Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

QUALCO Muffler Weld - Exhaust system repair

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pszemol - 06 Aug 2005 16:54 GMT
Anybody here used the above mentioned product ?

I applied yesterday some amount of it on my exhaust system
in my junky car but my concern is that this stuff does not harden.
I left a small blob of the material on the parking lot to compare
how it hardens on my car and this morning it had thin layer
hardened on the surface but when I pressed harder my finger
plunger into the blob, which turned out to be wet and soft inside.

If this is how it works on the muffler system I do not like it!
I was in the understanding this is kind of polymer, similar to epoxy,
which hardens on its whole volume, but it looks like this is a
solvent type stuff which hardens trough the surface evaporation.
When the surface hardens, the deeper layers do not and stay soft.

Any advice?
Daniel J. Stern - 06 Aug 2005 17:05 GMT
> I applied yesterday some amount of it on my exhaust system in my junky
> car but my concern is that this stuff does not harden. I left a small
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> wet and soft inside. When the surface hardens, the deeper layers do not
> and stay soft. Any advice?

Yes, here's some very good advice for you:

Find a quiet, calm  place. Close your eyes. Clear your mind of extraneous
thoughts. Now spend 30 seconds pondering the difference in temperature
between a parking lot and an engine's exhaust system, and then 30 seconds
pondering whether you just asked a stupid question.
Pszemol - 06 Aug 2005 17:45 GMT
> Yes, here's some very good advice for you:
>
> Find a quiet, calm  place. Close your eyes. Clear your mind of extraneous
> thoughts. Now spend 30 seconds pondering the difference in temperature
> between a parking lot and an engine's exhaust system, and then 30 seconds
> pondering whether you just asked a stupid question.

Where did you grow so rude, punk ?

Imagine this - the repair I did is in the place, where the vibrations
from starting the motor might destroy the connection/seal...

I was counting on this seal to harden BEFORE I even start the car.
When I start the car and wait for it to heat up it might be too late
for the seal to harden.
* - 06 Aug 2005 22:32 GMT
Pszemol <Pszemol@PolBox.com> wrote in article
<dd27tn.g8.1@poczta.onet.pl>...
> > Yes, here's some very good advice for you:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Imagine this - the repair I did is in the place, where the vibrations
> from starting the motor might destroy the connection/seal...

You are PATCHING something.....not REPAIRING it  - not by any stretch of
the imagination.

You're asking a technical automotive forum for advice on a shade-tree,
jury-rigged, PATCH!!!!!

To top it all off your later post shows that you obviously did the patch
without even READING the instructions on how to correctly use the product
BEFORE attempting this PATCH!......THEN, you asked for advice......again,
BEFORE simply reading the instructions.

Now that you've answered your own, stupid question - BY READING THE
INSTRUCTIONS - wasn't Daniel on target when he asked if you felt at all
stupid?........

......and, I will add, too lazy to even read instructions, expecting
somebody else to do your thinking for you?
Pszemol - 07 Aug 2005 01:26 GMT
>> Imagine this - the repair I did is in the place, where the vibrations
>> from starting the motor might destroy the connection/seal...
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> You're asking a technical automotive forum for advice on a shade-tree,
> jury-rigged, PATCH!!!!!

If you consider my question too trivial for your Greatest Expertise
then simply do not answer and move forward to a question which
will be much more challenging to your so bright mind...

> To top it all off your later post shows that you obviously did the patch
> without even READING the instructions on how to correctly use the product
> BEFORE attempting this PATCH!......THEN, you asked for advice......again,
> BEFORE simply reading the instructions.

You are dead wrong.
I did read instructions more than twice, once already in the store.
And my question was not on the subject "to turn on or not to turn on the engine".
My question was to find somebody using this product before and willing
to share his/her experience about hardening too slow and on the surface only.
Make some minimal effort and read OP before you add your two cents
and completely miss the target...

> Now that you've answered your own, stupid question - BY READING THE
> INSTRUCTIONS - wasn't Daniel on target when he asked if you felt at all
> stupid?........

He was not only not on target but gave me WRONG advice
to turn the engine before the seal hardens.
Also, his wrong advice for him was so "obvious" that let him think
my question was "stupid". Some say there is no stupid questions,
there are only stupid answers, and yours or David's was one of them.
Bunch of smartasses thinking they are the smartest on the Planet.

> ......and, I will add, too lazy to even read instructions, expecting
> somebody else to do your thinking for you?

Once again - not interested in the thread then do not take part in it.
Unless you are attracted to flame wars only... then good luck to you.
Daniel J. Stern - 07 Aug 2005 00:57 GMT
> > Find a quiet, calm place. Close your eyes. Clear your mind of
> > extraneous thoughts. Now spend 30 seconds pondering the difference in
> > temperature between a parking lot and an engine's exhaust system, and
> > then 30 seconds pondering whether you just asked a stupid question.

