Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / June 2005
Honest mechanic?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
JHI - 15 Jun 2005 00:58 GMT Can anyone recommend an honest mechanic who does what needs to be done and does it correctly.
North Miami Beach, FL
Thanks
John_H - 15 Jun 2005 02:22 GMT >Can anyone recommend an honest mechanic who does what needs to be done and >does it correctly. > >North Miami Beach, FL Only if you're prepared to travel. :)
-- John H
* - 15 Jun 2005 12:19 GMT I'd be happy to find a few honest customers.....
Someone who will admit that he tried - and failed miserably - to fix the problem himself, only making it worse.....
Someone who really DID have another estimate which was much lower than mine......
Someone who really DID have the work he's trying to have warranteed done by my shop.....
Someone who really DID only hear the grinding brakes for the first time "...this morning"......
Someone who will not try to blame the need for a wheel alignment on me fixing the transmission.....
Someone who's willing to pay me a reasonable fee for the investment I have made in the tools, equipment, and education needed to fix their particular car....not expect me to work for $12-an-hour because they consider that to be a good hourly salary.....
Someone who doesn't confuse the terms "honest" with "cheap"....hoping to find a competent technician who moonlights for $10-an-hour.......
Someone who doesn't automatically pigeonhole EVERY automotive technician as being incompetent and dishonest......
Yes, there are some scumbags in this industry - as there are in ANY industry.......but there are also a fair share of dishonest customers who make it hard for the honest ones.......
The blowhards who profess to be automotive "experts" - yet have never earned a single hour's pay working on cars - are the worst......
......and there are a large number of them on this particular board.
larrybud2002@yahoo.com - 15 Jun 2005 14:25 GMT > Yes, there are some scumbags in this industry - as there are in ANY > industry.......but there are also a fair share of dishonest customers who > make it hard for the honest ones....... Let's face it, there are more scumbags in the auto repair industry than in most other areas of customer service because most people don't know jack sh.t about cars.
aarcuda69062 - 15 Jun 2005 15:20 GMT > I'd be happy to find a few honest customers..... > [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > ......and there are a large number of them on this particular board. Bravo!
Bob - 15 Jun 2005 18:07 GMT >> I'd be happy to find a few honest customers..... >> [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > Bravo! Yes indeed!
Brian - 15 Jun 2005 18:57 GMT I work on race cars professionally - but as a hobby business. I can totally agree with these comments, and have a few of my own below...
>>> I'd be happy to find a few honest customers..... I'm very selective about who I work for - benefit of doing this as a hobby...
>>> Someone who will admit that he tried - and failed miserably - to fix the >>> problem himself, only making it worse..... fixing their mistakes is time on the books - and I don't do flat rate. How long it takes me to fix it is how long the bill is for.
>>> Someone who really DID have another estimate which was much lower than >>> mine...... Good - go get them to do the work. I don't want to work on your rat bag race car anyway...
>>> Someone who really DID have the work he's trying to have warranteed done >>> by >>> my shop..... I don't warranty my work - the engine is off warranty when it fires, basically...race car stuff just breaks and there is nothing you can do about it. That a fact of 100hp per liter life...
>>> Someone who's willing to pay me a reasonable fee for the investment I >>> have [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >>> to >>> be a good hourly salary..... I once figured out what my actual loaded cost was, and I was working at a loss - that's when I reminded myself that I had all that stuff before I started working on other peoples cars, and that this was a hobby after all...Lot's of people would consider me a backyard mechanic moonlighting, and that fair because that pretty much what I am. But I supply an honest service to people who want to race for a hobby. I do things they can't do and that other shops don't want to do, so I charge them a fair price for the privilige.
Brian
Don Bruder - 15 Jun 2005 17:17 GMT > I'd be happy to find a few honest customers..... <snip>
> The blowhards who profess to be automotive "experts" - yet have never > earned a single hour's pay working on cars - are the worst...... Hmmm... Haven't been paid to work on cars, but if I do say so myself, I seem to do pretty good keeping mine on the road in good running (Although perhaps not particularly "cosmetically pleasing") shape. It sees a garage/mechanic only for alignment and smog work - Basically, stuff that's outside my equipment capabilities to dial in precisely. I know it inside and out, and inside out, and what knowledge about it is needed that isn't already stored in my head is available from the factory manual that's carried tucked into the pouch on the back of the passenger seat.
So although I'm honest (I *KNOW* what needs to go on - why would I want to try to bullshit the guy I'm asking to take care of it for me???) it's unlikely you'll see me in your shop unless I happen to stumble across you while looking for an alignment or smog check.
Some of us DO have a clue, guy.
And as far as your rates... $20-30 an hour, MAYBE. 60, 70, 80+ an hour? Get a grip on reality, chum. Maybe to a brain surgeon. Not to a car mechanic. Particularly when I'm perfectly capable of knocking out the job myself.
Dunno why, but the line "If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen" comes to mind...
 Signature Don Bruder - dakidd@sonic.net - New Email policy in effect as of Feb. 21, 2004. Short form: I'm trashing EVERY E-mail that doesn't contain a password in the subject unless it comes from a "whitelisted" (pre-approved by me) address. See <http://www.sonic.net/~dakidd/main/contact.html> for full details.
Bob - 15 Jun 2005 18:15 GMT >> I'd be happy to find a few honest customers..... > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > mechanic. Particularly when I'm perfectly capable of knocking out the > job myself. Sounds like you need to open a shop and set the shop rate at about $25/hour. See how long it takes before you're bankrupt.
Daniel J. Stern - 15 Jun 2005 19:14 GMT > And as far as your rates... $20-30 an hour, MAYBE. 60, 70, 80+ an hour? > Get a grip on reality, chum. Maybe to a brain surgeon. Not to a car > mechanic. Uh...you're joking, right? Prevailing shop rates for real mechanics at independent shops (not Taco Bell reject parts changers and quickie oil change parlor apes) average between $60 and $90/hr, US. Go to a dealer and you'll pay about 30% more than that.
> Particularly when I'm perfectly capable of knocking out the job myself. Well, then...do so!
Shep - 15 Jun 2005 21:22 GMT Dan, sorry I sent you, in error, a reply to your post. Was tired from fighting with rusted axles this am.
>> And as far as your rates... $20-30 an hour, MAYBE. 60, 70, 80+ an hour? >> Get a grip on reality, chum. Maybe to a brain surgeon. Not to a car [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Well, then...do so! Daniel J. Stern - 15 Jun 2005 23:29 GMT > Dan, sorry I sent you, in error, a reply to your post. Was tired from > fighting with rusted axles this am. I didn't get it; try danredbear "at" yahoo "dot" ca
Don Bruder - 15 Jun 2005 22:41 GMT > > And as far as your rates... $20-30 an hour, MAYBE. 60, 70, 80+ an hour? > > Get a grip on reality, chum. Maybe to a brain surgeon. Not to a car [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > change parlor apes) average between $60 and $90/hr, US. Go to a dealer > and you'll pay about 30% more than that. No, Dan, *I* won't.
I'm not much interested in being ripped off, y'see.
> > Particularly when I'm perfectly capable of knocking out the job myself. > > Well, then...do so! I do - Because the rates a shop charges border on robbery.
Why not just stick a gun in my face and demand my wallet when I walk in the door? It'd be quicker for both of us, and despite being a criminal act, much more honest, in my book.
