Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / July 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ford to use lasers to ignite and burn fuel.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
cuhulin@webtv.net - 14 Jul 2009 14:12 GMT
www.carthusiast.com

Ford has a Brighter Idea!

Ford, Ford, Car of Tomorrow, Buy a Ford, today!
cuhulin
fred - 14 Jul 2009 23:34 GMT
> www.carthusiast.com
>
> Ford has a Brighter Idea!
>
> Ford, Ford, Car of Tomorrow, Buy a Ford, today!
> cuhulin

Hmm. Problematic at best. Would be better to vapourize the fuel that way.
Less power required and would work better. Pre-injection of course.
Besides, what happens when the lens (or all of them) gets covered in
deposits hmm?

Somebody wasted *way* too much time watching Austin Power movies IMHO.
cuhulin@webtv.net - 15 Jul 2009 00:54 GMT
Maybe they could use those fancy lasers to heat water in a boiler and
bring back the steam engines.
cuhulin
chuckcar - 16 Jul 2009 03:28 GMT
> Maybe they could use those fancy lasers to heat water in a boiler and
> bring back the steam engines.
> cuhulin

Or get a hold of some tritium (pure nonsence BTW - they use hydrogen sub
1) and make a *real* engine - ala Spiderman 2.

Signature

(setq (chuck nil)  car(chuck) )

hls - 20 Jul 2009 22:18 GMT
> www.carthusiast.com
>
> Ford has a Brighter Idea!
>
> Ford, Ford, Car of Tomorrow, Buy a Ford, today!
> cuhulin

This promises to be another high priced, high maintenance
fiasco by the
Turd  Motor Company
dyno - 24 Jul 2009 18:21 GMT
>> www.carthusiast.com
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> fiasco by the
> Turd  Motor Company

The whole point of a research effort is to investigate the opportunities
that an alternative ignition system might offer. At the research phase
there is no guarantee that the system will ever make it into production.

I applaud Ford for questioning the status quo on some of the "taken-for-
granted" engine subsystems.
cuhulin@webtv.net - 24 Jul 2009 20:39 GMT
I think I read somewhere about two or three months ago, something like
that is already being used in some applications.

www.devilfinder.com
New technology in spark plugs

Not spark plugs or Ford, but laser ignition system.
cuhulin
hls - 24 Jul 2009 21:23 GMT
"dyno" <dyn@null.trq> wrote in message news:4a69ed86$0$5657

> The whole point of a research effort is to investigate the opportunities
> that an alternative ignition system might offer. At the research phase
> there is no guarantee that the system will ever make it into production.
>
> I applaud Ford for questioning the status quo on some of the "taken-for-
> granted" engine subsystems.

The ignition system, taken alone, is not so very interesting.  Ignition
already
does a really good job, and is more or less inexpensive and dependable.

Ford had investigated an experimental stratified charge system that held a
lot of promise, and this ignition system applied to that particular engine
might
be a solution.

I just dont want any more overengineered, overly expensive, poorly durable
systems.
Don Bruder - 24 Jul 2009 21:51 GMT
> >> www.carthusiast.com
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> I applaud Ford for questioning the status quo on some of the "taken-for-
> granted" engine subsystems.

I can't see a laser system being worth the headache to develop. Granted,
I also don't see any particularly major downside to it (beyond the
probable cost factor) but the reality is, when it comes right down to
cases, ignition seems to me like ignition.

Trying to do the ignition system thing with a laser seems to me a lot
like excessive "gizmo-fication". I just can't see how using a laser
instead of the current electrical systems could give any useful
advantage. (Except to the folks who sell it, if/when it becomes more
than a pipe-dream.)

Signature

Email shown is deceased. If you would like to contact me by email, please
post something that makes it obvious in this or another group you see me
posting in with a "how to contact you" address, and I'll get back to you.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.