> Where did you grow so rude, punk?

Well, it all started when you asked a patently dumb question.

> Imagine this - the repair I did is in the place, where the vibrations
> from starting the motor might destroy the connection/seal...

If you're counting on exhaust glue to hold your car together, you've got
much bigger things to worry about than poking finger-holes in globs of
exhaust glue on parking lot tarmacs.
Pszemol - 07 Aug 2005 01:32 GMT
>> Where did you grow so rude, punk?
>
> Well, it all started when you asked a patently dumb question.

What do you see dumb in the "Anybody here used the above mentioned product ?" question, punk ?

>> Imagine this - the repair I did is in the place, where the vibrations
>> from starting the motor might destroy the connection/seal...
>
> If you're counting on exhaust glue to hold your car together, you've got
> much bigger things to worry about than poking finger-holes in globs of
> exhaust glue on parking lot tarmacs.

No, I am not counting on glue to hold my car together...
Only to hold exhaust pipes together, it was design to do just this.
Daniel J. Stern - 07 Aug 2005 04:31 GMT
> No, I am not counting on glue to hold my car together... Only to hold
> exhaust pipes together, it was design to do just this.

Better read those instructions again for the first time, there, guy.
Exhaust paste isn't meant to "hold exhaust pipes together", it's meant to
act as a sealant for very minor leaks in clamped joints.
N8N - 06 Aug 2005 17:31 GMT
> Anybody here used the above mentioned product ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Any advice?

Don't worry about it.  You're obviously not trying to do a quality
repair here or you would have just bought new pipes.  But I suspect
that the product you are using is temperature activated.

Now if you're trying to patch a hole in a running pipe, the best thing
to do would be to take an empty beer or soda can, cut the ends off and
slit it lengthwise, and clamp it over the pipe with two hose clamps
after smearing the inside of it with muffler epoxy.  Seriously.

good luck

nate
Pszemol - 06 Aug 2005 17:51 GMT
> Don't worry about it.  You're obviously not trying to do a quality
> repair here or you would have just bought new pipes.  But I suspect
> that the product you are using is temperature activated.

The repair is in the place where two pipes link: the exhaust manifold
pipe and the rest of the exhaust system - just under the car...
There is a broken weld on the front pipe. The pressure and vibrations
are quite strong in that place so I could not start the engine for
heat activation on wet stuff for obvious reasons: the exhaust would
blow out the wet, soft stuff out from the gap or the vibrations would
break the connection. I do not need to use the car over the weekend
so I will let it dry more before I do the initial test of the heated system.

Or... I will try to heat the exhaust pipes locally with a small torch to avoid
exhaust gasses pressure buildup and vibration but use heat to harden the seal.

> Now if you're trying to patch a hole in a running pipe, the best thing
> to do would be to take an empty beer or soda can, cut the ends off and
> slit it lengthwise, and clamp it over the pipe with two hose clamps
> after smearing the inside of it with muffler epoxy.  Seriously.
>
> good luck

Thanks for the idea with the bottle - but it would not work in my case!
user@domain.invalid - 07 Aug 2005 07:21 GMT
> The repair is in the place where two pipes link: the exhaust manifold
> pipe and the rest of the exhaust system - just under the car...
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> so I will let it dry more before I do the initial test of the heated
> system.

Good luck.  I've not yet seen a patch with the goo work that close to
the engine.  The muffler cement crap works ok near the muffler, but
doesn't work worth sh*t near the manifold.  Either weld it or learn to
live with it.

You might find a muffler shop willing to weld it for less than monkeying
around with that muffler cement crap.  As you can probably guess, I
don't bother with it anymore.

Ray
Pszemol - 07 Aug 2005 15:55 GMT
> Good luck.  I've not yet seen a patch with the goo work that close to
> the engine.  The muffler cement crap works ok near the muffler, but
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> around with that muffler cement crap.
> As you can probably guess, I don't bother with it anymore.

You are probably right - it will be very hot up there...
And the pipe craced on the weld, so maybe welding would be
a better idea. But so far, the cement-crap cost me $2.99+tax
so I guess it will be really hard for me to find a welder who can
weld it for less ;-)

Of course, I did not start the engine yet...
And this could tell me pretty quickly I need to weld it
and the lesson will be learned  -  thank you for your opinion.
ray - 08 Aug 2005 14:54 GMT
>> Good luck.  I've not yet seen a patch with the goo work that close to
>> the engine.  The muffler cement crap works ok near the muffler, but
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> And this could tell me pretty quickly I need to weld it
> and the lesson will be learned  -  thank you for your opinion.