 Signature Don Bruder - dakidd@sonic.net - New Email policy in effect as of Feb. 21, 2004. Short form: I'm trashing EVERY E-mail that doesn't contain a password in the subject unless it comes from a "whitelisted" (pre-approved by me) address. See <http://www.sonic.net/~dakidd/main/contact.html> for full details.
Nate Nagel - 15 Jun 2005 23:06 GMT >>>And as far as your rates... $20-30 an hour, MAYBE. 60, 70, 80+ an hour? >>>Get a grip on reality, chum. Maybe to a brain surgeon. Not to a car [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > the door? It'd be quicker for both of us, and despite being a criminal > act, much more honest, in my book. I'm gonna have to side with the shop owners on this one... How much investment in tools do you need to have to do all the work on your car? I'm sure if I bought all the tools in my collection new, I'd probably be well over $10K, and I'm always finding something new I need to have. Just the other day I had to buy a set of 3/8" drive metric Allen drivers. I also just bought a timing light, dwell meter, and one of those little infrared temperature sensors on eBay (my dwell meter shat the bed, my timing light got lost in a move a couple years ago and was never replaced, and the temperature thing is just a lot neater and more useful than using a candy thermometer in the radiator.) Add to that rent or mortgage/property taxes (keep in mind that most gas stations are located in "desirable" high traffic locations, and the real estate is priced accordingly,) power bill, water bill, etc. and you can see that you're going to have to charge a good bit to stay in business. Sure the mechanic may only be making $20-30 an hour but the overhead could easily double that.
Now is it worth it for a mechanically savvy car owner to take his car to a mechanic and pay $80 an hour for something he could do himself? Probably not. But sometimes it's worth it when you just don't want to do a job yourself, don't have time to do any car work right away, or run into something that requires an expensive special tool that it's not worth buying for just one job. I don't bitch when I choose to take a car to a mechanic; I just figure in my head how much my time is worth, and then decide if I'm willing to pay the difference or not to not have to do the job.
nate
 Signature replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel
HLS@nospam.nix - 15 Jun 2005 23:49 GMT I believe that I am correct in saying that the tools are deductible from taxes. If so,then in principle we taxpayers in general pay for the professional mechanics tools.
Now guys, $100 per hour is roughly $800 per day, or $17-18000 per working month.
I realize that a lot slips through the cracks, etc, but when the common joe goes to pay the mechanics bill, he is paying at a rate that reflects upon his ability to earn. Many of you earn more than $15000 per month??? And get your training and tools paid for by tax deductions?
Nate Nagel - 16 Jun 2005 00:14 GMT > I believe that I am correct in saying that the tools are deductible from > taxes. If so,then in principle we taxpayers in general pay for the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > more than $15000 per month??? And get your training and tools paid for by > tax deductions? Unless I'm missing something, a "tax deduction" means only that the money spent on tools and training is deducted from your taxable income. Therefore the mechanic or shop owner, depending on who foots the bill, is still paying 70-80% of those costs.
There's lots of industries where price of a service is significantly higher than what the employee is making. A good fire alarm tech can cost anywhere from $80-120 an hour. Do you think he's actually making that much? Do you think that the remainder is going straight into the pockets of those greedy fire alarm service company owners? I can assure you that neither is the case.
The only time I ever get annoyed at a mechanic is when I pay full price for what I feel is work that I could have done better myself. However, I tend not to patronize shops twice where I feel that has happened.
nate
 Signature replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel
Ototin - 16 Jun 2005 03:19 GMT >The only time I ever get annoyed at a mechanic is when I pay full price >for what I feel is work that I could have done better myself. Why do even bother going to another mechanic?
pakeha@not.a.real.address.com - 16 Jun 2005 02:53 GMT >I believe that I am correct in saying that the tools are deductible from >taxes. If so,then in principle we taxpayers in general pay for the >professional mechanics tools. The tax you pay on tools is deductible, and you *HAVE* to spend a certian pecent of your annual income on tools for the cost of said tools to be deductible, ask me how I know...
>Now guys, $100 per hour is roughly $800 per day, or $17-18000 per working >month. If the shop rate is $100 an hour, You think the wrench is getting that?? Are you mad??
>I realize that a lot slips through the cracks, etc, but when the common joe >goes to pay the >mechanics bill, he is paying at a rate that reflects upon his ability to >earn. Many of you earn >more than $15000 per month??? And get your training and tools paid for by >tax deductions? If I were earning $15K a month, I could afford a Big Assed house, with a BA garage, BA barn for the wifes horse, Unfortunately, I ain't making BA money like you claim I am, $3400 to $3500 a month is more like it...
The OP has the right idea though, give me an honest customer, one who hasn't dicked around with trying to "fix" the MIL, and knackered it to a far greater extent that it was originally...
SteveL
smile4camera@bellsouth.net - 16 Jun 2005 22:54 GMT > >I believe that I am correct in saying that the tools are deductible from > >taxes. If so,then in principle we taxpayers in general pay for the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > a certian pecent of your annual income on tools for the cost of said > tools to be deductible, ask me how I know... Some locations, working as a mechanic you pay a personal property tax each year on the tools of your trade.. considering how much some mechanics have into their equipment, this can be a significant amount.
Jim
larrybud2002@yahoo.com - 16 Jun 2005 03:06 GMT > I believe that I am correct in saying that the tools are deductible from > taxes. If so,then in principle we taxpayers in general pay for the > professional mechanics tools. They still PAY for the tools, for crying out loud. The amount isn't deducted from the tax bill, it's deducted from their income, just like any other capital investment any company makes.
> Now guys, $100 per hour is roughly $800 per day, or $17-18000 per working > month. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > more than $15000 per month??? And get your training and tools paid for by > tax deductions? 2nd, $800 ain't jack sh.t. Do you have any clue as to what goes into running a business? Let's talk property taxes, electricity to run the tools, rent on the building, workman comp, payroll taxes, perhaps health care, etc.
If it's so damn easy, why don't you start your own business?
aarcuda69062 - 16 Jun 2005 03:27 GMT > I believe that I am correct in saying that the tools are deductible from > taxes. If so,then in principle we taxpayers in general pay for the > professional mechanics tools. Not quite (actually, not even close). Plenty of professions are allowed to deduct business expenses.
> Now guys, $100 per hour is roughly $800 per day, or $17-18000 per working > month. Damn cheap compared to a hospital room.
> I realize that a lot slips through the cracks, etc, but when the common joe > goes to pay the > mechanics bill, he is paying at a rate that reflects upon his ability to > earn. ?????
> Many of you earn > more than $15000 per month??? NASCAR crew chiefs.
> And get your training and tools paid for by > tax deductions? No, not paid for. Remember, the tools (beyond basic) and training are necessary because of the changes that the government hands down to the OEMs. In the last 13 months, I've spent over $2000 to update just one scan tool, and I own more than one... Am I complaining? Only about the holes in the coverage that were supposed to be fixed.
BillyBBad - 16 Jun 2005 14:23 GMT >I believe that I am correct in saying that the tools are deductible from >taxes. If so,then in principle we taxpayers in general pay for the >professional mechanics tools. No, you don't get it. You've got tax deduction confused with tax credit. There's no tax CREDIT for tools. The deduction is from INCOME, not taxes. Taxes are computed (for most businesses FOUR times a year) and paid based on income. Tax credits reduce the tax bill after taxes are computed. I hope you don't have a mortgage, because according to you, that would mean that I and the rest of us taxpayers are buying your house for you, since one can deduct the interest from a home mortgage from their income, and I don't want to buy a house for someone as ignorant as you seem to be. The rest of your post is worthless drivel until you take a business or economics course, or go through some hard knocks and risk owning your own for-profit business.
