Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Theoretical auto engine thermodynamics question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
JazzMan - 10 Sep 2005 17:03 GMT
While thinking about EGR it occurred to me to wonder about
the way IC engines work. I assume that fuel and air burn,
the heat released heats up the components of air not
involved in combustion, namely N2, causing them to expand
(Dalton's) and push the piston down. Now here's the question:
Would different ratios of O2 and N2 affect efficiency enough
to matter?

JazzMan
Signature

**********************************************************
Please reply to jsavage"at"airmail.net.
Curse those darned bulk e-mailers!
**********************************************************
"Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of
supply and demand. It is the privilege of human beings to
live under the laws of justice and mercy." - Wendell Berry
**********************************************************

marks542004@yahoo.com - 10 Sep 2005 19:28 GMT
> While thinking about EGR it occurred to me to wonder about
> the way IC engines work. I assume that fuel and air burn,
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> live under the laws of justice and mercy." - Wendell Berry
> **********************************************************

As I understand it the piston is pushed down by the combination of the
combustion products being higher volume than the pre-combustion fuel
and pressure caused by temp increase.

Anything that increases combustion efficiency (turbo charging, air
intake design, N02 injection) will increase the efficiency of the
engine.
Don Stauffer - 12 Sep 2005 15:07 GMT
>>While thinking about EGR it occurred to me to wonder about
>>the way IC engines work. I assume that fuel and air burn,
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> intake design, N02 injection) will increase the efficiency of the
> engine.

Cramming more air into the engine may not in itself increase the thermal
efficiency. It does affect both the volumetric efficiency at high rpm,
and the power to weight ratio.  If, however, it increases the actual
compression ratio, not the geometric ratio, it can affect thermal
efficiency.

Ordinarily the efficiency computed is the full throttle efficiency.
Throttling reduces actual CR, and hence efficiency.  That is why, if
there were no power richening of mixture, engines would be most
efficient at a pretty high throttle opening, just below point where
volumetric efficiency starts to take a nosedive at higher rpm.  So
engine is most efficient at low to mid rpm but full throttle (again, not
including power enrichment).

Turbocharging helps efficiency not only by boosting actual CR, but by
utilizing exhaust enthalpy that is ordinarily discarded, so turbocharged
engine ordinarily more efficient than mechanically supercharged ones.
Misterbeets - 11 Sep 2005 05:01 GMT
No, because the thermodynamic properties of all gasses are the same.
Unlike the chemical properties.
k wallace - 11 Sep 2005 05:11 GMT
> No, because the thermodynamic properties of all gasses are the same.
> Unlike the chemical properties.

welll...if  you're talking about ideal, PV = NRT stuff, okay.
But once you are talking about IC engines, you have chem and thermo
stuff all in there together, causing heat, work, losses...

I'm not going to go look it up, but I'm sure that the enthalpies of
combustion of N and O are different, so yeah, it would make a difference.
Air is pretty much straight 21% O2/ 79%N2, what would you do to change
that?
k wallace
HLS@nospam.nix - 11 Sep 2005 14:44 GMT
> > No, because the thermodynamic properties of all gasses are the same.
> > Unlike the chemical properties.
> >
> welll...if  you're talking about ideal, PV = NRT stuff, okay.
> But once you are talking about IC engines, you have chem and thermo
> stuff all in there together, causing heat, work, losses...

Even that isn't quite true.  That equations describes the ideal gas law, and
many gases fit closely, but
some deviate a lot.
k wallace - 11 Sep 2005 20:22 GMT
>>>No, because the thermodynamic properties of all gasses are the same.
>>>Unlike the chemical properties.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> many gases fit closely, but
> some deviate a lot.

that's why I said, "if you're talking about ideal, PV= NRT stuff...."
which doesn't take into account Z, the compressibility factor. Z is
solved for with an infinite series expansion (which you probably know
since you discuss pvnrt as the ideal gas law) so I won't go into
details, as likely no one else here is interested :)

k wallace
Don Stauffer - 12 Sep 2005 15:59 GMT
> Even that isn't quite true.  That equations describes the ideal gas law, and
> many gases fit closely, but
> some deviate a lot.

The law applies to actual gases as long as you have the right value of R.
HLS@nospam.nix - 12 Nov 2005 16:56 GMT
> > Even that isn't quite true.  That equations describes the ideal gas law, and
> > many gases fit closely, but
> > some deviate a lot.
> >
> The law applies to actual gases as long as you have the right value of R.

Sorry, Don, I lost this thread about a month ago.
It has been all too convenient over the years to assume that 0.082046
lt-at/(deg mol) fit
the wide range of gases.  And it does, as long as the pressure is relatively
low.

I guess I would normally attempt to use Van der Waals corrections or a
different equation
of state rather that to try to derive a function which would describe R
(hopefully a universal
constant) for complicated cases.  (Glad Im not a physicist.  Not my favorite
cuppa)
Don Stauffer - 12 Sep 2005 15:09 GMT
> No, because the thermodynamic properties of all gasses are the same.
> Unlike the chemical properties.

Not quite true.  Thermal properties of actual gases are not quite the
same as ideal gas.  In cases where the efficiency or other parameter are
exponential with  a given thermal property, it can make a difference.
The differences are ordinarily not extreme (except for helium) but
because of the strong dependence, it can make some difference.
Don Stauffer - 12 Sep 2005 15:00 GMT
> While thinking about EGR it occurred to me to wonder about
> the way IC engines work. I assume that fuel and air burn,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> JazzMan

Yes.  Frequently in analysis of IC engines, one takes the properties of
air as the working fluid. It simplifies the situation to use air as the
working medium.  While in  truth the working fluid contains many species
of combustion products, the result is not that far off from just
considering the compression, heating, and expansion of air.  If I
remember right, air has reasonably good thermo properties.  A diesel, of
course, frequently operates with very high amounts of air compared to
fuel and combustion products.  In spark ignition engines operating in
air, the mixture ratio cannot vary that much to really affect things
much unless one uses a lot of EGR.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.