> I used to have one of those old torch type leak detectors and it was
> worthless
> for everything I ever tried it on. Thank goodness there are better tools
> out there
> today.
I've seen guys who were great with those. Definitely a skill to use, one that
was beyond me too.

Signature
Barack Obama, May 9: "I've now been in 57 states? I think one left to go."
Calab - 20 May 2008 01:57 GMT
>> I used to have one of those old torch type leak detectors and it was
>> worthless
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> that
> was beyond me too.
Well, I do have a TIF5000 detector
(http://i20.ebayimg.com/08/i/000/f1/45/d5c1_1.JPG)... but I've had little
chance to get used to operating it. I'll definately try it out once I've
done testing with pressure & soap solution.
> "aarcuda69062" <nonelson@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:nonelson-
> > What do you propose to pressurize with?
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> out there
> today.
Yeah those torch type leak detectors were better at turning refrigerent
into nerve gas than finding leaks.
The only person in this thread that I know of and would trust my AC
sytem to is aarcuda. I'm suprised he's been silent about some of the
post here. No offense but I don't think the OP is knowledgeable enough
or equipped well enough to tackle the AC system. There are so many
basics that aren't even being covered here or followed on.
Steve - 20 May 2008 15:49 GMT
>> "aarcuda69062" <nonelson@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:nonelson-
>>> What do you propose to pressurize with?
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Yeah those torch type leak detectors were better at turning refrigerent
> into nerve gas than finding leaks.
What, you don't like the smell of phosgene in the morning? (for the few
milliseconds you can smell it, anyway) :-p
> The only person in this thread that I know of and would trust my AC
> sytem to is aarcuda. I'm suprised he's been silent about some of the
> post here. No offense but I don't think the OP is knowledgeable enough
> or equipped well enough to tackle the AC system. There are so many
> basics that aren't even being covered here or followed on.
That is quite probably true. But its also reasonably harmless to try to
find a large leak with low-pressure air (50 PSI or less). It is
interesting to note that most factory service manuals for R-134a systems
advise against testing with air, because air/R-134a mixtures in just the
right combination and at high enough pressure are apparently combustible.
HLS - 25 May 2008 02:30 GMT
"Heatwave" <m3lt1ng5n0wmen@wah00.com> wrote in message
> The only person in this thread that I know of and would trust my AC
> sytem to is aarcuda.
I have always had a great respect for aarcuda, but AC work is not
rocket science.
Some of the problems with amateur mechanics is a lack of understanding
of AC systems, a lack of equipment to do proper diagnosis, and the tendency
to do the job "on the cheap".
IMO, if you dont take the time, effort, and expense to do the job properly,
you have just thrown away a lot of money.
mr.som ting wong - 31 May 2008 13:32 GMT
what kind of pressure are you referring too?
compressed air?? i hope not air contains moisture and that is a big nono
it will cause more issues down the road sooner than you think
esp. if you have added any of that r134 with sealer in it it will choke off the
whole ac system
since you replaced parts go back there and look for bad seals/ torn orings
get some r134 with dye added and charge up system then look for leaks
> > "aarcuda69062" <nonelson@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:nonelson-
> > > What do you propose to pressurize with?
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> or equipped well enough to tackle the AC system. There are so many
> basics that aren't even being covered here or followed on.