Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cavalier head gasket issue ever addressed?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
krinshaw876@yahoo.com - 26 Aug 2005 15:11 GMT
I posted this in the wrong group yesterday so sorry if anyone sees a
cross-post.

I was just wondering if GM ever resolved the problem with the 2.2
cavaliers blowing head gaskets?  I have a 95 that has gone through a
gasket already and I may be looking for another cavalier in the future.

I'm just concerned about *what year* to look for (if the issue ever
was addressed).

I posted a similar message on the j-body.org forums and someone
mentioned that in 2002 GM started putting a different engine in the
cavaliers (I think they mentioned something like "ecotek").  Could
someone confirm and/or add any info on this?  Thanks!
Shep - 26 Aug 2005 20:40 GMT
The 2.2 has had updated gaskets from GM and I believe new head bolts and
torquing procedures, make sure the head is not warped. Ecotek is a different
engine.
>I posted this in the wrong group yesterday so sorry if anyone sees a
> cross-post.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> cavaliers (I think they mentioned something like "ecotek").  Could
> someone confirm and/or add any info on this?  Thanks!
krinshaw876@yahoo.com - 26 Aug 2005 23:14 GMT
Thanks for the reply, so do you know what year they started using the
new procedure, and what year they started using the ecotek engine?
krinshaw876@yahoo.com - 26 Aug 2005 23:14 GMT
Thanks for the reply, so do you know what year they started using the
new procedure, and what year they started using the ecotek engine?
Shep - 27 Aug 2005 01:00 GMT
Ecotek I believe 2001 or so? The updated gaskets and info should be
available at any GM dealer. It's not critical when the update was done
regarding you predicament, maybe around 99-2000? Did some research looks
there was a recall in 98 for the head gasket problems, so that is probably
the updated parts.
> Thanks for the reply, so do you know what year they started using the
> new procedure, and what year they started using the ecotek engine?
Masospaghetti - 02 Sep 2005 01:03 GMT
> Thanks for the reply, so do you know what year they started using the
> new procedure, and what year they started using the ecotek engine?

The Ecotec engine began service in 2001 I believe in the higher model
Cavaliers (option on LS models, standard on Z24) but the base models
still made use of the 2.2L pushrod motor. In 2003, all Cavaliers came
with the Ecotec motor, accompanying the facelift they also received.

I am not familiar with the head gasket problem, but if it was an issue
on the 2.2 it probably was ok on the 2.3/2.4 motors which were options
since 95. They were completely different motors, the 2.2 being OHV and
the 2.3/2.4 as DOHC. The 2.3/2.4 came standard on Z24 models and were
options on the LS.
Chevrolet - 05 Sep 2005 21:56 GMT
BUT the 2.2 was a better motor than the 2.3/4  they would gernade under
racing and stop and go traffic
>> Thanks for the reply, so do you know what year they started using the
>> new procedure, and what year they started using the ecotek engine?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> 2.3/2.4 as DOHC. The 2.3/2.4 came standard on Z24 models and were options
> on the LS.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.