Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / April 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Hyundai 2007 Santa Fe 2.7 V6  low fuel mileage

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rich - 05 Apr 2008 20:49 GMT
I have this Hyundai with an auto transmission and two wheel drive and
I'm getting only about 19-20 in town and 21-22 on the highway.

In town travel is typically with one person and light or no loads.
Highway is usually 2 people with up to 100# of load.   Highway speeds
are not above 60mph with cruise control.

All driving is quite conservative.  Air pressure is maintained at
30psi religiously.

The rating EPA is 21/26.  I really think I should be getting better
given my conservative driving and speeds.

Does anyone experience this same low fuel economy on this vehicle? Any
ideas on solutions or paths to pursue?   I suspect that my dealer will
not be very receptive to diagnostic tests under warrantee since the
mileage is not way far out of line and he may just suggest that it is
my driving habits.
Mike - 05 Apr 2008 22:54 GMT
>I have this Hyundai with an auto transmission and two wheel drive and
> I'm getting only about 19-20 in town and 21-22 on the highway.

 The intown mileage looks good, how are you figuring the highway mileage ?
How many highway miles were driven to calculate mileage.

> In town travel is typically with one person and light or no loads.
> Highway is usually 2 people with up to 100# of load.   Highway speeds
> are not above 60mph with cruise control.

 You might be able to get slightly better milage with the cruise control off,
depending on your driving style.

> All driving is quite conservative.  Air pressure is maintained at
> 30psi religiously.
>
> The rating EPA is 21/26.  I really think I should be getting better
> given my conservative driving and speeds.

  Better than what, the EPA rating ? The EPA recently cahnged the way they
calculate fuel mileage as nobody could get the mileage figures they posted
when driving in the real world. You would have to drive like you had an egg
under your foot just to get close to EPA estimates.

> Does anyone experience this same low fuel economy on this vehicle? Any
> ideas on solutions or paths to pursue?   I suspect that my dealer will
> not be very receptive to diagnostic tests under warrantee since the
> mileage is not way far out of line and he may just suggest that it is
> my driving habits.

  Other than making sure the engine is in proper tune there is not much you
can do.
Steve B. - 05 Apr 2008 23:18 GMT
>I have this Hyundai with an auto transmission and two wheel drive and
>I'm getting only about 19-20 in town and 21-22 on the highway.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>mileage is not way far out of line and he may just suggest that it is
>my driving habits.

Someone else already pointed out the old EPA numbers weren't real
accurate so they changed the way they figure them.  Current EPA is
17/24 on this vehicle so you are doing pretty good.

Gas formulations make a difference too as does the terrain you are
driving in.

                 Steve B.
Rich - 07 Apr 2008 18:00 GMT
>>I have this Hyundai with an auto transmission and two wheel drive and
>>I'm getting only about 19-20 in town and 21-22 on the highway.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
>                  Steve B.

Thanks, Steve.

Actually I have found that I can beat the EPA numbers with my
conservative driving.  And the car is only 6 months old with 12,000
miles, so the air filter and engine tune should be OK.  My previous
car was a 1999 Cadillac Deville with the 4.6 Northstar V8 and I could
routinely turn 20-21 city and 25-26 on the highway.  I think this is
more than the EPA estimates for that vehicle.

On this Hyundai I have gotten 21-22 around town last October and have
turned 27+ on the highway also.  I realize that the terrain makes a
difference too, but a recent highway trip with 2 people and no cargo
from NJ to MA on hilly terrain at 60mph got me only 23.1mpg.  I really
think I should be doing better.

One of the things I am strongly considering is to get the agressive
tread M+S stock tires off and replace them with a high-mileage rated
highway tread.  I think my mileage should improve by 1-2 mpg and the
tire road noise should drop dramatically.

What do you think of this idea?

TIA, Rich
Mike - 07 Apr 2008 18:37 GMT
>>>I have this Hyundai with an auto transmission and two wheel drive and
>>>I'm getting only about 19-20 in town and 21-22 on the highway.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> Actually I have found that I can beat the EPA numbers with my
> conservative driving.

  That's not what you stated above.

 And the car is only 6 months old with 12,000
> miles, so the air filter and engine tune should be OK.  My previous
> car was a 1999 Cadillac Deville with the 4.6 Northstar V8 and I could
> routinely turn 20-21 city and 25-26 on the highway.  I think this is
> more than the EPA estimates for that vehicle.

 EPA estimate for that vehicle is 17 city  and 28 highway.  I would say that
is pretty close.

> On this Hyundai I have gotten 21-22 around town last October and have
> turned 27+ on the highway also.  I realize that the terrain makes a
> difference too, but a recent highway trip with 2 people and no cargo
> from NJ to MA on hilly terrain at 60mph got me only 23.1mpg.  I really
> think I should be doing better.

  Is that with the cruise control on ?  The reason I ask is that you better
the EPA estimate for city driving were I assume cruise control is not used. A
person can control the throttle more efficiently than the cruise control can
as they are able to see a hill coming up and start to increase the throttle
gradually were as cruise control will generally just snap the throttle open
when it senses the load. I have always been able to do better than cruise
control by at least 2 miles per gallon, more in really hilly terrain.

> One of the things I am strongly considering is to get the agressive
> tread M+S stock tires off and replace them with a high-mileage rated
> highway tread.  I think my mileage should improve by 1-2 mpg and the
> tire road noise should drop dramatically.
>
> What do you think of this idea?

I don't think it is a good one. Have you figured out how long it will take
just to pay for the tires with that small an increase in MPG ?  How about this
idea that costs nothong to try, raise your tire pressure by about 5 psi and
see if that has any affect on your mileage. The pressure chart on the door
jamb is meant to give the best ride not so much the best mileage. See if a
small increase in tire pressure will help. If you play with tire pressure be
sure to monitor tire wear as well.

> TIA, Rich
John S. - 07 Apr 2008 20:15 GMT
> >>I have this Hyundai with an auto transmission and two wheel drive and
> >>I'm getting only about 19-20 in town and 21-22 on the highway.
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Driving hilly terrain with the speed control engaged will likely
result in lower mpg than if you manage the speed yourself.  Cruise
controls usually do a decent job on the flats but can go a little
crazy in the hill country.  I tried a speed control in the drumlin
country of Pennsylvania and it could get downright scary.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.