$2.99+tax + you can't drive your car for two days + how many hours
wasted?  Heck, you probably coulda bought a $99 stick welder by now and
fixed it.

So, did it hold?  I bet it blew out in less than two minutes or the
first time you revved it up.  That stuff is useless for patching pipes.

If you want to do a cheap patch, take a Coke can, slit it, lather the
inside with muffler cement and take a couple of hose clamps and attach
it to the pipe.  I've done that and had it last for a lot longer than it
should have.

Ray
Pszemol - 08 Aug 2005 15:31 GMT
> $2.99+tax + you can't drive your car for two days
> + how many hours wasted?

I do not consider this time "wasted" at all.
I find car repairs entertaining more than passively watching TV.
Watching TV whole afternoon - that is a big waste of time, but
milions of people around the world do it without thinking a lot about it :-)

>  Heck, you probably coulda bought a $99 stick welder
> by now and fixed it.

Well... I probably could if I was in business of fixing cars...
But I am not :-) I can afford to take this car and repair it properly
but if I can have some fun doing the repair myself, to learn something
new and save some money doing that - the heck I will do it :-)

> So, did it hold?  I bet it blew out in less than two minutes or the
> first time you revved it up.  That stuff is useless for patching pipes.

Well... I don't want to judge it prematurely but so far it holds fine.
I drove for some time Sunday and nothing bad happened.
I drove my regular route to work today and it is still fine.
So if you would put some money on your bet you would loose it.

> If you want to do a cheap patch, take a Coke can, slit it, lather the
> inside with muffler cement and take a couple of hose clamps and attach
> it to the pipe.  I've done that and had it last for a lot longer than it
> should have.

This is a good idea, but the place it happened in my car, it would
be impossible to use this trick. My exhaust pipe cracked on the
weld where the flange was attached to the 90' bend exhaust pipe.
Not on the sied it is connected to the exhaust manifold but on the
rear end, where it meets another flange and there is a rubber
donut between flanges.

If the glue does not hold I plan to try to unscrew this short 90' pipe
and get a new one - or weld it taken out of the car... Maybe I will have
a chance to have some more fun learning how to weld myself :-))
ray - 08 Aug 2005 19:57 GMT
>> $2.99+tax + you can't drive your car for two days
>> + how many hours wasted?
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> and get a new one - or weld it taken out of the car... Maybe I will have
> a chance to have some more fun learning how to weld myself :-))

ok.
your car, your life, your money.
and it may hold up for a bit, but you'll probably still find the general
consensus around here is that the muffler cement makes a lousy patch,
doesn't usually hold up, and you'll probably have to do it again - and
this time properly.
There's nothing wrong with bailing wire and duct tape fixes, but you
have to know what's ok to fix with that and what's not worth it.

Ray
Mike Romain - 08 Aug 2005 17:20 GMT
> >> Good luck.  I've not yet seen a patch with the goo work that close to
> >> the engine.  The muffler cement crap works ok near the muffler, but
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Ray

I have better luck with soup cans.  The new Coke cans melt too easy....

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Pszemol - 06 Aug 2005 17:57 GMT
> Don't worry about it.  You're obviously not trying to do a quality
> repair here or you would have just bought new pipes.  But I suspect
> that the product you are using is temperature activated.

Oh, I just re-checked the instructions on the back cover and I know
now why I did not start the car but expected it to harden on its own.
It reads at the bottom with capital lettering:
"DO NOT START ENGINE UNTIL REPAIR IS THOROUGHLY HARDENED"

So I guess I will be fine. Maybe I put too much of this stuff
and the bottom layers just need some more time to harden...
We will see.
sdlomi2 - 06 Aug 2005 20:36 GMT
> Anybody here used the above mentioned product ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Any advice?

   Please try to overlook that rudeness.  And don't feel singled out!
Frequently a source of some good ideas even though often predicated with
flames (whose damages apparently are unfelt by sendor) toward the poster;
often highly theoretical & apparently without experienced practice.  Seems
that such opportunities inspire given responses.  Admitting that both exist,
hopefully we can utilize the pluses & overlook any minuses.
   BTW: I agree with your analysis about the test & the possibility it was
too thick.  Good luck & please let us know if it works.  It would indeed be
nice to know if such a successful product exists.   s
Daniel J. Stern - 07 Aug 2005 01:15 GMT
> Please try to overlook that rudeness.

Poor advice. Then he'll never learn to stop asking stupid questions (i.e.,
the kind that can be answered all by oneself with just a few moments'
additional thought or, as another poster pointed out, reading the
instructions in the first place.)

> Frequently a source of some good ideas

Why, thank you.