HLS@nospam.nix - 18 Jun 2005 02:09 GMT > >I believe that I am correct in saying that the tools are deductible from > >taxes. If so,then in principle we taxpayers in general pay for the [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > economics course, or go through some hard knocks and risk owning your own > for-profit business. You dont know much about me. I have run my own business, and have managed multimillion dollar global sales operations. I know what it costs.
I have had courses in cost accounting, budgeting, etc.
On my mortgage, if I had one, tax deductions mean that someone else IS subsidizing part of my financial obligation. My owning a house is not a God given right, nor do I see any reason why I should be given a deduction because I encumbered debt, bought a house, or sired a child.
Our taxes go to pay for your and my kid's schooling, your tools, and a whole bunch of other things.
When we pay $100 per hour service fees, and cost times 3 for parts, that might be acceptable IF the work is done properly and competently, and IF you charge for the hours you actually accumulate on my car. Too many times it ISNT done professionally.
If you do a halfassed job, cut corners to beat the flat rate, do a shitty job and still charge me a premium rate, you should be in prison. That is, if scam artists and frauds went to prison in the USA anymore.
BillyBBad - 18 Jun 2005 07:40 GMT >> >I believe that I am correct in saying that the tools are deductible from >> >taxes. If so,then in principle we taxpayers in general pay for the [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >multimillion >dollar global sales operations. I know what it costs. I shudder to even entertain the thought that the above is true, since you seem unable to tell the difference between a deduction of income versus a tax credit, and still insist that a deduction is some sort of subsidy. According you your twisted logic, I'm saddled with your existence, since you get to take a "standard" deduction from your adjusted gross income. I'm somewhat encouraged that the above indicates that all of your money managment is in the past.
>I have had courses in cost accounting, budgeting, etc. Maybe you should've actually gone to the classes and taken better notes.
>On my mortgage, if I had one, tax deductions mean that someone else IS >subsidizing part of [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >or sired >a child. Ah, and the drivel starts anew. The income deduction for all loan interest except qualifying home mortgage interest was phased out around two decades ago. You can no longer deduct personal loan interest, credit card interest, or the interest from a car loan from your income. So you don't get a deduction for interest paid for just any old debt encumberance. You don't get a deduction for buying a home. The only deduction you get is the interest paid that year for the mortgage interest. You also get to take a deduction for other taxes paid, such as property taxes (BTW that's where most schools get most of their money, the Feds are damned stingy with educational support, but someone with enough business savvy to be deemed worthy of managing a multimillion dollars in global sales would know that). You don't get anything for siring children. You get special treatment now (I never qualified, I made too much for the earned income credit, and either myself or my wife kept the kids out of day care so we couldn't take dependent child care tax credits for either one) for RAISING children (meaning you give them the majority of what it takes to support them). None of your bastard children that you don't give any support to can be claimed as a deduction. You'll only be able to prove your subsidizing someone else is when you can show the zero sum. The mechanic paid the Snap-on representative $1000.00 for tools. Who got your tax subsidy money, and how did he get it?
>Our taxes go to pay for your and my kid's schooling, your tools, and a whole >bunch of other things. And since I (I really haven't deducted tools from my personal income, but let's say I did) paid the Snap-on representative $1000.00 for the tools, where is the check for your share of the subsidy? With those tools, I'm now able to charge for using them. Now I can pay taxes on income. Without the tools, the IRS would get less, or worse, nothing. Now where's the money going to come from to send your kids to school, to pay for a whole bunch of other things. (Did you really manage millions of dollars, who managed the taxes at your business?)
And since I sent my kids to private school, I should've been able to deduct it from my income, after all it was a couple that you didn't have pay the schooling for. Unfortunately for me, such a deduction wasn't allowed when my children were school aged. I still had to pay property taxes, and sales taxes, and my property tax rate is partially tied to the upcoming budget as approved by the public school board. I'm in Florida, we don't have a state tax on personal income.
>When we pay $100 per hour service fees, and cost times 3 for parts, that >might be acceptable >IF the work is done properly and competently, and IF you charge for the >hours you actually >accumulate on my car. Too many times it ISNT done professionally. This isn't covered by tax code directly, but let's just try to make a case that'll apply. Let's say you get to pay a $1000.00 repair bill. If it was a true scam, and he collected $1000.00 for $0.00 cost, then he'd have to pay taxes on $1000.00. So by your TL, he's an outstanding taxpayer, sending your kids to school blah, blah. For the IRS to get involved, means that our perpetrator would have to risk "cheating the IRS", by telling them that he didn't collect $1000.00. While income tax evasion isn't as "tough" as it was when it put Al Capone away, it's still considered a serious Federal felony.
Perhaps this is just tranferrence. You're really angry that you cannot deduct auto repairs from your personal income, hence you must be subsidizing those in the business because the business can deduct certain costs of operations from its reported income. Now, if you want a flat-tax supporter, I'll be in your corner, but do come up with a decent rate that'll pay down the debt, cover the budget, and at the very least, simplify things. Good luck trying to get that past all the accountants in Congress though.
>If you do a halfassed job, cut corners to beat the flat rate, do a shitty >job and still charge me a >premium rate, you should be in prison. That is, if scam artists and frauds >went to prison in the USA anymore. We do send scam artists and frauds to prison when we can prove a case against them. Just look at some from the current batch that have managed multimillion dollar global sales operations, such as Worldcom and Enron executives. Seems they had the same economics and business accounting courses as you did.
HLS@nospam.nix - 18 Jun 2005 12:44 GMT You see things the way you want to, Billy, in your narrow provincial terms.
Am I a flat tax supporter? Not really, but if it would simplify the American tax quagmire, it might be better than what we have.
The point of my devils advocate position in this thread would apparently be missed on you: " Auto mechanics have a bad name and some of it is deserved. Excellence is not demanded, and shoddy expensive work is often the outcome."
This reputation does a disservice to those who really do spend the time and money to become educated in their fields, who invest in the tools needed to do the job, and who perform their jobs in a competent and honest manner.
The world does not owe you a living.
Of the Worldcom and Enron executives you mentioned very few have been dealt with, and their theft was enormous. These guys were not incompetent...they were thieves. They had no moral or ethic which kept them from stealing from those unable to protect themselves.
Auto mechanics who abuse the customer relationship are also thieves, they do it to make more money and with less work, and they do it at the expense of a customer base whom, they believe, either have no choice or are too uninformed about autos to complain.
* - 18 Jun 2005 13:00 GMT HLS@nospam.nix wrote in article <cOTse.2174$Nz2.1577@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>...
> You see things the way you want to, Billy, in your narrow provincial terms.
> Auto mechanics who abuse the customer relationship are also thieves, they do > it to make more money and with less work, and they do it at the expense of a > customer base whom, they believe, either have no choice or are too > uninformed about autos to complain. Now....don't you wish you took a shop class or two in high school instead of joining the "Future Bean Counters Club" ?????
You would know a lot more about mechanical things, and not feel as though you were getting ripped off for a quality repair at a fair, reasonable price that covers the investment in tools, equipment, education and facilities that were required to effect said repair.
