Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / November 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Mercedes 300TE cam timing

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MasterBlaster - 05 Oct 2009 22:34 GMT
We're trying to diagnose a 1990 300TE4Matic, 3.0 straight-6 SOHC 4-valve
that started running like crap. It's gutless, and can barely get out of its own way.
Started by checking the usual suspects... main and "differential" fuel pressures
are within specs, ignition parts are good, timing is okay (crank-triggered),
cat doesn't seem to be plugged, etc, etc.

While checking all that other stuff, we noticed some clattering coming from
behind the distributor cap that sounded like a loose timing chain, so we
popped off the distributor and valve cover to see if maybe the chain had
jumped a tooth. However, the only sources we have to verify the timing
marks are being very unhelpful, and basically giving the same useless info.

They all say to set the crankshaft at #1 TDC, which we did using the metal
pointer that is part of the same bracket that holds the crank sensor pick-up.

Then they say "Ensure timing marks on camshaft and bearing cap are aligned",
and show a drawing of the backside of the cam gear bearing flange...
http://www3.telus.net/neatcrap/300TE/topview.gif

The bearing cap has the appropriate "mark" (big tab in the casting), but the
back of the cam's flange doesn't have a nice big mark as shown. What it
does have is two BIG bosses located 180degrees apart (which look more
like cast-in handles for manufacturing), a smaller boss located between the
two big bosses (looks like a much thinner version of the big bosses, that's
been filed down to almost nothing, possibly a casting line), and a tiny dot
on one of the cam's "ribs". The big bosses do not line up with the caps's
mark (6 teeth before it), the smaller boss doesn't either (3 teeth after it),
but the tiny dot DOES line up.
(Note: pic is NOT at TDC (about 180 out), but I've shown where our marks are).
http://www3.telus.net/neatcrap/300TE/back-of-cam-flange.jpg

Our sources also show drawings of the front of the timing components, with a
"timing mark" on the left side, apparently level with the top of the head...
http://www3.telus.net/neatcrap/300TE/frontview.gif

Our gear also has a mark in the same place when at TDC (pic out about 180),
but since the gear can be flipped front-to-back if necessary to alter the timing by
3 degrees, the arrow may just point to the oval hole for the oval pin. Didn't look
at the back to see if there's another arrow...
http://www3.telus.net/neatcrap/300TE/front-of-cam-gear.jpg

So the problem is, we have no cam tab, a dot that's not mentioned anywhere, and
none of the sources explicitly say if the arrow should be level with the head at TDC,
so we can't be sure if it's still in time or not.

(Cross-posted to alt.autos.mercedes and rec.autos.tech)
Merc300te - 29 Oct 2009 23:32 GMT
I am working on a 1989 300te. Replaced the head gasket, and a broken
timing chain. I am currently trying to set the timing. It looks to me
like the 'tiny dot' is a timing mark. Aligning that with the one on
the bearing cap puts the 'timing mark' on the gear in the right place
(if you trust the image of the front of the engine included in your
post, aligned with the head.) The big bosses can't be relied upon as
markers because they are basically identical and 180 degrees apart (at
least one of them will have to be wrong.) There is not a 'timing mark'
on the other side of the gear. Also, the valves at cylinder one appear
to be closed when the 'tiny dot' is aligned with the bearing cap mark.
At any rate, I can't find any other information out there. So, I'm
going with this 'tiny dot' scheme. I will post once it's back together
to let you know the results.
MasterBlaster - 30 Oct 2009 07:05 GMT
> I am working on a 1989 300te. Replaced the head gasket, and a broken
> timing chain. I am currently trying to set the timing. It looks to me
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> going with this 'tiny dot' scheme. I will post once it's back together
> to let you know the results.

Woo-hoo! Somebody else with the same problem!

We've also decided to go with the tiny dot. Although it's a bit loose, there
doesn't seem to be enough slack in the chain to allow it to jump a tooth,
so after a new chain and tensioner (ordered the parts, might as well put
them in), we'll keep looking for the "runs like crap" solution.
Merc300te - 01 Nov 2009 00:47 GMT
> > I am working on a 1989 300te. Replaced the head gasket, and a broken
> > timing chain. I am currently trying to set the timing. It looks to me
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> so after a new chain and tensioner (ordered the parts, might as well put
> them in), we'll keep looking for the "runs like crap" solution.

I put it back together, and after charging the battery have been
trying to start it. The vehicle sounds like it's going to start but
does not. Spark is occurring, and it seems to be getting fuel. There
may be a fuel pressure issue, though it did not have one before taking
on this job. Let me ask you, Masterblaster, when you line up the TDC
sensor point on the wheel with TDC sensor, do you end up with the
arrow aligned on the left with the head? I'm wonedering if my timing
is off by a few teeth.
MasterBlaster - 01 Nov 2009 07:10 GMT
> Let me ask you, Masterblaster, when you line up the TDC sensor point
> on the wheel with TDC sensor, do you end up with the arrow aligned on
> the left with the head? I'm wonedering if my timing is off by a few teeth.

Actually, I line up the TDC mark on the wheel with the edge of the metal
timing pointer, not with the sensor or the hole:
http://www3.telus.net/neatcrap/300TE/300-timing-marks.jpg

With the wheel's mark and the pointer lined up, the tiny dot on the cam is in
line with the boss, and the arrow is just like in the drawing; even with the top
edge of the head:
http://www3.telus.net/neatcrap/300TE/frontview.gif
Merc300te - 06 Nov 2009 04:13 GMT
Thank you for the thorough responses. Models after 1986 use the dot to
set the timing on the cam. There are no markings on my harmonic
balancer or crankshaft pulley. So, I had initially used the tab (which
I assume the crankshaft position sensor uses to determine the
crankshaft position) lining it up with the hole where the sensor
resides. I do have tick marks, but the labels for the degrees are
rubbed off. I have adjusted the timing by aligning tick marks with the
pointer. But, I can't be sure which mark corresponds to '0'. I made
the assumption that the degree mark nearest the 'tab' is '0'. This
does not seem to be the case. Nor, is the one following that.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.