Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How do I calculate Torque?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
AChevyFan - 06 Mar 2005 16:37 GMT
What is the calculation for torque?
I know the Horsepower is:

HP = Torque(lb-ft) * RPM/5252

But how do I get Torque?
Mike Romain - 06 Mar 2005 16:55 GMT
Let's see if I have had enough coffee....

If HP = T * (rpm/5252) then you could divide both sides by (rpm/5252)
and maybe end up with

T = HP/(rpm*5252)

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

> What is the calculation for torque?
> I know the Horsepower is:
>
> HP = Torque(lb-ft) * RPM/5252
>
> But how do I get Torque?
Mike Romain - 06 Mar 2005 16:56 GMT
Crap that should be

T = HP/(rpm/5252)

Need more coffee...

Mike

> Let's see if I have had enough coffee....
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> >
> > But how do I get Torque?
AChevyFan - 06 Mar 2005 20:53 GMT
That's a great algrebra lesson but I am assuming that I have neither HP nor
Torque to calculate so that doesn't help me.

> Let's see if I have had enough coffee....
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> >
> > But how do I get Torque?
Mike Romain - 06 Mar 2005 21:06 GMT
You have to have one or the other to come close or go to a speed shop
that tests them on a dyno.  Math and the real world seldom match up.

Mike

> That's a great algrebra lesson but I am assuming that I have neither HP nor
> Torque to calculate so that doesn't help me.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> > >
> > > But how do I get Torque?
Don Stauffer in Minneapolis - 07 Mar 2005 14:53 GMT
> That's a great algrebra lesson but I am assuming that I have neither HP nor
> Torque to calculate so that doesn't help me.

Ah, then your only choice is either a dyno session or one of these
accelerometers.  With the accelerometer you can compute torque at rear
axle but it also takes a lot of algebra.  Knowing the rear axle ratio
you can convert rear axle torque to transmission torque, and ultimately
to engine torque, though that is a bit iffy with an automatic (fine to
do with manual box, however).
Brian - 07 Mar 2005 17:33 GMT
I've seen formulas to calculate - or estimate - hp from acceleration data.
If I had nothing and wanted to do better than a guess, I would probably get
one of those G-force accelerometer gadgets.

>> That's a great algrebra lesson but I am assuming that I have neither HP
>> nor
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> engine torque, though that is a bit iffy with an automatic (fine to do
> with manual box, however).
Don Stauffer in Minneapolis - 08 Mar 2005 14:53 GMT
> I've seen formulas to calculate - or estimate - hp from acceleration data.
> If I had nothing and wanted to do better than a guess, I would probably get
> one of those G-force accelerometer gadgets.

If you carefully plot acceleration versus speed, yeah, you can do it.

If you use an average, like a 0-60 time, you will get an AVERAGE torque,
not a peak one, or a torque vs rpm.

Further, 0-60 is too high, because at speeds above about 35-50 mph, air
resistance is using a considerable torque.  It would not be just a
function of mass of car.  So you'd have to compute acceleration vs speed
up to 30, at several data points.  This is getting a bit hard to measure
accurately by a stopwatch and speedometer, which is why actual
accelerometer is good.  I have seen some for a little over a hundred bucks.
Dan_Thomas_nospam@yahoo.com - 08 Mar 2005 15:38 GMT
   Using vehicle acceleration to measure hp is useless. We've done it
with airplanes on takeoff, and we get a horsepower figure of about
one-fifth of what we know the engine is giving us. Any movement thru
air represents drag, any rolling wheels represent drag, and the losses
through the drivetrain are significant. Further, unless the engine is
operating at the desired RPMs (redline or max torque) it's all
irrelevant.
     The most accurate measurements use an engine brake and
torquemeters. Torque x RPM x 6.28 divided by 33,000 equals hp.

      Dan
Stan Weiss - 08 Mar 2005 15:57 GMT
In late model cars you maybe able to capture the needed data from the
ODII port. The rolling and air drag losses can be calculated. Afar as
the drive train losses you ignore this and what you have is very close
to what you would get from a chassis dyno.
Stan

>     Using vehicle acceleration to measure hp is useless. We've done it
> with airplanes on takeoff, and we get a horsepower figure of about
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>        Dan
Steve - 08 Mar 2005 17:43 GMT
>     Using vehicle acceleration to measure hp is useless. We've done it
> with airplanes on takeoff, and we get a horsepower figure of about
> one-fifth of what we know the engine is giving us.

I know several people who have taken their car to the strip, weighed it,
and used trap speed to compute horsepower, and THEN gone to a chassis
dyno and checked the power that way. They've all said that the numbers
are amazingly close- usually within 10-15%, and nothing like the 1/5
you're talking about.

I would guess that with an airplane trimmed for takeoff with the gear
and flaps hanging way out, the high aerodynamic drag just before liftoff
invalidates the method.
Dave Baker - 08 Mar 2005 18:17 GMT
> >     Using vehicle acceleration to measure hp is useless. We've done it
> > with airplanes on takeoff, and we get a horsepower figure of about
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> are amazingly close- usually within 10-15%, and nothing like the 1/5
> you're talking about.