Comboverfish - 16 Jun 2005 15:55 GMT > I believe that I am correct in saying that the tools are deductible from > taxes. If so,then in principle we taxpayers in general pay for the > professional mechanics tools. To be more specific, multiply your adjusted gross by .02, then any non-consumable tool purchases above that figure are deductible. So a 50k/year employee sees his first red deductible cent *after* spending $1000. Its not exactly a get rich loophole that's screwing American tax payers. The practice is not limited to mechanics, either. The weirdest part about it from an employee's standpoint is when your married income causes your deductions to be limited well below the actual amount. That's a kick in the scroat for sure.
Toyota MDT in MO
Shep - 16 Jun 2005 01:24 GMT I just did an inventory for insurance purposes for a small local shop 2 bays, reasonable tools and up to date diagnostics, 125k value at acv dollars and cents, this does not count the training and time spent to keep up with modern technology, insurance rates, disposal issues, accounting and the usual overhead of running a business. The owner works 5.5 days a week, at 50.00/hour book time. You need to own/run an auto reapir shop to appreciate the complexities of fixing almost any brand car or truck these days.Every day is like " walking on a razor blade in a thunderstorm" to make money, satisfy the customers and keep your sanity, this is not the kind of business you can work to retirement age either.
>>>>And as far as your rates... $20-30 an hour, MAYBE. 60, 70, 80+ an hour? >>>>Get a grip on reality, chum. Maybe to a brain surgeon. Not to a car [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > > nate Comboverfish - 16 Jun 2005 16:02 GMT >Every day is like " walking on a razor blade >in a thunderstorm" That sounds slightly better than walking on a razorblade in dry weather conditions, but still painful.
Daniel J. Stern - 15 Jun 2005 23:26 GMT > > Prevailing shop rates for real mechanics at independent shops (not > > Taco Bell reject parts changers and quickie oil change parlor apes) > > average between $60 and $90/hr, US. Go to a dealer and you'll pay > > about 30% more than that. > > No, Dan, *I* won't. Then you've no ground for commenting on shop rates.
Bob - 15 Jun 2005 23:21 GMT >> And as far as your rates... $20-30 an hour, MAYBE. 60, 70, 80+ an hour? >> Get a grip on reality, chum. Maybe to a brain surgeon. Not to a car [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Well, then...do so! That reminds me of one of my favorites, the guy who says: It shouldn't cost much should it? I'd do it myself but just don't have the time. Like somehow the fact he "could" do it himself should make the job cheaper. Bob
Don Bruder - 15 Jun 2005 23:49 GMT > >> And as far as your rates... $20-30 an hour, MAYBE. 60, 70, 80+ an hour? > >> Get a grip on reality, chum. Maybe to a brain surgeon. Not to a car [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > the fact he "could" do it himself should make the job cheaper. > Bob As a recent example, about 4 days ago now, the boss's assistant at work needed her cig. lighter socket repaired so she could plug her spotlight into it when out on her route. Seems the old one had a burnt center contact.
New cig. lighter socket at any parts place that has anything even remotely resembling a nodding aquaintance with realistic prices: $3.00-7.00 plus tax. Let's be generous and say $10.00, out the door.
Time to put in - Variable by car, I'm sure, since this job needs to get to the back side of the dashboard - In her car, 15 minutes (based on her report of how long the car was in the hands of the mechanic). In mine, two screws and 30 seconds. Either way, obviously not a major task to accomplish.
Tools required: Besides the screwdriver (Phillips) for mine, a pair of slip-joint pliers are useful, but not vital. Again, I acknowledge that milage varies by car/job, but since this is my only concrete data, I'll say $3 for the screwdriver, and $5 for the pliers - Both of which have been part of the toolkit and long since paid off for so long I can't even remember. Total expense so far, being generous and pretending I ran out to the store and bought the tools specifically for this job: $18.00
Someplace to do the job: It sure doesn't require a 6 liftbay/greasepit garage to swap a lighter socket... (yes, I realize there are jobs that DO require special facilities and/or hardware. That ain't this case.)
Her final bill for the job: $92.73, big as life and twice as ugly down there in the "total amount due" box.
Versus $18 plus "throw me some gas money"
What kind of horseshit is that? I mean other than "We saw that little ol' lady coming, and by god, we fleeced her for all she was worth!"
 Signature Don Bruder - dakidd@sonic.net - New Email policy in effect as of Feb. 21, 2004. Short form: I'm trashing EVERY E-mail that doesn't contain a password in the subject unless it comes from a "whitelisted" (pre-approved by me) address. See <http://www.sonic.net/~dakidd/main/contact.html> for full details.
larrybud2002@yahoo.com - 16 Jun 2005 03:10 GMT > even remember. Total expense so far, being generous and pretending I ran > out to the store and bought the tools specifically for this job: $18.00 ...
> Her final bill for the job: $92.73, big as life and twice as ugly down > there in the "total amount due" box. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > What kind of horseshit is that? I mean other than "We saw that little > ol' lady coming, and by god, we fleeced her for all she was worth!" Did you have to pay employees, taxes, rent, utility bills to fix it?
You guys are amazingly clueless as to what goes into running a business, any business.
ray - 16 Jun 2005 14:44 GMT >>>>And as far as your rates... $20-30 an hour, MAYBE. 60, 70, 80+ an hour? >>>>Get a grip on reality, chum. Maybe to a brain surgeon. Not to a car [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > What kind of horseshit is that? I mean other than "We saw that little > ol' lady coming, and by god, we fleeced her for all she was worth!" I'm assuming when you go somewhere for breakfast you pay only the cost of two eggs from the grocery store and a slice of bread. Not.
I'm a DIY-er... and I have run a computer consulting business. As a result, I no longer flinch at the $80/hour shop rates... because the rest is overhead.
Yeah, some places fleece you. I'm not paying a plumber $100/hour anymore... I've decided to buy a snake for next time my plumbing is broken... but it'll probably cost me $1000.
Oh... and for some stupid reason, you CAN'T change the lighter on my Trans Am without a special tool. I know this from disassembling my console with the shop manual.
Ray
smile4camera@bellsouth.net - 16 Jun 2005 23:14 GMT > >>>>And as far as your rates... $20-30 an hour, MAYBE. 60, 70, 80+ an hour? > >>>>Get a grip on reality, chum. Maybe to a brain surgeon. Not to a car [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >>>change parlor apes) average between $60 and $90/hr, US. Go to a dealer > >>>and you'll pay about 30% more than that.
> I'm a DIY-er... and I have run a computer consulting business. As a > result, I no longer flinch at the $80/hour shop rates... because the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > anymore... I've decided to buy a snake for next time my plumbing is > broken... but it'll probably cost me $1000. Just had the plumber people out today.. deep well pump went out. I'm running around at 05:30 with a multimeter troubleshooting.. pump is a 220v unit. When I measured 12 amps on one hot leg, zero amps on the other hot leg, and 12 amps on the ground wire (all this at the wellcap) I knew it was time to have the pump pulled.
Tools required were t-handle, crimper, torch for the heat shrink, PVC cutter, wire stripper, and knife.
Labor rate was $125/hr.
The local farm tractor dealer is around $80/hr.
Now... GeekSquad prices.. in home service..
to install a drive - CD, DVD or HD = $159 Memory install = $129 OS install = $229 Single title software install = $129 To add a computer to your network = $129 Virus removal = $159
I'm in the wrong field..
