Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / August 2005
pressure drop across air filter
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Matt - 15 Aug 2005 01:46 GMT I would like to be able to measure the pressure drop caused by an air filter. Then I could compare different makes and models of filters, and compare a new filter to a used one.
My air filter has a peculiar configuration that lets me put the open end of a clear plastic tube on the inside of the filter while the engine is running, without modifying the filter. So I can set up a U-tube of water to measure the pressure difference.
What would be a typical pressure drop (say at idle) for a 1970's four-stroke engine that uses a paper filter? Or where could I find specifications or other data so I can know what I should expect? Any units are fine: mmHg, mmH20, psi, atm, etc. The vehicle of interest happens to be a '76 Honda 360 motorcycle, but general information is welcome.
krusty kritter - 15 Aug 2005 05:02 GMT > What would be a typical pressure drop (say at idle) for a 1970's > four-stroke engine that uses a paper filter? Or where could I find > specifications or other data so I can know what I should expect? Any > units are fine: mmHg, mmH20, psi, atm, etc. The vehicle of interest > happens to be a '76 Honda 360 motorcycle, but general information is > welcome. Every time I read a message on Google Groups, I get a list of websites that Google thinks might be applicable. I could spend hours reading all of those sites...
But, from my experience working with filters in a cogeneration plant, I remember that we had a large K&N filter in the ash disposal system of a biosolids-burning waste heat heat boiler. The biosolids were dried sludge from a sewage digester, and the stuff still had about as many BTU's per pound as wood, according to the engineers.
But it left an ash, and that had to be vacuumed out of a baghouse without running the ash through the impeller of the vacuum, so the ash went through a cyclone separator and the big K&N filter that you could stick your head inside only had to deal with the lightest particles that the cyclone separator didn't remove.
There was a differential pressure alarm that was supposed to tell us when the filter was plugged up. That would happen when the pressure differential reached 0.25 PSI.
I would think that the pressure differential across your Honda's filter would be extremely low at idle.
Matt - 15 Aug 2005 08:26 GMT > There was a differential pressure alarm that was supposed to tell us > when the filter was plugged up. That would happen when the pressure > differential reached 0.25 PSI. That would be 6.9 inches of water.
> I would think that the pressure differential across your Honda's filter > would be extremely low at idle. Maybe I could measure a difference between a clean filter and a dirty one at 3K rpm in neutral.
krusty kritter - 15 Aug 2005 14:47 GMT > > I would think that the pressure differential across your Honda's filter > > would be extremely low at idle. > > Maybe I could measure a difference between a clean filter and a dirty > one at 3K rpm in neutral. You could probably get reasonable measurements up to the first torque peak around 4500 RPM and again at 9000 RPM. The midrange flat spot air flow reversal of an engine might make the differential pressure look very low or even non-existant...
Matt - 15 Aug 2005 08:30 GMT > Every time I read a message on Google Groups, I get a list of websites > that Google thinks might be applicable. I could spend hours reading all > of those sites... Ah, I don't usually use Google Groups, but I just tried it and I see what you mean. I will look at some of those links ... thanks
Don Stauffer - 15 Aug 2005 14:30 GMT > I would like to be able to measure the pressure drop caused by an air > filter. Then I could compare different makes and models of filters, and [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > happens to be a '76 Honda 360 motorcycle, but general information is > welcome. I believe it can get up to a few tens of inches of water. That is, of course, not a lot considering the value of atmospheric pressure measured in inches of water.
That is why I don't ordinarily believe these claims of fantastic horsepower increases with a fancy aftermarket air filter. Even removing it altogether shouldn't amount to that much of an increase.
Likewise, this stuff about how dirty air filters affect fuel milage bothers me. Since the eighties epa regs required carb float chambers vented not to atmosphere, but to plenum between air cleaner and carb. I believe modern FI also measures ambient air pressure there, so fuel is NOT SUCKED into manifold by pressure drop across air filter.
Matt - 15 Aug 2005 14:40 GMT > Likewise, this stuff about how dirty air filters affect fuel milage > bothers me. Since the eighties epa regs required carb float chambers > vented not to atmosphere, but to plenum between air cleaner and carb. I > believe modern FI also measures ambient air pressure there, so fuel is > NOT SUCKED into manifold by pressure drop across air filter. In a carbureted system, a plugged air filter acts about like a choke.
Don Stauffer - 16 Aug 2005 14:16 GMT >> Likewise, this stuff about how dirty air filters affect fuel milage >> bothers me. Since the eighties epa regs required carb float chambers [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > In a carbureted system, a plugged air filter acts about like a choke. Not if the float chamber is vented to the area between the filter and the throttle valve. It only acts as a choke if float bowl vented to ambient atmosphere.
