It is not nearly as important as it once was to warm up a car before driving because.
1) Electronically controlled fuel injection works much better when cold than carburetors.
2) The oil most people use these days e.g. 5W20 is not as thick when cold as the 10W40 oil that was once common.
> In the old days people warmed up their cars. But I have heard that
> newer cars need no warm up, just start and drive off.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> How long should you warm up a car in the winter?
Warming up your car is a waste of gas. Some people still do it
because back when cars had carbeurators, they ran like crap in the
cold.
>>In the old days people warmed up their cars. But I have heard that
>>newer cars need no warm up, just start and drive off.
As far back as I can remember (60s) the "best" recommendation has always
been to start the car, wait for the oil pressure to stabilize (30
seconds is plenty) and then drive (gently) to put a load on the engine
and warm it up faster than idling can. In fact, I drive a '60s vintage
car every day and that's exactly what I do. No "warm up" at all- its
just a waste of fuel and it puts a whole lot of combustion by-products
(water, unburned fuel, acids) into the engine oil.
Conversely, you don't want to jump in, start it, and immediately apply
full load and 5000+ RPM. With both old and the very newest engines,
clearances do change as temperatures increase and there is always more
wear on a cold engine than a warm one. No need to exacerbate it with
excessive loading while cold.
>>What if you live next to an interstate and you drive one block then at
>>freeway speeds?
Maybe let it warm up just a little longer, and merge onto the freeway
sedately to keep the engine RPM from winding way up and sending the oil
pressure through the roof while the oil is still cold.
Don Stauffer in Minnesota - 27 Nov 2007 15:20 GMT
> >>freeway speeds?
>
> Maybe let it warm up just a little longer, and merge onto the freeway
> sedately to keep the engine RPM from winding way up and sending the oil
> pressure through the roof while the oil is still cold.
Indeed, depending on car weight and engine size, most engines today
are cruising at a fairly low power level at constant speed on a
freeway (at legal limits anyway). If you can merge without using full
throttle it shouldn't put too much stress on the engine with a block's
worth of warmup. Only during heavy acceleration do we use a high
percentage of engine power.
* - 27 Nov 2007 16:03 GMT
Don Stauffer in Minnesota <stauffer@usfamily.net> wrote in article
<b48c47b0-3f52-4318-96c7-300e8f2df46e@e4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>...
> > >>freeway speeds?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> worth of warmup. Only during heavy acceleration do we use a high
> percentage of engine power.
Good point!
I run down the highway at 70 mph at 2200 rpm. That's just a few more rpm
than a 1700 rpm fast idle on choke - and it is under load, which is much
better for the engine.
Ray - 27 Nov 2007 21:39 GMT
>>> In the old days people warmed up their cars. But I have heard that
>>> newer cars need no warm up, just start and drive off.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> wear on a cold engine than a warm one. No need to exacerbate it with
> excessive loading while cold.
My $.02 - Where does the OP live?
Warming up your car in January in Florida vs Minneapolis vs Alaska...
It's still pretty much warm it up for a "bit" and then drive easy until
everything else is warmed up, but a "bit" and "easy" isn't the same at
20F vs -40F.
The engine gets warmed up idling, but the transmission doesn't, nor does
the wheel bearings or axle lube... so you need to drive it easy when
it's cold even if the engine has been idling for 10 minutes.
I live in Winnipeg (hit -25C today...) and if my car was parked outside,
I'd probably start it and let it warm up for about a minute before
loading the kids in it and then driving off, so it would have a 2-3
minute warmup. That would be the same if it was a 2008 or a 1988. If
it was a 1968 with a manual choke, that might be a bit different, but
not much.
Ray
tomasz.kk@gmail.com - 28 Nov 2007 20:03 GMT
i drive off right after i start the engine. But to get to the street
i need to pass about 300 meters of gravel road, so i have to drive
slowly about 1000rpm. I think its better for the engine then idling it
for a couple of minutes.
I used to drive citroen xm in the past with hydropneumatic
suspension, after i started it, i had to wait about 5+ minutes for
it to lift the car, only then i could start driving. that was
necessity:)