Jim
ray - 17 Jun 2005 16:48 GMT >>>>>>And as far as your rates... $20-30 an hour, MAYBE. 60, 70, 80+ an hour? >>>>>>Get a grip on reality, chum. Maybe to a brain surgeon. Not to a car [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > Jim Not sure which field you're in, but I'm a computer tech and a home mechanic... and it's definitely a lot messier being a plumber. Can't remember the last time I had to wade around in sludge fixing windows. Installing Linux doesn't usually result in header burns... I don't need eye protection changing a CPU fan. :)
smile4camera@bellsouth.net - 19 Jun 2005 22:52 GMT > Not sure which field you're in, but I'm a computer tech and a home > mechanic... and it's definitely a lot messier being a plumber. Can't > remember the last time I had to wade around in sludge fixing windows. > Installing Linux doesn't usually result in header burns... I don't need > eye protection changing a CPU fan. :) I work on a research farm.. my 'title' is Mechanic II, but my job description includes working on facilities and roads. While most of my time is spent turning wrenches on farm equipment, I've also done computer support, plumbing and electrical. Today is Sunday.. I've been at the farm since 8am and left around 1:30pm. Got called in at 9pm last night; stayed till 11pm.
One of our well pumps had issues.. it's a three phase unit powered by a rotary converter.. for there is only single phase utility power available at this point. The starter for the rotary converter went bad and held the pump running.. I was told that water system pressure hit 120psi. Normal is 60-80psi. Lines started popping. Last night I determined that the rotary converter starter was bad.. this morning was rewiring the circuit to allow manual control of the pump to allow someone to run the pump to water the animals. We still have to find a leak; we are going from 2/3 full tank to 1/2 full tank of water in less than 5 minutes, and this is a 3000 gallon tank. The area that this water system serves is several dozen acres... with more than a mile of piping.
The computer work is mostly virus removal and system setup.. though there is talk of stringing fiber in between the buildings. I've informed that work group that I do have a couple of OTDRs, as well as some other fiber equipment. No fusion splicer.. yet.
Sure, the plumber might get a messy job once in a while.. so does the mechanic. 'Puter support is probably the cleanest of the ones mentioned. For me at least, plumbing is also the least technical of the three.. so why are mechanics so undervalued?..
shiden_kai - 20 Jun 2005 02:03 GMT > Sure, the plumber might get a messy job once in a while.. so does the > mechanic. 'Puter support is probably the cleanest of the ones > mentioned. For me at least, plumbing is also the least technical of > the three.. so why are mechanics so undervalued?.. I think it's some sort of cultural thing...."everybody" thinks they are an expert when it comes to cars and repairing cars. Fortunately for technicians, this is slowly going away as vehicles are becoming so complex electronically that the DIY'er can do very little these days, other then basic mechanical work.
One of my closest friends (was my best man at my wedding) is a plumber. Over the years, he routinely wants to charge me 60-80 dollars an hour to "help" me with plumbing problems, but can't see any reason why he should pay me much more then 30 dollars an hour to help him with mechanical work. Needless to say, I don't do much for him. The funny thing is, he "can't" do any mechanical work, but I've done plenty of plumbing, heating, and electrical work around my own house. It's simple work that takes very little to figure out. Even had the furnace go south, it actually has a very rudimentary form of "codes" that flash and basically point you in the right direction. Took about fifteen minutes to figure out the problem, and five minutes to remove and install the faulty part. No doubt this will become more complex as the years go on...but the technology is similar to the early era of computer controls on cars. I doubt that technicians would have problems figuring out the furnace, but a furnace tech would likely have no clue figuring out an electronic problem on a modern vehicle.
Ian
Bob - 20 Jun 2005 04:05 GMT >> Sure, the plumber might get a messy job once in a while.. so does the >> mechanic. 'Puter support is probably the cleanest of the ones [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > but can't see any reason why he should pay me much more > then 30 dollars an hour to help him with mechanical work. I'd just tell him plumbing is easy, the only two things you really need to know are: sh.t runs down hill and payday is Thursday.
One thing that bothers me seriously though is that here, anyone can repair cars but you need a license to cut hair. That seems pretty screwed up to me, I've never heard of anyone dieing from a botched hair cut.... but a bad brake job on the other hand could result in real problems. Bob
Daniel J. Stern - 20 Jun 2005 05:54 GMT > One thing that bothers me seriously though is that here, anyone can repair > cars but you need a license to cut hair. That seems pretty screwed up to me, Hell, that's nothing.
You need a license to go down to the river and fish, but any two retards who can figure out how to fit tab "A" into slot "B" can be parents.
smile4camera@bellsouth.net - 20 Jun 2005 11:18 GMT > I'd just tell him plumbing is easy, the only two things you really need to > know are: sh.t runs down hill and payday is Thursday. You forgot 'Hot on the left, cold on the right'
> One thing that bothers me seriously though is that here, anyone can repair > cars but you need a license to cut hair. That seems pretty screwed up to me, > I've never heard of anyone dieing from a botched hair cut.... but a bad > brake job on the other hand could result in real problems. I'm certainly not advocating licensing.. but I do agree that we've got some real hacks out there. Keep in mind that not only do you have people who don't know how to repair cars, but you've also got people who just don't care if they fix it right or not.. just fast. I've worked with both, and I'd rather work with the one that didn't know how.. I can train them. The 'I don't care' I don't have much use for. When you mix the two traits together you get someone I used to work with years ago.. it was so bad that we named a sickness after him.. it was defined as 'the unconscious refusal to do the job right'. One of his classics (he was management's darling) was his speed at tuning up v6 Ford minivans.. management was always asking why we couldn't do this as fast as he could.. the correct response being, of course, we replaced **all** the spark plugs; not just the easy ones.
Jim
> Bob smile4camera@bellsouth.net - 20 Jun 2005 11:43 GMT > > Sure, the plumber might get a messy job once in a while.. so does the > > mechanic. 'Puter support is probably the cleanest of the ones [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > are becoming so complex electronically that the DIY'er can > do very little these days, other then basic mechanical work. Even the basic stuff isn't basic anymore.. fan belts, spark plug replacement.. wiper blades haven't changed much though.
> One of my closest friends (was my best man at my wedding) > is a plumber. Over the years, he routinely wants to charge me [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > of "codes" that flash and basically point you in the right > direction. Codes?.. Codes!?!.. We don' need no stinkin codes!!
> Took about fifteen minutes to figure out the problem, > and five minutes to remove and install the faulty part. No doubt [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > out the furnace, but a furnace tech would likely have no clue > figuring out an electronic problem on a modern vehicle. I've found a bad transformer and bad relay on my furnace.. as you've noted, pretty much all the work done at our house is by us. One example that comes to mind is when I found that a mid 90's Saturn non-working speedometer was because of a bad seatbelt module.. if we can troubleshoot and fix that, there'e not much in a house that can stop us.
Jim
ray - 20 Jun 2005 16:14 GMT > Sure, the plumber might get a messy job once in a while.. so does the > mechanic. 'Puter support is probably the cleanest of the ones > mentioned. For me at least, plumbing is also the least technical of the > three.. so why are mechanics so undervalued?.. It's a weird world when you talk money - should a garbageman make more than a lawyer? If we shot them all tomorrow, which would we miss more? Frankly, you couldn't pay me enough to be a cop - I don't like the idea of getting shot at (which is also why I don't work at the post office.)