10-15% ?? Struth. With my vehicle performance simulation software (details
on the website) I can get within a couple of percent of true bhp if the
vehicle performance and weights, gearing etc are known accurately.
--
Dave Baker - Puma Race Engines (www.pumaracing.co.uk)
Don Stauffer in Minneapolis - 09 Mar 2005 21:27 GMT
>     Using vehicle acceleration to measure hp is useless. We've done it
> with airplanes on takeoff, and we get a horsepower figure of about
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>        Dan

True, but the original poster didn't have access to a dyno.  Your
reasons are why I pointed out that all data must be taken at low speed,
and would be a hell of a job.  One would need to take data about every
mph, and need some sort of automatic data acquisition system.

I should have also mentioned measuring DECELERATION also.  This gives
data on drag sources.  One can see the slope of the deceleration curve
change as aero drag drops off but tire and chassis drag, much of which
are independent of velocity, stay there.  One should account for these
forces when computing hp or torque.  However, rolling friction is
typically relatively low, so acceleration data at low speed will give a
REASONABLE value on a car with manual transmission.

BTW, data I have seen on chassis friction indicated less than 5% of
power lost there.  Tires were about the same.
Steve - 07 Mar 2005 19:07 GMT
> That's a great algrebra lesson but I am assuming that I have neither HP nor
> Torque to calculate so that doesn't help me.

OK then... what DO you have? You have to know something to start the
calculation.

And any calculation that depends on knowing cylinder pressure will have
to be converted to BMEP, and you'll have to know the engine's geometry
as well (bore and stroke).  Calculations like that aren't very precise
unless you have a full-blown computer model akin to "Desktop Dyno."
Loren Eggert - 06 Mar 2005 16:59 GMT
If you have a known HP and RMP simply insert them into the formula you gave
and solve for torque.  Otherwise, torque is something that must be measured
on the dyno.  It would take a rather complex formula involving many
variables for you to calculate it.

> What is the calculation for torque?
> I know the Horsepower is:
>
> HP = Torque(lb-ft) * RPM/5252
>
> But how do I get Torque?
AChevyFan - 06 Mar 2005 20:53 GMT
Which is precisely why I am asking...thnx.

> If you have a known HP and RMP simply insert them into the formula you gave
> and solve for torque.  Otherwise, torque is something that must be measured
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> >
> > But how do I get Torque?
Don Stauffer in Minneapolis - 06 Mar 2005 17:20 GMT
> What is the calculation for torque?
> I know the Horsepower is:
>
> HP = Torque(lb-ft) * RPM/5252
>
> But how do I get Torque?

Devide the horsepower at any rpm by that rpm value.  The value of peak
torque may NOT be at the same rpm as peak HP, so you cannot compute peak
torque by dividing peak hp by rpm for peak hp.  However, you can get the
torque at THAT rpm by dividing hp by rpm at the rpm for peak hp. It just
may not be the PEAK torque (which usually appears at a lower rpm).

In other words, you really need a curve of hp vs rpm to derive torque.
In fact, usually the dyno outputs torque vs rpm and you derive
horsepower by multiplying torque and each rpm.  At least, that is the
way it used to be.  Modern computerized dynos output curves of both,
doing the multiplication for you.
William R. Watt - 06 Mar 2005 23:34 GMT
Torque = moment of intertia x angular acceleration

It would be explained in a college physics text.
That's where I'm looking at it.

You can calculate the monent of interia of a flywheel and calculate the
torque needed to get it accelerating at a given rate but trying to
calculate the moment of interia of the whole driveline including
transmission would, I imagine, be quite difficult. As mentioned it would
better be done by measuring resistance on a tread mill.

> What is the calculation for torque?
> I know the Horsepower is:
>
> HP = Torque(lb-ft) * RPM/5252
>
> But how do I get Torque?

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William R Watt    National Capital FreeNet    Ottawa's free community network
homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm 
warning: non-FreeNet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned
Kathy and Erich Coiner - 07 Mar 2005 03:45 GMT
Get a mechanical engineering degree with emphasis on thermodynamics.
You will learn this in your 4th year thermodynamics classes.

Erich

> What is the calculation for torque?
> I know the Horsepower is:
>
> HP = Torque(lb-ft) * RPM/5252
>
> But how do I get Torque?
Steve - 07 Mar 2005 19:08 GMT
Actually, its first-year "Physics for Engineering Students," regardless
of engineering discipline (even us EEs had to take basic physics and
mechanics.

> Get a mechanical engineering degree with emphasis on thermodynamics.
> You will learn this in your 4th year thermodynamics classes.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>
>>But how do I get Torque?
Steve - 07 Mar 2005 19:04 GMT
> What is the calculation for torque?
> I know the Horsepower is:
>
> HP = Torque(lb-ft) * RPM/5252
>
> But how do I get Torque?

Not sure what you're asking here. Typically, torque is MEASURED, not
calculated. Horsepower is computed from measured torque.

If you have a horsepower curve and you want to back-derive torque, just
solve for Torque in your equation above: (HP*5252)/RPM
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.