Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Replacing Tie Rod Ends Caprice

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Caprice85 - 09 Nov 2005 12:43 GMT
I need to replace both tie rod ends on my 85 chevy caprice. It looks
like there will be no load on the tie rods and I can just crawl under
the car and take them off without anything self-destructing.  Do I need
to jack the car up?

Thanks
Comboverfish - 09 Nov 2005 13:05 GMT
> I need to replace both tie rod ends on my 85 chevy caprice. It looks
> like there will be no load on the tie rods and I can just crawl under
> the car and take them off without anything self-destructing.  Do I need
> to jack the car up?

It will help to have the car on jackstands 1) to fit under the car
easier and 2) to allow the hubs/knuckles to swing back and forth for
easier access to the components.  I can't imagine performing this on
the ground esp. when jackstands and a basic jack can be had for cheap.

Toyota MDT in MO
frank-in-toronto - 09 Nov 2005 23:06 GMT
>> I need to replace both tie rod ends on my 85 chevy caprice. It looks
>> like there will be no load on the tie rods and I can just crawl under
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>easier access to the components.  I can't imagine performing this on
>the ground esp. when jackstands and a basic jack can be had for cheap.
yeah yeah.  of course he'll use jackstands.  i have
the same situation with an 87 caprice.  give me some
tips.  any problems i should look out for?  i'll get an
alignment afterwards but how can i get it close?
count threads?
thanks...theick
Matt - 10 Nov 2005 05:26 GMT
> but how can i get it close?
> count threads?

Yes.  I could be wrong, but I don't see why you should necessarily get
it realigned.
* - 10 Nov 2005 12:11 GMT
Matt <themattfella@xxyyyzzzz.com> wrote in article
<1SAcf.12587$cg.12168@news02.roc.ny>...

> > but how can i get it close?
> > count threads?
>
> Yes.  I could be wrong, but I don't see why you should necessarily get
> it realigned.

Well, he just MIGHT want to get it re-aligned to avoid excessive tire wear.

Manufacturers do NOT match OEM components right on down to the exact number
of threads and thread-starting points, so even if he were to count turns
off-and-on, the likelyhood of it being absolutely correct are slim.

Counting turns will only get the car close enough to get it to an alignment
rack........
N8N - 10 Nov 2005 13:22 GMT
> Matt <themattfella@xxyyyzzzz.com> wrote in article
> <1SAcf.12587$cg.12168@news02.roc.ny>...
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Counting turns will only get the car close enough to get it to an alignment
> rack........

And this is all ASSuming that it's correctly aligned now.

I'd definitely get an alignment after finishing all the suspension
work.

nate
frank-in-toronto - 10 Nov 2005 23:12 GMT
>> Matt <themattfella@xxyyyzzzz.com> wrote in article
>> <1SAcf.12587$cg.12168@news02.roc.ny>...
...
>And this is all ASSuming that it's correctly aligned now.
>
>I'd definitely get an alignment after finishing all the suspension
>work.
thanks for the advice.  it isn't aligned right now because it's
an old boat and the repair shop wanted 300 dollars for the
tie rod job.  i wasn't sure how long i was going to keep the
car so i settled for the expense of simple tire wear.
...thehick
Caprice85 - 11 Nov 2005 04:32 GMT
>>thanks for the advice.  it isn't aligned right now because it's
an old boat and the repair shop wanted 300 dollars for the
tie rod job.  i wasn't sure how long i was going to keep the
car so i settled for the expense of simple tire wear.
...thehick  <<

$300 ?  Something's wrong there, unless there's more work than just tie
rods.

BTW my mech says he would just use a tape measure if he did the tie
rods for me, and not recommend an alignment.

The sad part is that I just had it aligned 3 months ago !  They said
the suspension was tight. But now my mech, at inspection time, says the
tie rod ends are both worn, and the sway bar end-link needs to be
replaced too.
* - 14 Nov 2005 20:32 GMT
Caprice85 <user132384@aol.com> wrote in article >
> BTW my mech says he would just use a tape measure if he did the tie
> rods for me, and not recommend an alignment.