I'm just lucky what I like doing pays good enough to keep doing it. (just don't show my boss this post :)
Ray
Kathy and Erich Coiner - 21 Jun 2005 03:06 GMT "ray" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message news:S3Bte.4986> It's a weird world when you talk money - should a garbageman make more
> than a lawyer? If we shot them all tomorrow, which would we miss more? If we shot them all tomorrow, How long would it take to have a complete crew of fully trained replacements?
The skill, and time it takes to aquire that skill, is a really good determiner of pay. Or........... a strong union
Erich
Bob - 21 Jun 2005 04:07 GMT > "ray" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message news:S3Bte.4986> It's a weird > world when you talk money - should a garbageman make more [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Erich If we shot them all it would take a couple of weeks to train new garbagemen and we would already have enough lawyers. Bob
Don Bruder - 21 Jun 2005 05:16 GMT > > "ray" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message news:S3Bte.4986> It's a weird > > world when you talk money - should a garbageman make more [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > If we shot them all it would take a couple of weeks to train new garbagemen > and we would already have enough lawyers. ^^^^^^
Umm... Bob? I'm thinking you mis-spelled "way too many".
Q: How do you know when a lawyer is ripping somebody off? A: S/He's breathing.
Q: What do you call 10,000 dead lawyers? A: A good start.
 Signature Don Bruder - dakidd@sonic.net - New Email policy in effect as of Feb. 21, 2004. Short form: I'm trashing EVERY E-mail that doesn't contain a password in the subject unless it comes from a "whitelisted" (pre-approved by me) address. See <http://www.sonic.net/~dakidd/main/contact.html> for full details.
ray - 21 Jun 2005 15:05 GMT > "ray" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message news:S3Bte.4986> It's a weird > world when you talk money - should a garbageman make more [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Erich and/or what the business world decides you're worth. I find computer stuff incredibly easy, but employers have decided it's worth a lot of money to them to keep their servers running, so they give me lots of money.
Like I said, life's not fair - and the "value" of your paycheck isn't an easily calculated number...
Daniel J. Stern - 16 Jun 2005 16:50 GMT > As a recent example, about 4 days ago now, the boss's assistant at work > needed her cig. lighter socket repaired so she could plug her spotlight [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > the job: $92.73, big as life and twice as ugly down there in the "total > amount due" box. Versus $18 plus "throw me some gas money" So why didn't *you* offer to do it for $18 plus gas money? For that matter, why don't *you* open up a $20/hr auto shop? If your little theories are as right as you think they are, you ought to make a killing in a very big hurry.
Don Bruder - 16 Jun 2005 19:43 GMT > > As a recent example, about 4 days ago now, the boss's assistant at work > > needed her cig. lighter socket repaired so she could plug her spotlight [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > So why didn't *you* offer to do it for $18 plus gas money? Can't offer to fix something that one doesn't know is broken.
> For that > matter, why don't *you* open up a $20/hr auto shop? If your little > theories are as right as you think they are, you ought to make a killing > in a very big hurry. Might be a good idea. I've been kicking something like that around in my head for a year or so now, trying to decide if I feel like going for it.
We shall see, I guess...
 Signature Don Bruder - dakidd@sonic.net - New Email policy in effect as of Feb. 21, 2004. Short form: I'm trashing EVERY E-mail that doesn't contain a password in the subject unless it comes from a "whitelisted" (pre-approved by me) address. See <http://www.sonic.net/~dakidd/main/contact.html> for full details.
smile4camera@bellsouth.net - 16 Jun 2005 23:24 GMT > > For that > > matter, why don't *you* open up a $20/hr auto shop? If your little [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > We shall see, I guess... I think you really need to do this.. but if you do, make sure you have all your licenses, permits, etc, etc.. just like a shop would. Don't be a backyard mechanic.
Jim
Pete C. - 17 Jun 2005 22:41 GMT > > > For that > > > matter, why don't *you* open up a $20/hr auto shop? If your little [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Jim Perhaps there is a market for a limited service garage. No tranny rebuilds or engine swaps, just basic stuff like the lighter socket or perhaps brake shoes and mufflers...
Oh, wait, I think that already exists. As I recall, they do have cheaper hourly rates, and you get what you pay for.
One note though to a previous post though - since disposal fees are generally added as line items on the bill, they can't be used as part of the overhead to justify the hourly rate. Not saying that there isn't adequate justification for those rates anyway since the overhead for any business is quite high.
As far as the overhead that justifies the $80/hr rates when the mechanic is getting $25/hr, I can think of:
Rent or mortgage / taxes. Workers comp insurance. Unemployment insurance. General commercial liability insurance. Probably additional insurance riders for auto work since a bad brake or steering job could kill someone. Heat / air conditioning. Electricity. Maintenance on fixed items like big honkin' compressors, welders, tire machines, brake lathes, lifts, tube benders, etc. The cost of replacing or upgrading those compressors, welders, tire machines, brake lathes, lifts, tube benders, etc. Janitorial services. Uniform and industrial laundry services. Industrial gasses, i.e. oxygen and acetylene - possibly line items. Welding consumables - possibly line items. Building maintenance overhead such as paint, rest room, parking lot, landscape, light bulbs, signage, etc. Coffee and perhaps bottled water for the break room and waiting area. Advertising. Employee training / certification.
I'm sure I missed a few as well. I'm not in the auto business, nor do I even run a business, but I do understand that there is a lot of overhead in items you'd never even realize until you actually think about it.
Where I have a problem with auto service establishments is not with the prices since I understand the justification for them and know enough technically to not worry about bogus stuff being added to the service. What gets me hoppin' mad is how frequently they make promises they don't even try to keep.
One example was when I had my truck in for brakes all around and rear axle seals (Chev. K3500 DRW). This was a well defined job so there were no surprises to be had when they pulled things apart.
I was going to be out of town for the day so up front they knew that I was going to drop the truck off late the night before so they'd have it there for the moment the mechanic arrived at 7am. I told them that I'd be back to pick it up at 4pm and they promised that they would have no problem having it ready for then. I also gave them my pager and cell numbers in case they ran into a problem.
I dropped the truck off around 10pm and headed out of town. When I got back into town at about 3:30pm after a tiring 2 hr drive I called them and found that they had not even started on the truck. I was down there minutes later to take my truck, rip them some new bodily orifices and take the truck elsewhere for service, never to return.
Just my 2 or 3 cents...
Pete C.
ray - 20 Jun 2005 16:04 GMT > One note though to a previous post though - since disposal fees are > generally added as line items on the bill, they can't be used as part of > the overhead to justify the hourly rate. Not saying that there isn't > adequate justification for those rates anyway since the overhead for any > business is quite high. those "shop supplies" charges cheese me off too. I'd rather pay $125 for a new tire "total cost" then $99 for the tire and $10 for mounting, $10 for balancing, $5 for disposal fees, $5 for shop supplies, $3 for air surtax, etc. etc... I know the fees are there, it just makes me feel "ripped off" when I get a tire mounted for "10 bucks" that ends up costing me "twenty bucks" when I go to pick it up. Just tell me it's $20 up front.
Ray
* - 20 Jun 2005 23:14 GMT ray <nospam@example.com> wrote in article <6WAte.4983$mN.53876@news1.mts.net>...