Matt - 19 Aug 2005 21:40 GMT >>> Likewise, this stuff about how dirty air filters affect fuel milage >>> bothers me. Since the eighties epa regs required carb float chambers [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > the throttle valve. It only acts as a choke if float bowl vented to > ambient atmosphere. I won't be likely to contradict you on that---it seems to make sense to me.
My bowls are vented to atomsphere. In each bowl there is a little "standpipe" that is open to the headspace and passes through the fuel and down through the bottom of the bowl. The bottom end of that pipe is equipped with a foot-long rubber hose that extends approximately to the bottom of the frame. When the bike is moving, the open ends of the hoses have wind blowing past them. I've been running without the hoses lately because they tend to get in the way when I am doing carb work. I don't expect that running without the hoses matters much.
G C - 15 Aug 2005 14:32 GMT > I would like to be able to measure the pressure drop caused by an air > filter. Then I could compare different makes and models of filters, and [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > happens to be a '76 Honda 360 motorcycle, but general information is > welcome. Don't know on a scooter, but in my spray booth, I change filters at 2.5 to 3" WC. This is where I loose the required air velocity (100fpm) across the face of the booth. The easy way to check is to measure a new filter and an old clogged one. If all you want is to find the lowest restriction, you don't need a baseline to start. The DP is really only important at normal operating load, however.
 Signature Gopher 33 28 19N 112 01 49W '77 CB750K '78 CB750K '00 ZG1000 '96 Ducati 900SS **********pull 'mychain' to reply*********** ("I've abandoned the idea of trying to appear a normal, pleasant person. I had to accept myself as I was, even if no one else could accept me. For the rest of my life I would continue to say precisely the wrong thing, touch people in the raw and be generally unpopular. I had a natural gift for it" W. F. Temple)
Matt - 15 Aug 2005 14:43 GMT > Don't know on a scooter, but in my spray booth, I change filters at 2.5 > to 3" WC. Sorry, what is WC? water something ...
> This is where I loose the required air velocity (100fpm) > across the face of the booth. The easy way to check is to measure a new > filter and an old clogged one. If all you want is to find the lowest > restriction, you don't need a baseline to start. > The DP is really only important at normal operating load, however. I'm thinking maybe I can fill a clear tube with ATF and strap it to the handlebars.
G C - 16 Aug 2005 13:31 GMT >> Don't know on a scooter, but in my spray booth, I change filters at >> 2.5 to 3" WC. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > I'm thinking maybe I can fill a clear tube with ATF and strap it to the > handlebars. WC water column, inches water. I forget the amount but it's something like 1 inch mercury is 124" water.
Domestic gas pressure and filter differential are the only things I know measured in WC.
 Signature Gopher 33 28 19N 112 01 49W '77 CB750K '78 CB750K '00 ZG1000 '96 Ducati 900SS **********pull 'mychain' to reply*********** ("I've abandoned the idea of trying to appear a normal, pleasant person. I had to accept myself as I was, even if no one else could accept me. For the rest of my life I would continue to say precisely the wrong thing, touch people in the raw and be generally unpopular. I had a natural gift for it" W. F. Temple)
twillmon@cybermesa.net - 15 Aug 2005 14:48 GMT >Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.tech,rec.autos.tech >I would like to be able to measure the pressure drop caused by an >air filter. Then I could compare different makes and models of >filters, and compare a new filter to a used one. >My air filter has a peculiar configuration that lets me put the >open end of a clear plastic tube on the inside of the filter while >the engine is running, without modifying the filter. So I can set >up a U-tube of water to measure the pressure difference. >What would be a typical pressure drop (say at idle) for a 1970's >four-stroke engine that uses a paper filter? Or where could I find >specifications or other data so I can know what I should expect? >Any units are fine: mmHg, mmH20, psi, atm, etc. The vehicle of >interest happens to be a '76 Honda 360 motorcycle, but general >information is welcome.
If what you are interested in is what's happening when you're riding, do the test on the road, in realistic conditions. Air flow through a 360cc engine at no load is so low you'll play hell getting any useful numbers. Run your tubes to a handlebar mounted manometer and go down a deserted road (with a friend riding chase).
I'd try to get a differential pressure gage called "Magnahelic" (sp?) for this job - much easier to read its needle.
If it's only data you want, do it on the bench. Suck air through various filters with a vacuum cleaner, powered through a Variac if you want variable speed. Instrument for pressure drop, volume of air flowing through.
