> I don't know this system...
Your response was rather abrasive considering this fact.
> In response to your question, I would pull the orifice tube and check to
> make sure it has no debris in it at the very least but I'd jsut replace
> orifice tube. It's chump change in comparison to having redo everything
> again.
That is a good plan if this car had an orifice tube. It has an
expansion valve, however, which is next to the evaporator. There was
no direct mention of system contamination. I see no reason to spend
hours of time replacing or "checking" a part that doesn't need any
attention. He said he flushed the system -- if done properly, even an
expansion valve can be remotely cleaned by backflushing.
Toyota MDT in MO
Steve B. - 19 Jul 2005 17:15 GMT
>That is a good plan if this car had an orifice tube. It has an
>expansion valve, however, which is next to the evaporator. There was
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Toyota MDT in MO
Thanx for pointing out that his car has an expansion valve.
The OP is replacing the compressor so there is at least a good chance
that there is trash in the system. I would replace the valve if I was
doing the job myself if only to preserve the warranty on the
replacement compressor. I also don't understand how you can do a
decent flush of the evap and lines with the expansion valve still in
place. How do you manage to get enougt fluid to back feed through the
expansion valve to flush it all out?
Steve B.
Comboverfish - 19 Jul 2005 19:07 GMT
> I also don't understand how you can do a
> decent flush of the evap and lines with the expansion valve still in
> place. How do you manage to get enougt fluid to back feed through the
> expansion valve to flush it all out?
You can't be successful flushing 100% of the time, but experience will
tell you if the cleaning process was or was not a success before
recharging the system. Every system poses it's own challenges related
to which lines and components need to be removed to facilitate
flushing. Expansion valves can be cleaned in place if the evaporator
has large enough tubing, or for several hours of extra labor in the
case of most smallish import cars, it can be removed and cleaned or
replaced if too crapped-up. An example of simplicity would be Chrysler
H blocks -- really easy to get to!
Toyota MDT in MO
Bruce Chang - 19 Jul 2005 17:44 GMT
>> I don't know this system...
>
> Your response was rather abrasive considering this fact.
Sure, I could have candy coated my response but the fact remains that A/C
work is finicky and if you will neglect things because "I'm not ready to do"
then you're gambling. For me, at least, gambling with A/C work is not worth
it. It's a lot more time and money than it's worth if it doesn't work out.
>> In response to your question, I would pull the orifice tube and check to
>> make sure it has no debris in it at the very least but I'd jsut replace
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> attention. He said he flushed the system -- if done properly, even an
> expansion valve can be remotely cleaned by backflushing.
What's involved in checking the expansion valve? You said it was next to
the evap. Does it mean the evap core has to be removed to get to it?
-Bruce
Daniel J. Stern - 19 Jul 2005 17:47 GMT
> I could have candy coated my response but the fact remains that A/C work
> is finicky
...and dangerous...
> For me, at least, gambling with A/C work is not worth it. It's a lot
> more time and money than it's worth if it doesn't work out.
...risk of injury, risk of property damage, risk of death...
> What's involved in checking the expansion valve?
If you have to ask...!
asarangan@yahoo.com - 20 Jul 2005 05:00 GMT
I am the OP. I spent many hours looking for the expansion valve. I
could not find it in the engine compartment. I assumed it had to be
inside the evaporator on the passenger side. Taking that apart is not
an easy job, so I sealed it up and hoped that the flushing would have
taken care of any blockage in the expansion vavle.