Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Antiseize compound?  Graph Vs. Copp

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mab992@post.com - 08 Aug 2005 14:04 GMT
Is there any advantage to copper based antiseize
compound?  Does it last any longer?

I don't think of copper as being antiseize
the way I do graphite.

Thanks
MB
Daniel J. Stern - 08 Aug 2005 19:39 GMT
> Is there any advantage to copper based antiseize compound?  Does it last
> any longer? I don't think of copper as being antiseize the way I do
> graphite.

There are numerous different metallic (and other) powders used in
antiseize compounds. Metallics such as Nickel, Silver, Copper, and Lead.
Non-metallics such as graphite and "white graphite" (Molybdenum
Disulphide). Each has its own properties and some types are better suited
to certain specific applications than others.

DS
John Kunkel - 08 Aug 2005 20:22 GMT
> Is there any advantage to copper based antiseize
> compound?  Does it last any longer?
>
> I don't think of copper as being antiseize
> the way I do graphite.

http://www.sacskyranch.com/antiseize.htm
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.