I well wrong place I guess. Your site might be the best thing since sliced bread.. I'll never know as I have no interest in visiting something run by someone who refuses to learn and follow the rules. You spam the newsgroups and apparently steal content from others. No thanx... There are hundreds of other sites out there that do follow the rules. Steve B. Yeah you got "free" advertising at AF too :rolleyes: Probly shouldnt post your link anymore summer1978 , thank you... Signaturexeroinfinity http://www.automotiveforums.com summer1978 <sergey@donnelly.edu> wrote in article <1190733625.957364.188320@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>... > > >> > > solv...@donnelly.edu wrote in article > > >> > > <1190602457.104920.184...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > for free stuff, > As you know: You get nothing for nothing, and darn little for a penny. Well, you're trying to get something for nothing by plagiarizing copyrighted material from textbooks. I refer, of course, to your "metal work" section where the definition of welding has been lifted from Hobart. Unless the copyright notice specifically states, "Limited reproduction allowed if proper credit is given", then YOU are in violation of copyright law!!!!! >>> > > solv...@donnelly.edu wrote in article >>> > > <1190602457.104920.184...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > And just about all of it seems to be the same half-dozen sock puppets all talking to each other. SignatureTegger > >>> > > solv...@donnelly.edu wrote in article > >>> > > <1190602457.104920.184...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > -- > Tegger They are real people. >> And just about all of it seems to be the same half-dozen sock puppets >> all talking to each other. > > They are real people. Proof? SignatureTegger > >> And just about all of it seems to be the same half-dozen sock puppets > >> all talking to each other. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > -- > Tegger do you want a print out of ip addresses? :)))))))) summer1978 <sergey@donnelly.edu> wrote in article <1190728031.827167.259120@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>... > > > > solv...@donnelly.edu wrote in article > > > > <1190602457.104920.184...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Plus, over 200 threads/posts......... ......yup!....mostly by the same handful of people who really don't offer much in the way of auto repair advice.....
|
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.