> even though often predicated with flames (whose damages apparently are
> unfelt by sendor)

Grow a thicker skin or stop reading my posts -- problem solved. Also,
the letter "o" doesn't make even a cameo appearance in the word "sender".

> often highly theoretical & apparently without experienced practice.

*chuckle* I've had more different kinds of grease under my nails than I
care to try to count, but here's the thing: it's of no consequence to me
what you think of my advice. Like it? Hate it? Think it's all theoretical
and impractical? Don't make no nevermind to me. It costs $0.00, whether
anyone follows it or not, same as every other piece of advice given out by
every other poster to Usenet.

> nice to know if such a successful product exists.

Yeah, the amazing exhaust paste that glues together a car that should've
been in the junkyard three years ago. It was actually available for about
6 weeks back in 1972, but Big Oil found out about it, bought up the
patents, paid the inventor a great deal of hush money, and shelved it
right next to the 300mpg carburetor.

DS
Pszemol - 07 Aug 2005 01:43 GMT
> Poor advice. Then he'll never learn to stop asking stupid questions (i.e.,
> the kind that can be answered all by oneself with just a few moments'
> additional thought or, as another poster pointed out, reading the
> instructions in the first place.)

I see you are on the mission here to teach people not to ask "stupid"
questions like the one asking for people having first hand experience
with the product in the subject...
Since when this is your newsgroup and you feel responsible for the
other people questions ? Not interested, move on...

>> even though often predicated with flames (whose damages apparently are
>> unfelt by sendor)
>
> Grow a thicker skin or stop reading my posts -- problem solved. Also,
> the letter "o" doesn't make even a cameo appearance in the word "sender".

You are not only rude, but also suffering from a low esteem syndrome
if you have to point out typos in other people writting... What a jerk!

>> often highly theoretical & apparently without experienced practice.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> anyone follows it or not, same as every other piece of advice given out by
> every other poster to Usenet.

You are simply the best!
This counting kinds of grease under your nails must be
another way to heal your self esteem problem, I guess...
Pszemol - 08 Aug 2005 07:15 GMT
>    Please try to overlook that rudeness.  And don't feel singled out!
> Frequently a source of some good ideas even though often predicated with
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> too thick.  Good luck & please let us know if it works.  It would indeed be
> nice to know if such a successful product exists.   s

I did test the repair today. Started the engine, run it about half an hour
and the exhaust was at its normal temperature - the glue/cement holds
ok, looks like it hardened fine. I drove couple rounds around the block
and everything is fine so far. I am curious how will it stand the normal ride,
with regular speeds, potholes, sharp turns and regular road vibrations.

I guess I will see this soon.
I am going to come back here and write about it in a week or so.
Let you guys know if this stuff is worth the time.
Pszemol - 16 Aug 2005 00:36 GMT
If anybody still interested in this thread from 8/6/2005:
It is over a week since I did the repair and so far so good.
I have inspected the car today and even made a picture:
http://www.darmoland.pl/pszemol/exhaust.JPG
Visible cracks come from too tick layer of the goo I put on.
It did harden from the surface leaving the bottom layers
wet and soft - when I started the car after a day of
drying it hardened too quick leaving cracks. The cracks
do not affect the performance of the glued pieces at all.
It is rock-hardened and sealed completely.
Exhaust works as new, I am very satisfied with this $2.99 repair.

BTW here is the link to the product I have used:
http://www.itwconsumer.com/catalog.aspx?prodID=58
And here is its MSDS:
http://www.itwconsumer.com/productfiles/msds_58.pdf

Greetings,
Pszemol.

>> Anybody here used the above mentioned product ?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> too thick.  Good luck & please let us know if it works.  It would indeed be
> nice to know if such a successful product exists.   s
Pszemol - 27 Aug 2005 04:30 GMT
:-) Ha, ha, ha... it cracked. This glue did not hold the pipes.
This repair lasted less than 3 weeks!

> If anybody still interested in this thread from 8/6/2005:
> It is over a week since I did the repair and so far so good.
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>> too thick.  Good luck & please let us know if it works.  It would indeed be
>> nice to know if such a successful product exists.   s
Scott Dorsey - 27 Aug 2005 19:28 GMT
>:-) Ha, ha, ha... it cracked. This glue did not hold the pipes.
>This repair lasted less than 3 weeks!

I have actually had good luck with the high temperature silicone cements
for field-expedient muffler repair.  The red stuff from GE Silicones is
what the local industrial place carries and I have had it last at least
the six months or so that it took me to get around to fixing it properly.
The silicone never really hardens but remains rubbery, so that it does not
break when the muffler flexes and changes shape as it heats and cools.
--scott

Signature

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.