If you just want the bike to run better, get a K&N (small version of what Krusty had in his power plant). When I was in the business, they made them to fit your Honda. Far better than the stock paper grit-strainer.
Frankly, I don't understand the fuss about a Honda 360 - it's about the most boring bike I ever rode - not much power, dull handling. Maybe the brakes were pretty good...
Tom Willmon near Mountainair, (mid) New Mexico, USA (In the '70's, owner, Sun Cycle, Rockville, MD)
Net-Tamer V 1.12.0 - Registered
Matt - 15 Aug 2005 14:54 GMT > If you just want the bike to run better, get a K&N (small version of > what Krusty had in his power plant). When I was in the business, > they made them to fit your Honda. Far better than the stock paper > grit-strainer. Doesn't look like they make one for CJ360T. I emailed them last night and am waiting for a reply.
HLS@nospam.nix - 15 Aug 2005 15:33 GMT > If you just want the bike to run better, get a K&N (small version of > what Krusty had in his power plant). When I was in the business, > they made them to fit your Honda. Far better than the stock paper > grit-strainer.
> Tom Willmon > near Mountainair, (mid) New Mexico, USA > (In the '70's, owner, Sun Cycle, Rockville, MD) > > Net-Tamer V 1.12.0 - Registered Getting an U-tube to work is simple and accurate. The rest of the test is not, I think.
I have never seen any proof that K&N is broadly 'better' than anything else.
'Better' entails a lot of criteria. 'Better' at what?
You need to have a constant and measurable flow of air, for delta P to mean anything at all. Low delta P doesn't mean too much about filtration efficiency, if you are interested in that, and if not just dump the filter and suck in anything that comes your way.
Filters often become more efficient at removing small particles when they become least efficient at passing air.
Matt - 15 Aug 2005 23:58 GMT > If it's only data you want, do it on the bench. Suck air through > various filters with a vacuum cleaner, powered through a Variac if > you want variable speed. Instrument for pressure drop, volume of air > flowing through. I just ran such a test.
I have the left and right used filters, and I'm trying to determine whether to replace them, as they run about $45 each off the shelf. I was able to buy a NOS right filter on ebay for $16.50 delivered. I tested all three of these filters.
I used a 2.0hp 6.0A model QPS20 wet/dry shop-vac attached where the carb would be.
In "Experiment 1" I found that both the used filters developed a differential pressure near 40mm H20 and that the new right filter developed about 19mm H2O.
For "Experiment 2" I made some improvements in the vacuum setup (cleaned the shop-vac, used a shorter cord, straightened the vacuum hose). Then the DP was about 58mm for the used filters and 44mm for the new filter.
I could use some help in interpreting the data ...
krusty kritter - 16 Aug 2005 03:46 GMT > I have the left and right used filters, and I'm trying to determine > whether to replace them, as they run about $45 each off the shelf. I > was able to buy a NOS right filter on ebay for $16.50 delivered. I > tested all three of these filters.
> In "Experiment 1" I found that both the used filters developed a > differential pressure near 40mm H20 and that the new right filter [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > I could use some help in interpreting the data ... Well, even the 58mm DP is less than a tenth of a pound, it's actually about 1/3rd of the DP that would cause a pressure alarm across the big K&N filter at the cogeneration plant. And your operating conditions are nowhere near as dusty as the ash removal system I described.
As long as you now have a new filter, you should be able to see if the right hand cylinder still makes the spark plugs sooty...
Then try NO filter at all and see what happens. If the cylinder stops carbon fouling, you know it's an intake side problem...
Don Stauffer - 16 Aug 2005 14:25 GMT >> If it's only data you want, do it on the bench. Suck air through >> various filters with a vacuum cleaner, powered through a Variac if [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > I could use some help in interpreting the data ... That is a couple of inches of water. I am trying to remember what atmospheric pressure is in inches of water. Seems to me it is abut 16 feet, right? That would be 192 inches. If so, those filters are not lowering pressure at intake by all that much, as would be expected. Most air cleaners really are quite efficient devices.
krusty kritter - 16 Aug 2005 15:07 GMT > > In "Experiment 1" I found that both the used filters developed a > > differential pressure near 40mm H20 and that the new right filter [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > the shop-vac, used a shorter cord, straightened the vacuum hose). Then > > the DP was about 58mm for the used filters and 44mm for the new filter.
> That is a couple of inches of water. I am trying to remember what > atmospheric pressure is in inches of water. Seems to me it is abut 16 > feet, right? That would be 192 inches. If so, those filters are not > lowering pressure at intake by all that much, as would be expected. > Most air cleaners really are quite efficient devices. The static pressure of one foot of water is 0.433 inches...
