> I drive a 2003 Dodge Grand Caravan with 110,000 miles.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Any opinions on this? What would the partial solution obtained by
> cleaning the fuel injectors indicate?
aarcuda69062 <nonelson@sbcglobal.net> wrote in news:nonelson-
015484.20393320042008@news.chi.sbcglobal.net:
> In article
> <610d6889-ab92-4e4b-a892-58220bf7a1a5@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> That it wasn't a solution, partial or otherwise.
I don`t find that to be so. he could have had poor injector spray that
caused the converter to work too hard and start to degrade. then the
cleaning corrected the problem but the converter continued to degrade
untill it once again could not do the job. KB
PS I have long said to throw a can of cheep cleaner in the tank every
month or so to prevent the injectors from getting that bad.

Signature
THUNDERSNAKE #9
Protect your rights or "Lose" them
The 2nd Admendment guarantees the others
aarcuda69062 - 24 Apr 2008 02:52 GMT
> aarcuda69062 <nonelson@sbcglobal.net> wrote in news:nonelson-
> 015484.20393320042008@news.chi.sbcglobal.net:
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> I don`t find that to be so. he could have had poor injector spray that
> caused the converter to work too hard and start to degrade.
It would have set a rich or lean code, not a catalytic converter code.
> then the
> cleaning corrected the problem but the converter continued to degrade
> untill it once again could not do the job.
Or simply, the oxygen sensor monitors didn't run because of the ambient
temperatures during the time when the light was off after the supposed
fix.
> KB
> PS I have long said to throw a can of cheep cleaner in the tank every
> month or so to prevent the injectors from getting that bad.
It's not a GM product.