Your "mechanic" doesn't understand front-end alignment......

He's probably trying to convince you that the tape measure is okay since he
doesn't own a front-end alignment machine - or even a toe guage - to do it
correctly.....so he would either have to farm it out" or have you go to one
of his better-equipped competitors to get a proper alignment.

The "toe-in" specification is the comparison of front-to-rear tread
widths....AT SPINDLE HEIGHT.......not above or below - which give different
readings.

I cannot think of a single automobile that would allow you to string a tape
measure between the front and read tread widths AT SPINDLE
HEIGHT......considering all the things hanging down in the way, and the
fact that spindle height is often pretty close to chassis height....which
puts the chassis in the way of measuring tread widths AT SPINDLE
HEIGHT.....

.......so, your "mechanic" will actually be measuring the tread width much
further down on the tire - bringing the two measuring points closer
together - front-to-rear - and giving you a false reading of actual toe
in/out.

One-eighth-inch measured at six-inches off the ground, might project into
one-half inch measured at 13-or-so inches off the ground at spindle height.

Looking down from the top of the tire in the exaggerated example below,
your "mechanic" is measuring further down (and around ) the tire maybe at 5
and 7 o'clock from "b"-to"b" while the specification is measured from
"a"-to-"a" - at 3 and 9 o'clock.

5 and 7 o'clock are much closer across the clock than 3 and 9 o'clock.

\a<----------------------------------------->a /      REAR          
\                                               /     ^
  \ b<---------------------------------->b /     |
    \                                        /        |
      \ <---------spindle--------------/        |
        \                                 /        |
         \ b<---------------------->b/         |
           \                           /                  v
             \a<--------------->a /            FRONT

You can see, if the differences between the front and the rear "b" lines is
one-eighth, the difference between the front and read "a" points will be
much greater.

That is why toe-in guages are designed with pointers to reach up to the
center of spindle height on the tires - front and rear........

......and why "tape measure alignments" are not really alignments.......
Matt - 10 Nov 2005 22:35 GMT
> Matt <themattfella@xxyyyzzzz.com> wrote in article
> <1SAcf.12587$cg.12168@news02.roc.ny>...
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Counting turns will only get the car close enough to get it to an alignment
> rack........

IF IF IF it was in alignment already, and he compares the new part to
the old, and they are the same, and he counts threads, then it will be
in alignment after the repair.

How much does an alignment cost these days?
Comboverfish - 10 Nov 2005 22:58 GMT
> Matt wrote:
> IF IF IF it was in alignment already,
> and he compares the new part to
> the old, and they are the same

And they won't be

> and he counts threads, then it will be
> in alignment after the repair.

The alignment will be close, but the manufacturing tolerances for a
threaded, forged tierod can't reasonably be so precise as to start the
thread at the exact same measurement on each unit.  It's a completely
unnecessary step, and one few would pay (significantly) extra for.
Maybe the US government, but probably noone else.  The real world
differences in tierods can add up to a toe spec that will featheredge
tires, using the thread counting method.

> How much does an alignment cost these days?

About $60 to $110.  A tape measure works wonders for fine tuning the
toe close enough to get to the alignment shop.  Done with the vehicle
sitting flat and level, a tape measure can get you really close.

Toyota MDT in MO
HLS@nospam.nix - 11 Nov 2005 22:26 GMT
The only difficult job of removing tie rod ends in that era auto can be
separating the
joint from the wheel assembly.  I assume it is like similar GM products I
have worked on.
Loosen the nut, but dont remove it.  You can tap on the nut and even heat a
little if you
need to in order to loosen the taper fit.

I put a mark on the tie rod and measure to a reproducible point on the end.
Then, when
I put the new end on, I screw it in to the same index mark (or as close as I
can come).

You would be wise to have the alignment checked, at least.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.