So 40 millimeters times 0.0394 = 1.576 inches
1.576 divided by 12 = 0.131
0.131 X 0.433 = 0.056 PSI
Edward Dike, III - 16 Aug 2005 18:23 GMT | > > In "Experiment 1" I found that both the used filters developed a | > > differential pressure near 40mm H20 and that the new right filter [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] | | 0.131 X 0.433 = 0.056 PSI The static pressure of 1 foot of water is 12" WC....... 12"=1'
ED3
Edward Dike, III - 16 Aug 2005 18:33 GMT | | > > In "Experiment 1" I found that both the used filters developed a | | > > differential pressure near 40mm H20 and that the new right filter [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] | | | | 0.131 X 0.433 = 0.056 PSI The static pressure of 1 foot of water is 12" WC....... 12"=1'
Possibly you meant 0.433psi? Standard Atmosphere is 29.92" hg / 14.9psi/ 34.7' / 416" WC ED3
Stan Weiss - 17 Aug 2005 03:48 GMT > | | > > In "Experiment 1" I found that both the used filters developed a > | | > > differential pressure near 40mm H20 and that the new right filter [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > Standard Atmosphere is 29.92" hg / 14.9psi/ 34.7' / 416" WC > ED3 I get Standard Atmosphere is 29.92" hg / 14.7psi / 33.9' / 406.8" WC / 1013.25 millibars / 76 cm hg Stan
krusty kritter - 16 Aug 2005 20:26 GMT > "krusty kritter" <kriyamanna@aol.com> wrote in message
> | The static pressure of one foot of water is 0.433 inches... I should have written that the static pressure of one foot is water is 0.433 pounds per square inch.
> | So 40 millimeters times 0.0394 = 1.576 inches > | [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > ED3 Matt - 17 Aug 2005 04:53 GMT > That is a couple of inches of water. I am trying to remember what > atmospheric pressure is in inches of water. Atmospheric pressure is 760 mmHg. The density of mercury is 13.6 times that of water.
0.760m * (39.37 in/m) * 13.6 = 407 in = 33.9 ft.
krusty kritter - 16 Aug 2005 14:59 GMT > In "Experiment 1" I found that both the used filters developed a > differential pressure near 40mm H20 and that the new right filter [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > the shop-vac, used a shorter cord, straightened the vacuum hose). Then > the DP was about 58mm for the used filters and 44mm for the new filter. You're seeing a velocity squared effect...
The increase in delta p can be explained by the dynamic pressure of the air molecules striking the filter medium at a higher speed.
dynamic pressure = 1/2 density X velocity^2
dynamic pressure is in pounds per square foot
sea level air density of dry air at 59 degrees F is 0.002377 slugs per cubic foot
(a slug is a unit of mass density, multiply a slug of air times 32.2 and you get the weight of a cubic foot of air---it ain't much
velocity is in feet per second
HLS@nospam.nix - 16 Aug 2005 17:14 GMT > You're seeing a velocity squared effect... I agree...Pressure alone doesn't tell the whole story. Do you think he could adapt a second u-tube to measure the dP parameter of airflow through an orifice plate, and correct it accordingly?
Matt - 17 Aug 2005 04:43 GMT >>You're seeing a velocity squared effect... > > I agree...Pressure alone doesn't tell the whole story. Do you think he > could adapt a second > u-tube to measure the dP parameter of airflow through an orifice plate, and > correct it accordingly? I was thinking the same thing about an orifice plate. Not sure whether the filter DP data are meaningful unless the air flow rate is known and/or known to be comparable to air flow rates at top speed.
krusty kritter - 17 Aug 2005 17:44 GMT > > I agree...Pressure alone doesn't tell the whole story. Do you think he > > could adapt a second [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > the filter DP data are meaningful unless the air flow rate is known > and/or known to be comparable to air flow rates at top speed. While you're up to your a.s in technical jargon like static pressure and differential pressure and universal gas constant, absolute pressure, gauge pressure, temperature in degrees Rankine, Newtonian physics, Bernoulli, Kutta-Jukowski, Coanda effect, standard atmosphere, Boyle's Law, Charles Law, Gay-Lussac's Law and associated formulae, don't lose sight of your original intent, which was to correct the relentless carbon fouling problem in your CJ-360...
Have you tried riding with the one new filter installed and checking the spark plug, or what? Please do that test, before I succumb to senile dementia...
