Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

good tires in "non-performance" size?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Nate Nagel - 13 Feb 2005 13:46 GMT
Hi all,

as you may know I just bought a '55 Stude Commander...  looking for
recommendations for tires.  Stock size is 6.70-15 which means I need to
be looking at something like a 205/75R15.  I priced out some WWW radials
and I think I am looking at blackwalls. :)  That said are there any
decent performing tires available in that size?  Seems to be only used
for minivans and SUVs anymore.  I can't run a 215/70 as the stock wheels
are only 5" wide - I wouldn't mind buying more wheels but I'm kind of
short of cash right now, that would add another $160 or so for a set of
new steel wheels.

Are the Pirelli P400 any good?  How about the Michelin all-seasons
available in that size?

thanks,

nate

Signature

replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

Daniel J. Stern - 13 Feb 2005 17:13 GMT
> I just bought a '55 Stude Commander...  looking for recommendations for
> tires.  Stock size is 6.70-15 which means I need to be looking at
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> - I wouldn't mind buying more wheels but I'm kind of short of cash right
> now, that would add another $160 or so for a set of new steel wheels.

So how 'bout BFGoodrich Traction T/A P205/70R15?

> Are the Pirelli P400 any good?  How about the Michelin all-seasons
> available in that size?

My experience with Pirelli has been consistently lousy, and while Michelin
makes some good tires, you will overpay.
Laura K - 13 Feb 2005 18:58 GMT
>> I just bought a '55 Stude Commander...  looking for recommendations for
>> tires.  Stock size is 6.70-15 which means I need to be looking at
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> - I wouldn't mind buying more wheels but I'm kind of short of cash right
>> now, that would add another $160 or so for a set of new steel wheels.

Check Tire Rack (http://www.tirerack.com)
Even if you don't buy from them, the survey ratings from people who have them
on their cars are very helpful. The Kumhos are rated much higher than the
Pirellis -- and are about half the price ($38).
http://tinyurl.com/6hdgp
I've bought tires from Tire Rack and the service from them and their
recommended installers has been excellent.
Daniel J. Stern - 13 Feb 2005 19:25 GMT
> Check Tire Rack (http://www.tirerack.com)
> Even if you don't buy from them, the survey ratings from people who have them
> on their cars are very helpful. The Kumhos are rated much higher than the
> Pirellis -- and are about half the price ($38).

Kumhos are garbage.
Motorhead Lawyer - 14 Feb 2005 20:43 GMT
> > Check Tire Rack (http://www.tirerack.com)
> > Even if you don't buy from them, the survey ratings from people who have them
> > on their cars are very helpful. The Kumhos are rated much higher than the
> > Pirellis -- and are about half the price ($38).
>
> Kumhos are garbage.

Upon what do you base that, Daniel?  I know they make pretty decent
*track* tires.  While I haven't yet owned any, I *have* owned more than
a few sets of Pirellis and it wouldn't take much to be better than
those.
--
C.R. Krieger
(Been there; done that)
Daniel J. Stern - 14 Feb 2005 21:18 GMT
> > Kumhos are garbage.

> Upon what do you base that, Daniel?

Personal experience.

> I know they make pretty decent *track* tires.

Yep, that's what everyone says who's tried them. My experience is with
their *street* tires. I'll give them about five years to progress along
the learning curve, then maybe have another look.
Scott en Aztl?n - 15 Feb 2005 04:24 GMT
>> > Kumhos are garbage.
>
>> Upon what do you base that, Daniel?
>
>Personal experience.

Please elaborate.

Kumho tires are universally praised in nearly every automotive
enthusiast forum. Indeed, a friend of mine had a set on his Z06 and
had no complaints about them. Yours are the first negative words I've
ever heard about the brand.

Signature

Sloth Kills!
http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/

N8N - 15 Feb 2005 15:29 GMT
Scott en Aztlán wrote:

> >> > Kumhos are garbage.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> had no complaints about them. Yours are the first negative words I've
> ever heard about the brand.

Now that I look a little harder the Kumho 795 does look like a good
option.  I know someome who has the Kumho performance tires on her
Corrado (don't remember the model, but the tread looks very similar to
the Yoko ES100s on the Porsche) and she seems to be happy with them.
Anyone had any personal experience with the 795s?

thanks,

nate
Ulf - 15 Feb 2005 21:16 GMT
> Scott en Aztlán wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> the Yoko ES100s on the Porsche) and she seems to be happy with them.
> Anyone had any personal experience with the 795s?

Not the 795s but I have Ecsta's on my Camaro and compared to the
Firehawk SC50's that I had before they're junk.

> thanks,
>
> nate

Ulf
Nate Nagel - 13 Feb 2005 23:50 GMT
>>I just bought a '55 Stude Commander...  looking for recommendations for
>>tires.  Stock size is 6.70-15 which means I need to be looking at
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> So how 'bout BFGoodrich Traction T/A P205/70R15?

Might have to do that, but I was trying to stay with the 75s for gearing
purposes.  For now at least it has a 3.31 rear and a Flightomatic, which
I'm not nuts about...  Finding a lower numerical ratio than a 3.31 for a
Studebaker is somewhat difficult, I think the lowest commonly available
was in the area of 3.07:1 (and the FOM is a later second gear start
model so off the line performance is less than sparkling)

>>Are the Pirelli P400 any good?  How about the Michelin all-seasons
>>available in that size?
>
> My experience with Pirelli has been consistently lousy, and while Michelin
> makes some good tires, you will overpay.

Never had a set of Pirellis, that's why I asked.  I did have Michelin
Pilots on my GTI and loved 'em (but that might have just been because
they weren't totally awful like the Continentals that were on it from
the factory)

nate

Signature

replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

gcmschemist@gmail.com - 15 Feb 2005 16:33 GMT
> > My experience with Pirelli has been consistently lousy, and while Michelin
> > makes some good tires, you will overpay.
>
> Never had a set of Pirellis, that's why I asked.

My experience has been just the opposite of Dan's.  They have provided
decent, if not stellar, all-season performance (in a no-season sort of
way), have lasted well, been of a decent price from places like Tire
Rack, and come in a seemingly endless array of sizes.

They seem to do best as a touring tire (quiet, don't hydroplane, last a
long time) and not as good as an all-season tire (OK with an AWD
vehicle, barely acceptable on a FWD vehicle.)

The P-Zeros are a decent performance tire for the money, but they
aren't Pilots.  The P6000 worked OK as a no-season tire, and back when
I had my RWD convertible, the P6s were fairly decent for the money as
well.

FWIW,

E.P.
TCS - 14 Feb 2005 01:38 GMT
>Hi all,

>as you may know I just bought a '55 Stude Commander...  looking for
>recommendations for tires.  Stock size is 6.70-15 which means I need to

That's about the size the 60's-70's VW bug used.  You might want to
see about what performance tires were available for the bug.

I personally would be looking to replace the wheels as well.
N8N - 14 Feb 2005 21:02 GMT
> >Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> I personally would be looking to replace the wheels as well.

I seriously doubt that as I've seen 165-15s on Beetles and I don't
think that size would even fit on my rims!  I bet the original bias ply
was something like 5.60-15 or thereabouts.  If nothing else I wouldn't
want to set the weight of that heavy Stude front end on tires that
narrow.

nate
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.