> "*" <nospam@this.addy.com> writes in article <01c5a35c$a31e0720$45a3c3d8@race> dated Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:55:16 -0500:
> >Care to elaborate?????....give us some specifics?????
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> -- spud_demon -at- thundermaker.net
> The above may not (yet) represent the opinions of my employer.
"*" <nospam@this.addy.com> writes in article <01c5a37b$3d94e440$58a6c3d8@race> dated Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:34:24 -0500:
>Spud Demon <spud_demon@LUMINA.MITRE.ORG> wrote in article
><de0bdv$kl9$1@newslocal.mitre.org>...
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>they
>> failed to disclose this when selling it.
>"Extended Warrantees" are, simply, insurance policies offered by
>third-parties......
Could be. I don't know for sure whether his warranty contract was with the
dealership or a third party. Even with a third party there is the potential
for corruption, such as kickbacks if the warranty repairs are less than a
certain amount over the life of the contract. Knowing this guy, if going to
another dealership for a second opinion had been an option, he would have
done it. A third-party warranty would have been portable, right?
>......a lot of different-displacement engines appear the same externally,
>and bolt right into the original location ....i.e. 265 cubic-inch Chevrolet
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>a smaller-displacement, "inferior-to-stock" engine, and failed to disclose
>this to the dealership.....do you?
It's possible, but I doubt that someone would fix up a truck in order to
sell it to a dealership, when he could get more selling to a private party.
(I'm assuming the stock engine had to be replaced and that it wasn't just
swapped out for sh.ts and giggles). What probably happened was some guy
traded in the Ranger with a blown engine and the dealer swapped in an engine
from a car that had other problems in order to maximize profit. And it
worked.
>.........all dealerships are crooked, and all customers are honest, innocent
> victims........
>.........RIGHT!?!?
Did you read the part of my post where I gave an example of a dealer that I
think highly of (Pohanka)? Geez! Unfortunately getting a fair deal doesn't
make for as interesting a story as getting ripped off.
-- spud_demon -at- thundermaker.net
The above may not (yet) represent the opinions of my employer.
* - 18 Aug 2005 17:03 GMT
Spud Demon <sd@LUMINA.MITRE.ORG> wrote in article
<de0hau$njf$1@newslocal.mitre.org>...
> "*" <nospam@this.addy.com> writes in article <01c5a37b$3d94e440$58a6c3d8@race> dated Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:34:24 -0500:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> from a car that had other problems in order to maximize profit. And it
> worked.
Of course........
As I pointed out, ONLY a dealer would be so crooked.......NEVER a customer.
You assume that the truck was traded with the blown engine, and the dealer
was the one that changed the engine......which, again, assumes that ALL
dealers are scum
I'm assuming that the original owner HAD to replace the engine at some
point prior to trading, then later traded the truck without disclosing the
swap to the dealer.......which recognizes that there are at least a few
scumballs on the customer side.
danyexp - 19 Aug 2005 02:19 GMT
Now, in all honesty, how many people do you think would actually disclose
this info to a dealer when trading???
> I'm assuming that the original owner HAD to replace the engine at some
> point prior to trading, then later traded the truck without disclosing the
> swap to the dealer.......which recognizes that there are at least a few
> scumballs on the customer side.
* - 19 Aug 2005 04:28 GMT
danyexp <danyexp@hotmail.com> wrote in article
<11gacs5l4agtnf7@corp.supernews.com>...
> Now, in all honesty, how many people do you think would actually disclose
> this info to a dealer when trading???
Thanks for making my point.......and revealing that double standard......
A person not disclosing an engine change when selling a car to a dealer is
considered to be doing the "normal" thing.....
OTOH.....The dealer who doesn't disclose the potentially unknown engine
change - an engine change that the consumer failed to disclose to him -
when selling same car to consumer is, somehow, a scumbag for doing the
exact same thing the previous consumer did......
Why is it "Buyer Beware" when the consumer is selling, yet the rules change
and it suddenly is NOT "Buyer Beware" when the consumer is buying?????
Yup!!!
ALL dealers are scumbags, and ALL consumers are the epitomy of
honesty.......
Bruce Chang - 19 Aug 2005 16:16 GMT
> danyexp <danyexp@hotmail.com> wrote in article
> <11gacs5l4agtnf7@corp.supernews.com>...
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> ALL dealers are scumbags, and ALL consumers are the epitomy of
> honesty.......
Because the dealer should know better. If the dealer didn't know, then they
are not scumbags but I think the major perception is the dealer should know,
and therefore, if they sold it without telling the consumer, they are
scumbags.