> those "shop supplies" charges cheese me off too. > I'd rather pay $125 for a new tire "total cost" then $99 for the tire [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > bucks" that ends up costing me "twenty bucks" when I go to pick it up. > Just tell me it's $20 up front. Some states - mine included - insist on listing "shop supplies" separately from labor charges on an automotive repair order in order to collect the sales tax on the product.
When shop supplies are absorbed into the non-taxable labor rate - say at a dollar an hour - the state loses.
Also, the state WILL assess a "use tax" based on a percentage of tax-exempt purchases which represents those items which have been purchased tax-exempt through a business' tax certification, but not actually charged - and taxed - to customers if such a "shop supplies" category is NOT listed on the repair orders of a business - such as auto repair - which uses consumables in the course of its work.
If I do not collect said taxes, I still have to pay them - so, I include a "shop supplies" category on my repair orders - and charge for such - just to keep the taxman off my back.
ray - 21 Jun 2005 14:58 GMT > ray <nospam@example.com> wrote in article > <6WAte.4983$mN.53876@news1.mts.net>... [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > "shop supplies" category on my repair orders - and charge for such - just > to keep the taxman off my back. ah, so it's the government's fault. :) ok, but can you at least incorporate that into your advertised total price? I don't mind paying "X" dollars for something, it's when X is the "implied" total and it's really "X+10%" when I go to pay for it... it feels like a rip - even if it's legit. I'd rather get quoted X+10% upfront. :)
* - 22 Jun 2005 23:24 GMT ray <nospam@example.com> wrote in article <s2Vte.5063$mN.55406@news1.mts.net>...
> ah, so it's the government's fault. :) > ok, but can you at least incorporate that into your advertised total > price? I don't mind paying "X" dollars for something, it's when X is > the "implied" total and it's really "X+10%" when I go to pay for it... > it feels like a rip - even if it's legit. I'd rather get quoted X+10% > upfront. :) A big 3X4 foot sign on the wall in my shop clearly states that you WILL be charged five percent of the labor charge for shop cupplies and consumables....then lists such things as speedy dry, gasket sealer, cleaners, towels, solder, lubrication items, etc.......
ray - 23 Jun 2005 15:02 GMT > ray <nospam@example.com> wrote in article > <s2Vte.5063$mN.55406@news1.mts.net>... [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > consumables....then lists such things as speedy dry, gasket sealer, > cleaners, towels, solder, lubrication items, etc....... Thank you. Unfortnately, you're probably not in Winnipeg so I can't send people your way.
5% sounds about right for all the misc crap that you need when working on cars....
Ray
shiden_kai - 18 Jun 2005 21:58 GMT >> For that >> matter, why don't *you* open up a $20/hr auto shop? If your little [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > my head for a year or so now, trying to decide if I feel like going > for it. Well, you will be doing it for "love".....not money...that's for sure!
Ian
Don Bruder - 19 Jun 2005 00:27 GMT > >> For that > >> matter, why don't *you* open up a $20/hr auto shop? If your little [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Ian Funny thing, that... Amassing a large amount of money holds no real interest for me.
As long as I've got enough to stay fed, clothed, and housed, and maybe a few "toys" on the side, I'm happy. The idea of being "filthy rich" leaves me going "but why? No matter how much I've got (or don't have) the reality is that sooner or later, I'm going to die, and that's the end of that. So why should I struggle to pile up a shitload of those stupid slips of paper, rather than enjoying life the way I want to while I'm still breathing?"
I guess that makes me some kind of freak...
 Signature Don Bruder - dakidd@sonic.net - New Email policy in effect as of Feb. 21, 2004. Short form: I'm trashing EVERY E-mail that doesn't contain a password in the subject unless it comes from a "whitelisted" (pre-approved by me) address. See <http://www.sonic.net/~dakidd/main/contact.html> for full details.
smile4camera@bellsouth.net - 19 Jun 2005 05:07 GMT > > >> For that > > >> matter, why don't *you* open up a $20/hr auto shop? If your little [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > > > Ian I've got good news and bad news.. which do you want first?..
> Funny thing, that... > Amassing a large amount of money holds no real interest for me. Ok.. the good news first. Amassing a large amount of money isn't going to be a problem with a shop rate of $20/hr..
> As long as I've got enough to stay fed, clothed, and housed, and maybe a > few "toys" on the side, I'm happy. The idea of being "filthy rich" [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > stupid slips of paper, rather than enjoying life the way I want to while > I'm still breathing?" But now the bad news.. your expectations on what you'll be able to do with the receipts from a $20/hr shop rate are.. optimistic. If your *salary* was $20/hr, it's only around $40k/year.. this is filthy rich to you?
Good luck,
Jim
> I guess that makes me some kind of freak... > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > subject unless it comes from a "whitelisted" (pre-approved by me) address. > See <http://www.sonic.net/~dakidd/main/contact.html> for full details. shiden_kai - 19 Jun 2005 06:27 GMT > Funny thing, that... > Amassing a large amount of money holds no real interest for me. Well, you are not alone. It's of little interest to me too. But that wasn't really the point of what I was saying.
> As long as I've got enough to stay fed, clothed, and housed, and > maybe a few "toys" on the side, I'm happy. The idea of being "filthy > rich" leaves me going "but why? Who's talking about being "filthy rich"? I don't know what you think is "filthy rich"....but anyone making even 200K these days doesn't qualify as "filthy rich" in my books. And I doubt that you will find many, if any, mechanics making that kind of money if they work someone else. If you open a shop with a door rate of 20 dollars an hour, it will simply be an expensive hobby....not any kind of actual business that can put food on your table.
> I guess that makes me some kind of freak... The fact that you understand and acknowledge that we are all going to die and can't take anything with us qualifies you as a relative genius in my book. Or perhaps a person who simply is willing to say what everyone else only thinks.
Ian
Steve B. - 16 Jun 2005 01:53 GMT >That reminds me of one of my favorites, the guy who says: It shouldn't cost >much should it? I'd do it myself but just don't have the time. Like somehow >the fact he "could" do it himself should make the job cheaper. > Bob I'm suprised how many people in this thread have no idea what it costs to run a business. I'm a computer geek by trade and do the car stuff for fun. I work for a small computer outfit and can tell you it costs more than you would ever imagine.
Our break even point is 6 hours per day at $60 an hour. Anything past that is profit for the company. Insurance takes a huge chunk of the money. Taxes take another big chunk. Add the back end employees to do the billing and collections, payroll and pay the bills. Add rent and lights on top of it all and the numbers get big real quick. Also consider that the shop has to pay the mechanic no matter what. Slow days and the mechanic still gets paid. Holidays and vacations are paid.
As far as not paying taxes on tools and training goes... you still have to make that money! The government doesn't pay for this stuff they just don't charge you tax on it
Steve B.
JHI - 16 Jun 2005 02:09 GMT This is a copy of my original post "Can anyone recommend an honest mechanic who does what needs to be done and does it correctly". I never said anything about costs. The going rate in my area is about $70 per hour which is fair as long as what is done really needs to be done.
>>That reminds me of one of my favorites, the guy who says: It shouldn't >>cost [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Steve B. ray - 16 Jun 2005 14:48 GMT > This is a copy of my original post "Can anyone recommend an honest mechanic > who does what needs to be done and > does it correctly". I never said anything about costs. The going rate in > my area is about $70 per hour which is fair as long as what is done really > needs to be done. If you lived in Winnipeg I could. My co-worker has a good mechanic. I don't think he's great, but he seems pretty good... I guess it would help if my co-worker stopped buying POS Ford products. ;) (My solution every time his car breaks - if you woulda bought a Camaro I could help you...)