Matt - 20 Aug 2005 13:47 GMT >>>I agree...Pressure alone doesn't tell the whole story. Do you think he >>>could adapt a second [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > the spark plug, or what? Please do that test, before I succumb to > senile dementia... Sorry to make us all wait ...
Matt - 20 Aug 2005 14:40 GMT >>> You're seeing a velocity squared effect... >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > the filter DP data are meaningful unless the air flow rate is known > and/or known to be comparable to air flow rates at top speed. Here is a rough estimate of the air demands of an engine cylinder.
If a two-cylinder bike consumes a gallon of gas in thirty miles at 90mph, each cylinder is using a gallon in sixty miles, or 60miles/90mph = 2/3 hours = 2400 seconds. A gallon of gas weighs about 5 1/3 lb, so if the fuel mixture ratio is 14, its burning requires about 75 lb of air. So air is needed at a rate of about 75 lb(453g/lb)/2400 sec = 14 grams/sec. The density of air being about 1/780 that of water, the cylinder uses about 14g/sec * (0.780 liter/g) = 11 liters/sec = 11 l/sec (0.0353 cu. ft/l) = 0.39 cubic feet/sec.
Thus an air filter needs to pass a cubic foot of air in about 2.5 seconds.
Now to measure the flow rate of my shop-vac ...
Matt - 20 Aug 2005 13:45 GMT >>In "Experiment 1" I found that both the used filters developed a >>differential pressure near 40mm H20 and that the new right filter [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > The increase in delta p can be explained by the dynamic pressure of the > air molecules striking the filter medium at a higher speed. If a given filter acts virtually like an orifice plate, then the flow rate is proportional to the square root of the differential pressure.
Then for either of the used filters, the flow rate increased by a factor of sqrt(58/40) = 1.2 in Experiment 2 (E2) compared to Experiment 1 (E1). So flow increased by 2/10.
For the new filter, the flow rate increased by a factor of sqrt(44/19) = 1.5 in E2 vs. E1. Flow increased by 5/10.
Thus the new filter was able to accomodate an increased load better than either of the used filters.
Mike Romain - 16 Aug 2005 23:26 GMT Ok, I must be missing something basic here....
Why not just use a run of the mill cheapie dial vacuum gauge from a cheap tune up kit and measure it like 'ported' vacuum?????
At idle it is going to be really low, open it up and you get 'manifold' vacuum. Change the shape of the air filter and the ported will change radically. The manifold vacuum is the one I would be watching....
Or if you are really serious about playing around, just drill a hole and tap a nipple into each manifold so you get the manifold vacuum at all times?
Other than that, the vacuum cleaner will give you an idea of the differences, but in real life, well....
I keep track of my gas mileage and when it starts to climb, I start checking things like filters......
Mike 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> I would like to be able to measure the pressure drop caused by an air > filter. Then I could compare different makes and models of filters, and [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > happens to be a '76 Honda 360 motorcycle, but general information is > welcome. Rick Cortese - 17 Aug 2005 01:57 GMT > Ok, I must be missing something basic here.... > > Why not just use a run of the mill cheapie dial vacuum gauge from a > cheap tune up kit and measure it like 'ported' vacuum????? Not sensitive enough. 15 PSI is roughly equivalent to a 30ft/360" of water.
HLS@nospam.nix - 17 Aug 2005 02:48 GMT > Ok, I must be missing something basic here.... > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > I keep track of my gas mileage and when it starts to climb, I start > checking things like filters...... If you want to make really accurate measurements, you have to be sure that you are measuring the parameter you really want to evaluate, at the exact and reproducible conditions that you would use across the range of filters, and that your measurement method is accurate.
Temperature, air density, atmospheric pressure, humidity, air velocity, etc might all be important. If you want to measure the restriction imposed by the filter, these parameters, in the same range as what you would experience on the road, might be all you need.
If you want to measure the efficiency of the filter to remove particles of different sizes, other tests would have to be carefully devised. Ability of the filter to continue to function as the particles accumulate may be important.
This is why it is hard to give a definite answer when asked 'Is K&N the best filter out there?'
The more you try to get a test that gets usable data, normally the more difficult it is to obtain the data, and the more expensive and complicated it becomes.
Don Stauffer - 17 Aug 2005 15:07 GMT But manifold vacuum is not what you want. That includes the drop across the air cleaner PLUS the drop across the throttle and venturi. You need to put the meter in between the filter and the carburetor (or throttle assembly). Further, the drop will be small in inches of mercury, so a normal manifold pressure gauge will show very little movement, and will be hard to read.
> Ok, I must be missing something basic here.... > [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] >>happens to be a '76 Honda 360 motorcycle, but general information is >>welcome.
|
|
|