>I have a 1990 Chevy one ton HD (G30) type van. The dealer tells me that
> going by my VIN number I have a turbo 400 transmission without
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> offer an opinion as to what might be the most common explanation for my
> problem? Thanks very much for any assistance. Lenny Stein.
> Like you said dealayed shift problems are usually caused by low vacuum to
> the modulator or a bad modulator, remember a poorly tuned or running
> engine by it's nature has low vacuum, so keep that in mind .
> <captainvideo462002@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>snip<
Here's a second on Shep's diagnosis. I've had extensive experience with
400's, and vacuum leak to modulator can cause exact symptoms you described.
BTW, off-topic, but I've always highly respected those trannies. When the
THM's 1st came out in GM's, the 400 was much superior to 350's in terms of
service/reliability/durability and performance(can't think of other
complimentary descriptive nouns just now!). HTH, s
captainvideo462002@yahoo.com - 14 Oct 2005 03:19 GMT
I'm going to try to get this thing up on ramps this weekend, (if it
ever stops raining here in New Hampshire that is). From what part of
the engine is the vacuum line taken? About how many pounds, (inches?)
should this vacuum be? I don't have a guage so to assess the amount of
vacuum if I put my finger on the line should it really suck it in or
feel like a typical manifold vacuum? If the vacuum seems adaquate, is
there a way to test the modulator without buying a new one? Lenny
Louis M. Brown - 14 Oct 2005 03:37 GMT
>I'm going to try to get this thing up on ramps this weekend, (if it
>ever stops raining here in New Hampshire that is). From what part of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>feel like a typical manifold vacuum? If the vacuum seems adaquate, is
>there a way to test the modulator without buying a new one? Lenny
Yea, pull the line off and see if there is any tranny fluid in it. If
there is, then the modulator's diaphragm is bad.
I'd just change it anyway, modulators aren't expensive.
-LMB
sdlomi2 - 14 Oct 2005 03:39 GMT
> I'm going to try to get this thing up on ramps this weekend, (if it
> ever stops raining here in New Hampshire that is). From what part of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> feel like a typical manifold vacuum? If the vacuum seems adaquate, is
> there a way to test the modulator without buying a new one? Lenny
While it's up, disconnect the vacuum hose going to the modulator; it
should have typical manifold vacuum which is definitely detectible with the
finger. Also, if it is strong, then that indicates possible modulator
trouble. Honestly, I never have replaced many mod's--usually a vac. leak
due to rubber hose pulled off, metal hose w/a rusty hole, or a rubber hose
with a burned (from exhaust) hole in it. I'm betting you'll find no, or
next to no, vacuum when you pull the line off the mod. s
captainvideo462002@yahoo.com - 01 Nov 2005 22:37 GMT
It was the modulator. The metal line into it just rotted and basically
sprung a leak. It shifts just fine now. Thanks to everyone for all the
advice. Lenny
lugnut - 14 Oct 2005 04:17 GMT
>> Like you said dealayed shift problems are usually caused by low vacuum to
>> the modulator or a bad modulator, remember a poorly tuned or running
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>service/reliability/durability and performance(can't think of other
>complimentary descriptive nouns just now!). HTH, s
I just built my first 400 for my BIL's 64 PU. It ties a
rather stout 400 SBC to a 4.11 gear set. He seems to think
it shifts a bit too smooth under hard acceleration. I drove
it and found the tires never quite smoking under 45 MPH at
full throttle. The tack and the speedo indicate it is
getting on with the program. Normal acceleration, it is
simply tight and slightly firm as it should be. I think his
complaint is the he could feel it shift more before it
roasted the forward CP because it was so damn lazy between
shifts allowing the engine to flare. I have yet to declare
my build successful. I usually reserve that declaration for
the first 25k miles.
Lugnut