> b...@coolgroups.com wrote in news:04c536fd-5608-4383-b7e3-a740f3d1c901
> @p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> --
> Tegger
Why not add another battery just for heating? Even if it gave just
15
minutes of heat, that would probably be enough to allow me to easily
scrape ice off my windows and drive off comfortably.
Also, why does my car's control panel look like it is heating when
the
gas is off? Shouldn't it indicate it's not really heating? Do most
cars mislead people like this?
Steve B. - 11 Jan 2008 05:40 GMT
>Why not add another battery just for heating? Even if it gave just
>15 minutes of heat, that would probably be enough to allow me to easily
>scrape ice off my windows and drive off comfortably.
Battery technology would be one of the bigger reasons I see. A lead
acid battery would be toast after you ran it down a half dozen times.
You could do something with other battery types but then you are
adding costs and weight to the vehicle. Back in the 50s some cars had
available gasoline heaters for instant heat but I haven't heard of one
since then.
>Also, why does my car's control panel look like it is heating when
>the gas is off? Shouldn't it indicate it's not really heating? Do most
>cars mislead people like this?
I guess they figure that if one was so sensory deprived that they
couldn't figure out the air coming out the vent wasn't hot anymore
that person didn't really need to be operating a vehicle anyway. There
is another big industry cover up that I bet you haven't even heard of
yet. I just read it on CNN's web site myself and couldn't believe it.
If you don't start the motor the car won't accelerate when you step on
the gas even though it still has a speedometer!! Someone should start
a class action lawsuit!!
Steve B.
Tegger - 11 Jan 2008 11:49 GMT
>> b...@coolgroups.com wrote in
>> news:04c536fd-5608-4383-b7e3-a740f3d1c901
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> 15 minutes of heat, that would probably be enough to allow me to
> easily scrape ice off my windows and drive off comfortably.
Like Steve B says, it probably has to do with cost, weight and
complexity. It would make no sense to add all that when the car gives
you an essentially free source of heat from its own engine.
I'd think most buyers would rather have their cost and complexity put
into things like the audio system, GPS's, plusher interiors, more
powerful engines, the sorts of things they'd use all the time.
If you want to heat up the interior more quickly, get remote start
installed. Or start the car, get back out again, then scrape off the
glass while letting the engine and heater blower do their thing.
> Also, why does my car's control panel look like it is heating when
> the gas is off? Shouldn't it indicate it's not really heating? Do
> most cars mislead people like this?
Not being familiar with the BMW dashboard, I can't hazard an answer to
that.

Signature
Tegger