Ray
smile4camera@bellsouth.net - 16 Jun 2005 23:34 GMT > This is a copy of my original post "Can anyone recommend an honest mechanic > who does what needs to be done and > does it correctly". I never said anything about costs. The going rate in > my area is about $70 per hour which is fair as long as what is done really > needs to be done. Sorry about the thread drift, but this is a problem that has been happening for a long time with the auto repair industry.. nobody trusts anyone. The 'exposed' type stories on the news don't help either. As in every field, there are good ones and bad ones. As I mentioned in an earlier post, I had my deep well pump replaced today. The difference between the setup on the old pump and new pump included things like the new having a torque arrestor, centering guides, and heat shrink on all connections.. unlike the old pump setup, which was a 30 lb pump swinging on the end of 150 feet of PVC.. no torque arrestor, no centering guides, no heat shrink on the ground connection.. etc.
When you do find someone you trust, treat them well and they will hopefully return the favor. You might also see if your local community colleges offer a 'learn about your car' class, which would help you learn more about it, and what it takes to repair it.
Regards,
Jim
Daniel J. Stern - 17 Jun 2005 01:02 GMT > Sorry about the thread drift, but this is a problem that has been > happening for a long time with the auto repair industry.. nobody trusts > anyone. The 'exposed' type stories on the news don't help either. Those shows where a bubbleheaded, anorectic bleach-blond pewls and jabbers about how they *cleverly* disconnected a car's O2 sensor or one of the spark plug wires, then drove it to various franchised muffler houses, harry-homeowner parts stores that also "fix" cars, quicky oil change parlors and fly-infested "Ibrahims Auto Repair's Brakes All Model's Just 99.99$ Front or Rear axel's" shacks and a shocking SIXty-SEVen perCENT of shops couldn't find the problem, blahbitty blah blah blah, etc.
Yeah.
Reason number 2,158,855,231 I don't watch TV.
John David Galt - 27 Jun 2005 19:08 GMT > Those shows where a bubbleheaded, anorectic bleach-blond pewls and jabbers > about how they *cleverly* disconnected a car's O2 sensor or one of the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > 99.99$ Front or Rear axel's" shacks and a shocking SIXty-SEVen perCENT of > shops couldn't find the problem, blahbitty blah blah blah, etc. OK, I'll bite: how would _you_ go about evaluating the competence of repair shops? Wait for the newspaper to rate one highly because they were paid to?
The Real Bev - 29 Jun 2005 02:22 GMT > > Those shows where a bubbleheaded, anorectic bleach-blond pewls and jabbers > > about how they *cleverly* disconnected a car's O2 sensor or one of the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > repair shops? Wait for the newspaper to rate one highly because they > were paid to? Probably the best thing to do is to patronize a shop that you don't actually know is incompetent or criminal. Nobody seemed to have a better idea...
 Signature Cheers, Bev ================================================================ I didn't break it! It was doing that before I broke it... er...
Nate Nagel - 16 Jun 2005 23:48 GMT > This is a copy of my original post "Can anyone recommend an honest mechanic > who does what needs to be done and > does it correctly". I never said anything about costs. The going rate in > my area is about $70 per hour which is fair as long as what is done really > needs to be done. Threads do drift... don't take it personally.
I would love to recommend a good mechanic but I don't live anywhere near you.
Any chance you could throw a pic of this bolt from hell up on your web site? I'm curious to see the beast that's caused two mechanics to give up. One thing I'm good at is getting stuck bolts out, one way or another :) Ask me how I spent last weekend. Go ahead, ask me :)
nate
 Signature replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel
aarcuda69062 - 16 Jun 2005 03:13 GMT > That reminds me of one of my favorites, the guy who says: It shouldn't cost > much should it? I'd do it myself but just don't have the time. Like somehow > the fact he "could" do it himself should make the job cheaper. > Bob Or when you quote a job on an older high mileage car and the customer remarks that the car isn't even worth that much. Like somehow the cost of a repair is supposed to be proportional to the cars value.
chip - 16 Jun 2005 04:07 GMT >> That reminds me of one of my favorites, the guy who says: It shouldn't cost >> much should it? I'd do it myself but just don't have the time. Like somehow [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >Like somehow the cost of a repair is supposed to be proportional >to the cars value. what kills me is that a lot of these posts have to do with bitching about the money. if it was so simple and required no training , this group wouldn't exist. we are at 82.00 an hour now, the techs don't see half of that. Although let your a/c at the house break when it's 100 degrees outside and then money is no issue. people treat cars like appliances, run em till they break, and then be shocked at the repair price. Chip
N8N - 16 Jun 2005 13:18 GMT > > That reminds me of one of my favorites, the guy who says: It shouldn't cost > > much should it? I'd do it myself but just don't have the time. Like somehow [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Like somehow the cost of a repair is supposed to be proportional > to the cars value. Eh, I could see me commenting on that at some point. But it wouldn't really be directed at the mechanic, it would just be me mentally figuring whether it's worth it to fix the car or if I shouldn't go beater shopping.
nate
shiden_kai - 18 Jun 2005 21:56 GMT > Or when you quote a job on an older high mileage car and the > customer remarks that the car isn't even worth that much. > Like somehow the cost of a repair is supposed to be proportional > to the cars value. We occasionally get those old cars in our shop. Had one the other day, an 88 Ciera...tick in the motor. I spent enough time on it to have a listen and then wandered up to service advisor to tell her to phone the customer and tell them to either get rid of the car or just drive it until it blows up. The car is hardly worth an hour of diagnostic time.
On the other hand, we have a customer that has an old 67 Malibu that brings his car into our dealership faithfully to get work done to it. Nobody in the shop really likes working on it, but the customer pays the 100 dollar an hour shop rate and never quibbles....just fix it. And so we do.
Ian
ray - 20 Jun 2005 16:09 GMT > On the other hand, we have a customer that has an old 67 Malibu > that brings his car into our dealership faithfully to get work done [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Ian Wouldn't you rather do plugs & points on a 67 Malibu than a 97?
:) although doing front drum brakes must be a bit old by now... :)
Nate Nagel - 21 Jun 2005 01:30 GMT >> On the other hand, we have a customer that has an old 67 Malibu >> that brings his car into our dealership faithfully to get work done [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > although doing front drum brakes must be a bit old by now... :) Drums are cake... but I'd prefer to do them myself rather than pay someone. Those backing plates are probably due for a repaint by now :)
nate
 Signature replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel
shiden_kai - 21 Jun 2005 01:46 GMT >> On the other hand, we have a customer that has an old 67 Malibu >> that brings his car into our dealership faithfully to get work done [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > although doing front drum brakes must be a bit old by now... :) That's the point, anyone can do plugs and points on 67 Malibu, not as many want to tackle the 97 Malibu. So on the older car, all the easy work is done elsewhere, they only bring it in for things they can't/won't tackle. Which usually involves rust every where, broken, rotted brake lines, all sorts of siezed items, "no longer available" items...etc. I'm a pragmatic technician, I work on cars to provide a decent living for my family, not to waste time on "classic" vehicles, no matter how much I might like them. Working on them should be reserved for the private garage at night.
I don't mind drum brakes, very simple to work on. Late model drum brakes with one spring that does the job of 4 on the old systems are great to work on.
|
|