Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

E20 coming to Minnesota

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Don Stauffer - 28 Apr 2005 14:47 GMT
Wow, I didn't realize the Mn legislature could move that fast. Before I
was able to gather my concerns and send them to my legislators, the
Minnesota house passed a bill requiring all gasoline sold in state by
either 2010 or 2013 to contain 20% ethanol.  I have seen no discussion
on how to protect consumers when their car warranties are voided by mfgs.

I am still trying to find out how much energy is consumed making a
gallon of ethanol.  My understanding is, whatever the value is, it is
supplied by oil or natural gas.  I am an advocate of development of
alternate energy.  But this bill smacks of a knee-jerk reaction to high
gasoline prices, not a well thought out policy.
Kevin Bottorff - 28 Apr 2005 16:20 GMT
> Wow, I didn't realize the Mn legislature could move that fast. Before I
> was able to gather my concerns and send them to my legislators, the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> alternate energy.  But this bill smacks of a knee-jerk reaction to high
> gasoline prices, not a well thought out policy.

this has nothing to do with high gas prices, it has been in the works
since 9-11, it is  a tool to reduce oil importation.  and the latest
studies show that ethanol is energy pos. remember corn and other plants
get energy from the sun not oil. The loss factor is in the refining end
and that % is improving all the time.  KB

Signature

ThunderSnake #9  Warn once, shoot twice
460 in the pkup, 460 on the stand for another pkup
and one in the shed for a fun project to yet be decided on

Daniel J. Stern - 28 Apr 2005 17:05 GMT
> Wow, I didn't realize the Mn legislature could move that fast.

Politicians are nothing if not opportunistic.

> Before I was able to gather my concerns and send them to my legislators,
> the Minnesota house passed a bill requiring all gasoline sold in state
> by either 2010 or 2013 to contain 20% ethanol.  I have seen no
> discussion on how to protect consumers when their car warranties are
> voided by mfgs.

Look at it from a dollars-and-cents perspective:

Farmers, Archer-Daniels-Midland (who produce virtually all North America's
fuel ethanol), misguided self-proclaimed "environmentalists" and auto
repair organizations probably bought more representatives than you did.

> I am still trying to find out how much energy is consumed making a
> gallon of ethanol.

Quite a bit. The exact amount depends on whose numbers are being used for
what political purpose.

>  My understanding is, whatever the value is, it is
> supplied by oil or natural gas.

That's correct. And the corn to make ethanol is farmed and shipped using
vehicles and equipment that run on petroleum, not to mention being
fertilized and pest-sprayed with petroleum-derived chemicals.

> I am an advocate of development of alternate energy.

So am I. Ethanol, however, surely doesn't look like the right path to
take.
y_p_w - 28 Apr 2005 19:26 GMT
> > I am an advocate of development of alternate energy.
>
> So am I. Ethanol, however, surely doesn't look like the right path to
> take.

I don't know if making ethanol from corn is the right way either.
There has been some talk of developing new methods of making ethanol
from such waste products as rice straw.  Rice straw is often just
burned in the fields after harvest and is a cause of concern for
the air quality in such places as the Central Valley of California.
scott_z500@my-deja.com - 28 Apr 2005 19:31 GMT
" My understanding is, whatever the value is, it is supplied by oil or
natural gas. "

Or nuclear power or from coal burning power plants.
Ashton Crusher - 29 Apr 2005 09:21 GMT
>Wow, I didn't realize the Mn legislature could move that fast. Before I
>was able to gather my concerns and send them to my legislators, the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>alternate energy.  But this bill smacks of a knee-jerk reaction to high
>gasoline prices, not a well thought out policy.

And your gas mileage will go way down also.  One reason people don't
get the gas mileage they expect on new cars is because the automakers
run the tests using 100% high quality gasoline.  Then your politicians
pass laws so the only thing you can get is watered down gasoline with
5 - 15% alcohol in it.  You lose 2 to 5 mpg in the process.
--
New service to compete with paypal
Get $25 pre-registration bonus by
following this link
www.greenzap.com/25smackers4u
Loren Eggert - 29 Apr 2005 20:15 GMT
Several distinguished universities have done studies and ethanol gives no
less than 15% energy return. I applaud MN for taking a step in the right
direction.  If you don't like it then move f&*^%$g elsewhere!!!!!

> Wow, I didn't realize the Mn legislature could move that fast. Before I
> was able to gather my concerns and send them to my legislators, the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> But this bill smacks of a knee-jerk reaction to high gasoline prices, not
> a well thought out policy.
Ignasi Palou-Rivera - 29 Apr 2005 21:49 GMT
> Several distinguished universities have done studies and ethanol gives no
> less than 15% energy return. I applaud MN for taking a step in the right
> direction.  If you don't like it then move f&*^%$g elsewhere!!!!!

I would have expected more from somebody with a Purdue address.

Signature

Ignasi.
(using SPAM trap e-mail address)

Don Stauffer - 30 Apr 2005 15:10 GMT
>>Several distinguished universities have done studies and ethanol gives no
>>less than 15% energy return. I applaud MN for taking a step in the right
>>direction.  If you don't like it then move f&*^%$g elsewhere!!!!!
>
> I would have expected more from somebody with a Purdue address.

He could be a frosh.
Loren Eggert - 01 May 2005 03:12 GMT
No, the address is legit.  I mean come on.  Why do people insist on
complaining about rising gas cost, oil dependance, and depleting our
non-renewable resources, but they cry, scream, and bitch when there is
action taken to improve the situation.  On the Weekend Farm Show on WGN
Radio a couple of weeks ago they broadcast an interview dealing with the
topic of E85 fuels.  Most of the new research states that there is between a
15 and 35% energy return on ethanol.  So why is no one using it.  I know
that E85 is not the same as a 20% level, but a conventional car will run on
the 20% where it takes flex-fuel engine management to burn the 85%.  Yes,
you will see a decrease in in mgp, but in the end, the bottom line will be
as good, if not slightly better than what it is right now.  When ethanol
becomes popular automakers will realize this and raise the compression ratio
of cars and make other changes to better utalize the combustion of alcohol.
Do a google search people.  If you are not willing to do some research, have
an open mind, and embrace rather than fear change, then go elsewhere because
you are not doing your country any good.
So, for all the Dons on this newsgroup, do some reading. I think you might
be surprised with the information learn.
Loren

>>>Several distinguished universities have done studies and ethanol gives no
>>>less than 15% energy return. I applaud MN for taking a step in the right
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
> He could be a frosh.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.